b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1831042 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | Popular

New Thread time
So, Christians are deluding themselves that this mornings victory and pitiful compensation payout to the mong faced air hostess means that they are within their rights to be bigoted despite the other three cases being rejected out of hand.

What do you think ought to be done about people wearing crosses and refusing to marry gay people and why doesn't it apply to the muslims with their ray guns and sheets on the head?
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:41, 195 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
Ban all religions, seems the fairest way

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:43, Reply)
I don't see why people can't wear crosses or whatever.
I also don't see why Christians should say they like gay people, what they believe is the word of god says they shouldn't.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:43, Reply)
this^
Sensible answer is sensible
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:45, Reply)
The hospital one was done to health and safety and applied to all jewellery I believe.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:46, Reply)
It applied to all the Jews as well yeah?

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:50, Reply)
free speech innit
If you are gay why would you want to get married by someone that hates gays? just go to a gay friendly church
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:46, Reply)
I'm just against "modernisation" of religion, it's old fashioned, often sexist and bigotted rubbish
the more honest they are about that the quicker religion will fade to obscurity.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:49, Reply)
So. It's not for you.
Leave them the fuck alone. I haven't got the energy to waste on them. It in no way effects me.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:54, Reply)
I got stopped by Mormons on wednesday.
IT WAS A MILD INCONVENIENCE
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:58, Reply)
I didn't know we had them in England

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:58, Reply)
MK is a bit like America

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:00, Reply)
Not true, there are no roundabouts in america*


*well very few
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:01, Reply)
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints.
I got stopped in Lewisham a few months ago. I thanked them, said I wasn't religious or interested.

And then I SHIT IN HER CUNT!!!!
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:00, Reply)
The way they keep changing they're beliefs as the modern world progresses really rather undermines the whole argument for religion I think

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:55, Reply)
I hate gays.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:00, Reply)
Then why do you spend some much time at Chariots?

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:04, Reply)
Hallelujah

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:06, Reply)
Because in two of the four cases
their "not liking gays" directly impacted on their ability to do their job properly.

ergo, they should be fucking sacked. It's not rocket surgery.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:20, Reply)
I think religions ought to be able to decide who they can marry based on their beliefs.
Whatever they may be. I don't have to agree with it, which is why I will be having a civil ceremony, for preference.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:46, Reply)
The point of this though was that a civil registrar said he shouldn't have to carry out civil partnerships
and another was a relationship counsellor who wouldn't help gay couples
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:48, Reply)
If you don't like your job, don't do it.
Simple.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:49, Reply)
*compares the beer mat*

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:49, Reply)
.com

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:50, Reply)
I think that was the joke in the first place lokesy you mongoloid freak of nature.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:52, Reply)
Because it is against their beliefs.
Who cares, get someone else.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:49, Reply)
this.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:50, Reply)
Bollocks.
If your beliefs prohibit you from doing your job properly, you should be fired.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:20, Reply)
If he's refusing to do his job, he should get disciplined and then sacked.
He's a representative of the government performing a legal ceremony. He doesn't get to choose unless it's illegal.

As far as the relationship councillor goes, if they're self-employed they get to choose their clients. They also get to be sued if they refused clients on discriminatory grounds.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:53, Reply)
Grow up.
You can't just discipline on a point of religious difference. It's one of those (few) things where an employer has to be careful.

The relationship councillor is unlikley to be sued, whoever referred un-councilled couples to him/her will be the one that gets sued.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:56, Reply)
I like how you can't mount an argument so you just say the othe person is being immature.
The whole point of this is that the employer was ruled to be totally correct for sacking the registrar for refusing to do his job simply because of his own bigoted views.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:02, Reply)
I'm suggesting that the best of dealing with it
is NOT the handwringing "sack him" level of PC that goes into these decisions. The thing with the registrar was easy to solve - he doesn't do same sex marriages, another registrar does. Nobody won here.

