Last pic post tonight
So obey the god of rock guitar etc etc. Youd better.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:46,
archived)
ahh...a nice warm beach.
Even with the big scary kid head, it looks inviting.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:20,
archived)
I don't enjoy it as much as I used to.
But I equate beaches with warmth, which is sadly lacking outdoors right now.
Plus, I like water. As long as I don't have to breathe it.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:37,
archived)
Plus, I like water. As long as I don't have to breathe it.
The big head's body should be a spring,
and he should be bouncing.
5/10. Must try harder.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:21,
archived)
5/10. Must try harder.
ok, i'l try harder after I've psoted this which doesnt deserve it's own thread.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:25,
archived)
I like that.
It works nicely. It might make a sober man feel dizzy after a while.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:26,
archived)
I did wonder.
Wasn't sure if it was only 2 , but the effect made it look like more.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:32,
archived)
4
see Tweaknik's "epilography" tutorial.
It's that, but TO THE MAX!! because i enjoy pushing the envelope.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:32,
archived)
It's that, but TO THE MAX!! because i enjoy pushing the envelope.
I dig the spacks.
The movement (or illusion of such) fascinates me.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:31,
archived)
Fuck the compo
I wont the Bob Ross one and got special mention for the Kenny Loggins one too. As far as I'm concerned I can never do better in any other compo, for they were the best ones!
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:31,
archived)
Of course it's good, I made it
*smug*
Nah, i just dont even think about compos unless they really capture my imagination anymore.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:35,
archived)
Nah, i just dont even think about compos unless they really capture my imagination anymore.
Arf!
edit: on a random note im listenng to the scarface soundtrack, so funny.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:12,
archived)
This town is like a big pussy just waiting to be fucked!
Edit: Woo! Icon! Me so happy me could shit!
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:26,
archived)
"Sir, you smell!"
"No, YOU smell. I stink."
- Mark Twain (I think) to a hapless fellow passenger on a train.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:17,
archived)
- Mark Twain (I think) to a hapless fellow passenger on a train.
odd.
i don't know whether to like this one.
hmmm... *strokes chin*
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:58,
archived)
hmmm... *strokes chin*
Executed perfectly inline with the FAQs..
"it reminds me of this..."
Arf!...and a class pic besides.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:13,
archived)
Arf!...and a class pic besides.
perhaps there's a pun to this that i don't see.
i love it anyway.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:13,
archived)
*suddenly realises things have to make sense on b3ta*
*ponders own existence*
*world implodes*
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:23,
archived)
*world implodes*
hehehhheggehhhhhehhhhehehehhaahahha
great, I just laughed so hard my neck hurts.
yay!
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:58,
archived)
yay!
indeed
I started laughing at the gag thinking it referred to the dog.
then I noticed the magic portally thing.
heh.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:02,
archived)
then I noticed the magic portally thing.
heh.
I spotted that,
but thought I'd make a crap sex related gag instead.
meh
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:06,
archived)
meh
I hadn't quite got to you, I was busy knocking out another piece of shit
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:07,
archived)
if i downloaded it now would i
be a peadophile?
/searches interwebanet
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:56,
archived)
/searches interwebanet
well when i was younger than 16 i used to fancy people my own age
so yes i suppose i was a peodophile.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:58,
archived)
no, no.
i mean "were" in the emphatic sense--if you were inadvertently a paedophile while watching alex mac, you'd be a paedophile. but watching alex mack, ipso facto, you wouldn't be a paedophile.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:16,
archived)
it's rather hard to find
I had to track down an irc channel that served nick shows- and even then I could only find single episodes, not the full series
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:57,
archived)
Well I wanted to have something light up for 2 seconds
I have now changed my plan to have it flash on and off x times instead, so I can just use a simply for loop type thing.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:41,
archived)
i really hated java
its so shit at anything to be honest. I prefer perl or php. can live with that.
/end nerd rant back to history essayedge
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:44,
archived)
/end nerd rant back to history essayedge
Oh..
Can't help in that case..Java appears to be a dieing language...
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:03,
archived)
it
works, but I is wasted. so that probably don't count for niffink
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:41,
archived)
put your nose
right on the screen and go cross eyed. It sort of goes 3D
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:44,
archived)
Like hell it does
If it was intended for 3D then Id get some glasses for that...not put my face on the screen like a spacker...no offense
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:46,
archived)
sit about a foot from the monitor
cross your eyes so the image lines up
or, custom-make a stereoscope to fit each of the images, and look through that.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:48,
archived)
or, custom-make a stereoscope to fit each of the images, and look through that.
