we're doing a sponsored image challenge this week
ask me questions
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:08,
archived)
yes - the winner will get their electricity bill paid for a year to about £500
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:11,
archived)
fuck that
I want a good prize..if it's an electricity company they can dig deep into their fat pockets
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:12,
archived)
well they don't have big fat pockets
they are a small company that adds a few wind turbines to the national grid that started with a wind turbine used to power an old army truck.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:15,
archived)
then I want a wind turbine as a prize,
so I can glue bread to it just to piss off the local pigeon fanciers
and if we win do we have to change to their electricity just to spend it?
(there's always a catch with these cnuts)
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:18,
archived)
and if we win do we have to change to their electricity just to spend it?
(there's always a catch with these cnuts)
did you know the production costs, energy used, pollution released and maintenance for turbines and solar power
currently outweigh any benefits they can provide.
The reason for companies pushing them is because they get grants and subsidies from governments wanting to appear to be eco friendly.
nPower are currently throwing lots of money to get a massive windfarm behind our house so we've done a lot of research :(
It would be ironic if I entered this challenge and won.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:19,
archived)
The reason for companies pushing them is because they get grants and subsidies from governments wanting to appear to be eco friendly.
nPower are currently throwing lots of money to get a massive windfarm behind our house so we've done a lot of research :(
It would be ironic if I entered this challenge and won.
yeah I know there's lots of conflicted messages on this issue
I have no problem with you entering your views into the challenge and if you win - you win.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:22,
archived)
!!!!
POV LEDs on a wind turbine displaying b3ta
That would be wonderful
ed. bindun:
hackaday.com/2009/12/02/worlds-largest-pov-display/
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:27,
archived)
That would be wonderful
ed. bindun:
hackaday.com/2009/12/02/worlds-largest-pov-display/
dunno
just trying to find out
EDIT: Ecotricity pick the winner. You can vote of course, but the prize goes to one picked by them.
Also ecotricity aren't going to do anything with the images - they are sill yours etc. It's not a cheapo way of getting stuff for a poster campaign.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:30,
archived)
EDIT: Ecotricity pick the winner. You can vote of course, but the prize goes to one picked by them.
Also ecotricity aren't going to do anything with the images - they are sill yours etc. It's not a cheapo way of getting stuff for a poster campaign.
Certainly true for PV solar,
but my understanding is that wind and non-PV solar this is not true.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:23,
archived)
The one planned behind us (8 turbines 125m tall)
would require various roads to be rebuilt and the turbines to be transported across the country from where they are made in Wales.
They would not be able to be active all the time not just due to wind dropping, but also excessive winds in the area, estimates put them at 30% efficiency (which is the national average I think).
Plus the usual concrete pollutants, 20 year MAX lifespan, untested engines, etc. And then you start considering environmental issues like wildlife killed (turbines kill bats not through collision but air pressure changes crushing their ribcages) and peoples lives disrupted my house would be less than a km from the first turbine, someone elses about a quarter of a km.
They are money grabbing cnuts. making a quick buck before the laws are changes to a 2m minimum distance from homes (like there is in Europe) which would cancel something like 80% of current proposed windfarms onland. Oh and they want to do these onland ones because its cheaper for them even though the wind levels/energy produced is massively less than at sea. See they couldn't give a fuck about energy production, they just want that subsidy. Rargh! Rant! happytoast has gone off on one again, get the tranquiliser gun.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:34,
archived)
They would not be able to be active all the time not just due to wind dropping, but also excessive winds in the area, estimates put them at 30% efficiency (which is the national average I think).
Plus the usual concrete pollutants, 20 year MAX lifespan, untested engines, etc. And then you start considering environmental issues like wildlife killed (turbines kill bats not through collision but air pressure changes crushing their ribcages) and peoples lives disrupted my house would be less than a km from the first turbine, someone elses about a quarter of a km.
They are money grabbing cnuts. making a quick buck before the laws are changes to a 2m minimum distance from homes (like there is in Europe) which would cancel something like 80% of current proposed windfarms onland. Oh and they want to do these onland ones because its cheaper for them even though the wind levels/energy produced is massively less than at sea. See they couldn't give a fuck about energy production, they just want that subsidy. Rargh! Rant! happytoast has gone off on one again, get the tranquiliser gun.
You are such a NIMBY!
You and your educated ways and facts and things.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:48,
archived)
personally, I quite like them.
Theyre not perfect now but they are a relatively new technology which, if we start developing them now, have the potential to significantly lower the amount of fossil fuels we use.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:52,
archived)
Outweigh how? Cost during production shouldn't be that much of an issue.
Do turbines and solar plants produce pollution? Or do you mean during manufactor/building? And if you do, do they produce more than during the building of a coal/gas/whatever plant?
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:30,
archived)
I would love them to be the solution I really would
and wouldn't mind seeing them out my window all the time.
But there's just too many problems with them right now.
Sticking them out to sea is an improvement because at least you get a much better level of consistent wind to make them worth the negatives.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:37,
archived)
But there's just too many problems with them right now.
Sticking them out to sea is an improvement because at least you get a much better level of consistent wind to make them worth the negatives.
I quite like the look of turbines.
I hear they're bastard noisey though.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:47,
archived)
that's what scares me
the sound reports that the power firms are using are at least 10 years out of date, they are pushing through turbines based on audio data of designs a 10th of the modern sizes.
