Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
What have you lost recently?
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:39, 205 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
so you can feel me dribble out of your arse one last time.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:48, Reply)
Have I mentioned that I think your wife is lovely?
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:47, Reply)
In poems and love letters to her. She's just waiting for him to finish the DIY, then she'll be on me in a flash.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:53, Reply)
This is why you're single. You know that don't you.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:45, Reply)
based on the amount of crap I've got to finish off today!
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:44, Reply)
luckily I have a weekend of doing absolutly nothing so I might get on that.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:54, Reply)
It's hard to see at the moment but it's really bad, it's going to take at an educated guess 10 years to get over the changes going through now, and that's just to get it back to 2008 levels of care, these aren't minor things either, people will actually die because of it.
So I really don't think becoming a gay gigolo when the health service is going down the pan is a safe option.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:59, Reply)
Just saying like
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:02, Reply)
enjoy it while you still can.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:05, Reply)
Actually I don't I blame that fucking self satisfied cunt Osbourne I hope he gets raped to death.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:13, Reply)
He's done nothing of note since he was chucked out of Sabbath.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:17, Reply)
It's the fucking internal NHS market place which forces say barnley primary care to compete with exeters primary care. So they have to buy everything seperatly and are punished if they overspend on items or services. And financial punishments for failing (relativly) arbitary targets.
It gets as farcical as individual clinics buying syringes individually when any company in the world would give the NHS a massive discount if they said "do you want to supply the whole of England with syringes for three years"
The finacial penalties are a joke, "you have to see x% of people in A&E within y hours" which doesn't take into account the number of people going through, so inner city glasgow has to get x% of 4000 a day, while somewhere like sussex has to get x% of 300, with the same £5k fine every month if they fail.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:14, Reply)
Don't get me started on the redundacies that are taking place or the three year pay freeze, or the abolition of the PCT's and SHA's and the FUCKING GP CUNT-SORTIUMS
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:20, Reply)
they probably are, i just don't know anything about it. but find an industry in the private or public sector that isn't going through the exact same thing. the bottom line is, the economy is fucked, there's fall-out, and it never ever falls on the people who caused the problem. they are swanning around now making millions because people are actually stupid enough to pay them to speak/write books.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:29, Reply)
people lose their lives, that changes absolutly everything.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:32, Reply)
it's not as black and white as money-v-life, and you know it!
the bottom line is, however amazing a job the nhs does, someone has to pay for it. this is why lots of other countries don't have it. and the money simply isn't there to do that, esp given the massive number of non-contributors who use it now, as opposed to when the concept was established all those years ago. in fact, the more money you contribute into the tax pot, the less likely you are to use it, as you are more likely to have access to private healthcare. so to make it work, they have to do something.
if it were up to me, i'd take money away from other things that i think are pointless and pump it into the nhs, transport and education, but naturally the government never think to ask me...
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:38, Reply)
You've been reading to much hyperventilating Daily Mail stranglewank journalism.
The private healthcare argument is massively spurious as the vast majority of medical situations require you to use the NHS first regardless of your wealth or private healthcare.
And of course someone has to pay. That's why you put taxes up and actually enforce collection of corporation tax, instead of bending over backwards and being taken by anyone who fanices it. Because, here's the thing - banks and big business aren't going to fuck off to another country if you actually start to tax fairly. they just aren't. So why even listen to that as a threat?
Your plan is fine, but you don't need to take money from other things. You just need more money. Easy. More tax. now THAT is fair.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:45, Reply)
but every time the country has ended up in the financial shit, it's followed a more left wing government.
the problem is that you are never going to get high earners to think they should "have to pay" more tax to support other people who choose not to work at all. so there will never be a definition of "fairly" because it will fluctuate depending on who is control.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:59, Reply)
I'd tax everyone more. High earners pay more money, but not proportionally more.
And that government thing is entirely untrue. It's happened once (Wilson's government) - I don't think you can call the previous Labour administration "left wing"
I'm not, incidentally, left wing. I'm very capitalist. I don't wave ineffectual fists at the nasty banks. Capitalism works. But the ONLY fair solution to financial crisis is wholesale tax increases, because it is the only thing that hurts everyone equally.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:06, Reply)
By abusing loopholes and tax havens and the like.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:08, Reply)
don't forget the lawyers.
but then the accountants and lawyers pay tax on their fees and salaries, so.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:10, Reply)
Closing tax loopholes would be the most fair method of raising more money, in my very ill-informed opinion.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:12, Reply)
They were too big to fail, they got a large amount of help from goverment and the government has now said they're not in the buisiness of micro managing the banks. Trusting them to sort themselves out.
