You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Archive 255 (Older | Newer)

# We should all go to this
Take over the world by painting pictures of mobile phones
www.photoshopworld.com

They have a challenge, but it's only open to attendees.
I think we should make our own Photoshop splash screens from the images anyway.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:49, archived)
# I can't believe they're holding
such a thing and we're not invited! ARTrage.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:44, archived)
# It's those people at the door again...
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 11:25, archived)
# is
it the mormons?
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 12:10, archived)
# It's
the Sweaterites.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 14:09, archived)
[challenge entry] just shoot me
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:44, archived)
# i don't
own a firearm. would a stabbing suffice?
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 15:20, archived)
# Waste a bit of time......
Obscure time related facts about how long you have lived.

www.timeanddate.com/date/birthday.html

Not that I can remember the exact time I was born or anything like that.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:42, archived)
# ok.. Googlewhack HiScore?
Not sure if this is how it works but on Google.com
1. Nano: 493,000
2. Swahili: 214,000
=105,502,000,000

Is this valid?
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:17, archived)
# No
You've got to have only a single result returned by Google...
That's the hard bit.

(BTW, why does my google result pages not list the number of hits for each word?)
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:24, archived)
# clarify the single result.
What do you mean by a "single result" returned by yahoo.
As in entering into the search field BOTH Nano & Swahili simultaneously?

I maybe being a bit dense about this, but I don't quite get the rules from what I've read.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:27, archived)
# The rules are
that Google should list only one result when both words are entered in the search box,
ie it says 'result 1-1 of 1'
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:34, archived)
# have you read my rules?
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:35, archived)
# OH MY
now I get it, and that
"CRETACEOUS LOLITAS" whack was amazing.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:37, archived)
# I had
Tuna Escariot which clocked in at 338,611,000 points! Hoorah!
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:45, archived)
# What???
I got 162 hits with "preposterous sycophant" who the hell can string a sentence together with these 2 words??? whaddafuck!
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:50, archived)
# I agree
so much I'm going to sell my house.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:48, archived)
# ha ha!
pelmet fortitude

615,760,000
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 11:53, archived)
# Except that
Escariot isn't underlined...

The best I could come up with was "Fuck Hydrodynamically" for 25,710,300,000. I think it should get EXTRA points for being a grammatically correct two word sentance. (IE you can order somebody to "Fuck Hydrodynamically").
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:51, archived)
# FINALLY!
I managed to get one, though not stellar by any means, I was just happy to make one work.
Bohr: 184,000
Promethea: 7630
1,403,920,000
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:06, archived)
# Woo!
Beat my own score!

Lolitas Heterozygous for 96,432,000,000
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:30, archived)
# huzzah
sesquipedalian warthog. A mighty 189,410,000
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:34, archived)
# got it!
My whack is: "starchy didjeridoo": Oz-style googlewhacking!
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:56, archived)
# Wrong!
Its "didgeridoo". Didjeridoo is NOT underlined on the google search...
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:02, archived)
# You should take
a snapshot of the "proof" google search for each entry in the records, because once google caches your pages, the whacks will be invalidated, so a dated "image" of the google results would be a good idea...
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:00, archived)
# actually,
my search still proves valid even after the fact.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:08, archived)
# Eventually
a search will throw up the googlewhack records page, i guarrantee it.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:15, archived)
# gotcha
ah.. after it's been posted to googlewhack. I see what you mean.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:21, archived)
# How about this then....
I screen grabbed it as evidence...

news: 169,000,000
the: 2,460,000,000
Score of: 415,740,000,000,000,000
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:52, archived)
# I think not...
is that windows xp i see?
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:59, archived)
# It is.
And I might have photoshopped my screengrab...

(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 11:02, archived)
[challenge entry] Eye diving
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:15, archived)
[challenge entry] R Kelly presents
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:11, archived)
[challenge entry] Monitor Lizard
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:59, archived)
# how do I upload a pic
I think I'm being thick but how do I add the pic

Cheers.
Great pic by the way
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:02, archived)
# Read
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:06, archived)
# cheers mate
I was being thick.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:10, archived)
# Thanks!
Sorry, was away for a while
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:20, archived)
[challenge entry] Eye Diving
Crap pun I know
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:57, archived)
[challenge entry] Lord of the Eyes
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:49, archived)
# Woo yeah!
I finally sorted my Norton firewall so I can see all those funky pics on Fortunecity pages!
(Fangs for the alternative idea, Fuzzbucket, but not needed now) :)
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:36, archived)
# Not a
problem. What was Peter Norton's issue with Fortunecity?
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:52, archived)
[challenge entry] Say what you see !
It's a sole, if that helps
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:35, archived)
# Hmmmmm,
buggered if I know what this is..
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:41, archived)
# Windows
of the sole?
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:50, archived)
# obviously someone
who knows his fish....
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:52, archived)
# or
checks for alt tags...
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:59, archived)
# bugger
didn't think of that
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:11, archived)
# The eyes are the windows of the sole
to be more precise
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 11:03, archived)
# excellent
have to say i particularly like that gag
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:00, archived)
[challenge entry] The Big Lebowskeye
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:28, archived)
# .
"don' fuck wit' da jesus."
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:29, archived)
# theres an eyeball
licking fetish apparently. Can't remember what it's called, but Hesus there looks like he'd know.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:43, archived)
[challenge entry] WARNING

new outbreaks found!
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:21, archived)
# Sooty is a sociopath
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:18, archived)
[challenge entry] Is there any light at the end ?
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:16, archived)
# cool
(imho)This is the best I've seen so far.(/imho)
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:39, archived)
# Designers Workout
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:15, archived)
# Bah
Only got 70. Explains why I'm so slow when it comes to photoshopping.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:54, archived)
# 114
but I've got a tablet and Parkinsons
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:16, archived)
# 140
And I've got a shite mouse.. And work to do..
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:36, archived)
# I
got 130, a sore arm and a wrecked head.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 10:13, archived)
# this building
is a nuisance
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:11, archived)
# if the wtc had looked like that
it would still be there now.
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:16, archived)
# cruel and pointless
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:10, archived)
[challenge entry] Hmmm....

Oh for a proper tweening tool
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:09, archived)
# Hey!
I liked it
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 9:13, archived)
[challenge entry] Event Hor-eye-zon (oh dear.)
(, Mon 28 Jan 2002, 8:07, archived)

« Older messages | Newer messages »

XML feeds