Plus the "acceptable" level of noise is the same as a town high street during rush hour. The thing is, even high streets don't have rush hour 24 hours a day, villages with no through traffic have it even less :(
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 16:03,
archived)
Plus the "acceptable" level of noise is the same as a town high street during rush hour. The thing is, even high streets don't have rush hour 24 hours a day, villages with no through traffic have it even less :(
PV is a mess
The plants that build the PV cells have been dumping all the nasty
chemicals used in silicone doping in rivers in China. the PV cells have
finite lifespans of around 20 years; not long enough for them to make
enough energy to cover their production (or purchase!) costs.
Wind has problems, but isn't half so bad.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:37,
archived)
chemicals used in silicone doping in rivers in China. the PV cells have
finite lifespans of around 20 years; not long enough for them to make
enough energy to cover their production (or purchase!) costs.
Wind has problems, but isn't half so bad.
not as much research as the two academic doctors
who i share an office with i am willing to bet!
although they would say 'it depends' rather than make a definite statement.
fwiw, it's surely a stepping stone thing, even if for now they are carbon positive, the cultural shift is to be encouraged, as only through uptake will systematic efficiencies be developed.....
and on a more basic level, the farm i am selling my paintings at this weekend have a turbine that provides enough energy that it has recovered it's cash costs in 6 years.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:38,
archived)
although they would say 'it depends' rather than make a definite statement.
fwiw, it's surely a stepping stone thing, even if for now they are carbon positive, the cultural shift is to be encouraged, as only through uptake will systematic efficiencies be developed.....
and on a more basic level, the farm i am selling my paintings at this weekend have a turbine that provides enough energy that it has recovered it's cash costs in 6 years.
Blimey! Good Prize, but..
Isn't it a little ironic that the prize will allow you to waste as much 'leccy as you want for a year...
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:13,
archived)
you could charge your neighbours to run extension cables to their houses
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:14,
archived)
You could heat your garden all year round with thirty 3-bar heaters
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:15,
archived)
can they just send the money
so I can buy drugs with it.
I am in constant pain and am worried that the doctor will stop prescribing Diazepam so need to prepare to buy it on the black market
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:14,
archived)
I am in constant pain and am worried that the doctor will stop prescribing Diazepam so need to prepare to buy it on the black market
dress up as a cat/dog/llama
and get taken to the vets. They'll give you anything as long as its paid for
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:15,
archived)
tsk
only questions with a question-mark will be accepted . . .
'allo Toasty!
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:11,
archived)
'allo Toasty!
I like chips a lot but I'm on a diet
so I'll go for Daddy. As eating my dad would make me vomit - more weight loss.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:33,
archived)
Were you in Vortin's diamond warehouse on the night of the 14th?
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:11,
archived)
Was growing a hitler moustache as funny as you thought it would be?
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:11,
archived)
it was small gingery and I didn't look much like hitler
more a paedophile
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:20,
archived)
Do they know what happened last time.....
...and the time before?
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:11,
archived)
I have told them about Virgin
but they are keen - it puzzles me too
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:20,
archived)
Either they have a b3tan insider
or want to be 'edgy'.
or something else.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:25,
archived)
or something else.
I think the problem was that Branson had only just stopped having nightmares about being chained to a radiator and pissed on by rob
and the challenge brought it all back.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:28,
archived)
Know anyone good in the Central Belt who can replace my kitchen?
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:11,
archived)
Unfortunately no*
I was just repeating Ben Wheatley's reply to the "what's the best question we could ask" question.
*living near Grantham now, so it's just an hour into Kings Cross, hoorah!
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 16:03,
archived)
*living near Grantham now, so it's just an hour into Kings Cross, hoorah!
why can't they invent a kind of electricity tablet that you just add water too?
can they get me a cheaper deal on my car insurance?
what really happened to the dinosaurs?
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:13,
archived)
what really happened to the dinosaurs?
Until you forget and leave one in the pocket of the trousers you just put in the washing machine!
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:16,
archived)
Washing machine eats electric,
so maybe that's what you'd do anyway.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:18,
archived)
because if I didn't do the occasional commercial sponsorship thing
I wouldn't be able to afford to put the time in it takes to run the site
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:19,
archived)
No no no that isn't wacky and/or crazy. Be more wacky and/or crazy.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:20,
archived)
I would be a much, much, much bigger sellout than Rob
If I owned b3ta
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:21,
archived)
my attitude is to let stuff in a bit
but don't hammer it so that there's still a website worth visiting.
Always thought I'd completely alienate the core members if it was sponsored this and that every week.
But it's also possible that I worry about nothing and a complete sell out would mean I had a much better life and B. B3ta would be loads better as I could afford to develop it more etc.
Who knows?
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:26,
archived)
Always thought I'd completely alienate the core members if it was sponsored this and that every week.
But it's also possible that I worry about nothing and a complete sell out would mean I had a much better life and B. B3ta would be loads better as I could afford to develop it more etc.
Who knows?
You know I was kidding, champ.
Here, I'll change my question to:
Do you iron your t-shirts once you've washed them, or just let them dry and fold them?
PLS ANSWER QUICK OMG.
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:28,
archived)
Do you iron your t-shirts once you've washed them, or just let them dry and fold them?
PLS ANSWER QUICK OMG.
It's great as it is.
Except maybe the borken search function...
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:32,
archived)
what's the challenge going to be then?
are they as shite as VoteForAChange?
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:23,
archived)
it's going to be quicker
it's a week long challenge - that I promise!
( ,
Wed 16 Jun 2010, 15:32,
archived)