Where as the NHS has had the soon abolisment of NICE (the only way it currently has to limit the use of overpriced undereffective drugs), a "real-terms increase" which in reality is cuts and a massive stuctural change imposed by the government. Totally the opposite to what happened to the banks.
This is all about ingrained mistrust of the people who work in the public sector by the government, and politicians in general to be able to do anything at all without them pointing out what they should focus on.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:48, Reply)
the problem is rather that the NHS (and education for that matter) isn't a business and shouldn't be treated as such. Since it isn't "allowed" to do what a business in the same position would do (refuse to treat patients if it's not commercially viable, etc)
There's no reason the any of the public sector should be going through this. All it needs is a political party in power with the balls to tax both the public and the corporate sector at a fair level.
I'm all for reform of the public sector to remove wastage and shit staff. But this is basically fucking idiocy of the highest order and it will bring the whole country to it's knees.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:37, Reply)
and you end up with the highest earning businesses/individuals being made to support everyone else. which is fine up to the point that it's fair. that point will be different for everyone. after that point, they will simply leave the country to get on with itself, and you end up with another "brain drain" like we had in the 70's when some people were being taxed at 90%.
i am not disputing the morals of it, obviously, but the harsh reality is that nothing comes for free, and if something has got to the point where it is unworkable, even if that has been caused by crap management or government, there has to be a massive shake-up to fix it.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:42, Reply)
That's more right wing horseshit.
Apart from anything else, the "brains" in this country aren't paid enough for it to matter what the tax levels are. You can't apply the term "brain drain" when what you mean is "voracious money grabbing scum with the morals of a hyena drain"
and, frankly, if the highest earning individuals don't like it, they can go and live in a country with a tax system that more suits their morals. Companies will not leave. Won't happen. Didn't in the seventies, won't happen now.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:49, Reply)
as to why you think people who work hard and want to be able to enjoy the rewards of that should be "money grabbing scum". so i am money grabbing scum because i work the hours i do after about 21 years in education and the last 10 years literally working my arse off, but that makes me "scum" because i resent being made to hand over even more of it to support people who have chosen not to work, or to have tens of children?
why?
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:01, Reply)
I appreciate you do well for yourself but I doubt (no offence) you fall into the catergory of people I'm talking about, who happily feel it's OK to try and hold the country to ransom by threating to take their toys away if tax is increased.
No-one is questioning your right to earn for working hard. But let me ask you, since you take that tack, what gave you the right to be paid more for your hard work than me for my equally hard and equally difficult work? You justifiably answer that and I'll agree that you shouldn't be taxed more than me.
And the "supporting people who don't work" argument is tired and untrue. That's a tiny amount of what your tax pays for.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:13, Reply)
and i chose mine. you could easily have gone into a job that paid more, you could easily have gone into a job that paid less.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:19, Reply)
as it in no way justifies why you shouldn't pay more tax than me.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:21, Reply)
i went into law for many reasons, but one of the factors was the salary. in return for this salary, it's blood sweat and tears. it's missed weekends. it's cancelled holidays. it's often not leaving the office at all from one day to the next. the recompense is financial. so why should i do all that for less recompense, when i could not work at all and hold my hand out for free stuff and then loll around scratching my arse on it.
distill out the hyperbole and you'll get the point!
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:35, Reply)
And I work, effectively, all the time. My role is basically three jobs, any one of which would stretch one person, but I have to do all three. I absolutely guarantee you I work as hard as you do. So, why should you be paid more than me?
Like I said, I don't begrudge you your salary for a second. But until you can justify why you're worth more than me, then you can't justify why you shouldn't pay more tax.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:46, Reply)
Are you suggesting that we can all have 100k jobs if we wanted? Societal pressure says otherwise.
Sorry to bust in, I am massively enjoying the discussion.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:21, Reply)
there's nothing in rswipes job that makes it "worth" more or less than, say, mine - she's paid more because that's how capitalism works, and I have no problem with that, as she freely says, my choice. I can and have worked in the private sector for much more money in the past and I still do on a consultancy basis when I have the time.
But since it isn't "worth" more then I can't think of one single justifiable argument why she shouldn't pay more tax.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:27, Reply)
but sadly it's not a valid one. I don't want to pay any more tax either!
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:32, Reply)
(in moths) I don't think there's many jobs that can ever be better than that.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:31, Reply)
but we can't all do that. every job contributes to society.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:32, Reply)
that would be a shit argument. I don't think people like firemen and nurses should necessarily be paid more, either. But I do think the more well of should pay more tax. Well, everyone should pay more tax, but you know what I mean.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:36, Reply)
although I'm glad you reminded me of that genius thread, who was it again?
