There were 4 of them living in captivity, all male, and two of them started attacking the others. Apparently this was because they'd formed a "pair bond" because there were no women around.
In all seriousness, couldn't they have just said they were gay?
(, Wed 8 Jul 2009, 13:12, archived)
so I choose to ignore you and instead sit down and try and comb my pubes into some sort of hilarious form.
(, Wed 8 Jul 2009, 13:22, archived)
your underwear on it for the ladies.
(, Wed 8 Jul 2009, 13:23, archived)
No talk of milking time, mind.
(, Wed 8 Jul 2009, 13:37, archived)
*causes men to vomit and children to cry, clutching their mothers dress hems*
(, Wed 8 Jul 2009, 13:18, archived)
"so do you come here often?"
"SHUT UP WE'RE TRYING TO DRAW YOU, AND STOP SCRATCHING YOUR ARSE"
(, Wed 8 Jul 2009, 13:21, archived)
Birds are something you shag.
Take your year in Provence and shove....it...up...your...arse.
(, Wed 8 Jul 2009, 13:14, archived)
i've met him and have his autograph
(, Wed 8 Jul 2009, 13:30, archived)
If it was BBC 3 they'd be writing a sitcom about it now
(, Wed 8 Jul 2009, 13:16, archived)
(, Wed 8 Jul 2009, 13:20, archived)
If they're shagging (and reading between the lines, they were), then they must be sexually attracted to one another, and they're of the same gender. Surely that makes them gay? Or, more accurately, homosexual, at least, if you want to remove any implications of a particular lifestyle that "gay" carries.
(, Wed 8 Jul 2009, 13:45, archived)
without knowing exactly what motivations are behind it. Pair bonding covers far more possibilities such as co-operation to protect territory or to improve social standing or boredom/frustration or liking a bit of cock. It also doesn't distinguish it from heterosexual relationships which may serve the same ends aside from procreation in other circumstances. It's suitably fuzzy I think.
(, Wed 8 Jul 2009, 13:59, archived)