b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9783424 (Thread)

# Alittlebitofpoliticsladiesandgentlemen



(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:14, archived)
# Oh dear.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:15, archived)
# Indeed?
Have I made some kind of faux pas error?
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:16, archived)
# "Faux Pas"?
How very European! :D
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:20, archived)
# Not entirely sure what you mean there.
/ninjas
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:21, archived)
# I like that. A man not afraid to show his ninja skills.
You're hired and you start on Monday. Bring some old clothes and some clingfilm.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:23, archived)
# Clothes and clingfilm?
After last time not bloody likely, I know you and you kind.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:26, archived)
# Is he Italian now?
'A vote a must happen now'.

He'll be flogging Dolmio on the telly next.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:16, archived)
# haha !
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:17, archived)
# He'd be lucky if he got a job
flogging Dolmio in Aldi.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:18, archived)
# He wouldn't be
the first Scotsman to do this (NSFW due to swearing).
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:21, archived)
# I can't help hearing "When's-a your Dolmio day!?" and think of the b3ta picture involving tampons.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:22, archived)
# Scottish Dolmio!
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:57, archived)
# Surprisingly hard to do realistic headline text, isn't it?
isn't it?
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:17, archived)
# Yes. Yes it is.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:19, archived)
# Arf
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:20, archived)
# Hahaha
Gollywog
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:23, archived)
# RATHER!
 

 
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:20, archived)
# HAHAHA
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:21, archived)
# haha!
'Kill 'Em All'?
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:31, archived)
# or as it was known in the Australasian pressing, "YOU'RE FUCKING DEAD"
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 22:18, archived)
# WHAT IS THIS SHIT!?!
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:36, archived)
# SAN FIS THICK BILF!
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 22:21, archived)
# they don't unnerstan' our ways them forrins
on the subject of which, at the bus stop earlier, with fireworks going off all around:

chinese guy (for it was him): is Happy New Year?
me: no, it's fireworks night.
cg (fiwh): ah!! Happy New Year?
me: no, Fireworks Night, every year, 5th November, Guy Fawkes and all that.
cg (fiwh): ah!! Happy New Year!!

bless him :)
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:22, archived)
# Did you give in, in the end, and give the correct answer of "yes, alright, it IS New Year"?
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:24, archived)
# no, his bus came.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:26, archived)
# Bless him indeed
For if it wasn't for him and his kind we wouldn't have fireworks and wouldn't be able to celebrate the day in the first place.

Happy New Year.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:25, archived)
# XIN NIAN KUAI LE!
GONGXI GONGXI!
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:25, archived)
# ha ha that was sweet :D
And I must put my hand on my heart and say (without googling) that I don't know when Chinese new year is, so I am in no position to criticise him.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:26, archived)
# It's more difficult though, it moves around on our calendar.
I think it was January 26th this year.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:28, archived)
# quite agree.
I think he was very brave actually, trying to converse with a random at the bus stop in a language he was struggling with.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:29, archived)
# Especially since you were one step away from
mugging him and stealing his ipod. :)
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:31, archived)
# hahaha!
noooooo.......I wouldn't do that!

got his mobile though, just need a new SIM card ;)
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:33, archived)
# usually around february or march
kung hei fat choi!
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:30, archived)
# Isn't it around about now?
Or February, perhaps?

Failing that, March, October, September, May, December, July, April, January, June or August, if I remember correctly.

And it's the year of the squid at the moment. Next up, the year of the spiny ant-eater, followed by the year of the ocelot.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:30, archived)
# i think next year is the year of the tiger
i'm a tiger.
rar.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:34, archived)
# I'm a dog.
Wuff.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:35, archived)
# i moved into a bedsit
above a chinese restaurant at the beginning of the year of the dog. the noise was horrendous, but i got free steamed ribs in blackbean sauce :)
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:38, archived)
# I'm a dragon, bitches.
Get your non-fictitious arses out of here.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:40, archived)
# unfair!
i want to be a dragon! i love dragons!
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:46, archived)
# rabbit rabbit yep yep
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 22:49, archived)
# I think that people should be entitled to vote on the Lisbon Treaty
but only if they can demonstrate that they've read and understood it, and are able to contextualise it within a broad political, economic and legal picture.

I fail to see the problem with this scheme.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:26, archived)
# If that was the criteria for voting then fair enough
but to say repeatedly there would be a vote and saying they wouldn't sign anything until the public were happy to do so and then go off and do it anyway is a fucking liberty.

At least thats the way I see it. I might have missed a trick some where.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:29, archived)
# The irony of you using the word liberty is that sentence
is not lost on me ;)
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:31, archived)
# Quite.
I was going to change it but decided against it.

Almost like posting what could be seen as an anti-european post and using the words 'faux pas' in a reply.

:D
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:34, archived)
# Well technically speaking the thing they promised the vote on and the thing they independently ratified aren't actually the same.
But I see where you're coming from.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:31, archived)
# They promised a vote on the constitution.
Fortunately, the French rejected that, which saved the UK population the indignity of making a national arse of itself.

The Treaty is different, and there's no reason at all to have a referendum on a treaty. There never has been before, so there's no precedent. And it's a precedent that no government would want to set - quite understandably and rightly, in my view.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:33, archived)
# Still
Grrrrrr... eh?
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:35, archived)
# Voter turnout 79%
Successful voting candidates 4%
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:30, archived)
# 79%?
That's very optimistic!
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:31, archived)
# I was thinking more the 4% ;)
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:34, archived)
# ^This^
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:36, archived)
# ha! very true!
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:40, archived)
# Ever the optimist ;)
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:31, archived)
# Maybe the question should be in a foreign language.
But written in caps, with big spaces between the words.

Because that's how you make a foreigner understand you.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:35, archived)
# DO. YOU. DO. CHIPS. PABLO.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:41, archived)
# ¿que?
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:46, archived)
# Never trust a paper that cant match its own font.
(, Thu 5 Nov 2009, 21:31, archived)