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:33, Reply)
Even I have to take some pleasure in that.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:52, Reply)
When I used to DJ a lot I would lose a mobile phone a month, on average, pissed up jumping in and out of cabs. I once lost a brand-new pair of £150 Technics headphones too. New that day.
In recent months I've lost one wallet and a wrap of DMT down the back of my record collection. I have found 100 magic mushrooms though.
Worst of all is that I have apparently lost The Warriors' soundtrack LP in my flat: I can find the sleeve but no record. Similarly my 12" of 'Mama Said Knock You Out', this is distressing.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:49, Reply)
I once lost an eyebrow pencil and the shock nearly killed me. I spent a month hunting for the damn thing before I gave up and bought a new one.
Work is a different matter however, as there are other people moving my stuff. This means I can never find anything.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:52, Reply)
Walking around for a month with only one eyebrow drawn on your face?
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:57, Reply)
"tidies" things up and is constantly losing stuff. I swear to god, one of these days I'm going to find her phone in the fridge or something
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:55, Reply)
Denied everything. I had to buy them all again, and then found them a year later stuffed into a cupboard where they had no reason to be.
I still have them, to remind me why 'bitchez ain't shit'.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:05, Reply)
This wasn't the mother of my kid, by the way. I don't half pick 'em.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:12, Reply)
She's back with her unpredictable and controlling boyfriend, so it means she can't see or speak to me anymore. Considering we were inseperable only a few months ago, I'm pretty fucking gutted.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:51, Reply)
Anyway, that's enough of being emo for today.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:08, Reply)
But found it again. Now I seem to have lost a report for a case I did years ago. It's on the network somewhere, but a Manager decided to 're-organise' things, and now no-one can find anything.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:51, Reply)
having just come back from lunch and spotted Al's thread.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:55, Reply)
And I think most people are secretly jealous.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:56, Reply)
I don't have any real dignity either so it's fine. And if you all choose to believe I'm that bendy then go right ahead :P
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:01, Reply)
we would be unable to insert our penises because her mouth would be in the way.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:13, Reply)
Have you admitted to the whole internet you can lick your own tuppence? On balance, that could end badly or well, really.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:11, Reply)
it's just Al making stuff up. Although I did say the other day I'd rather kiss my own arse than kiss the step brother I loathe.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:14, Reply)
I only wondered if you'd manage to "comedy" answer in the wrong place to the autofellatio comment a few threads down.
Of course, now I don't know how I'll get over the terrible disappointment. I was going to gaz you for pictures and EVERYTHING.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:25, Reply)
Going to put on my usual work album (which is ( ) ) and get stuck into JSTOR
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 13:56, Reply)
I get the odd rush of libido but it's very few and far between.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:11, Reply)
because all I want to do is sit in my bedroom and read and not see anyone or talk to anyone
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:13, Reply)
Don't worry hon. Summer will be here soon enough.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:18, Reply)
Even if it's the placebo effect might be worth it if it happens every year.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:27, Reply)
my libido fucked off three or four years ago and never really came back. Summer or winter doesn't make any difference.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:28, Reply)
And I shall say to you more or less what he said to me: 'And what exactly can I do about that?' ie, bugger all.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:00, Reply)
oh noez it's raining I'll have to stay in listening to greenday.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:40, Reply)
You get all emo whenever you see yourself in the mirror. Just because Facial Affective Disorder isn't a recognised condition, don't go all mental about it.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:43, Reply)
I have few enough chins to be happy about the way I look
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:45, Reply)
I thought my collection was tomorrow, turned out to be this morning and I missed it
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:11, Reply)
every braincell is dying. What makes it worse is I bumped into the invigilator who pointed out that I have *never* not even once turned up at the right time for a collection.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:16, Reply)
Seriously, it was a tidy little time series of the variation in temperature and I can't remember where I saved the damn thing.
*awaits spang*
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:12, Reply)
Also, as regards the post you made earlier, in a different thread (see "Berk and Her Amazing Tongue", A. T. Geordie 2011), it is not so much the actual word count that needs to be boosted, but the actual content: I am sorely lacking an argument.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:19, Reply)
I'm sorry, is this the full half-hour argument or just the five minutes?
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:26, Reply)
Please, take your time.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:34, Reply)
Do you mean that the use of sections of the Aeneid in, for example, GCSE or A Level Latin lessons is detrimental to the analysis of the Aeneid as a whole?
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:36, Reply)
And I'm not just talking about GCSE or A level. The Aeneid was first used as an object of study a few years after his death, and has been used for study of Latin for hundreds of years. Because scholars focus on the "highlights" (the fall of Troy, Dido), this author thinks that we can't see the Aeneid as a whole.
Do you agree?
