
Be interesting to hear what your monkey geek workmates make of it.
shadowboxent.brinkster.net/LEMUR/MexicoCreatureReport.html
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:26,
archived)
shadowboxent.brinkster.net/LEMUR/MexicoCreatureReport.html

But regardless,have you posted it on the FT Message board?
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:31,
archived)

:D
I notice that he's disabled right click and save..he says the image is "tracked"..Is this some kind of code connected to the picture or is he just spouting technobollox to scare ignorant fools like me?
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:36,
archived)
I notice that he's disabled right click and save..he says the image is "tracked"..Is this some kind of code connected to the picture or is he just spouting technobollox to scare ignorant fools like me?

it does sound like an attempt to scare people off what looks like a rather dull hoax.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:43,
archived)

which sets my alarm bells ringing.Too many charletains involved in the paranormal to take any of it all that seriously.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:54,
archived)

rather than the premier UK Financial publication ;)
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:43,
archived)

but I stopped buying it when its was bought by ummm john brown publishing..price and bullshit adverts went up,number of decent articles went down.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:47,
archived)

But the forum is still quite good
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:00,
archived)


(in other words, right-click is disabled, and some sort of wizardry prevents you getting the html source...)
edit : that was just a screen-shot, but :
shadowboxent.brinkster.net/LEMUR/MexicoDemon.jpg


_?_

that's the link to the screengrab I uploaded to b3tards, yes.
the other is the link that the page author is trying to obscure.
I'm mildly sympathetic to people's desire to keep people from re-using their images, but it is a futile effort.
If you let my computer connect to the server where the image is, and show it on my screen, then I have the image.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:45,
archived)
the other is the link that the page author is trying to obscure.
I'm mildly sympathetic to people's desire to keep people from re-using their images, but it is a futile effort.
If you let my computer connect to the server where the image is, and show it on my screen, then I have the image.

which is what Imagemagick invented convert for...
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:47,
archived)

you have to spend a lot more on your computer than a simple PC ;)
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:55,
archived)

free os, cheap pc, and can wipe a mac's arse with a vista license.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:58,
archived)

extremely basic until you give it emulation to run windows programs.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:10,
archived)

I use a macbookpro that I bring to work, and switch between using that and the box running XP, which can connect to the various servers and clusters at work which run linux (or perhaps solaris).
all operating systems have their uses, none are rubbish, none are the best. :)
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:17,
archived)
all operating systems have their uses, none are rubbish, none are the best. :)

If you must use Linux then you either want Debian for stability or Ubuntu for cutting edge new features.
As for Macbook pro. Had one of thos for quite some time now. It's been in a closet, unused for over 6 months.
There is always going to be a best OS for an individual. And right now for me that's Win 7 RC1.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:27,
archived)
As for Macbook pro. Had one of thos for quite some time now. It's been in a closet, unused for over 6 months.
There is always going to be a best OS for an individual. And right now for me that's Win 7 RC1.

I do find using XP like having one hand tied behind my back, but from what little I've seen of vista, it looks much better, and I guess 7 will be slightly more so.
I should really make use of boot camp one day...
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:36,
archived)
I should really make use of boot camp one day...

but you need to find the edge, and to do that you'll need a level 5 spatula of anti-icke
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:06,
archived)

how's your sister's foot?
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:51,
archived)

Your sister's delicate tootsies are my number one concern right now.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:55,
archived)

Will you bake her a cake for me?
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:59,
archived)

some sort of javascript/dom fooling about, perhaps.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:58,
archived)

if you have FF and adblock is go to view/view adblockable items, right click the address and copy or view in new tab.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:12,
archived)

it's nice to mouse-over elements, which then get highlighted in the rendered page
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:20,
archived)

shadowboxent.brinkster.net/lemurpics5.html
'a ghostly mist' no less; also 'It shows a large, well-defined ORB'
you don't really need to know the first thing about photography to err, start laughing like a loon
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:53,
archived)
'a ghostly mist' no less; also 'It shows a large, well-defined ORB'
you don't really need to know the first thing about photography to err, start laughing like a loon

millions of ghosts all waiting for digital tech to help them reveal their true orby form.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:57,
archived)

I may have unwittingly captured thousands of ghostly orbs as a photographer
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 11:59,
archived)

someone has taken a dead lemur and probably used acid or lime to remove it's fur and stuck it on a rusty trap - Demon! I hate fakers. Even the site is called Lemur - what do they think we are stupid or is this some spoof?
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:12,
archived)

Hopefully somewhere along the way it will attract the attention of an actual scientist who will call shinannigans.
Still, hoaxes are shite,but its pretty funny when pseudo scientists champion them and show themselves up.I treat this stuff like sci-fi art until someone with relevent academic knowledge tells me otherwise.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:28,
archived)
Still, hoaxes are shite,but its pretty funny when pseudo scientists champion them and show themselves up.I treat this stuff like sci-fi art until someone with relevent academic knowledge tells me otherwise.

I don't have to be a zoological authority to recognise the bone structure, head and tail of some lemur-like creature or monkey ffs. And I suppose just because I don't have a cerificate in animal biology therefore it must be a fucking demon because they photographed it right, so it must be true. Well you can wait for Zombie Stephen Urwin ro ressurect and prove what I already guessed but you'll be waiting a while as noone with any credibility gives a rat's arse about this fake.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:44,
archived)

I wasn't trying to put you in your place.
I pointed the article at Jahled because he works with animals..he knows animal scientists..I never said for one moment it was real,I wondered what animal they had altered to make this diarama.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:54,
archived)
I pointed the article at Jahled because he works with animals..he knows animal scientists..I never said for one moment it was real,I wondered what animal they had altered to make this diarama.

Its hard to tell how big it is.If its from mexico,what kind of apes/lemurs do they have over there?..Jaime maussian is involved,so expect an avalanche of bluster..this is the guy who championed the alien with long spindly arms hiding behind a lamp post..
Genuinely wasn't having a pop at you maiden...sosz for the misunderstanding xxx
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 13:01,
archived)
Genuinely wasn't having a pop at you maiden...sosz for the misunderstanding xxx

pffh
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:16,
archived)

I think that lots of bits of metal will react to static like that, if thin enough.
what a bunch of tools.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:57,
archived)
what a bunch of tools.

Long tail, longish toes...could be some kind of langur monkey? Sifaka?
Very posed and very fake.
The right 'hand' is totally missing, there is no bruising on the 'hand' that is trapped to indicate a long time caught by that appendage.
The feet are very carefully posed as well.
( ,
Sun 3 May 2009, 12:36,
archived)
Very posed and very fake.
The right 'hand' is totally missing, there is no bruising on the 'hand' that is trapped to indicate a long time caught by that appendage.
The feet are very carefully posed as well.