
You're hired and you start on Monday. Bring some old clothes and some clingfilm.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:23,
archived)

After last time not bloody likely, I know you and you kind.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:26,
archived)

'A vote a must happen now'.
He'll be flogging Dolmio on the telly next.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:16,
archived)
He'll be flogging Dolmio on the telly next.

the first Scotsman to do this (NSFW due to swearing).
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:21,
archived)


isn't it?
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:17,
archived)



on the subject of which, at the bus stop earlier, with fireworks going off all around:
chinese guy (for it was him): is Happy New Year?
me: no, it's fireworks night.
cg (fiwh): ah!! Happy New Year?
me: no, Fireworks Night, every year, 5th November, Guy Fawkes and all that.
cg (fiwh): ah!! Happy New Year!!
bless him :)
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:22,
archived)
chinese guy (for it was him): is Happy New Year?
me: no, it's fireworks night.
cg (fiwh): ah!! Happy New Year?
me: no, Fireworks Night, every year, 5th November, Guy Fawkes and all that.
cg (fiwh): ah!! Happy New Year!!
bless him :)


For if it wasn't for him and his kind we wouldn't have fireworks and wouldn't be able to celebrate the day in the first place.
Happy New Year.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:25,
archived)
Happy New Year.

And I must put my hand on my heart and say (without googling) that I don't know when Chinese new year is, so I am in no position to criticise him.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:26,
archived)

I think it was January 26th this year.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:28,
archived)

I think he was very brave actually, trying to converse with a random at the bus stop in a language he was struggling with.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:29,
archived)

mugging him and stealing his ipod. :)
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:31,
archived)

noooooo.......I wouldn't do that!
got his mobile though, just need a new SIM card ;)
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:33,
archived)
got his mobile though, just need a new SIM card ;)

Or February, perhaps?
Failing that, March, October, September, May, December, July, April, January, June or August, if I remember correctly.
And it's the year of the squid at the moment. Next up, the year of the spiny ant-eater, followed by the year of the ocelot.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:30,
archived)
Failing that, March, October, September, May, December, July, April, January, June or August, if I remember correctly.
And it's the year of the squid at the moment. Next up, the year of the spiny ant-eater, followed by the year of the ocelot.

above a chinese restaurant at the beginning of the year of the dog. the noise was horrendous, but i got free steamed ribs in blackbean sauce :)
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:38,
archived)

Get your non-fictitious arses out of here.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:40,
archived)

but only if they can demonstrate that they've read and understood it, and are able to contextualise it within a broad political, economic and legal picture.
I fail to see the problem with this scheme.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:26,
archived)
I fail to see the problem with this scheme.

but to say repeatedly there would be a vote and saying they wouldn't sign anything until the public were happy to do so and then go off and do it anyway is a fucking liberty.
At least thats the way I see it. I might have missed a trick some where.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:29,
archived)
At least thats the way I see it. I might have missed a trick some where.

is not lost on me ;)
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:31,
archived)

I was going to change it but decided against it.
Almost like posting what could be seen as an anti-european post and using the words 'faux pas' in a reply.
:D
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:34,
archived)
Almost like posting what could be seen as an anti-european post and using the words 'faux pas' in a reply.
:D

But I see where you're coming from.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:31,
archived)

Fortunately, the French rejected that, which saved the UK population the indignity of making a national arse of itself.
The Treaty is different, and there's no reason at all to have a referendum on a treaty. There never has been before, so there's no precedent. And it's a precedent that no government would want to set - quite understandably and rightly, in my view.
( ,
Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:33,
archived)
The Treaty is different, and there's no reason at all to have a referendum on a treaty. There never has been before, so there's no precedent. And it's a precedent that no government would want to set - quite understandably and rightly, in my view.