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:43, Reply)
But anyway, people focus on the good bits all the time, especially with something as lengthy as the Aeneid. Even The Bible isn't studied as a whole, due to all the bits that got edited over the centuries and compiled into the Apocrypha.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:47, Reply)
and the Bible is a load of pamphlets held together with a lot of faith. It's impossible to take The Word of God as...the word of God, when it's been through about 4 languages and countless translators.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:51, Reply)
because the Aenid is shit and dull and I hate it
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:36, Reply)
no more than Cicero. The popularity goes in roundabouts, no work or writer is sustained greatness, and overanalysis has contributed to a reading of Virgil through jaded eyes
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:48, Reply)
That's probably why I got a C in my GCSE.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:58, Reply)
Our core text last term was "Discuss the concept of the BFF", and this one it's "Poetry Porn".
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:02, Reply)
Virgil, I mean, not Brian.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:45, Reply)
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:49, Reply)
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:53, Reply)
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:59, Reply)
I miss GDS. When the weather's better, I might go back to that pub at London Bridge by the river, it's walking distance of where my friend lives now.
One of my sister's friends (an American, dear lord) is coming over to visit in... March, I think. She told me he had a liking for real ale, so I suggested the Porter (as it's in a nice area, things to see, etc.) Any other suggestions for me to pass on?
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:01, Reply)
As for your friend, I have many suggestions. It could be a long list, depending on how far he's prepared to travel for a pint.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:05, Reply)
-holds head in hands-
If he's staying with sister, he'll be in Kennington. She works partly in the Westminster area, but she might have another job by that point. Knowing sister, she won't put up with going that far. I thought the Porter might be nice to tie in with a visit to the Market, which is walkable (not that she'd ever do it) from where she lives.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:07, Reply)
I will instead say ... about this far: |----------------------------------------------|
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:40, Reply)
They're getting harder and harder to come by, it has to be said. I'm surprised you couldn't tell from the wood-grained pixels, though.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:55, Reply)
Sure, they reproduce everything with reasonable accuracy, but they lack that special warmth and clarity you used to get from a stone tablet.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:02, Reply)
everything else is all gain at the moment, love-life and work are potentially massively improved on the loser items that populated the back half of 2010.
however, i went to oxford yesterday, and as the trains were fucked i sprang the extra cash for a first class ticket so that i didn't have to touch any commoners.
THERE WERE NO FIRST CLASS COMPARTMENTS ON THE TRAIN. they should not sell first class tickets if they do not have first class bits. this is just thieving from innocent people. so, my temper with first not-so-great western, if that counts?
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:19, Reply)
Also, congratulations on the massively improved love-life and work situation!
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:27, Reply)
but sometimes it's good-good and sometimes it's shit-good!
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:30, Reply)
I have good and bad days, but I'm always doing morally-good work, and getting paid fairly decently in a place where I'm allowed to look weird.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:31, Reply)
Just because I posted a picture of what your vagina might look like.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:40, Reply)
If I got too close and my arm got sucked in by the gravitation pull of your chins I may never see my hand again
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:47, Reply)
is to travel by zepplin.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:21, Reply)
As someone who uses Worst-Late-Western trains quite often, it is almost impossible to tell the difference between their standard and first class carriages.
The only real difference is that instead of a copy of The Metro to read, you might get a copy of the Daily Express instead.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:33, Reply)
It appears that my brain has decided that I'm nocturnal. Morning all.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:21, Reply)
Not wanting to look like an auld codger or anything ...
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:02, Reply)
My super sonic sonar radar will help me!
*BEEP! BEEP!*
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:04, Reply)
I have ABSOLUTELY no idea what you're talking about, and I'm not going to Google it.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:15, Reply)
But only as a concept. I'm not going to look at the link. It would make me old.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:31, Reply)
to help me search throuigh Al's rolls and Lab's chins and hopefully find them again
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:36, Reply)
I think I left the first one in a train on the way to Amsterdam, then I KNOW I lost the other one in Brussels before I got on the Eurostar because I had it when I went through customs, and then when I got on the train it had disappeared. :(
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 14:44, Reply)
I myself lost one just a couple of days ago, after my lunch was attacked by a small dog.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:01, Reply)
In much better news, I got PURPLE ones from M&Co to keep my fingers toasty. PURPLE. I now have purple gloves, scarf and hat. All I need now is a purple coat and my life is complete.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:03, Reply)
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:17, Reply)
fuck he was a complete nutter wasn't he?
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:19, Reply)
who believe in one or two conspiracy theories despite their being flagrant bollocks. Much like him, they won't be reasoned with, even when they flatly contradict their own arguments. He was a particularly 'special' one though, it must be said.
(, Fri 14 Jan 2011, 15:26, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »
