
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular

www.news.com.au/national/older-mums-are-selfish-and-self-centred/story-e6frfkvr-1226157800677
utter, utter prick.
Well Barry, thank you for tirade against the older (potential) Mum.
I'll bet you anything you like this asswipe has a lovely trophy wife at home, who could pop out babies for him while he worked his way up (down?) to obstetrics. Someone who makes sure his din-dins are on the table and irons his shirts for the next day, while he dispenses his own special brand of wisdom to the masses.
Life doesn't work that way for some of us . . . especially when we "are" the wife.
Strong words from a specialty that only knows how to perform two operations and has the medical nous of a chocolate biscuit.
He'd better not break anything while I'm on-call . . .
Thoughts?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 10:45, 253 replies, latest was 14 years ago)

My parents were 37 & 38 when I was born, and my Dad is in better health than I am currently. Obviously my Mum isn't, but maybe if I'd loved her more, and not listened to as much Green Day, she'd still be here?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 10:49, Reply)

It's not really fair to expect a twenty year old to deal with care homes and dementia just because someone wanted to "live their life" before "settling down".
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 10:51, Reply)

but I can't say I disagree completely. Whenever some ancient man like David Jason, Des O'Connor or Rod Stewart become a father again at the age they are I just think 'selfish cunt'
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 10:57, Reply)

and dozens of other people should they choose to.
Actually I quite like Rod Stewert's attitude to his kids which has always been "they need to make their own money, why should they rely on me?".
I'm sure he'll see them right once he's carked it, but he wants them to stand on their own feet while he's around.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 10:59, Reply)

'those poor kids are going to lose their Dads before they turn 13' kind of way.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:00, Reply)

I have proof of this too. My dad went to open a tin of cat food, but my mum had left a tin of tomatoes on top of the pile of cat food tins.
So my dad opened the tomatoes and then got very grumpy because he had an open tin of tomatoes that he didn't need.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:09, Reply)

then I don't want to know.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:10, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:11, Reply)

to see if he'll do it again.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:20, Reply)

But then I've never wanted kids.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 10:59, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:00, Reply)

"But then I've wanted a dozen men to fire their hot spunk all over my face and tits."
To me, this reads as either you're missing the world 'always', or she's changed her mind.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:05, Reply)

I should have ended my original edit with "since I can remember"
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:06, Reply)

he may not have put it across very well, but basically he's saying older mums are more prone to health problems
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:02, Reply)

Are you Australian Mrs Legless? I like australian women, did you know that Poppet is australian? Maybe you know her? Do you like to do the TimTamSlam ? I like it when australians slap shrimp on the ol' barby.
You know this Amanda Knox person? Does she get any compensation for being in prison for 4 years without doing anything bad?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:04, Reply)

and given 3 years, so I expect the Italian authorities will just tell her to sod off
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:05, Reply)

Now we know that Amanda didn't do the murder, maybe the person who she said did the murder, did the murder?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:09, Reply)

We don't know anything of the sort, we know her conviction for the murder has been quashed due to unreliable evidence, but we don't know whether she actually was involved.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:10, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:14, Reply)

Thing is, I know the whole "No smoke without fire" thing, but without that, it means that whoever is up on court for anything will always possibly be guilty even if they are told they're not involved by the courts.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:16, Reply)

I'm just saying that a bold statement of "Now we know that Amanda didn't do the murder" is incorrect.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:19, Reply)

obviously we'll never know the whole story, but I don't think there was anything that said she was at the crime scene, that she had killed her friend or had any reason to.
She was stupid enough to lie at her first police interview, which looks bad, and she behaved oddly after the police turned up but that doesn't prove anything
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:20, Reply)

Knox and her boyfriend were imprisoned because the police believed they were somehow involved.
Good question about the slander thing though, rightfully she should be let off that unless she knew he wasn't involved and deliberately set out to ruin him
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:11, Reply)

and the court held that she was still guilty.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:13, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:19, Reply)

when I'm out there next year. Only they don't call them shrimp, they call them prawns.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:06, Reply)

I dream of a day where I can have a prawn that takes me 5 mouth fulls to eat.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:08, Reply)

but I think Mrs Legless has, in fact, met Poppet.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:06, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:06, Reply)

