Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
and I thought you were Cavy for a minute there.
Personally, I'd love to be given the chance to survive on £26k, as it would be a marked improvement in my financial state. I also get all 'Daily Mail' when I see people who don't work, but who can afford top of the range technology, brand name clothes, and holidays every year.
I don't want to see anyone go without hte basics, and there's no justification for punishing the poor, but what happened to living within our means? Why are we all automatically entitled to a 50" HD television whether we can afford it or not?
Ooh, I've come over all tory again. I may need to have a lie down and a go of the Daily Star.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:18, 4 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
I doubt there's that many.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:19, Reply)
After morgtage, council tax, life in general it's not that much really.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:26, Reply)
Not everyone qualifies for the maximum by any stretch
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:37, Reply)
I think the real focus of the argument ought to be not "why are people on beenfits getting over 26K" but "why are people who are working in jobs not taking home over 26K" and also "Why are there not enough jobs to go round and why is the economy shrinking" and finally "why are the cunts at the top of the pile STILL taking home far more than they could ever possibly need to the detriment of everyone else in the country".
This is just typical Tory policy, lets pit the badly off against the worse off by appealing to the nasty, bitter, selfish side of people too stupid to know any better. That way we can make everybody's life equally shit, rather than trying to make everyone's life equally good.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:33, Reply)
I baggsy a 35/hr a week job doing light duties. Someone else can do 18 hour days for the same pay as me.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:42, Reply)
You're just taking the typical Daily Mail line, I'm assuming partly tongue in cheek.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:45, Reply)
i agree with the rest of these questions, and would add more, like "why don't nurses and teachers and other valuable professions get paid more when they work they do is so important".
but not this: "why are the cunts at the top of the pile STILL taking home far more than they could ever possibly need to the detriment of everyone else in the country" - if they work in the private sector, then it's their firm's choice to pay them that. nobody else's business. and the firm will only do that if they think they are worth it.
there should be much greater transparency about those who get paid huge amounts in the public sector, though. i would like to start with my local council, and the dude at the top who gets paid a LOT for FUCK-ALL as far as i can see!
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:49, Reply)
the shareholders which decide the pay packets of these CEOs are institutional investors who sit on each others boards and will always award whatever wage increases they want.
There is plenty of transparency in the public sector already, a bit more in the private sector would be preferable, along with an actual government commitment to simplifying the tax system so there are fewer loopholes.
I don't mind someone earning that much as long as they are paying the same percentage of tax as me, but at that amount they are paying far lower rates of tax than someone earning a pittance.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:05, Reply)
www.payscale.com/research/UK/Country=United_Kingdom/Salary
....it seems to be considerably more than a lot of people have to do 40h pw in a shitty job to earn. With this in mind one can understand how people choose unemployment/churning out children as a 'career'.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:34, Reply)
Exactly how many people in this country are actually claiming benefits worth more than 26K a year?
I'm just curious, because it has been acknowledged that this cap will only save the government a few hundred million of a benefits bill that is over 40 billion.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:37, Reply)
This is, they said, three times higher than estimated.
Whilst compared with the entire bill it's a smaller amount, a few hundred million pounds is not 'only' anything, if you ask me.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:39, Reply)
is it not reasonable to assume that these people must be eligible for some quite serious benefits to get the total up to 26K plus?
Please put aside all your anecdotes about "my mate who has a colour TV and is on the dole".
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:43, Reply)
Keep your wig on.
The only people I know who don't work are crooks who claim nothing.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:44, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:44, Reply)
All the bins you can rummage.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:46, Reply)
I'm glad that'll put a stop to that sort of thing.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:45, Reply)
it went to someone on housing allowance. Granted this was in Scotland, so it might be a different story up there, but the council agreed an amount of rent, and two years later when I wanted to put the rent up by £50, they refused to honour it. I knew I'd never get the extra from the tenant, so I dropped the matter.
I'm sure what you say is true, and there are some seriously overinflated rental prices, just because councils are willing to pay them - maybe the reform should be focused on that instead. A cap on private sector rental to a certain percentage above rateable value, or something.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:48, Reply)
The previous government allowed landlords to charge councils something closer to market rents.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:49, Reply)
because something the size of a council could take out a mortgage at fucking great rates of interest and then they could let people stay in the houses and it wouldn't really be costing the council anything, especially after a few years once the mortgage was paid off.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:51, Reply)
Most have transferres to housing associations, laughingly called non profit making groups.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:55, Reply)
Say a good 4 bed house goes for £1500 a month in an area, a shit one with rubbish heating damp etc should be more like £1000-£1200, but because the "market rate" is £1500 they can charge that to the council.
fucking cowboys.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:59, Reply)
Because the government line is that you should move "somewhere you can afford" and whilst in principle I'm in favour of people living according to their actual capacity to pay their rent, the problem is that a) they are not doing anything to address inflating rents for sub standard properties and b) this looks very much like it will simply lead to creating ghettos that will become even more self perpetuating than those we presently have.
