

if some one can find the original, post it please , im sure that this is a shop.
they must be pretty fucking stupid lol.
who shopped it, the sun, or someone else.

Interestingly the BBC originally had a photo that showed just one missile launching.
There is video footage of 4 missiles launching, so if this is a shop its just a simplified visual representation, because the video doesn't work so well on newspaper
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:14,
archived)
There is video footage of 4 missiles launching, so if this is a shop its just a simplified visual representation, because the video doesn't work so well on newspaper


which meeeeeeans that someone is gonna get their asss kicked cos any news photos featuring even the slightest bit of doctoring (even changin the contrast beyond a certain level) are deemed unnewsworthy and the person who contributed it will be struck off as a news photographer forever, just like that reuters blokey.
EDIT: yeah check this from yahoo
This is the thumbnail

But you click for biggy and get this

How queer.........
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:20,
archived)
EDIT: yeah check this from yahoo
This is the thumbnail

But you click for biggy and get this

How queer.........

it makes them look more powerful.
They probably weren't even rockets originally, but bottles of cola with packets of menthos shoved in them.
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:41,
archived)
They probably weren't even rockets originally, but bottles of cola with packets of menthos shoved in them.

:D
and those crazy news agencies, for just regurgitating it
:D
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:49,
archived)
and those crazy news agencies, for just regurgitating it
:D

Must deny the slightest failure at all costs, even really blatantly!
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:56,
archived)

this is a crap shop!
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 17:27,
archived)


That missile test was from 2006.
www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic-art/293359/94270/On-Nov#tab=active~checked%2Citems~checked
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:23,
archived)
www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic-art/293359/94270/On-Nov#tab=active~checked%2Citems~checked

so does this mean that the one being bandied about today is an old one too?
Clearly launching from the same place.
And if it is, have missiles actually been launched or are we being fed lies to accept the next great American overthrow?
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:25,
archived)
Clearly launching from the same place.
And if it is, have missiles actually been launched or are we being fed lies to accept the next great American overthrow?

we're being fed American lies.
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:32,
archived)

lies from everywhere and everyone
it's all complete crap
I would suggest now's a good time to stock up on tins of beans

it's all going to get "interesting"
and by "interesting" I mean completely fucking fucked.
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:53,
archived)
and by "interesting" I mean completely fucking fucked.

sky £19 a month to watch crap as well, satellite telly is utter rubbish
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:55,
archived)

you have to strain so hard to make out what's going on
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 17:03,
archived)

although this being the sun, I wouldn't be surprised if they'd shopped a imam riding one of the missiles..
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:19,
archived)

I know because I wanted to do it...

( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:21,
archived)


when they were looking for evidence of WMD prior to going in to Iraq.
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:21,
archived)

www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2008/07/09/iran_tests_missiles_and_vows_to_hit_back_if_attacked/
It's like someone has decided to add a 4th missile to this image!?!
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:22,
archived)
It's like someone has decided to add a 4th missile to this image!?!

if 3 missiles was enough or not
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:30,
archived)

civilians would laugh at that if they saw that on the front page of the paper,
"Pah, only 3 missiles! fucking pussy"
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:36,
archived)
"Pah, only 3 missiles! fucking pussy"

it's a shame it didn't just blow up on the spot, that would have made an excellent photo
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:56,
archived)

or the US to make us accept their nuking of the Middle East "just in case"
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:36,
archived)

it's totally repressive-regime, war-monger, and arms-dealer friendly.
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 17:04,
archived)

they fired individual ones this time so it aint true anyway. I think they are called shish kebabs or shebabs or something
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:24,
archived)

this is propaganda from the west to make an attack acceptable.
Hold on, there's some guys in black suits knocking at my door, back in a sec
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:29,
archived)
Hold on, there's some guys in black suits knocking at my door, back in a sec

so why do we care, we outta range
yay for Iranian missiles, fire at will
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:32,
archived)
yay for Iranian missiles, fire at will

although I haven't personally verified that (it's not in my bookmarks, oddly).
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:37,
archived)

I stopped reading newspapers because they are full of too much bullshit.
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:29,
archived)

as they are easily in the top 10 of cunty coutries. But as ever loads and loads of civilians dying will ruin the fun.
Ackbar dinnerjacket and the revolutionarialy guard have it coming so bad.
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:54,
archived)
Ackbar dinnerjacket and the revolutionarialy guard have it coming so bad.

They'd be glassed over by Pakistani-supplied nukes from Syria.
Calm down, laddies, and have a cup of tea.
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:58,
archived)
Calm down, laddies, and have a cup of tea.

:(
I don't think it'll go nuclear, but i do think there'll be more shit in the middle east for quite some time to come.
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 17:03,
archived)
I don't think it'll go nuclear, but i do think there'll be more shit in the middle east for quite some time to come.

www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3566548,00.html
i wonder if the internet knows what Ive got for tea?
( ,
Thu 10 Jul 2008, 16:51,
archived)
i wonder if the internet knows what Ive got for tea?