It's like someone walking into a pub, anouncing their views on a subject at the top of their voice, asking everyone else what they think, and then walking out without a reply.
Do you know if Mrs Legless is fit?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:10, Reply)

I know Legless moved to the other side of the world to be with her, but since he's no looker himself that doesn't really mean anything. He could just be grateful for anything he could get.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:11, Reply)

I can't imagine anyone I would travel that far to get my leg over...... OHHHH, OH, is that why they're called 'legless', because something to do with getting your leg over?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:14, Reply)

I should have drawn the line like you Gonz.
Cheers,
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:17, Reply)

Because distance is only relivent in this case because it estimates how long it takes you to get there, and to get to aberdeen I got the train down to Heathrow and then a plane to aberdeen. I think it was like 3 hours door-to-door.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:21, Reply)

Course, I'm still enduring a 3-5 hour trip depending on traffic. Last week it was 8 hours because of the motherfucking A14.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:26, Reply)

and you're leaving me, so I don't care anymore
*wipes away tear*
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:29, Reply)

I wouldn't have to leave the country.
Cheers,
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:33, Reply)

Don't you think that's a silly idea? She might be hell to live with.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:35, Reply)

been very nice. They (Greeks) are mad Puressence fans for some reason too.
Cheers,
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:16, Reply)

I'm looking forward to this.
I 100% honestly, on all I hold dear, thought Apeloverage was a 15-18 year old school girl.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:12, Reply)

Seriously, is the book much cop?
Cheers,
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:20, Reply)

That was quite entertaining, actually...
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:20, Reply)

Has the sex offender meme died as well?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:24, Reply)

I thought it was funny that Chompy was the only person who, quite rightly in my opinion, thought there was anything creepy in Gonz going back to Waitrose to speak to that girl.
Nothing again Gonz, just I remember working in a supermarket and the girls hated being hit on when they were being friendly / just doing their job.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:32, Reply)

I did once chat up a girl at Tesco, we're now very good friends, so that was sort of a Win.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:37, Reply)

Until I realised she's not even mildly polite, and I'm not even slightly worth fearing.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:01, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:17, Reply)

I can't help thinking about that daft bint that had IVF in her sixties because she'd chosen a career over motherhood, then gave birth to twins and popped her clogs 18 months later leaving her poor sprogs orphans. OK, she lied about her age and said she was in her fifties, but still... fifties, ffs?
Discounting the whole "it's not fair on the kids who'll have to deal with having older parents shitting themselves and dribbling on a daily basis" argument, it is a truth that there are greater risks involved for women who have kids later in life - I mean, look at what a flid AA is for starters.
That said, I had a colleague who had a daughter about three years ago. Both parents were in their 20's, but the kid had Downs. My aunt, on the other hand, had her third kid at 42, and she's perfectly normal, apart from being a Jesus freak.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:05, Reply)

At least they're always smiling.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:06, Reply)

I'm a fat little baby, but my brother looks like he's got Downs, it's fantastic.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:09, Reply)

it also annoys me when men make sweeping statements over what women should and shouldn't be allowed to do. I notice no mention is made of elderly fathers, but presumably no-one minds caring for an old man, as much as they do for an old woman who gave birth to them.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:09, Reply)

"Ooh, look, he's in his 80's and can still get it up, isn't that amazing?" Er, no, it isn't. Well done, you've just fathered another child. And you're probably about to die. Nice going, fucktard.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:23, Reply)

With the minor proviso that all women should be forcibly sterilised at 30. And all men who father a child and don't have at least a five figure sum in the bank should have one testicle forcibly removed (assless mistake you don't make twice).
I think we can all agree what a better society it would be if that were the case. Vote Tory.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:09, Reply)

I wouldn't have wanted a 60 year old Mum when I was 18.
I want a sexy 40 year old.
NO OLD BADGERS. THANKS.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:12, Reply)

He's writing about women, not to them. Honestly, who'd write about something like this to a woman. You girls just aren't set up for comprehending stuff like this.
Now, stop worrying about what men talk about, dear, surely you have some ironing to do?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:13, Reply)

I start typing a letter and all hell breaks loose.
OK, in brief:
1. I have met Poppet - lovely lady
2. Dunno about the Knox case - lots of dodgy evidence was aired earlier in the piece and I'm not entirely sure who's guilty
3. I am quite well - just got distracted writing to someone.
Anything else I missed?
Edit: Tim Tam slams are wonderful . . . you should try one :)
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:19, Reply)