I'm not actually arguing that better allocation of benefits is a bad idea, but a crude cap doesn't appear to be a good way of doing it.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:49, Reply)
I think with only 67,000 homes affected it won't make a massive difference. I think a total revisiting of housing benefit would be for the best.
Not necessarily focused on reducing the cost, but a combination of that and increasing the standard of housing to a fit if basic state for a family on benefits.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:56, Reply)
housing benefit, child benefit, council tax benefit, free prescriptions, dental and eye care, free school meals, school uniform allowances, additional child credits for means tested benefits... and so on.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:46, Reply)
you then get £67.50 left over? That's £67.50 a week more than I get.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:47, Reply)
I bought him a beer before christmas and he never sent me a thank you card and with the interest payments it quickly mounted up.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:50, Reply)
Lunch today was two wholemeal pitta breads and butter. I had to borrow the butter.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:53, Reply)
Student food, innit.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:04, Reply)
If you're single, on the dole and have no kids, you're knackered really.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:52, Reply)
The last I knew, you had to wait 40 weeks before you got help on just the interest alone.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:50, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:52, Reply)
Not always the case, though.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:54, Reply)
I could sell mine in days, I suspect. My brother (who is up for redundancy) is not in the same boat, poor cunt.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:00, Reply)
Properties tend to go on the market and get snapped up more or less immediately. Our neighbour's put their place on the market about three years ago and didn't even get a sniff of an offer, whilst other properties around the estate were proudly displaying 'Sold' signs. No idea why.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:03, Reply)
is what put the potential buyers off.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:06, Reply)
when I next go to Davros' house I want one his gravy sandwich things from the shop near his house.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:11, Reply)
hardly "fuck all", is it?
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:00, Reply)
And by reducing maximum benefits to 26K you only save about 200 million. So it's not making any sort of significant difference in total government spending.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:10, Reply)
what could you do for hospitals/schools if you had another 200,000,000?
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:13, Reply)
Will actually end up with hospitals etc
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 15:21, Reply)
I'm on way below the lowest, the average being around 1.75* times what I get. But I'm more than happy where I am.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:52, Reply)
i can't decide if my result will help my pay review or hinder it. urgh.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:08, Reply)
you're probably not collecting much in the way of benefits.
But £500 a week is quite a lot in my book. I wouldn't mind bringing home that much without having to work for it.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:39, Reply)
I know of a brother and sister and neither of them have jobs.
Life of Riley for months, the pair of them.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:32, Reply)
whilst not bothering to do any research to see if they are correct in their wide reaching assertions.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:35, Reply)
I'm sure she has more than one or two similar anecdotes.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:37, Reply)
and about 50 miles, to hit someone who wasn't on the fiddle.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:38, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:46, Reply)
I heard one of them was on a sabbatical and one of them was actually self employed.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:36, Reply)
he's offered to take in a Scouser and teach it to use cutlery.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:44, Reply)
I don't know anyone who's needed them and gotten them in an acceptable timeframe. Sick Benfit is a fucking joke, around 60% of denied claims go through as granted on appeal. 60%, that's almost 2/3rds of this country's most vulnrable people who have to go through hell for no reason.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:55, Reply)
I just know they're going to throw her off 'the sick' and I swear she would get fired anyway becuase she has short-term amnesia and doesn't know where she's been/going. She's the type of trusting person who would get raped in the store-room or something.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:58, Reply)
I only know the one where he writes all over himself in permanent marker. Sometimes my nana says to her "In Tesco, remind me to get eggs" or whatever. And she says "Are you being funny?!"
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:04, Reply)
Payments being rediculously late, like, weeks and months, seem normal. Forms and letters always go missing, it's mass incompitancy, they _never_ call back, unless you owe them. They'll make mistake after mistake, if they over-pay you, it's no problem, they'll just take it out later on.
And they make the system so hellish that people make themselves really ill going back to work, and when they fail after a week because they aren't ready, they have to start all over again.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:07, Reply)
I'm going to go with her and take a dictaphone
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:09, Reply)
the lone 3rd generation scrounger who earns £100k on the side, however, will get the daily fail readers frothing at the gash.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:59, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:08, Reply)
which strikes me as a bit much.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:12, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
