Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Pitbulls and Rottweilers seem to be up there. Of course you can put it down to bad owners but it does seem a little disproportionate
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:35, 4 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:36, Reply)
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:39, Reply)
but the word family appears 111 times on the wiki page for list of fatal dog attacks.THats out of 246 fatalities so I would say its pretty common that the family pet kills
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:43, Reply)
not sure i follow.
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:44, Reply)
first family dog killer was a labrador, this screws everything up, still failing to see the bit that says it was well trained, where is that bit? cheers
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:45, Reply)
All breeds can be badly trained
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:46, Reply)
so no point debating with you, even that dumb bitch whose staffie killed her own kid defended the dog.
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:50, Reply)
i didn't realise i was even defending her, is she part of this discussion?
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:52, Reply)
i've got pics if you like too!
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:53, Reply)
that it's the badness of the owner rather than the breed? i'm so confused.
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:46, Reply)
so the breeds most likely to kill if they did snap probably shouldn't be kept as pets. Ie. the big strong ones
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:48, Reply)
but also there is no evidence there that any of those dogs were not badly trained rather than well trained and just snapping
edit: though i should point out, if there were evidence of that then of course i would completely agree. i don't disagree even, i just havent seen any evidence other than what people reckon, so far here
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:49, Reply)
So really the size of the dog is irrelevant.
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:57, Reply)
am i looking at the same info as you here?
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:46, Reply)
but there is no evidence that the majority of the dogs in the list were badly trained.
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:47, Reply)
so i have no idea why you thought the list proved anything
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:48, Reply)
So?
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:58, Reply)
as they are frequently kept as untrained guard dogs, so very much more likely to be in a situation where they attack
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 14:01, Reply)
when there were 15 in all of europe and it doesn't say how many of them were a well trained family pet :( i am terrible at research
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:43, Reply)
Over 75% of dog bites are from the pet of family or friends. Yes I know stats can prove everything
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:45, Reply)
are the sort who can't recognise the warning signs of a dog getting stressed.
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:54, Reply)
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 14:07, Reply)
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:44, Reply)
like, you might get yer ankles knackered up.
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 13:49, Reply)
and in fact apparently postmen dread yorkshire terriers most of all. but those dogs still aren't going to kill you, unless you lie down and let them chew your face off...
(, Wed 27 Mar 2013, 14:00, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