One is a golden retriever cross labrador called Cracker, and the other is a lbarador called Rudolph.
They look so happy in the photos, which makes me happy. I wish I had a dog of my own. Do you have any dogs Mrs Legless?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:29, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:42, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:48, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:13, Reply)

Same with stopping smoking and drinking in my opinion.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:20, Reply)

The amount of health issues linked to doing either, even in small amounts when pregnant are staggering.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:21, Reply)

a woman who must have been 10 months pregnant, wearing a mini dress and smoking outside a bookies. Pure class
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:23, Reply)

she would have looked really pretty, so I'll go with 'no'
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:26, Reply)

Something like 3 small glasses of red wine a week.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:23, Reply)

Granted, it was 5 years ago, so things may have changed since, but at the time, according to what I read, there was no clear indicator how much was too much, so the only way to stay safe was to avoid it completely.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:25, Reply)

around about those levels, the benifit outweigh the risks.
Edit: according to some studies, it's hard to get much in the way of facts since the PC brigade stopped doctors testing on babies.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:33, Reply)

But their drinking definitely inspired me.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:22, Reply)

Those of us who got conceived before the advent of all these namby-pamby nanny-state health-and-safety-gone-maaaad Guardian-reading hippie natural-birth earth mothers, who's mums smoked and drank, grew up to be double-hard bastards. Fact.
Kids these days are all nonces and it's because they didn't have to learn to survive in a hostile womb.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:25, Reply)

No natural defences because they didn't have to be a Womb Warrior like wot we did.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:27, Reply)

Good weight - tick
Giving an absolute age after which he categorically gives his opinion that pregnancy is off-limits - no tick.
Calling someone 37 or over "selfish" - kind of impolite, especially since a 37 year old is not necessarily "old" - some can be so, physiologically speaking.
Giving this rather controversial opinion from his comfy home base where he will never have to worry about it - a little hypocritical, no?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:25, Reply)

he was actively knobbing 40 year old women and getting them up the duff deliberately.
As it is, his opinion may be distasteful to you, but it's not hypocritical.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:26, Reply)

a little/lot annoying to be stating publicly his opinion on older pregnancy - not fact, no stats, just a throwaway line about being "selfish."
Let me see if I can give a comparative statement. Smokers heal much slower cf non-smokers. So a broken bone in one takes more time and resources to deal with. Smoking also happens to be an individual choice that I don't agree with. I haven't seen anyone call smokers "selfish" for not quitting when they break bones and thus saving hospitals money.
And his opinion is his own - fair call to him. But to use his title as ammo, that's wrong . . .
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:32, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:35, Reply)

We don't have children yet.
I'm not Barry's "magical 37" yet but I am one of those who didn't choose to be older than 30 and without children. I didn't meet Legless until I was 30.
My job has taken most of my time for a while, and only recently can I feel human again.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:39, Reply)

In your comparison smoking is to age what bones are to pregnancy.
I think it's perfectly valid to think that older Mum's are selfish. The same applies to older fathers too, as I said earlier. (edit: Although I should reiterate again that it feels to me that he has his ages all wrong here, 37 seems young)
I think the 'looking after older parents' is an odd thing to focus on, but the health risks are proven and the bigger concern I have is that the older the parent, the more likely they are to die and leave young children who didn't get the benefit of knowing them for as long as they should.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:37, Reply)

joint replacement and smoking. Both choices, just like age and pregnancy.
A joint replacement with a risk of infection and loosening in a smoker is bad (bad, bad, bad) but aside from outlining the risks I don't preach to a patient.
I'm betting the next argument will be that a smoker doesn't damage anyome else, a pregnant lady with comorbidities does . . . :)
3....2....1....
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:42, Reply)

They can take your eye out. I read it in a book.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:44, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:44, Reply)

But now I don't understand the point you were trying to make.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:45, Reply)

