
One of the comments reads: "The fact this man ever faced charges in the first place is beyond sad. I've read up on this case, there was NO harassment at all. She didn't like him disagreeing with her, so she made a criminal complaint."
The comment in the video about a game where you punch a feminist in the face reminded me of the punch Michael Gove 'game' on here a while ago.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:01, Reply)

It actually punched Gove in the face?
How did they manage that?!
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:11, Reply)

and then he can sue her for loss of earnings
Edit - seems that there's more to it than the video says...
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:11, Reply)

If someone else's opinion on something or other really annoys you
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:14, Reply)

also, you know from this place how people don't like using ignore
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:18, Reply)

I really don't understand twitter. And not bothered to change that.
[edit] Apologies for the split infinitive, Amadeus, I know you're a stickler for proper spelling & grammar.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:20, Reply)

Other than seeming to be a very good way of fucking yourself over if you are famous saying something daft or stupid, regretting it and deleting it, only for every other tosser in the world to screen grab it and post it everywhere to identify you as a cunt
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:25, Reply)

i use it as a news feed mainly and often find interesting articles to read that have been linked etc
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:27, Reply)

Some of the stuff I've written here could easily come back & bite me on the bollocks if taken out of context.
/notbothered
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:38, Reply)

never post your personal details, never use your real name.
and that's why i'm not on facebook.
let's be honest we've all said things in the past that were a bit stupid even *in* context. but we move on. we learn, we change our minds about things and we grow as people. but not on social media. everything you ever said is who you are, forever.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:45, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 12:10, Reply)

As far as I can tell the main reason he thinks I would do it is so that I can waste time trolling people I know well enough to troll in person.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 12:20, Reply)

Which is why I'm also not on Facebook. Well that and its full of navel gazing narcissists who interest me about as much as the Kardashians.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 12:33, Reply)

today they are trying to ruin the career of Jeremy Corbyn.
The mind boggles.
and there's nothing wrong with split infinitives, this isn't Latin
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:28, Reply)

but I thought I'd use it to follow people/sites I like as a sort of news feed for interesting things.
Then realised I didnt care enough about them to even open my twitter app.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:28, Reply)

a lot of b3tans migrated to it as an easier way to throw artwork out to a wider audience
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:34, Reply)

is pretty disgusting.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:21, Reply)

She said, paraphrasing, if something bad happened it would be his fault. And yeah, the whole personal responsibility thing is not an unreasonable view to take.
Act like a twat, take the consequences.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:34, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:25, Reply)

metronews.ca/news/toronto/1108049/toronto-twitter-harassment-trial-second-woman-says-gregory-alan-elliott-wouldnt-leave-her-alone/
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:32, Reply)

Some of what he said was harassment, I think (although some of it fair comment). But he probably crossed a line.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:44, Reply)

who post in threads of people who have ignored them
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:54, Reply)

that's then bit where I think he kind of has a point: if you want to control who can respond to you, don't use a public mass comms platform where anyone can respond to you.
I think the case for harassment is more about the content than the medium, if that makes sense.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 12:31, Reply)

Changing the platform you communicate with could cut you off from a lot, or even most, of your intended audience. Victims of harassment shouldn't be expected to either retire from having a public presence or "learn to deal with it", as if it's some sort of innate price you have to pay.
Reading the article, the guy certainly doesn't seem like the worst troll that I've ever seen, though. Time in jail seems a bit much.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 13:42, Reply)

You don't have a right to an audience.
( , Fri 17 Jul 2015, 10:49, Reply)

it's up to the provider of your platform to cut you off from your audience, if anyone's going to do that. Following your logic, it's ok to harass journalists until they stop writing stories about you in the papers, for instance.
( , Thu 30 Jul 2015, 20:45, Reply)

figured there would be more to it
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:53, Reply)

And now he's whining because they've had enough and reported him to the police. He's like that kid on the playground who'd been told not to touch you so he spends the rest of every break following you around, throwing kicks and punches that barely miss and mouthing abuse at you and relying on the defence "but I didn't touch him, I didn't say anything, I've done nothing wrong". He could have stopped at anytime and just got on with enjoying his own life. What a saddo.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:50, Reply)

I note one of the women described as a 'prolific user,' which i'm assuming indicates she has a strong opinion on just about everything, much of which he obviously finds to be absolute bollocks, and hence expresses himself using the medium of Twitter.
It's sort of like an opinionated columnist getting upset because someone comments on whatever it is they feel the need to express to everyone else is their opinion about.
All of which reminds me why I don't use Twitter
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 12:10, Reply)

as a ruling in her favour would open the floodgates for court cases against her from the folk she's allegedly trolled in the past, including Mr. Elliott.
Here's her TED Talk on trolling, for anyone who wants a better understanding of her thoughts/manner/approach: www.youtube.com/watch?v=_KHEkR5yb9A
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 11:58, Reply)

news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/christie-blatchford-ruling-in-twitter-harassment-trial-could-have-enormous-fallout-for-free-speech
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 12:06, Reply)

"He and Guthrie, for instance, initially fell out over his refusal to endorse her plan to “sic the Internet” upon a young man in Northern Ontario who had invented a violent video game, where users could punch an image of a feminist video blogger named Anita Sarkeesian until the screen turned red.
Guthrie Tweeted at the time that she wanted the inventor’s “hatred on the Internet to impact his real-life experience” and Tweeted to prospective employers to warn them off the young man and even sent the local newspaper in his town a link to the story about the game."
She sounds a bit like a Stalinist
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 12:19, Reply)

Why is "Free Speech" seemingly only ever invoked to protect the rights of nasty fucks to say nasty things, and not to protect the rights of other people to call them out and expose their nastiness.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 12:24, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 12:42, Reply)

"stop being such a cunt, son"
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 13:23, Reply)

( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 16:01, Reply)

This is NOT a precedent setting case (reddit just believes it is because reddit is full of MRA idiots).
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 14:27, Reply)

I think it might be the subjectline that gives it away.
( , Thu 16 Jul 2015, 14:35, Reply)