b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 9821466 (Thread)

# 'ning

(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 9:58, archived)
# hahahahahaha!
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 9:59, archived)
# haha, will they rape smurfette?
youve got auto-hate enabled on this film though right?
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 9:59, archived)
# no, I'm looking forward to it
I don't think it'll be very good in terms of story. But as computer game cutscenes go, I think it'll be ace
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:04, archived)
# as long as theres pew pew lasers and some mild peril, i'll be happy
its in 3d right?
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:10, archived)
# :(
Is the slightly slutty smurfette dead? :(
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:00, archived)
# Hahahaaha!
BRAW!
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:00, archived)
# Hahahaha! :D
This is relevant to my interests. I never liked the smurfing Smurfs.
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:01, archived)
# Smurfist!

Heheheheh, I was thinking that when I saw the trailer
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:01, archived)
# sadly squashing it down to this size
made the Smurf houses on the second frame just red blobs :(
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:05, archived)
# Oh I see now

That's a pity
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:16, archived)
# my mate saw the trailer on itunes - and wasn't impressed
saw it on big screen last night and changed his opinion
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:08, archived)
# that's pretty much the way cinema works though
make it big and loud enough and you're overwhelmed
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:09, archived)
# earplugs not supplied
is it me or is cinema getting louder?
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:11, archived)
# The loudest film I ever saw was Pulp Fiction in 1994
wow, that rhymes
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:14, archived)
# I can't escape the feeling that one would be looking at a two hour in-game movie from a video game
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:17, archived)
# it'll be like watching
DOOM

with Dwayne 'The Rock' Jonson.
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:19, archived)
# haha
the only film I ever watched in a foreign language and still didn't miss anything..
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:24, archived)
# hahahahahahah
saw the trailer for that last night on the big screen

It does look good though. This is my opinion - I like "switch off and tune out" cinema

I saw 2012 last night and thoroughly enjoyed it even though it was incredibly ludicrous and contrived
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:01, archived)
# Ah, nice

Me and the missus are trying to get to see 2012 for two weeks now... one of us is always too busy though
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:19, archived)
# me and my mate were like that
saw it at the 9.30 showing last night

it's long

didn't get home while 1

I'm knackerd
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:24, archived)
# We're going to try for the Sunday matinee now
;)
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:37, archived)
# That's outstanding!
and would be a better watch than the real thing I fear!
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:04, archived)
# Bloody brilliant!
I saw the trailer for this and it left me completely cold - it looked like a series of video game inserts
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:04, archived)
# Braveheart meets Ferngully meets Pocahontas meets half a dozen computer games
does not great cinema make

But it should be some nice eyecandy, as long as you can watch it in 2d and aren't forced to sit through fuzzy vision for 3 hours
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:08, archived)
# I don't think they ever hope to win a "best picture" with this type of film
it's just there to be enjoyed - not analysed

I'd happily watch this kind of thing 20 times over than be forced to sit through typical Oscar Fodder

:_)
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:10, archived)
# Prole
;P

*quaffs mead from silver goblet and watches 7 hour long film noir from 1934 featuring one actor in a furnitureless room*
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:13, archived)
# yep
I saw that once

the highlight is when he scratches his nose at 6:34:12
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:16, archived)
# I always get goosebumps at that scene
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:20, archived)
# The only "recent" movie I saw in 3D was Monsters vs. Aliens - and I got motion sickness during a street chase scene :/
Yeh, eye candy I guess - It's certainly a "cinema" movie
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:11, archived)
# i saw that in 2D and didn't get any motion sickness.
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:16, archived)
# Up was beautiful in 3d
mainly because they only had one leap out the screen at you moment, and the rest added depth to big vistas. I can't help feeling that things whizzing past constantly and monsters leaping about is going to be quite nausea inducing
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:18, archived)
# So does this new-fangled 3D work then?
watching Flesh for Frankenstein on C4 the other night, it seemed to all be in sepia, and gave me a headache, but it worked... sort of, even if the 3D effects were all a bit blurry.

I've not seen anything NEW in 3D
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:28, archived)
# me neither
but I've heard good things
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:30, archived)
# In the cinema it works through polarisation with 2 projectors and polarised lenses, so you get full colour - it looks really good (just as long as you keep your head straight and don't move about too much :P)
On telly it's not quite that easy and therefore, looks a bit poo.
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:32, archived)
# in guesswork, luddite terms.... you wear sunglasses with a kind of twisted lense in each
So everything is darker and less vibrant than normal, but its better than the sepia look of old.

Which is why I'd rather watch the film in 2d. But its not being described as a film its a rollercoaster - just without the excitement, vibration and wind, and with lost of long story bits.
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:33, archived)
# Coraline worked in 3D too
I think it's the use of 3D to add depth, rather than throw stuff at your face, which made it effective and subtle, rather than gimmicky.

I'm looking forward to Avatar a lot. I bet I'll be disappointed, but for some reason I'm a bit excited about it.

Possibly because I'm tall and blue and it's rare to see my point of view in films.
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:56, archived)
# I thought the opposite in Coraline
It was horribly gimmicky, weird stuff stood out that distracted from the story - The first thing I remember of that film is a bowl of peas on the dinner table!

Terrible film, not a patch on Corpse Bride or Nightmare, appalling adaptation of the source too
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:59, archived)
# How odd that I disagree so strongly.
I loved the book, and I like the film a lot. Very different, certainly not a direct port over, and with a different feel, but I had a good time. I really liked the 3D, I didn't find it intrusive at all. The noly "showy" bit I remember is the flight over the garden.

If you want bad modern 3D, the excellently shite "The Final Destination" is a great example of a poorly made film that could have nonetheless been a good laugh, crippled by un-necessary special effects and idiotic, poorly implemented 3D.
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 11:38, archived)
# *offers around smurfetts still warm cadaver*
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:05, archived)
# "I hate humans!"
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:09, archived)
# Hahaha
'nings!
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:12, archived)
# nings
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:13, archived)
# 'ning matey!
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:22, archived)
# Hahahaha...
:)
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:13, archived)
# epic!
also reminds me of a recent south park episode -- if you've not seen it you probably should because it's excellent :)
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:19, archived)
# hehe
Dances with Smurfs :D
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:23, archived)
# That's the one
If we say "Dances with Smurfs" a few more times in this part of the thread perhaps we'll get onto Google?
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:26, archived)
# It was funny when South Park did it too.
S13Ep13 "Dances With Smurfs"
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:19, archived)
# I haven't seen SP in years, they're on series 13?!
last one I saw was Chef dying I think, but I'd missed loads before that too :(
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:23, archived)
# It's slightly erratic at the minute
but about half the time it gets it right and when it does it's better than it ever was
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:25, archived)
# when i catch the odd episode now
I always say "i must start watching this again" and then don't.

The last one I saw was the wrestling one which i thought was genius
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:48, archived)
# THIS ISN'T WRASSLING!
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 11:02, archived)
# bit of mindpiss there
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:24, archived)
# Not so smurfy now, is it?
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:29, archived)
# you can take that smurf and smurf it up your smurfing smurf
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:34, archived)
# *expletive removed*
Yeah!
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:39, archived)
# aaaw bless :(
:D
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 10:39, archived)
# I take it you haven't seen the lastest south park episodes?
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 11:04, archived)
# :)
(, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 11:27, archived)