
what about Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy? (the tv series, not that god-awful shitty movie).
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 20:15, Reply)

Also: This series was execrable tummyfruit, and the recent film shits all over it. Even with yer rap fella who can't act in it.
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 20:18, Reply)

But I'll freely admit its the only film in the world that needs less Alan Rickman.
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 20:23, Reply)

I remember listening to the original radio show through headphones, and it was brilliant. The sound effects were state-of-the-art BBC electronic workshop noises, and the stereo effects were great. Radio is like a book - you imagine the pictures yourself. As soon as they put real faces and cod special visual effects it spoiled it all. The killer was seeing Marvin. My imagined Marvin was much better and much more miserable.
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 20:24, Reply)

The TV series was OK because it stuck fairly well to the radio show and the advanced computer graphics were actually just animated drawings, but neither film did justice to the original radio show.
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 20:53, Reply)

The films were awful. The TV series was ok, the books and radio were brilliant. No argument.
I have spoken.
( , Thu 30 Jan 2014, 0:44, Reply)

None of the versions agree. None of them are canon, nor should they be considered to be. They all reflect Adams' version of the story at the time they were made. He himself is quite clear on this.
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 21:01, Reply)

It wasn't too awful up until then.
The film was dogshit.
The radio serieses and the first three books are top bollock. And the LP version, which is different again.
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 20:40, Reply)

Is my favourite, followed (very closely) by the radio series, then the books, there is no tv series or film
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 21:52, Reply)

( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 22:14, Reply)

But - heresy time - none of them is particularly good.
Seriously. It's just a sequence of pointless chases held together with fucking stupid names for things and undergraduate-level jokes.
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 21:38, Reply)

ok, mildly amusing, that's it.
some of it is proper cringeworthy.
( , Thu 30 Jan 2014, 3:08, Reply)

I enjoyed the books when I first read 'em: When I was twelve.
But when I tried to reread one in my twenties, I just found it awful.
( , Thu 30 Jan 2014, 8:57, Reply)

( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 22:01, Reply)

Sam Rockwell's Zaphod was a worthy alternative, Zooey Deschanel was nice to look at, the design of Marvin was lovely, the infinite improbability sequences were fantastic and the Vogons were excellent.
But the end was fucking awful, Rickman did not suit Marvin and Hobbity fella was a terrible choice for Athur, he didn't seem annoyed by anything at all, more half asleep.
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 20:38, Reply)

hmmmm zooey...:)
only bit i disagree on was rickman as marvin i thought was a good selection
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 23:26, Reply)

It very much felt that the film wasn't really intended for me; it was more of a family film, for people only vaguely interested in the books/radio series.
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 23:32, Reply)

I'm still waiting for them to release that knife that cuts bread straight into toast.
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 21:32, Reply)

The original BBC radio series was the high point. It rather went downhill from there.
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 22:53, Reply)

Is Dawkins, isn't he. Never made that connection until now.
Funny how, eight short years after its release, it's become part of the cultural landscape. Hard to remember a time when a book all about how God is a load of bullshit was so ridiculously insane that it was only mentioned in comedy radio shows.
( , Wed 29 Jan 2014, 23:06, Reply)