Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
So what do you all think of the Cap on household benefits? £26,000 after tax is pretty decent income IMO.
Generally I'm all for it, hopefully it'll stop landlords putting their shitty run down houses at market rate and getting them filled by the unemployed and paid for by the tax payer.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 11:54, 176 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
She lives in a luxury 2-bed flat in the middle of Shoreditch. Her fridge is full of brand name products and shit like four shrink-wrapped potatoes on a foam tray, not even loose veg, let alone 'slightly knackered but basically fine veg bought from Hoxton market at the end of the day' which is how a real struggling single mum would shop.
I'm pleased that my daughter has such a lovely standard of living but surely it's wrong that I'm working 50h a week (well, I'm 'at' work 50h a week) and can't have a comparable living standard?
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:02, Reply)
yesterday she refused to pass on a message to my daughter that I love her and miss her 'because it might make her feel sad'.
What a poisonous, hateful cunt.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:04, Reply)
but at full price it would be at least £1500 PCM - I'm sure the state pays maybe £1200 of this?
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:05, Reply)
It's nowhere near as nice and has just one bedroom. £1200 for a 2-bed is not that steep.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:10, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:11, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:12, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:19, Reply)
Hope she doesn't have to move out.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:09, Reply)
It is a shame though, it's fucking lovely.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:14, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:06, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:08, Reply)
When that inevitably shifts east what's left?
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:13, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:17, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:08, Reply)
You should only be ALLOWED a TV and satellite if you have a job.
That might get some of the lazy feckers off their arses.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:14, Reply)
than by their terrible TERRIBLE parents who don't even work.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:17, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:14, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:15, Reply)
Then it's the dragon's turn, and the dog will be fucked.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:48, Reply)
is a reasonable income and yes it should stop landlords from artifically inflating the rent prices. However I believe (and I could be wrong) but they are going to leave the child support payments out of the equation so you have the potential for increased broods to increase income.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:24, Reply)
If you had read anything on the subject you would know that the government is committed to including child benefit within the 26K.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:25, Reply)
Child support is a different kettle of eels though. However, I thought that these were normally taken into consideration when calculating means tested benefits so the more child support you get, the less income support etc is paid. Unless the system's changed since I last worked as a benefits monkey.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:29, Reply)
Do keep up.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:29, Reply)
uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/pay-as-little-tax-as-tony-blair.html.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:26, Reply)
uk.finance.yahoo.com/news/pay-as-little-tax-as-tony-blair.html
Not bad, Al. Another application away, another to complete. Dinner to make for when the missus gets in. it's a rock 'n' roll lifestyle and no mistake. How's your good self?
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:37, Reply)
The bathroom is finished and yesterday I lifted the stairs carpet and fixed them all down with massive screws to stop them squeaking, fixed the floorboards on the landing after they got ruined by the electrician and made chicken and dumplings for dinner while the wife was out at a spa with her mother.
Gotta run 3 miles tonight though.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:46, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:51, Reply)
Our generation are much too apathetic to ever bring that much hate to bare on one person who wasn't a TV celebrity.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:53, Reply)
Also, my mate with three kids and no job is fucking loaded. Oh wait she's got a job now but for years she didn't and she was loaded, then she went to university and got bursaries for being a slag and she was loaded and her kids had £100 mobile phones when £100 was a lot for a mobile phone. And she gets into the gym for free because she's a depressed slag.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:40, Reply)
That cuts deep :(
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:42, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:43, Reply)
I just think roots has developed better taste.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:54, Reply)
I don't notice you jumping on any LEAVE BRITNEY ALONE bandwagons.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:14, Reply)
and on my foot I have a sock
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:45, Reply)
but it's cos I'm sick and paranoid with hangoverness not governess. hangover-ness.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:49, Reply)
Did you turn into a gobby shit? I hate it when I get drunk and start mouthing off and then wake up the next day and realise what a drunked gobshite I was being.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:51, Reply)
or someone's watching me. there is always a feeling of guilt but I can remember i didn't do anything bad, except tellt he landlord I was trying to set up one of our barmaids with his grandson
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:04, Reply)
There's plenty of people sleeping in doorways and on the street here.