I have to say that I don't have a problem with people holding any of these views, they are not my views and I feel are misguided but that's the thing with views and opinions: they are easy to ignore.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:10, Reply)
But why should a government employee put all the other staff at a disadvantage because of their personal bigotted views?
What if all the staff at that council decided that they personally would like to refuse to help anyone called Steve, for no justifiable reason at all, just an arbitrary decision? That's exactly what's happened here.

You can't have a point of principle that says this council will not discriminate against people based on race or sexuality and then allow members of staff to do just that.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:16, Reply)
If it's anything like most public sector jobs,
a main part of the job description is to be able to work with and for people of different race/religion/sexuality and not to descriminate based on that.
He'd have applied for a job while knowing that he couldn't do that.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:18, Reply)
This is a standard nhs clause.
The jobholder must comply with all policies and procedures designed to ensure equality of employment. No person whether they are staff, patient or visitor should receive less favourable treatment because of their gender, ethnic origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, religion etc.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:20, Reply)
I'm not hand-wringing. As far as I'm concerned his job is to marry people.
He refused to marry certain people because he doesn't like their sexual orientation. If I refused to do my job because I didn't like somebody's sexual orientation, I would be disciplined and, if I did it again, sacked.

I don't see how the two things are different.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:17, Reply)
They aren't.
It's quite simple.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:18, Reply)
OK good, just making sure.
Stunned doesn't seem to agree.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:20, Reply)
That's hardly surprising.
He's not the smartest cookie in the crumble.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:21, Reply)
completely agreeing with Al yet again here.
I'm starting to get worried about myself.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:26, Reply)
You'll be frothing at the left wing clopper of indignation in no time

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:28, Reply)
Just as long as no-one starts reverse dutch steamboating swipe.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:30, Reply)
It's not a point of religious difference.
They are refusing to do something that is specifically part of their job. You aren't discriminating against them. They are repeatedly and deliberately failing to fulfil the terms of their contract. Their reasons for doing so are almost entirely irrlevant.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:23, Reply)
oh Kroney, I thought you'd never ask!
Of course I'll get a civil ceremony with you.

Doesn't really have the same ring to it does it.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:48, Reply)
Yeah, so gay couples should be able to get married
and have all the same rights and privileges resulting from that. I'm not disputing that, I'm just saying that religion doesn't have to do it.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:55, Reply)
An easy solution would be to exterminate all the gays, then these issues wouldn't arise

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:57, Reply)
Same with the asians. There wouldn't be any racism if there weren't any asians over here.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:00, Reply)
this guy gets it
and the irony of you posting this from poland is deep and rich
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:01, Reply)
Do you know, in all the time I've spent here I have *never* seen a jew?
I wonder why?
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:02, Reply)
Which other 2 cases?
To be honest Al, it's all a bit daft. It's point scoring and bluster. No one important or worthwhile could give a shit about a cross, or head scarf or funny jew hat. If it annoys you, then you have a problem, not them. If religions want to be dicks to each other then fine, but companies and organisations stay out of it unless someone is being abused in the workplace over it, it's not your business.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:47, Reply)
See my post above

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:48, Reply)
I also wager good money
that the stewardess bint was sacked because she was a fucking nightmare, and not because of the cross. The cross was a convenient scapegoat because she was asked to remove it and didn't.

It just rather backfired on BA
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:25, Reply)
Al, good to see the usual reactionary drivel from you.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:48, Reply)
Good to see a well thought out response to my knee jerk post.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:49, Reply)
Good to see knee jerkery is alive and well.
Where would us Brits be without it?
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:50, Reply)
Worst rated comment on the story on bbc is
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21025332
"When 11 Human Skeletons were dug out of the Dinosaur beds in Utah, the theory of Evolution died. Scientists who made their fortune from the theory would no longer have an income. Governments spent fortunes trying to prove the fable. Christians have despite a lack of funding always held strong for the truth and are providing evidence of creation. Therefore we get persecuted for telling the truth

What the fuck has that got to do with anything
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:55, Reply)
I must have missed the "Evolution being bollocks" memo

