
And good work covering the failure immediately below.
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 9:04,
archived)

very odd. (But is that a joke or another fantastic B3ta mistake becoming truth?)
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 9:20,
archived)

what do you expect? It's human nature to dislike those qualities :P
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 12:45,
archived)

but also very much aware my opinion is almost certainly wrong ;)
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 14:22,
archived)

because the wrong choice of pants, is going to make the primary coloured skintight bodysuits with boots & capes look really camp. ;)
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 9:24,
archived)

( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 9:43,
archived)

as part of a pun on Fermat's last theorem, whose birthday this is.
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 9:53,
archived)

but have no idea what it is or how it quantifies the marvellousness of poofs
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 9:59,
archived)

Fermat wrote something like "x^n+y^n=z^n only when n=2. I have concocted a marvellous proof of this but this margin is too narrow to contain it". Conventional wisdom is that Fermat was trolling generations of mathematicians and didn't have a proof at all.
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 10:10,
archived)

But if they don't pop up to claim it I'm happy to take all credit.
It's impossible for Fermat to have had anything similar to the actual proof of the theorem, since it relies on maths developed in the 20th century. At this point, Stephen Fry (prompted by a researcher who's been reading Wikipedia in the back room) would doubtless say that it seems likely an elementary proof could be found (due to Friedman's Grand Conjecture, of which I've never heretofore heard), but it would be insanely long.
/just been reading Wikipedia blog
Also, clicks to both images, since I've been insanely rude :)
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 10:17,
archived)
It's impossible for Fermat to have had anything similar to the actual proof of the theorem, since it relies on maths developed in the 20th century. At this point, Stephen Fry (prompted by a researcher who's been reading Wikipedia in the back room) would doubtless say that it seems likely an elementary proof could be found (due to Friedman's Grand Conjecture, of which I've never heretofore heard), but it would be insanely long.
/just been reading Wikipedia blog
Also, clicks to both images, since I've been insanely rude :)

(cos he was a great big genius), but Simon Singh's book (which is fantastic) makes the point that he probably had a flawed proof along the lines of some of the later attempts.
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 10:25,
archived)

I like to think that mathematicians back in them olden days weren't as po-faced and serious as we all believe and instead liked to arse around like the rest of us.
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 10:46,
archived)

Also, I have met Andrew Wiles, as he went to my college.
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 11:31,
archived)

but not clever enough to write on a bigger bit of paper
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 10:17,
archived)

clever enough not to bother, leaving us convinced in later centuries of his genius. I mean, who can remember Fermat's Penultimate Theorem? But the Last Theorem, that made him a legend!
The first mathematician to truly understand great PR.
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 10:18,
archived)
The first mathematician to truly understand great PR.


I have to wear a thong over the costume as it's just too damn revealing otherwise
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 11:16,
archived)

but unlikely, it hasn't even made the popular page
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 12:12,
archived)

Things suddenly appear on it from nowhere.
Your pic really deserves to get you number 5.
:D

( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 12:17,
archived)
Your pic really deserves to get you number 5.
:D


but I am really impressed with how well the drawing went! I obviously don't do much proper figure work any more and it came out quite good :D
But I can't take all the credit, it was inspired by a line in Caitlin Moran's book "How to be a woman" on how women have a lot of trouble with increasingly small pants "Batman doesn't have to put up with this shit" which then caused my brain to Superman and Batman discussing the logistics of thongs :)
( ,
Wed 17 Aug 2011, 12:28,
archived)
But I can't take all the credit, it was inspired by a line in Caitlin Moran's book "How to be a woman" on how women have a lot of trouble with increasingly small pants "Batman doesn't have to put up with this shit" which then caused my brain to Superman and Batman discussing the logistics of thongs :)