Then again, I got paid 40 grand for 10x1 day workshops working with unemployed single mothere in Wythenshawe, all of whom had big tellies, new mobiles and designer labelled kids.
As I say, it's how good at blagging you are.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:52, Reply)
Every time a councilor or money person "saves money" by spending £50k on "Celeb Apperances" for "staff Moral", s/he should personally go to the cancer patient who can't get treatment due to funding, or the two nurse's who got laid off, again, due to funding (the fact that 1 evening came to two people's yearly wage here).... they have to explain to them, infront of the press, that they choose this "celebraty apperance" over them.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:55, Reply)
they should be punched in the face and made to run a car out of their wages like everyone else in the country.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 12:57, Reply)
I also can't work out how any of them can justify wages higher than the PM. I'm not saying income higher than the PM, but wages for that specific job. It's the only industry on the planet where a branch-manager owns a wage higher than the CEO.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:00, Reply)
Because the leader of each council is often in charge of managing budgets bigger than a lot of companies, so they are effectively individual CEOs with the PM being the overall project manager for a huge conglomerate.
If anything, you could argue that the PM doesn't get paid enough for the responsibility that they have to accept.
But it's not just the "wage" that cameron takes home. Once you are the PM, you are set for life, you will always end up being given directorships and "speaking tours" for the rest of your days, so the amount you actually earn while in office is pretty much by the by.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:06, Reply)
Public service has to strike a balance between attracting the people who will be most effective, while providing the best value for the tax payer.
It's not there yet by any means, but that's the plan.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:17, Reply)
I've done cheap jobs on the promise of more work, and that's bullshit, a contract is a contract, and if the future job isn't written into the contract, then it's irrelivent. This is a scaled up version of that.
I agree that these people are managing services and budgets that rivel major institutions, but they are still getting higher wages than the figurehead. Maybe rise the PM's wage to £175k and make £150k the cap? Pulling figures out my arse here.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:42, Reply)
and I thought you were Cavy for a minute there.
Personally, I'd love to be given the chance to survive on £26k, as it would be a marked improvement in my financial state. I also get all 'Daily Mail' when I see people who don't work, but who can afford top of the range technology, brand name clothes, and holidays every year.
I don't want to see anyone go without hte basics, and there's no justification for punishing the poor, but what happened to living within our means? Why are we all automatically entitled to a 50" HD television whether we can afford it or not?
Ooh, I've come over all tory again. I may need to have a lie down and a go of the Daily Star.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:18, Reply)
I doubt there's that many.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:19, Reply)
After morgtage, council tax, life in general it's not that much really.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:26, Reply)
Not everyone qualifies for the maximum by any stretch
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:37, Reply)
I think the real focus of the argument ought to be not "why are people on beenfits getting over 26K" but "why are people who are working in jobs not taking home over 26K" and also "Why are there not enough jobs to go round and why is the economy shrinking" and finally "why are the cunts at the top of the pile STILL taking home far more than they could ever possibly need to the detriment of everyone else in the country".
This is just typical Tory policy, lets pit the badly off against the worse off by appealing to the nasty, bitter, selfish side of people too stupid to know any better. That way we can make everybody's life equally shit, rather than trying to make everyone's life equally good.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:33, Reply)
I baggsy a 35/hr a week job doing light duties. Someone else can do 18 hour days for the same pay as me.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:42, Reply)
You're just taking the typical Daily Mail line, I'm assuming partly tongue in cheek.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:45, Reply)
i agree with the rest of these questions, and would add more, like "why don't nurses and teachers and other valuable professions get paid more when they work they do is so important".
but not this: "why are the cunts at the top of the pile STILL taking home far more than they could ever possibly need to the detriment of everyone else in the country" - if they work in the private sector, then it's their firm's choice to pay them that. nobody else's business. and the firm will only do that if they think they are worth it.
there should be much greater transparency about those who get paid huge amounts in the public sector, though. i would like to start with my local council, and the dude at the top who gets paid a LOT for FUCK-ALL as far as i can see!
