
afterall the whole point of putting cigs on display is that you can see the price!
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 11:58,
archived)

What is the score with not being able to smoke in open spaces, such as open rail platforms, parks, hospital grounds and so on?
Why the fuck gives anyone the right to dictate what others do to themselves?
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:00,
archived)
Why the fuck gives anyone the right to dictate what others do to themselves?

democracy and freedom is a facade and in actual fact we are property of the state!
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:03,
archived)

here smoking in public is within open spaces and im fine with it.
though idon't want to be in a lift with someone smoking
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:04,
archived)
though idon't want to be in a lift with someone smoking

leads to extra cleaning, as very often bins are not provided, and even if they are, there's still
a high amount of smokers who drop and stomp their butts anywhere they like.
Irrespective of anything else, at least it helps reduce part of the litter problem they cause.
Mind you, this is a minor point in the grand scheme of things
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:04,
archived)
a high amount of smokers who drop and stomp their butts anywhere they like.
Irrespective of anything else, at least it helps reduce part of the litter problem they cause.
Mind you, this is a minor point in the grand scheme of things


Was he made to pick it up?
Was he abused by passers by?
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:07,
archived)
Was he abused by passers by?

But when, in the absence of a bin withing a couple of metres, did you last see a smoker stub out his cigarette and take the butt away for disposal later?
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:08,
archived)

I have no problem with punishing littering, but find the idea that banning smoking is the way to stop fag buts, rather than enforcing the ban on dropping them.
Let's ban all streets - that'll stop street crime.
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:12,
archived)
Let's ban all streets - that'll stop street crime.

Clark's Village for the ultimate, cacophonous loss.
/West Country obscurity
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:20,
archived)
/West Country obscurity

but then I went to the new Westfield last week and found the hidden layer of hell
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:25,
archived)

I only have to use them a couple of times a year, but it was a decent investment nevertheless.
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 13:47,
archived)

I've not heard of it being banned in parks or open rail platforms. Any links?
Hospital grounds banning smoking, though, seems to me not to be unreasonable, what with hospitals being about health, an' all...
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:04,
archived)
Hospital grounds banning smoking, though, seems to me not to be unreasonable, what with hospitals being about health, an' all...

There's certainly signs up.
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:06,
archived)

it'll be bloody dangerous for their health.
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:06,
archived)

Find me some documentation on the health affects of smoking.
I think that statistically smoking over 20 a day reduces the life span by 2 years?
Compare this to car related issues - why do we allow ambulances to drive on hospital grounds? We should ban CDs TODAY - they are made with plastics.
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:10,
archived)
I think that statistically smoking over 20 a day reduces the life span by 2 years?
Compare this to car related issues - why do we allow ambulances to drive on hospital grounds? We should ban CDs TODAY - they are made with plastics.

(he may have got this due to blood transfusions/shots in the Army, so another aside to this comment is to ask you if you've been tested for it).
He drank for years and years, which didn't help it, and really fucked things up for a long time. Cirrohsis, for one.
Are they going to demonise alcohol? Are they bollocks.
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:13,
archived)
He drank for years and years, which didn't help it, and really fucked things up for a long time. Cirrohsis, for one.
Are they going to demonise alcohol? Are they bollocks.

but on a much smaller scale
I reckon we will see tv ads for alcohol banned in our lifetime
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:16,
archived)
I reckon we will see tv ads for alcohol banned in our lifetime

is equivelent of smoking two fags in terms of the carconegins you inhale
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:14,
archived)

Why is it I'm always stood/sitting next to The Man With All The Aftershave In The World On?
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:15,
archived)

But let's take it at face value. Maybe some lives would not be ended by ambulances if there were none. But a lot of people would be made worse off directly.
Now perform the same thought-experiment with cigarettes. Not quite the same result.
Look: of course there's a trade-off to be made. But noone'd deny that. And since smoking does nothing at all to promote health, and ambulances do quite a bit, it's clear which way the trade should go on that one.
The actual measure of the harm of smoking isn't all that important here, I don't think. It's just a matter of a body the function of which is to improve health deciding not to facilitate an activity that diminishes it. No biggie.
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:15,
archived)
Now perform the same thought-experiment with cigarettes. Not quite the same result.
Look: of course there's a trade-off to be made. But noone'd deny that. And since smoking does nothing at all to promote health, and ambulances do quite a bit, it's clear which way the trade should go on that one.
The actual measure of the harm of smoking isn't all that important here, I don't think. It's just a matter of a body the function of which is to improve health deciding not to facilitate an activity that diminishes it. No biggie.

i'd rather have lung cancer and know who the hell i am
than be eight years old again at the age of ninety
FACT
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:21,
archived)
than be eight years old again at the age of ninety
FACT

get Alzheimer's - then you can forget you've got lung cancer
/logic blog
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:22,
archived)
/logic blog

Or is it just a question which is hard for you to answer?
Ignore Ambulances - let's go with cars instead?
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:28,
archived)
Ignore Ambulances - let's go with cars instead?

It's a different matter. I dig hard questions.
EDIT: OK, let's go with the car thing. I don't see your point.
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:37,
archived)
EDIT: OK, let's go with the car thing. I don't see your point.

Why ban fags when you can ban cars?
Non essential journeys are just to make you happier - which is what fags are for . . .
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:55,
archived)
Non essential journeys are just to make you happier - which is what fags are for . . .

... Noone proposed banning fags; that's not what the issue here was. Here, we were concerned with banning smoking in some places. Applying that principle to cars - that they should be banned in some places as well, seems straightforward...
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:58,
archived)

even the big long open ones, i got caught out at cambridge platform 5 shortly after the ban came in, just chipped the fag and nothing further was said
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:07,
archived)

Bus Stops, Parks, Railway Platforms (open or otherwise) saying that there isn't much enforcement.
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:07,
archived)

Hospitals are places to make you well. Smoking a cigarette, if you are a smoker, is not an individual health issue, it is in fact a bad idea to try and give up during a time when you are under physical stress.
Also, if you have smoked for your whole life and then go to hospital because you are dying of MS, how lovely it is that not being able to smoke in the grounds makes your last days wank as well?
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:08,
archived)
Also, if you have smoked for your whole life and then go to hospital because you are dying of MS, how lovely it is that not being able to smoke in the grounds makes your last days wank as well?

where the prices seem only to be a 'guide' for how much one actually gets charged.
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:01,
archived)

My local corner shop has just decided that if you buy fags on a card you'll get charged 70p more!
( ,
Wed 10 Dec 2008, 12:04,
archived)