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:55, Reply)
Let's be honest, you'd have to be an idiot to believe in God in any shape or form,so you can hardly expect coherent arguments from those that do.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:56, Reply)
There speaks someone who is nearer their own birth than death.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:58, Reply)
that very much depends on lifestyle
anyway, you're not exactly ancient are you?
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:59, Reply)
He is.
Also, his lifestyle means he'll die in the not too distant future.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:01, Reply)
So Gout and liver failure are driving stunners to God, it's how he would have wanted it

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:03, Reply)
God takes any soul, no matter what the reason.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:07, Reply)
I don't believe in souls

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:14, Reply)
You're "our soul"

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:16, Reply)
This joke won't work in Nakers' accent.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:18, Reply)

accent brain
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:20, Reply)
We can't all be satisfied by your brand of safe mediocrity.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:03, Reply)
Religion is a comfort.
My dad went all Jesus when he got old. It sickened me but I let it slide because people don't want to think that humans are one big biological lightbulb and that when it's out, it's out.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:02, Reply)
But in Nakers' case the light is on, but nobody is home.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:09, Reply)
He won't be if my plan works.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:00, Reply)
I don't understand why human remains in a place near dinosaur remains proves god exists.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:06, Reply)
THIS COUNTRY IS FULL.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:55, Reply)
I've got a little scab on my finger and it really hurts and it all red around it, I'm thinking of picking it off to see if there is any pus under there? What do you think internet?

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:57, Reply)
I'd start at the wrist, just to be safe

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:58, Reply)
Ok now what?

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 13:58, Reply)
Get a hammer
and smash yourself in the face with it.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:00, Reply)
*puts on Cannibal corpse CD*

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:02, Reply)
Remember: down the tracks, not across the road.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:00, Reply)
I've got the scab off, it really hurt, but i was brave
now it throbs a bit, but there doesn't seem to be any pus.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:05, Reply)
Have you got something sharp you can prod it with to see if there is any pus deeper inside it?

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:07, Reply)
it's oozing plasma, think that's going to be all
I pop some TCP on it later.

Thanks for your concern about my well being though
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:10, Reply)
Salt will help slow the oozing.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:11, Reply)
I have pepper as well
I'll get seasoning
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:13, Reply)
Make sure you rub it in well.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:14, Reply)
I can't decide if these people are retarded or if I can get us out of the recession by whittling my own toothbrush from locally sourced wood
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21024336
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:00, Reply)
tl:dr
can you summarise please?
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:02, Reply)
Smug couple are only going to BUY BRITISH for a year.
He was on the telly discussing how he was going to build his own radio and mobile phone.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:03, Reply)
I'd do his wife though.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:05, Reply)
Only if you're British.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:06, Reply)
I'm 100% british, to be sure

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:07, Reply)
You sound a bit Irish to me.
And your name looks Irish too.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:10, Reply)
Or is THATS THE JOKE?

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:10, Reply)
That was the joke.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:12, Reply)
Could you explain it to me?

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:14, Reply)
I assumed his name was Persian or something

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:13, Reply)
Really?
She's not that nice, espcially when you're comparing her with a stripper.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:07, Reply)
I have a thing for Tartan skirts, I think it's based on my teenage watching of Wild Things.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:08, Reply)
I was judging this by the freeze frame on the video,
now watching it, I withdraw my comment.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:09, Reply)

comment penis
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:11, Reply)
I'd be slightly more inclined to listen to him
if he was also going to remove all foreign-built goods from his life.
Good luck getting any Internet technology, for a start.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:11, Reply)
It's so massivley retarded, "british good, forrin bad"

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:12, Reply)
This is the attitude that left the american car industry decades behind the Asians