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:49, Reply)
the shareholders which decide the pay packets of these CEOs are institutional investors who sit on each others boards and will always award whatever wage increases they want.
There is plenty of transparency in the public sector already, a bit more in the private sector would be preferable, along with an actual government commitment to simplifying the tax system so there are fewer loopholes.
I don't mind someone earning that much as long as they are paying the same percentage of tax as me, but at that amount they are paying far lower rates of tax than someone earning a pittance.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:05, Reply)
www.payscale.com/research/UK/Country=United_Kingdom/Salary
....it seems to be considerably more than a lot of people have to do 40h pw in a shitty job to earn. With this in mind one can understand how people choose unemployment/churning out children as a 'career'.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:34, Reply)
Exactly how many people in this country are actually claiming benefits worth more than 26K a year?
I'm just curious, because it has been acknowledged that this cap will only save the government a few hundred million of a benefits bill that is over 40 billion.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:37, Reply)
This is, they said, three times higher than estimated.
Whilst compared with the entire bill it's a smaller amount, a few hundred million pounds is not 'only' anything, if you ask me.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:39, Reply)
is it not reasonable to assume that these people must be eligible for some quite serious benefits to get the total up to 26K plus?
Please put aside all your anecdotes about "my mate who has a colour TV and is on the dole".
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:43, Reply)
Keep your wig on.
The only people I know who don't work are crooks who claim nothing.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:44, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:44, Reply)
All the bins you can rummage.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:46, Reply)
I'm glad that'll put a stop to that sort of thing.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:45, Reply)
it went to someone on housing allowance. Granted this was in Scotland, so it might be a different story up there, but the council agreed an amount of rent, and two years later when I wanted to put the rent up by £50, they refused to honour it. I knew I'd never get the extra from the tenant, so I dropped the matter.
I'm sure what you say is true, and there are some seriously overinflated rental prices, just because councils are willing to pay them - maybe the reform should be focused on that instead. A cap on private sector rental to a certain percentage above rateable value, or something.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:48, Reply)
The previous government allowed landlords to charge councils something closer to market rents.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:49, Reply)
because something the size of a council could take out a mortgage at fucking great rates of interest and then they could let people stay in the houses and it wouldn't really be costing the council anything, especially after a few years once the mortgage was paid off.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:51, Reply)
Most have transferres to housing associations, laughingly called non profit making groups.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:55, Reply)
Say a good 4 bed house goes for £1500 a month in an area, a shit one with rubbish heating damp etc should be more like £1000-£1200, but because the "market rate" is £1500 they can charge that to the council.
fucking cowboys.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:59, Reply)
Because the government line is that you should move "somewhere you can afford" and whilst in principle I'm in favour of people living according to their actual capacity to pay their rent, the problem is that a) they are not doing anything to address inflating rents for sub standard properties and b) this looks very much like it will simply lead to creating ghettos that will become even more self perpetuating than those we presently have.
I'm not actually arguing that better allocation of benefits is a bad idea, but a crude cap doesn't appear to be a good way of doing it.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:49, Reply)
I think with only 67,000 homes affected it won't make a massive difference. I think a total revisiting of housing benefit would be for the best.
Not necessarily focused on reducing the cost, but a combination of that and increasing the standard of housing to a fit if basic state for a family on benefits.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:56, Reply)
housing benefit, child benefit, council tax benefit, free prescriptions, dental and eye care, free school meals, school uniform allowances, additional child credits for means tested benefits... and so on.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:46, Reply)
you then get £67.50 left over? That's £67.50 a week more than I get.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:47, Reply)
I bought him a beer before christmas and he never sent me a thank you card and with the interest payments it quickly mounted up.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:50, Reply)
Lunch today was two wholemeal pitta breads and butter. I had to borrow the butter.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:53, Reply)
Student food, innit.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:04, Reply)
If you're single, on the dole and have no kids, you're knackered really.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:52, Reply)
The last I knew, you had to wait 40 weeks before you got help on just the interest alone.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:50, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:52, Reply)
Not always the case, though.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:54, Reply)
I could sell mine in days, I suspect. My brother (who is up for redundancy) is not in the same boat, poor cunt.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:00, Reply)
Properties tend to go on the market and get snapped up more or less immediately. Our neighbour's put their place on the market about three years ago and didn't even get a sniff of an offer, whilst other properties around the estate were proudly displaying 'Sold' signs. No idea why.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:03, Reply)
is what put the potential buyers off.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:06, Reply)
when I next go to Davros' house I want one his gravy sandwich things from the shop near his house.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:11, Reply)
hardly "fuck all", is it?
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:00, Reply)
And by reducing maximum benefits to 26K you only save about 200 million. So it's not making any sort of significant difference in total government spending.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:10, Reply)
what could you do for hospitals/schools if you had another 200,000,000?
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:13, Reply)
Will actually end up with hospitals etc
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 15:21, Reply)
I'm on way below the lowest, the average being around 1.75* times what I get. But I'm more than happy where I am.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:52, Reply)
i can't decide if my result will help my pay review or hinder it. urgh.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:08, Reply)
you're probably not collecting much in the way of benefits.
But £500 a week is quite a lot in my book. I wouldn't mind bringing home that much without having to work for it.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:39, Reply)
I know of a brother and sister and neither of them have jobs.
Life of Riley for months, the pair of them.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:32, Reply)
whilst not bothering to do any research to see if they are correct in their wide reaching assertions.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:35, Reply)
I'm sure she has more than one or two similar anecdotes.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:37, Reply)
and about 50 miles, to hit someone who wasn't on the fiddle.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:38, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:46, Reply)
I heard one of them was on a sabbatical and one of them was actually self employed.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:36, Reply)
he's offered to take in a Scouser and teach it to use cutlery.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:44, Reply)
I don't know anyone who's needed them and gotten them in an acceptable timeframe. Sick Benfit is a fucking joke, around 60% of denied claims go through as granted on appeal. 60%, that's almost 2/3rds of this country's most vulnrable people who have to go through hell for no reason.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:55, Reply)
I just know they're going to throw her off 'the sick' and I swear she would get fired anyway becuase she has short-term amnesia and doesn't know where she's been/going. She's the type of trusting person who would get raped in the store-room or something.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:58, Reply)
I only know the one where he writes all over himself in permanent marker. Sometimes my nana says to her "In Tesco, remind me to get eggs" or whatever. And she says "Are you being funny?!"
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:04, Reply)
Payments being rediculously late, like, weeks and months, seem normal. Forms and letters always go missing, it's mass incompitancy, they _never_ call back, unless you owe them. They'll make mistake after mistake, if they over-pay you, it's no problem, they'll just take it out later on.
And they make the system so hellish that people make themselves really ill going back to work, and when they fail after a week because they aren't ready, they have to start all over again.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:07, Reply)
I'm going to go with her and take a dictaphone
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:09, Reply)
the lone 3rd generation scrounger who earns £100k on the side, however, will get the daily fail readers frothing at the gash.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 13:59, Reply)
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:08, Reply)
which strikes me as a bit much.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 14:12, Reply)
The number one group in society for getting upset about welfare dependece is the low wage working class. AFAIC if you're on 25k a year from the DWP you're doing far too well, you should be made to spend the money wisely for the purpose of being a responsible, hardworking and healthy citizen, otherwise you don't deserve it. Far too many people in my area waste money that is not rightfully theirs on useless things like drink or Sky HD that only make their situation worse. Work should always be an option that comes off as more worthwhile.
(, Mon 23 Jan 2012, 16:28, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »
