b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Creationism » Message 7294365

[challenge entry] ..I'm on the side of Creationism

From the Creationism challenge. See all 279 entries (closed)

(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:35, archived)
# That's quite clever fella.
Except there is a flaw in your logic ;) Oasis have clearly evolved to be a far better band than the Beatles ever were and with slightly less drugs. Probably.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:37, archived)
# hahahahaha
you're a funny guy
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:37, archived)
# ^this
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:38, archived)
# you thrive on the anticipation of the debate that's now gonna kick off, don't you ;)
/although saying that, I never really rated the Beatles much

*prepares for stoning*
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:38, archived)
# rolling stoning ?
..
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:40, archived)
# I much prefer the Stones as a group
and always remember that a rolling stonehead gathers Kate Moss
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:42, archived)
# A rolling stone gathers momentum
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:43, archived)
# A stoned Moss rolls no more...
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:48, archived)
# i'm with you
they were ok

mind you, the beach boys were a musical revelation when they were first around, but they're wallpaper music these days - maybe it was the same with the beatles
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:41, archived)
# more than likely, I don't dislike their music, it's just very 'samey'
some of Lennon's solo stuff is superb, and I'd much rather listen to that
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:42, archived)
# for sure
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:43, archived)
# ^ Lennon


and also George
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:44, archived)
# aye
There's something about Macca that's irks me every time I see or hear him
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:44, archived)
# uh oh
you've just pressed one of m3's buttons
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:45, archived)
# I often do that, it's my magnetic sexual appeal
*May contain more than 100% of lies, unless anyone wants to stroke my ego here...guys girls....GUYS GIRLS????
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:46, archived)
# don't you mean
girls?...GIRLS?
or is there something you want to share with the group?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:48, archived)
# Edited for clarity...
/do I look that fussy?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:50, archived)
# *strokes*
Oh ... ego ..... meh
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:49, archived)
# it's a start... :D
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:51, archived)
# I love the Beach Boys.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:43, archived)
# so do i
but having grown up with them, they don't sound revolutionary
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:44, archived)
# Oh yes, see what you mean.
I remember when we moved, my dad made sure I had a copy of Pet Sounds... :D

No, not revolutionary to me- but then Frank Zappa doesn't confuse me down to my Pops as well. I think it's fathers, they brainwash you into it.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:46, archived)
# i own trout mask replica
but i've only played it once,
well, some of it
well, some of bits of it
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:49, archived)
# You've just looked at it and then found something better to do, haven't you?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:49, archived)
# i honestly tried
i did

but i failed
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:50, archived)
# ^This
it's terrible.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:52, archived)
# :D
I own loads of terrible music, and love it all.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:57, archived)
# Trout Mask Replica
was probably the most unlistenable 'music' I have ever encountered. Captain Beefheart's other albums weren't much better.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:03, archived)
# I'm sure I could find you something
FAR more unlistenable...
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:06, archived)
# Have you heard Besnard Lakes?
Kind of Beach Boys high floaty vocals, but with Arcade Fire / other alternative type bits... they're rather wonderful...
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:49, archived)
# Oooh, I shall give them a bash.
Cheers!
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:50, archived)
# They did some good tunes
but compared to the total number of tunes they wrote my verdict is mediocre

/throw enough shit at a wall and some of it will stick blog
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:42, archived)
# an intersting theory.
i've always thought they were a tad over rated but i guess they were original.

oasis on the other hand are just plain shit.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:45, archived)
# I find changing the lyrics in your head makes any Oasis song sound infintely better...
"I said may-beeeeee, I'm sure I ordered chips and gra-vy" works fine for me.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:49, archived)
# Correct.
And the rolling stones are only slightly more shit than Hendrix, The Doors and Bob Marley. I loved the Beatles and bought everything they ever released and on vinyl. I'd still rather listen to Oasis than them these days, Old stuff is just too dated. I'd rather listen to The Freemasons or Soulcast than Oasis. hed Kandi all the way for me as I like to think I progress with the music. There might be less genius around than in the past ( and remember I was there for most of it ) but modern production techniques make for some seriously clever stuff today that was not possible in the 60's.

Mostly people's defence of their musical past is just a misguided self-hypnosis to convince themselves that there really were those 'good old days'

But essentially I just said the first thing that popped into my head that I knew would cause a row ;)
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:02, archived)
# All the above posts are simply wrong.
The later Beatles stuff is still amongst the best music ever written. Oasis are like puny torch bulb running from a nearly dead 1.5V battery in comparison to the floodlight of the Beatles.

That is all.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:38, archived)
#
less fewer

/pedant
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:38, archived)
# *reads again*
what?!

is this serious?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:38, archived)
# What??
*Does Donald Sutherland pointy finger thing at end of Body Snatchers*
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:38, archived)
# ..
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:38, archived)
# hm
they haven't even evolved, so forget the bit about the Beatles
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:40, archived)
# I'm not a big fan of the beatles to be honest
but even I know they're better than wassis
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:42, archived)
# hahahahahahaha
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:45, archived)
# Beatles? Oasis?
What silly names, everyone knows Cab Calloway is much better
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:48, archived)
# Actually this ^
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:52, archived)
# The Beatles are overrated
but Oasis are shite.

On balance, the Beatles win.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:52, archived)
# Fuck yeah
The Beatles were vastly overrated. I'd rather listen to Cliff Richard.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:11, archived)
# silly BBD
cloning the beatles with status quo is not creationism.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:37, archived)
# why is there two liams
?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:38, archived)
# That's Andy Bell
formerly of Hurricane #1, more formally than that in an actually good band - Ride.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:40, archived)
# And better yet
he of Erasure fame.

;)
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:43, archived)
# No that's Vince...
Hang on..

You're fooling with me aren't you...

c'mere you...
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:51, archived)
# I do like to fool with Yazoo
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:58, archived)
# You freebase milkshake?
Woah, hardcore..

*back off*
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 16:00, archived)
# that's what I though
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:42, archived)
[challenge entry] I Think I may burn for this !!!!
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

sorry for crapness ... rushed lol.
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:39, archived)
# Fuck me


You broke the internets.



edit/

W-what?
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:40, archived)
# lol!!!!111!!!!
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:40, archived)
# The dolphins were monkeys..That didn't like the land
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:41, archived)
# I meant to woo this earlier, so shall do so here :)
great stuff
(, Thu 14 Jun 2007, 15:56, archived)