I don't normally post serious stuff here, but with our rights to protest and rights to complain and rights to even have a say being diminished by new laws etc. we surely don't want these dangerous, high pressure, chundering machines to be used to silence us or make people afraid to speak up or talk out - do we?
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 15:05, Reply)
to rip the clothes off sexy protesters.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 15:10, Reply)
Maybe if you had a shower occasionally the police wouldn't need to hose you down first before arresting you.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 15:11, Reply)
p.s. your username is apt for someone speaking up for the pigs
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:11, Reply)
or worse is okay though. As long as no civilians are injured.
I do agree they could turn the psi down a tad though.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 15:12, Reply)
unless the state does it
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 15:58, Reply)
They're used to stop riots. There's a bit of a difference.
The alternative to the water cannon in those respects is fun stuff like rubber bullets and tear gas.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 15:17, Reply)
for turning a potentially damaging, newsworthy protest in to a dismissable riot.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 15:24, Reply)
Recent new laws and other proposed laws are designed to make it easier to criminalise peaceful protests, so they will in effect end up being treated like riots! Riots are shit yes, but everyone should have the right to protest peacefully with out being shot at by the police with any type of weapon!
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 15:25, Reply)
One of our most basic human rights.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 15:27, Reply)
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:09, Reply)
People don't seem to realise when they are on a protest with lots of other people about things like middle class people's right to go to university and not have to pay for any of it for example, there really isn't any need to pretend they are an anarchist and its 1917 again, and McDonalds windows need smashing.
And yet that's what always happens. Water canons seem good to me
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 15:23, Reply)
to any comment that doesn't bumlick it's way through the Guardian slavishly like some leftwing Stasi clone
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:29, Reply)
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:07, Reply)
Some of the "best bits" of what happened were edited together and shown on the tellybox, but I don't believe what I saw there is what happened.
See my earlier comment on riots being "easily dismissable".
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:25, Reply)
Whilst I didn't enjoy watching all that scum nicking stuff and beating people up during the riots the other year, it was great to see them all get nicked and sent down.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:57, Reply)
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 18:34, Reply)
as long as the Police are allowed to use them to hose the crusties off the road at Balcombe that is.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 15:49, Reply)
to return fire when the staff administered the usual audience soaking during "There's a Light".
I got thrown out into Leicester Square, sans water pistol, and had to wait in the pub dressed in full Frank n Furter outfit while my bastard mates finished watching the film.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:25, Reply)
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:47, Reply)
let the revolution commence!
*charges up gravel driveway*
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:41, Reply)
*lights charge on my 15 tubular artillery devices using gunpowder to propeller shots or balls, other wise known as a cannon or when multiple cannon"
**misses**
***releases hounds instead***
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:49, Reply)
and they are not very scary. Unless you are a stereotype black lady from the deep south that keeps a cat called Thomas
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 17:09, Reply)
the episode of 'Who do You Think You Are' featuring one half of Cannon and Ball
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:14, Reply)
a bukkake video featuring one half of Cannon and Ball
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:15, Reply)
a Yewtree investigation of one half of Cannon and Ball
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:17, Reply)
a series on the history channel where Tommy Cannon rests his can of Iron Bru on historical firearms up and down the country
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:20, Reply)
a two man stage play featuring Cannon and Ball talking intimately about their genitals for three hours
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:22, Reply)

Sorry for the wrong font. Couldn't be arsed to find the right one
*couldn't help it*. Edit won't let me change the subject. boohoo
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 15:59, Reply)
Now that a middle class wanna be anarchist may get a soaking it's suddenly an issue.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:05, Reply)
Some trendy occupy tit-wank getting his basin haircut wet whilst lobbing bricks at the police= brutality.
Some Belfast headbanger protesting against an orange wearing bowler hatted twat marching through their sink estate= irrelevant local news
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:30, Reply)
...between the old converted fire pumps used in N. Ireland and the high velocity water cannons we're talking about here. The ones in N Ireland could hardly knock you off your feet. They were designed to repel, not inflict injury!
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 17:13, Reply)
We are starting to lose all our rights to complain about or influence this govt, and now we'll be shot with water cannons for thinking about trying.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:37, Reply)
When I protest I'm not normally spending a lot of money to do so and won't need to register with the electoral commission.
I will also be very interested in seeing who being lobbying my M.P.
Large charities along with other big business spending lots of money to influence the democratic process will do but I don't have a problem with that.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 17:09, Reply)
The lobbying bill is detrimental to the rest of your protest rights.
Speaking out against the govt is slowly becoming illegal.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 17:15, Reply)
Brick throwers yes, window smashers yes but not bog standard protest.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 17:28, Reply)
But I can't help but think of various peaceful protests last year where the police kettled, brought in horses and massaged the situation in to a violent one. The last thing they need is another weapon with which to antagonise.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 18:53, Reply)
with limiting groups with no political agenda from being able to publically point at a political figure or party before or during an election - or any time - and say "You're shit, you're not doing what we, the people, want, you're lying, you're crap and you're corrupt"
It's like they don't want us to go about remembering stuff at such sensitive times (or at all)
I also have a problem with big businesses being allowed to lobby the govt in their interests. The bill (so I've heard) will do nothing to curtail lobbying of politicians.
One might argue that it was named thus because it aimed to make lobbying of the people illegal (unless by politicians).
YOU may personally be able to protest, but if you associate with people to do this and try to encourage others to join you, and try to reach a lot of people through advertising - ie, if you try to actually make a difference - you're now being naughty.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 17:20, Reply)
blog.38degrees.org.uk/2014/01/29/gagging-law-its-over-for-now/
It is a device aimed at stopping the rise of grass-roots protests, so that (I imagine) the only debate is on TV where the message can be managed.
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 17:39, Reply)
that guy was only going to use those eyes to read the Guardian
(, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 16:08, Reply)
