Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
I've just heard that she's decided to vote conservative - not because she agrees with their policies and likes the party. No. She is voting for them because a) her fiance is, so by her reckoning, she has to too, and b) David Cameron had a disabled child so she feels sorry for him.
Why are people this dim allowed to vote?!
Have you heard any more stupid reasons to vote yet?
Alternatively, what's your Tory candidate name?
1) Father's middle name
2) Name of the street you grew up on
3) Headmaster's Surname.
Mine's Alexander Wester-Wilson.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:13, 89 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
That's would beat a disabled kid in top trumps.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:22, Reply)
with his wife weeping with what remains of her consciousness on the kitchen table, saying, in his smug Etonian voice,
"I'm sorry darling, but I'm behind Clegg in the polls...this really is the only way I can mend Broken Britain."
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:32, Reply)
But then if he's prepared to perform a home abortion on his wife, then I don't think the brand of gin in question would be top of the list of priorities.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:37, Reply)
and that's rare.
I used SamCam as an abbreviation ;)
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:43, Reply)
because Margaret Thatcher ruined this country'
Stupidest reason ever
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:17, Reply)
"Anything's got to be better than another four years under John Major" seems fairly sound to me*.
*I was too young to vote at the time, to avoid any confusion if this spirals into a full-on debate
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:20, Reply)
Margaret Thatcher promulgated Tory policy. Which never changes. That's why it's called Conservative. It can be dressed up as anything they wish to call it but if you look at the fundamental tenets there is no change. And if you are going to quote do so accurately.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:58, Reply)
I was quoting someone I actually know. A die-hard Northerner
And of course, silly me, policies never change. Which is why we always have the same manifestos, and the same parties in power
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:04, Reply)
I'm not going to comment any more. It's bad for my blood pressure. But please, feel free to try and change my mind.
I used to be really dyed in the wool red but I am mellowing to the extent that I even consider some tory policies actually very sensible.
So my tory candidate name?
Cecil Tanfield-Lewis. Wow, I'm impressed.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:17, Reply)
My mum can't decide who to vote for, but it won't be Labour because the local candidate is "a stuck-up so-and-so who thinks she's better than everyone else." This, in itself, is insufficient reasoning for my liking.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:17, Reply)
And John Highcliffe-Estate Conway.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:21, Reply)
That's not bad.
Though not as good as my pr0n name, which would be Morris Wilde.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:21, Reply)
It's the first name of your pet, followed by your mother's maiden name.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:23, Reply)
I went for tea in Fallowfield last night with my mum. I got really nostalgic :(
How are you sweetie?
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:32, Reply)
Good ta, but not doing nearly as much work as I should be :/
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:37, Reply)
Rose Derby-Pickering.
done mother's as father's is quite recognisable/rare, even though it's prime tory material.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:21, Reply)
It's truely stupid, "we're going to let them join the UK" like that's what they've wanted all along.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:24, Reply)
How will they save the economy? Healthcare? Money for new prisons?
Their leaflet had gingers on. It was almost like "THIS IS THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE ETHNIC MINORITY"
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:28, Reply)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_National_Party#Policies
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:29, Reply)
Churchill and Griffin on the same fucking pamphlet.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:33, Reply)
if it has a ginger family, and "BRING OUR BOYS HOME"
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:35, Reply)
Thankfully the BNP have no presence here.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:38, Reply)
called the Mebyan Kernow candidate a "Greasy Haired Twat"
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:39, Reply)
Do you think they even know that?
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:04, Reply)
I have no problem with people voting for who they believe in but voting for one stupid policy seems more than a little stupid.
Oh and James Whitcross-Hazelwood
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:30, Reply)
many of my friends are not registered to vote and have never voted, despite being in their early 30's.
A friend of mine has a 22 y/o girlfriend who is fat, blonde, pregnant and stupid. She said she couldnt remember who she voted for last time. I furrowed my brow and pointed out that the last general election was 5 years ago, so she wouldn't have been old enough to vote. She said, "But I thought they happened every year...I remember voting at school".
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 16:39, Reply)
Stupidist reason is every Labour supporter who mentions Thatcher as a reason to not vote conservative and vote labour. She was first in power 28 years ago, Labour have spent the most recent 10 years, the 10 most prosperous years of the modern age, racking up huge debts, this is stupid on a momumental scale.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:03, Reply)
totally, they somehow infiltrated all the other countries also suffering from recession ATM, damn those sneaky Laboutites!