My original point was I felt he was using the MBBS FRACOG (obstetrician) title to push his social comments. And I feel it's wrong - it gives the non-medical reader a skewed view.
If you convert the issue into another type of health problem, it sounds less like advice and more like "listen here, I know what's best for you ladies . . ."
I'll stop ranting now . . .
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:50, Reply)

has stated that he thinks women having babies older is more risky, a fact that is backed up by the evidence, and yet he shouldn't be using his title, that of "women having babies doctor", despite this making him better placed than most to form such an opinion?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:53, Reply)

of someone who is never going to have that particular issue, and who hasn't taken into account that plenty of older women are absolutely fine, and that everything in life bears certain risks. Would he rather a forty year old women who wants a child and is prepared for it, has it, or a sixteen year old who might be better physically, but in nearly every other respect is a poorer choice?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:56, Reply)

but what he's said is that of older women that come in having babies, more of them have problems than the younger women, again this is actually born out by evidence. So his opinion, based on this evidence, is that waiting to have kids and putting both you and your baby at risk, is selfish.
And to suggest that only someone who is a woman who is in that situation is allowed to have the opinion that it is either good or bad and that anyone else venturing such an opinion is "smug" is a bit ridiculous.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:04, Reply)

so I'm not affected by it, but I find his judgement offensive, especially the selfish comment. As I said there are risks to everything, and people are entitled to take those risks.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:12, Reply)

Or do you think that everyone should be able to do anything they want to, without any concern for how their actions may affect someone else?
Oh, hang on, you're a tory, you do think that.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:15, Reply)

He can give whatever opinion he likes.
He also needs to remember what his job entails, and that there is a degree of social responsibility with giving advice about his field.
The "selfish" part of the interview gave me the shits, not his opinion on when to have babies. The judgement passed on an older mother is the wrong part, not the facts he opines...
It would be like me saying "all smokers who don't quit before their surgery are idiots." The science backs up smoking as a risky behaviour, but my judgement of stupidness for smokers is wrong.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:58, Reply)

Say someone has a family that relies on them, but they are diabetic. They are told that smoking and drinking are worse for them than average people because of their condition, but they continue to do it anyway. That person is being selfish, they are putting themselves before other people who rely on them.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:06, Reply)

but do you think antagonising them and insulting them will lead to a change in behaviour? Nup.
All you'll get is "F*%$ off" - as seems to be the theme of the comments following the original article from a lot of people.
And to be fair, I have referred to someone as an "idiot" for certain lifestyle choices that didn't help his surgery. It was confrontational and probably didn't work for him anyway.
One of the first things medical students are taught (well, way back when I started . . .) is that judgements of patients are off-limits. What I think of someone is irrelevent because my job is to lok after them, even if I don't/agree with them.
Being judgemental of a person clouds clinical judgement . . . you tend to bugger things up when you're not thinking objectively.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:10, Reply)

He's not gone to an individual patient "You're a selfish cunt you are". And I suspect, that as a Doctor he probably wouldn't, for the same reasons you wouldn't, that said I have no evidence that this is true, but you have none the other way either.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:19, Reply)

It's not where his training lies, and I'm certainly not involved in public health, so I'm not going to give social commentary even in a subject I know a lot about.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:27, Reply)

I don't know, but given you based your comments on an article about an article, I can't imagine you know either.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:34, Reply)

And as stated before, I received the digest of the article as an email.
He's an obstetrician, admitted to the college in 2005.
No involvement in public health, professor at UWE.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:39, Reply)

I mean, why would I have a problem with that?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:50, Reply)

Except for those with big boobies.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:51, Reply)

but the risk of chromosonal disorders like down syndrome does increase with age. at 20 it's 1 in 1500, at 37 it's 1in 242 and it just gets more likely as you increase age.
I'm not saying he's right but it's not a simple case of "my body, I can do what I like" waiting to become pregnant in later life does have drawbacks.
I don't really get his point about looking after parents, that's a strain whenever it happens
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:31, Reply)

may have seemed a little more credible with a couple thrown in.
To be fair, some creative editing on the journalist's part to make the "selfish" comment prominent did the job of making me 1. look and 2. get mad enough to comment
He just seemed to come off as a pissed off little boy . . . "You nasty women coming in with all these problems - just stop it!"
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:36, Reply)

Taking his medical opinion "people should stop making my job hard" and trying to justify it with poorly thought out logic and moronic social commentary.
All doctors think they know what's going on in society, and how to fix it but they rarely do.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:40, Reply)

it's that I can't fix a bloody thing.
I cannot unbreak bones
I cannot reverse arthritis
I cannot uninjure tissues
And my job is not to be a preacher. I make the best of a situation after the injury. Preventative medicine is part of what I do, but insulting people isn't a great way to do it...
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:44, Reply)

You should get all your arthritic women pregnant.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:52, Reply)

She also continues to smoke weed, so perhaps her view is not so valid...
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:55, Reply)

That sort of thing?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:57, Reply)

But it's ok because she "doesn't put much tobacco in". Weed is fine apparently.
Oh, and she can't eat because it makes her feel sick.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:59, Reply)

In order to occasionally buy weed I have to occasionally spend time with people like this. It's nice to see how the other half live sometimes.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:07, Reply)

which you know will never even come close to fruition?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:16, Reply)

Always keep myself at least one removed from them.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:30, Reply)

au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/newshome/10391604/you-are-selfish-senior-doctor-tells-old-mums/
it does have some numbers in, but not many. But it's a report of an interview, so that's really down to the poor quality journalism that is so prevalent in the southern hemisphere.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:42, Reply)

didn't see that - thanks. I received the link in an email (hence my absence earlier).
Yes, some stats - and a little on the caseoad of that particular unit, which see difficult pregnancies. So I guess the sample is skewed a little . . . which I would've thought "Barry" might have taken into account.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:48, Reply)

you can't possibly know what "Barry" actually thinks, the whole article is a ludicrous puff piece designed around a headline whose only intention is to grab your attention. Which it did. But it only contains about 3 or 4 quotes from the guy.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:51, Reply)

the sound bites from the guy are very well picked.
But I still find it hard to believe that in the course of a typical interview those phrases would come up, so I suspect ol' Barry is a bit of a prick.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:54, Reply)

I don't see why it would surprise you that they came up?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:00, Reply)

that is a judgemental statement if I ever saw one . . . why on earth would a sane, logical (and someone who should be well-mannered with the public) man come up with that in the course of an interview?
"It is riskier to have babies as an older woman"
"It is more complicated having babies as an older woman"
There are far more civilised ways to say a similar thing.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:07, Reply)

I get that you don't agree with him, that's fine, but you're trying to make out that what he said is totally unexpected.
He has done an interview with a paper about his opinions on older women having babies. His opinion is that doing so is selfish. That's it, that's his opinion. It's an opinion arrived at by doing a job that involves coming in to contact with a lot of older women who have children and experience problems.
The facts are, as you say:
"It is riskier to have babies as an older woman"
"It is more complicated having babies as an older woman"
But his opinion, based on those facts, are that it is selfish of older women to have kids. And ultimately he's fully entitled to his opinion, as you are to yours.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:13, Reply)

the but about being selfish is unexpected, and very unprofessional.
His opinion is hiw own, and I disagree with him (although he can speak his mind on the subject at will).
What shits me is his position in this article is of a health professional, with training in a certain area. He provides facts, but also provides an opinion which is atagonistic, rude and does very little for his standing as a doctor.
He can't prove "selfish," he can't give me a percent incidence of "selfishness," - it a judgement that doesn't belong with all the other stuff there.
He loses credibility and objectivity when he uses that sort of description.
It's also a lazy way to argue - insult the population you are informing.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:22, Reply)

over that of the health of your potential child? 1 in 247 for Downs isn't great odds.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:27, Reply)

He's a medical profesional doing an interview, would you expect him to say "Generally, and it's not true of all older women, and I really hope you don't mind me saying, but generally (and I stress, this isn't with everyone, it's only with some (really sorry if this offends)) that it could possibly be riskier to have babies as a mature women (which doesn't mean you're ugly or insupiror, it's just the way nature is, I really hope that's OK with you, it's just my experiance, might not be true for everyone" ?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:25, Reply)

because it's not going to get reported is it?
I wasn't aware that hyppocratic oath forbade Doctors from having an opinion either.
I'm with you and Al, I really don't see the problem here.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:28, Reply)

but imposing opinions/values on patients is.
What I feel about a patient's condition is not relevant to what say/do to them.
It doesn't even come into the conversation.
Could you imagine your doctor telling how he feels about each of your medical decisions? It's basically not his business.
I saw the problem with this guy's choice of words. That is all.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:34, Reply)

How would you word "It is riskier to have babies as an older woman" and "It is more complicated having babies as an older woman" ?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:38, Reply)

but I'm happy to agree to disagree as I'm a little tired of making the same point multiple times.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:41, Reply)

that's not what he has done. he hasn't said to a patient in a consultation that he thinks they are selfish. He has offered an opinion at a general level in response to a question he was asked.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:41, Reply)

Selfish doesn't sound particularly measured.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:43, Reply)

If someone knowingly makes a decision that puts their self interest above that of other people who rely on them, that is selfish.
Selfish - concerned excessively or exclusively with oneself : seeking or concentrating on one's own advantage, pleasure, or well-being without regard for others
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:46, Reply)

I will not accept that sort of language is a proper way to address a difficult medical question, and makes the person sound less credible, and you don't have an issue with it.
And I need to sleep.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:50, Reply)

a patient comes to you and says "I've got diabetes but I love eating pies and cakes, smoking 50 fags a day, and drinking a bottle of wine"
You're going to say "Ok, that's fine, your decision 100%, I have no opinion on your actions".
Or, as a sensible doctor, you would more likely say "Don't smoke or drink and eat less pies and cakes"
And they will say "But I want to keep doing all this, and if I die my 3 year old child will be an orphan"
You will continue to say "oh, fine, your decision 100%".
Or maybe "You're being a bit selfish putting your cake and pie needs before that of your child, the way you are going, you will die much sooner than you need to"
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:43, Reply)

what I will tell them is the options for their health. If you do this, x will happen. If you do this, y will happen.
At no point will I insult someone if I disagree with them. "If you want to do the following to your body, - these are the consequences . . . "
What ultimately happens to a patient is up to them, except when something life-threatening happens.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:46, Reply)

He's make a generalisation. Based on risks backed up by evidence.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:50, Reply)

then?
Joking . . .
He's made a judgement on the personalities of a population, based on evidence (clincal and his own experience). Selfish is a adjective used to describe behaviour - he shouldn't be touching that argument in public at all.
And now I really am getting to bed . . . 'night
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:52, Reply)

It's very bad manners when trying to have a discussion with someone.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 13:14, Reply)

It wasn't eve theoretically nice.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:49, Reply)

Are they fucking mad?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:22, Reply)

"I've been workign on the Rail Road, all the live long day"
"Swing low, sweet chariot, comin' forth to carry me home."
It helps the time pass.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:33, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:27, Reply)

It's also wiser not to smoke or drink when pregnant and to have a good diet, all of this is good advice but no reason to make it law. There is also the emotional/financial aspect. Physically women may be best able to have l=kids at 18/20 but what 18 year old has the sense to raise a child well, let alone the cash, I reckon it all evens out in the end.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:34, Reply)

And they should all get council accomodation out of our taxes.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:37, Reply)

Early, subsidised, pregnancy kick the brats out to have there own kids when they are 16 and you are 32 and then you can have your life to your self. It would work, not sure how healthy the kids would be emotionally, but physically they'd probably be fine.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:41, Reply)

excellent jobs they will no doubt all occupy.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:46, Reply)

I shall use it to feed her gruel and dress her in sack cloth
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:53, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:45, Reply)

( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 11:51, Reply)

there's too many people as it is, children are just a selfish indulgence.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:00, Reply)

that's why it is encouraged
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:01, Reply)

still having a child is probably the least environmentally friendly thing an individual can do.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:06, Reply)

that or being Jeremy Clarkson
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:07, Reply)

is absorbed into the bummer from the bummie rather than being released into the air
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:14, Reply)

'utter, utter prick' is three words
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:01, Reply)

Oh well that explains it, very sorry for your lack of culture etc...
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:04, Reply)

Why must everyone lie on /qotw?
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:03, Reply)

and set up my own, better board on mingers.com
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:05, Reply)

but part of my always wants to say it "minge-ers"
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:07, Reply)

but it's still three words, you pleb
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:06, Reply)

That's really not fair to say that at all.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:34, Reply)

It is unfair of me to speculate as to whether Mrs Legless is still menstruating or not.
Unless it is for the lols.
( , Tue 4 Oct 2011, 12:40, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »