b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9415861 (Thread)

# have you seen the latest mexican alien pic?
Be interesting to hear what your monkey geek workmates make of it.
shadowboxent.brinkster.net/LEMUR/MexicoCreatureReport.html
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:26, archived)
# Bloody hell, I am sure that's a hoax
But regardless,have you posted it on the FT Message board?
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:31, archived)
# Financial Times?
:D
I notice that he's disabled right click and save..he says the image is "tracked"..Is this some kind of code connected to the picture or is he just spouting technobollox to scare ignorant fools like me?
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:36, archived)
# well, I guess he might constantly search the web for it
it does sound like an attempt to scare people off what looks like a rather dull hoax.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:43, archived)
# Jaime Maussin is involved..
which sets my alarm bells ringing.Too many charletains involved in the paranormal to take any of it all that seriously.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:54, archived)
# Fortean Times I assume
rather than the premier UK Financial publication ;)
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:43, archived)
# It's hopalong cassidy :D
happy belated birthday ,clumsy oaf!
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:44, archived)
# Cheers fucknugget :)
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:51, archived)
# Ft = Fortean times
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:44, archived)
# got doxens of 'em,
but I stopped buying it when its was bought by ummm john brown publishing..price and bullshit adverts went up,number of decent articles went down.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:47, archived)
# Right, the magazine is a bit *meh*
But the forum is still quite good
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:00, archived)
# It's
just chicken in a can
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:41, archived)
# ha! apparently that image is 'tracked'


(in other words, right-click is disabled, and some sort of wizardry prevents you getting the html source...)

edit : that was just a screen-shot, but :

shadowboxent.brinkster.net/LEMUR/MexicoDemon.jpg
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:37, archived)
# http://www.b3tards.com/u/3769e8f395ef79a7cc21/untracked_thumb.png


_?_
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:41, archived)
# what?
that's the link to the screengrab I uploaded to b3tards, yes.

the other is the link that the page author is trying to obscure.

I'm mildly sympathetic to people's desire to keep people from re-using their images, but it is a futile effort.

If you let my computer connect to the server where the image is, and show it on my screen, then I have the image.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:45, archived)
# And that kids is why God invented Print Screen ;)
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:44, archived)
# or OSX's Grab program, which is superior in action, but produces annoying tiff files.
which is what Imagemagick invented convert for...
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:47, archived)
# Yeah, but to get that,
you have to spend a lot more on your computer than a simple PC ;)
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:55, archived)
# kde 3.5 had a great screen cap program.
free os, cheap pc, and can wipe a mac's arse with a vista license.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:58, archived)
# apart from it being
extremely basic until you give it emulation to run windows programs.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:10, archived)
# *yawns*
I use a macbookpro that I bring to work, and switch between using that and the box running XP, which can connect to the various servers and clusters at work which run linux (or perhaps solaris).

all operating systems have their uses, none are rubbish, none are the best. :)
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:17, archived)
# No actually KDE is pretty rubbish
If you must use Linux then you either want Debian for stability or Ubuntu for cutting edge new features.

As for Macbook pro. Had one of thos for quite some time now. It's been in a closet, unused for over 6 months.

There is always going to be a best OS for an individual. And right now for me that's Win 7 RC1.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:27, archived)
# true enough - everyone finds an OS that gets enough features 'right' for them
I do find using XP like having one hand tied behind my back, but from what little I've seen of vista, it looks much better, and I guess 7 will be slightly more so.

I should really make use of boot camp one day...
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:36, archived)
# I hate Vista.
I don't get it :(

BRING BACK WINDOWS 95!
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:38, archived)
# or select and control c
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:49, archived)
# Or simply tear the image out of the web page!