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:14, Reply)
They're retarded. Buying something of the same quality which is more expensive is bad for the ecconomy.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:04, Reply)
Their son is called Lucan
therefore I surmise they can shove it up their arse for nothing and fuck off whilst they are doing it.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:31, Reply)
There are some occasions when registrars should be allowed to discriminate then.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:32, Reply)
Nope, people should be allowed to call their children whatever they like
It simply marks out pricks more easily for the rest of us.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:35, Reply)
Also helps teachers to identify the likely troublemakers just by glancing down the register.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:36, Reply)
I missed these judgements, linky?
I assume tomorrow's Daily Mail headline will be CHRISTIANS WIN BATTLE AGAINST MUSLIM BLIZZARD THAT SHUT DOWN HMV
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:00, Reply)

www.guardian.co.uk/law/2013/jan/15/ba-rights-cross-european-court
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:04, Reply)
Thank you
Landmark legal victory aside, that woman is doing very little to promote Christianity in that picture. Unless it's setting itself up as the religion for goggle-eyed mongs.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:08, Reply)
She shouldn't really be outside during the day
they melt in direct sunlight you see
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:12, Reply)
Christians or mongs?
Haha, trick question, one and the same innit
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:17, Reply)
I look forward to that article.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:05, Reply)
It is useful when they wear something that identifies them as a religious nut.
It should be made compulsory for them all to display their religious symbols.
Perhaps some kind of armband?
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:06, Reply)
Like a bomb vest?

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:12, Reply)
Yes, that would work.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:15, Reply)
in shallah.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:18, Reply)
"Shallah" being the Raghead word for "your arse"

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:19, Reply)
Raghead is a much underused expression.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:21, Reply)
And with good reason
Notoriously touchy, these Ragheads.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:24, Reply)
They should relax with a good bacon sandwich.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:27, Reply)
A couple of drinks would loosen them up a bit too.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:29, Reply)
Obviously anyone should be able to wear any symbol of their religion they like
as long as it's not deliberately provocative or offensive. It's basically emblematic of a long-held love or belief and is therefore no different from wearing a football shirt or band T-shirt. But just as if you wear a Hanson T-shirt to a Slayer gig or a Liverpool shirt whilst strolling through Manchester, in certain circumstances you're going to get shit for it, and no amount of religious pride or gross naivete will change that.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:15, Reply)
I quite want a can of Lilt or Apple Tango

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:15, Reply)
Me too.
Can you send a courier?
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:17, Reply)
So how long until Al deletes this thread?

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:16, Reply)
how long until someone gets me a can lilt or Apple Tango?

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:17, Reply)
I'll delete the thread once you have your lilt.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:17, Reply)
I don't think they even sell it downstairs...I'll pop and have a look

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:18, Reply)
Ther was no Lilt :(
But i do have an apple tango instead, it's alright I suppose
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:21, Reply)
I've finished it now, probably drank it too quickly to be honest

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:27, Reply)
This is fascinating stuff here.
Do you not think you should have started a new thread for this?
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:29, Reply)
maybe I will

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:31, Reply)
I shall hover my mouse across the delete button

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:22, Reply)
I imagine that the thought hadn't crossed his mind until this provocation.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:18, Reply)
I bet it had.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:18, Reply)
Then you owe my twenty pounds, since it hadn't.
Any deletion is now entirely your own fault.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:22, Reply)
I didn't place a bet with you and certainly not for £20.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:26, Reply)
Standard terms and conditions when you sign up to b3ta
Check the FAQ page
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:28, Reply)
Can't argue with that.
Next time I see Battered I'm getting twenty quid or he's getting a good duffing up.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:30, Reply)
Pfft. I'd really like to see you try.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:33, Reply)
So would i
i might even put a £20 bet on the outcome
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:34, Reply)
You could charge people to watch that.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:36, Reply)
HAHA!
Properly funny internet hardmaning here.

I'm just imagining Battered swinging wild haymakers and hooks while I stretch out one arm and push against his forehead therefore preventing him getting close enough to touch me.
(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:35, Reply)
Properly funny internet hardmaning here.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:36, Reply)
Ha ha.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 14:36, Reply)
This is going well.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 15:14, Reply)
I've done a snappy new thread

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 15:14, Reply)
I'm still reeling from the revelation that the man with the Irish name might actually be Irish.

(, Tue 15 Jan 2013, 15:15, Reply)

« Go Back | Reply To This »

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1