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:06, Reply)
the recession would still have happedned, but our debt would not be 65% of GDP, thus leaving us in a better postion economically.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:10, Reply)
is the only thing that has stopped our economy totally collapsing. THere are many reasons not to support Labour, such as the Iraq war, but their handling of the economy has actually been quite good. They have ploughed a lot of money into health and education and improved them a lot.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:19, Reply)
I'm surprised Labour aren't crowing to the rooftops about this, since they got so much shit saying it was terrible when they did it, but it's ended up being a very good investment.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:24, Reply)
with the weak being left behind. This leaves a healthy selection of businessess who can prosper. It's economic Darwanism.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:31, Reply)
but there wasn't actually a choice, the banks simply could not fail. However, the thing to do now would be to break them up into smaller companies to prevent it happening again. But that's just not going to happen, and capitalism runs on to it's inevitable conclusion of one massive business controlling everything. Welcome to Tesco, have a nice day.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:32, Reply)
especially not relative to the sheer amount spent. Financial prolifigacy is not an indication of quality
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:23, Reply)
How can you see the length of waiting lists back in the mid 90s and say that at most you having to wait a month or two for operations is not an improvement. To say the opposite is naive at best and utter stupidity at worst.
As for education, yes your parents are teachers, so you base your argument on their anecdotal evidence without presenting a single piece of evidence as to why teaching is so much worse than it was in the 90s.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:26, Reply)
although this is a universe of 4...
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:28, Reply)
low interest rates and low unemployment. Which other government has ever achieved this? We have since had six quarters of negative figures due to a worldwide recession followed by a return to growth.
Borrowing always increases in a recession. Gordon Brown's early years as chancellor saw him reducing the debts that escalated during the recession of the early nineties.
It is simply incorrect to suggest that the Labour government has presided over years of famine.
That said of course, the election is about the next five years not about 1997.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 18:26, Reply)
of The War, or the economy, either one would have been just the same by the Tories, only more so and smugger.
Edit: John Newcross-Parsons
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:13, Reply)
And the tory policies on the economy are just terrible. George Osbourne couldn't be in charge of a paper bag, let alone a major economy.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:21, Reply)
stating that:
A) I was voting in the first place
B) That I wasn't voting Tory
C) That me reasons for not doing so were based on the above
Merely that those were stupid reasons to vote Tory, although I will add at this point that they would also display a lamentably knowledge of political history, and a shocking naivete worthy only of a child or possibly the educationally sub-normal.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:21, Reply)
claim that people who believe the opposite are educationally subnormal.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:22, Reply)
I thought I was answering a question on a humourous website
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:31, Reply)
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:23, Reply)
I've made no statement as to my political beliefs, or who, if anyone I will be voting for, one could assume from what I said, and with as much evidence, that I was in fact voting Tory, but was doing so for other reasons.
That said, I don't find anything as such wrong with refusing to vote, there are many legitimate reasons, including, but not limited to dislike of all the candidates on offer, the lack of a "none or the above" box to tick on the ballot paper, disbelief in democracy as a valid system of government, and disbelief that our current system is even fit to be considered a democracy. I'm sure there are others those are just off that top of my head.
That said, and before you go jumping to any more conclusions I shall, in fact, be voting.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:38, Reply)
also water is wet, the sky is up, politicians are lying bastards and the electorate and (mostly) retards, any more tautologies that need stating?
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:46, Reply)
It quite possible for me to argue that anyone who thinks that Gareth Barry is better than James Milner is a fool, without being a Man City or Aston Villa fan.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:43, Reply)
you do so
in a long
and possibly tangential post regarding ducks
I saw a duck today, it went "mwap mwap mwap" in the way that ducks went.
I admired it's earthy humour.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:46, Reply)
Luckily I had some Ian Dury to comfort me.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:52, Reply)
We assume politicans will do what they say and policies will remain unchanged after the election. Yeah right.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:22, Reply)
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:31, Reply)
Having a candidate named Barry Drive-Barry would actually be the most exciting thing that's happened in this whole campaign.
I'd be "MyDaddidn'thaveamiddlename Lee-Smith"
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 17:39, Reply)
John Haselbech-Rumble.
Has a ring to it, don't you think?
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 18:13, Reply)
David Eversden-Corbett
David Eversden-Peacock
David Eversden-MacMurray
(I've been through a few heads in my time)
((fnarrrrr))
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 22:10, Reply)
I can remember a load of teacher's names, but I'm completely drawing a blank on any headmasters.
And I was struck off as a prefect for offences above and beyond.
(, Wed 28 Apr 2010, 23:38, Reply)
Headmasters retired and were replaced at both my schools halfway through my time there.
Although I've been to an awful lot of schools (brought up on both sides of the Atlantic, in various cities), but I can't remember any other headmaster names.
(, Thu 29 Apr 2010, 9:57, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »