
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular

tell me your first world problems.
alt:What socks are you wearing? mine are spotty with an orange cuff, toe and heel.
altalt: i've had my lunch so i don't give a shit about yours
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 13:50, 193 replies, latest was 12 years ago)

When will people understand that it's not the data that matters, but the insight that can be delivered!
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 13:53, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 13:55, Reply)

The old, "if we put up every piece of data it'll look like we've done more work/know what we're talking about"
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 13:56, Reply)

That's Christmas, you can tell by the Dec-12 mark under it.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 13:58, Reply)

rather than a UK one, and now they won't turn up in time for this weekend when I need them. First World problem, right there.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 13:53, Reply)

It's a fairly convoluted story, but the stag appeared, along with myself, naked in a picture in a magazine about 15 years ago. I've got hold of the original image, cropped it to be just him, printed it on one side of the business card with the text "you can't buy this level of class" on the other side.
It seemed funny at the time but sadly they won't arrive in time.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:05, Reply)

I've also contacted a local printer but they will probably charge loads, it's not funny enough to justify too much of an outlay.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:13, Reply)

save the messages left and play at the wedding
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:10, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 13:56, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 13:59, Reply)

the guy has a pair of moobs he can juggle like watermelons at half price
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:13, Reply)

I think my co-workers are worried about me now.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:09, Reply)

In a family, there are 7 sisters and each sister has 1 brother. If you count the father, how many males are there in the family?
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:01, Reply)

swipe can't understand why she's got 2 brothers, but her brothers have only got 1...
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:07, Reply)

excuse me, mr kettle? could you just come over here for a minute? oh thank you.
mr pot ^here^ has something he wants to tell you...
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:11, Reply)

drugs are bad, m'kay?
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:08, Reply)

but now I want another one
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:10, Reply)

and I hope you aren't suggesting Nakers is some kind of Sainburys standard cookie povvo.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:15, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:16, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:16, Reply)

it's so soft and chocolatey and covered in sugar. it's like a grandmother's love, in a paper bag.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:12, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:18, Reply)

i had two. i didn't hatch from a reptile egg, unlike YOU.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:20, Reply)

alt plain black. All my socks are the same. I never have to look for a pair. I just grab two from the drawer. Wacky socks are for cunts.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:24, Reply)

I got 99 problems but a pitch(er) ain't one.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:28, Reply)

Alt: Non-matching blue socks.
AltAlt: See above
Monty will be happy, we're making a card for someone called 'S Patel'
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:37, Reply)

I don't care how long its been wrongly used its still wrong.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:43, Reply)

Irregardless
Adverb
Without paying attention to the present situation; despite the prevailing circumstances.
Synonyms
notwithstanding
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:45, Reply)

- other than that a normal person would use the latter and a bent spastic the former.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:47, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:47, Reply)

The words inflammable and flammable both have the same meaning, ‘easily set on fire’. This might seem surprising, given that the prefix in- normally has a negative meaning (as in indirect and insufficient), and so it might be expected that inflammable would mean the opposite of flammable, i.e. ‘not easily set on fire’.
In fact, inflammable is formed using a different Latin prefix in-, which has the meaning ‘into’ and here has the effect of intensifying the meaning of the word in English.
Flammable is a far commoner word than inflammable and carries less risk of confusion.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:07, Reply)

because my main flat panel television is in the sitting room. However, it is only a 720p display which, no matter how I fiddle, simply will not display text without looking oddly sharp and rough. I find this mildly, yet persistently, annoying.
I am wearing the grey sock of the unimaginative.
Is there something on the 13th? I wouldn't know. I haven't been personally invited.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:42, Reply)

Nowt you can do about that.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:44, Reply)

What about smart TVs? What's the point in being able to display the internet on your television if it's just going to look like shit graffiti?
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:46, Reply)

so when viewed from a distance the pixels look the same size.
Try a 640x480 VGA projector close up, looks like an old 8-bit Atari.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:53, Reply)

Adjust the resolution until the text looks nice and clear. This has the advantage of making you feel like you are using your PC in 2001
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:52, Reply)

All monitors have a native resolution and TVs can only display one.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:54, Reply)

I have a media center PC attached to 2 two TVs in my house and I can adjust the resolution in the control panel on both of them.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:58, Reply)

The displays may be able to accept different resolutions, but it can't display them. It up or downsizes it to fit to the screen. That is why when you watch SD television on your HD TV, it doesn't display as a tiny box in the centre.
What you might be seeing is the TV's interpretation of the graphics card output. It isn't being truly displayed in the way a monitor would.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:02, Reply)

I do exactly what I said so I can read text more easily on my 42" TV change the resolution, text becomes bigger spread over more pixels and can be read more easily.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:04, Reply)

It is simply displaying the information the graphics card is sending to it. The graphics card is altering to whatever resolution you're asking for and the television is scaling that back to its one native resolution.
This is a pointless argument as TV and monitor resolutions aren't even the same thing. Point is, you're wrong.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:06, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:09, Reply)

argue with those that do because "BUT MY EYES SAY IT LOOKS DIFFERENT"
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:11, Reply)

Bury the rag deep in your face
For now's the time for your tears.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:13, Reply)

You claimed TV's can only display one. I am telling you mine can display more than one.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:13, Reply)

You are wrong because you don't know what you're looking at.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:15, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:20, Reply)

I like it on normal
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:23, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:02, Reply)

In fact the setup in media centre as if you are attached to a television and still gives you lots of options for resolution. My shitty 19" flatscreen can display more than one resolution.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:07, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:09, Reply)

If you run a different resolution all you'll do is blur it, and probably ruin your eyes into the bargain.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 14:57, Reply)

My gran has her PC on 800x600 because shes nearly blind, its makes it massive but not blurry.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:01, Reply)

and if she's nearly blind she won't see the blurring anyway.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:06, Reply)

and I am sat about a foot away and it didn't blur.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:08, Reply)

This is the ONLY resolution that displays a true image. Every single other resolution is fiddled with by the GPU in a process called interpolation. This resizes the output to the native res of the monitor. It stretches it, or shrinks it. This can make the display look blurry.
If yours doesn't, you either have a very good GPU, or really shitty eyes.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:14, Reply)

It will display any suitable resolution you choose, but it'll do it by grouping/dithering pixels to suit. This may make text appear blurred, depending on the native and set resolutions.
Whatever you set doesn't change the number of pixels shown, it just forces the electronics to do something clever to try and make them match up.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:15, Reply)

Most users don't want to know about the relationship between resolution and size, so when they get a bigger monitor, they complain everything's too small, reduce the res, then complain cos they can't get any more on screen than they could before!
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:20, Reply)

because apparently he's got a magical television that works in a completely different way to all others on Earth. We could make millions!
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:21, Reply)

And when I take screenshots, they're naturally double the size, but its annoying as none of my punters have one.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:36, Reply)

So they have scaling. You get the benefit of Retina at any scaling, no other display/computer can do that. This is also the best interim solution considering the non-retina design of almost all software and websites.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 16:04, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 16:36, Reply)

it's 720p and the resolution is absolutely spot on. Mind you, it's connected through an AV amp.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:41, Reply)

Now, please excuse me whilst I go and rage-hang myself.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:43, Reply)

I was just providing extra information. But the 720p part of your issue is clearly some kind of red herring, cos it doesn't cause me a problem.
Are you going through a VGA input or an HDMI/DVI?
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:45, Reply)

and, really, if you'd met him...
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:51, Reply)

it's not a red herring. You'll have different hardware, firmware and probably software to me. It's probably not comparable.
I'm going through a DVI output on the GPU, to an HDMI in on the television.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:50, Reply)

I thought you were saying it was a problem with 720p TVs and computers full stop, not just a random issue associated with the combination of stuff you have.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 16:40, Reply)

www.telegraph.co.uk/subscriptions/digital/?WT.mc_id=601900 They email you a code through, I'll let you know if it works.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:00, Reply)

So you can get 12 bottles for like £40
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:09, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:11, Reply)

Anyway thinking about this one mainly for the Fitou.
wine.telegraph.co.uk/jsp/product/productDetails.jsp?productId=eprod420076
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:16, Reply)

just that volume is not the only concern for many people
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:19, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:28, Reply)

2. THERE ARE LIMITS TO THE VOUCHER
3. THE LIMIT IS I HAVE TO BUY FROM A CERTAIN PLACE AND I HAVE TO BUY A CASE OF 12 BOTTLES
4. THAT MEANS I HAVE TO CONSIDER VOLUME WHEN BUYING THE WINE
5. YOU'RE A DICK
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:32, Reply)

It keeps butting in whenever I'm fucking her.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:37, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:36, Reply)

wine.telegraph.co.uk/product/Conde-de-Cron-Vino-Tinto-NV/09652NV
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:40, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:45, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:56, Reply)

"
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 16:02, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:22, Reply)

We do them at work
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:28, Reply)

i got a message to say a parcel had arrived for me. i thought it was my lovely new abercrombie denim skirt. nooooooooooo. it's a fucking file of documents :(
alt: socks don't go with business suits (not the ones with skirts anyway). i am wearing sheer black hold-ups.
altalt: i just had some yorkie and a glass of milk, ta for asking
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:19, Reply)

is it going to make you look sexy, sexy as a denim destroyed miniskirt?
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:26, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:27, Reply)

Will everyone be able to see your yawning orangutan?
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:28, Reply)

this is why tangles was specifically excluded
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:35, Reply)

i heard you shrieked like a nun riding over cobbles without a saddle
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:45, Reply)

It'll be the most lopsided Eiffel Tower in history.
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:39, Reply)

( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:44, Reply)

it was on the fucking popular page for DAYS :(((((((((((((
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 15:50, Reply)

the crotchless pvc ones?
looks like a red setter trying to escape from a bin bag
( , Tue 25 Jun 2013, 16:06, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »