b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 8935562 (Thread)

# I spent an awful lot of time on this for no good reason.


A picture of a diving board plus an image of an empty swimsuit from a catalogue site would have been better.

Also cutting it out was hard enough, without building inside the suit from scratch.

And I only chose it for it's humorous pose, which I removed.

I fail.
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:30, archived)
# cracking bit of work there, sir
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:30, archived)
# But an utter waste of time.
I could have effected it with a lot less effort.
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:31, archived)
# exceelent work though
maybe choose a more suitable picture next time though
www.worth1000.com/contest.asp?contest_id=12569&display=photoshop
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:50, archived)
# Well I like it.
It looks like the municipal pool in Lausanne!
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:31, archived)
# a very nice job!
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:31, archived)
# Pffffft
at the text
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:32, archived)
# ^
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:32, archived)
# Beter than all my invisibles! From yester-year
I'll try to find one....Invisisble slut:
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:32, archived)
# sideways tits!
and tiny midget-legs
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:40, archived)
# Well I like it anyway, so shush
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:33, archived)
# needs work on the shadows
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:33, archived)
# oh i forgot about this one
Click for bigger
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:37, archived)
# yeah well it took ages
cya later b3ta
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:59, archived)
# very nicely done nonetheless.
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:33, archived)
# it's the effort that counts...
that's super work, sir
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:33, archived)
# that's what i always say
but apparently size and duration also score highly
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:34, archived)
# Boo! Get off the stage!
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:34, archived)
# If she's invisible,
why does she need a swimsuit anyway?

Woo, too.
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:35, archived)
# so the invisible man can't perv off on her
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:36, archived)
# Can invisible people see each other?
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:39, archived)
# If not, can they see themselves?
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:39, archived)
# If an invisible tree fell in a forest,
something something something something?
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:41, archived)
# Ah I have given this a lot of thought (I do stuff like that)
and if a tree falls in a forest and there is no-one around to hear it does it make a sound?

My answer is yes as we evolved ears to hear sound - not that sound was created to suit the fact we have ears. Therefore sound is an ambient part of the evironment and we evolved to learn to hear sound else we wouldn't need ears - therefore sound happens whether we hear it or not. ta-da!
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:52, archived)
# 'sound' is our interpretation of waves of energy being emitted from any given source
not the energy itself. if there are no ears to receive the energy, there is no 'sound'

so in terms of literal truth, if a tree falls and no one is around to hear it, it doesn't make a noise, it merely produces waves of sound energy
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:02, archived)
# It depends on your definition of 'sound',
whether sound is just molecules vibrating in certain ways, or whether it's the qualia of us perceiving those vibrations.
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:06, archived)
# "qualia"
that was the word i was looking for.

'"sound"ness' good grief....
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:09, archived)
# I would say that vibrations in the air is sound
regardless of how they are perceived. Often this kind of question of the falling tree is coupled with the remark "We don't hear the wind unless it rustles through the leaves of a tree." but any movement of air makes a sound often too low a frequency for us to preceive.
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:28, archived)
# I agree.
But I'd use sound to describe the physical or mental processes, and this whole debate seems to depend on which definition you use.
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:31, archived)
# True but it's fun philosphising about stuff
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:38, archived)
# Well, that really depends on what you mean by 'stuff'.
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:40, archived)
# I think about life the universe and everything really
I'd like to know the answers, not just some philosophy but the truth of things. However I don't think there really is truth of things only subjective interpretations about these things - however there must be an undeniable truth of things but we will never know what is the objective truth of life.
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:48, archived)
# I'm sure there is a fundamental truth, but I'm sure we'll never know it for sure.
My basic strategy is to argue the opposite to the other guy, because it makes things more fun.
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 23:54, archived)
# an age old question...
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:42, archived)
# Hey, I think it's ace.
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:36, archived)
# It's going to make a funny splash !
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:39, archived)
# MUCH B3TA NOW
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:41, archived)
# you win the elvis weathercock award
for having no good reason
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:43, archived)
# Elvis Weathercock
I wish to change my name to this, effective immediately
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:45, archived)
# But it still says McBadger ;)
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:47, archived)
# cool !
is this shoppery or real ?
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:47, archived)
# shopee
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:52, archived)
# Elvis is in the wind . . .
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:49, archived)
# Moar!
in this kind of vein
(, Thu 13 Nov 2008, 22:54, archived)