(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:00, archived)
# aye
but you need to find the edge, and to do that you'll need a level 5 spatula of anti-icke
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:06, archived)
# :)
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:08, archived)
# A man named Bob Mulberrry invented the print screen function
how's your sister's foot?
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:51, archived)
# Oh, cheers.
Not worried about my foot you cunt ;)
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:53, archived)
# I don't give a tinker's toss about your foot
Your sister's delicate tootsies are my number one concern right now.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:55, archived)
# Pfft!
She is ok. Still in pain, but she can walk.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:57, archived)
# :( This makes me very sad. I wish her all the best.
Will you bake her a cake for me?
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:59, archived)
# Fuck off pervert :P
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:02, archived)
# :(:(:(:(
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:09, archived)
# or people who can read source code
;)
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:55, archived)
# strangely enough, show source shows just "<HTML>"
some sort of javascript/dom fooling about, perhaps.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:58, archived)
# scroll down a little
:)
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:09, archived)
# doh!
I guess it fooled me :)
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:24, archived)
# easiest one for that nonsense
if you have FF and adblock is go to view/view adblockable items, right click the address and copy or view in new tab.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:12, archived)
# in safari 4 (beta), there's a whole 'web inspector' - a bit like firebug, which shows the in-memory structure of the page
it's nice to mouse-over elements, which then get highlighted in the rendered page
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:20, archived)
# That is quite a site
shadowboxent.brinkster.net/lemurpics5.html

'a ghostly mist' no less; also 'It shows a large, well-defined ORB'

you don't really need to know the first thing about photography to err, start laughing like a loon
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:53, archived)
# And look at that well defined Orb..
millions of ghosts all waiting for digital tech to help them reveal their true orby form.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:57, archived)
# Hahahahahahahaa
I may have unwittingly captured thousands of ghostly orbs as a photographer
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 11:59, archived)
# Any rods? :D
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:01, archived)
# Only his own in his private files ;)
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:21, archived)
# Any giant, disembodied thumbs?
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:29, archived)
# It's a lemur
someone has taken a dead lemur and probably used acid or lime to remove it's fur and stuck it on a rusty trap - Demon! I hate fakers. Even the site is called Lemur - what do they think we are stupid or is this some spoof?
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:12, archived)
# Are you saying this with some kind of zoological authority?
Hopefully somewhere along the way it will attract the attention of an actual scientist who will call shinannigans.
Still, hoaxes are shite,but its pretty funny when pseudo scientists champion them and show themselves up.I treat this stuff like sci-fi art until someone with relevent academic knowledge tells me otherwise.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:28, archived)
# Oh wow that puts me in my place then doesn't it!
I don't have to be a zoological authority to recognise the bone structure, head and tail of some lemur-like creature or monkey ffs. And I suppose just because I don't have a cerificate in animal biology therefore it must be a fucking demon because they photographed it right, so it must be true. Well you can wait for Zombie Stephen Urwin ro ressurect and prove what I already guessed but you'll be waiting a while as noone with any credibility gives a rat's arse about this fake.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:44, archived)
# Nope don't take it so personal maiden.
I wasn't trying to put you in your place.
I pointed the article at Jahled because he works with animals..he knows animal scientists..I never said for one moment it was real,I wondered what animal they had altered to make this diarama.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:54, archived)
# Ah okay
well to me it looks like a lemur.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:57, archived)
# I was thinking spider or squirrel monkey..
Its hard to tell how big it is.If its from mexico,what kind of apes/lemurs do they have over there?..Jaime maussian is involved,so expect an avalanche of bluster..this is the guy who championed the alien with long spindly arms hiding behind a lamp post..
Genuinely wasn't having a pop at you maiden...sosz for the misunderstanding xxx
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 13:01, archived)
# so why don't they show the other pictures that they had taken?
pffh
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:16, archived)
# I fear for the world when people are amazed at this shite
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:24, archived)
# ha! that was soooooo ammaaazzzinngg! :)
I think that lots of bits of metal will react to static like that, if thin enough.

what a bunch of tools.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:57, archived)
# Whatever it is, it's faked, I'm sure
Long tail, longish toes...could be some kind of langur monkey? Sifaka?

Very posed and very fake.
The right 'hand' is totally missing, there is no bruising on the 'hand' that is trapped to indicate a long time caught by that appendage.
The feet are very carefully posed as well.
(, Sun 3 May 2009, 12:36, archived)