Oh yeah I forgot about that
*Looks for the sterioscope I made for occasions where I may need one*
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:50,
archived)
well, if you don't want to do the latter,
go with the former.
if you don't want to do either, you can't experience the magic of the picture, and you have no grounds for complaint.
EDIT: do you know how to cross your eyes?
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:51,
archived)
if you don't want to do either, you can't experience the magic of the picture, and you have no grounds for complaint.
EDIT: do you know how to cross your eyes?
I can cross my eyes
But if I dont see it like other people dont see it then whats the problem?
EDIT: its a double image for both scenes anyway so where does the sterioscope thing come into it?
*checks name to make sure he is a photographer*
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:55,
archived)
EDIT: its a double image for both scenes anyway so where does the sterioscope thing come into it?
*checks name to make sure he is a photographer*
In photoshop
overlaying one image against the other, one of them has been skewed or rotated...but sadly it still doesn't work for me either... you must have funny eyes dude! =)
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:59,
archived)
They are not identical images.
They are screen shots taken from two different points of view just like your eyes see two different points of view.
The amount you cross your eyes is about the same as looking at something up close. You just need to control how much by lining up the pics to form a 3rd image between the original two. Practice a little and when you get it it will pop out at you.
Not to mention that the resolution gets extremly clear because of the combined images.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:00,
archived)
The amount you cross your eyes is about the same as looking at something up close. You just need to control how much by lining up the pics to form a 3rd image between the original two. Practice a little and when you get it it will pop out at you.
Not to mention that the resolution gets extremly clear because of the combined images.
I wish I could see it
I CAN see those other 3d type 'magic eye' pics, but not this one.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:01,
archived)
Ah right..Sorry guys
I admit I didnt try the photoshop bit. But in eye terms I didnt see the illusion. Sorry. No offense obviously. Just didnt work for me :-S
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:03,
archived)
if you're doing it properly, the image in your head should look something like this:
img.photobucket.com/albums/v122/barnaclese/stereoeyesexample.jpg
but the middle image shouldn't be blurry, as you only look at about 3 degrees at a time, so the image, like in real life, lines up with anything you're focusing on or anything just as far away, but things that are closer or farther away don't line up. your brain rights this and determines how deep objects are relative to what you're looking at.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:05,
archived)
but the middle image shouldn't be blurry, as you only look at about 3 degrees at a time, so the image, like in real life, lines up with anything you're focusing on or anything just as far away, but things that are closer or farther away don't line up. your brain rights this and determines how deep objects are relative to what you're looking at.
But why?
You have 3 images of differing brightness/contrast...and slightly differing angles. Maybe if it was through a stereoscope Id see it but when its onscreen I doubt it. Sorry!
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:08,
archived)
I have a 19" monitor..
I get the feeling my eyes arn't big enough for this screen-effect!..lol
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:08,
archived)
i sized it down; this is just an example. it doesn't work on a two-dimensional medium unless there are actually two separate pictures.
what i'm illustrating with this picture i've posted is how much you should cross your eyes.
you should cross your eyes so that the middle image lines up like that.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:10,
archived)
you should cross your eyes so that the middle image lines up like that.
Sorry..
Just doesn't work on my screen/eyes.
If it did you could write a book and make more pics and get rich! Woo!
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:16,
archived)
If it did you could write a book and make more pics and get rich! Woo!
Its easy,
Just go crosseyed so your lefteye looks at the right image and righteye t'other
then focus on the third image that appears inbetween
it is fuckin' freaky
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:52,
archived)
then focus on the third image that appears inbetween
it is fuckin' freaky
Actually the further away from the screen you are
the better it works. About arms length is good.
Be sure there is no glare on your screen from light behind you. Keep your eyes level with the picture and look at it straight on.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:43,
archived)
Be sure there is no glare on your screen from light behind you. Keep your eyes level with the picture and look at it straight on.
Ive seen more of my room than I care to see to be honest
trying to find something in that...I just dont see it. Im sorry. Dont hate me for that but I really dont get it :-S
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:49,
archived)
Exactly
No offense intended but all I see is 2 images for each thing. Glad Im not the only one.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:51,
archived)
maybe this will work...
x
/edit deleted cos it was doin me ed in.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:16,
archived)
/edit deleted cos it was doin me ed in.
it does if you blink your eyes right
or if you wave your hand in front of the screen...perfectly in time
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 2:20,
archived)
What a trooper...
More here,...
www.dekionplexis.com/TheContinuingWorldOfPop.html
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:33,
archived)
More here,...
www.dekionplexis.com/TheContinuingWorldOfPop.html
Why?
I wouldn't enjoy it.
Unless there weren't any security cameras, janitors, or guards. Then I'd maraud.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:19,
archived)
Unless there weren't any security cameras, janitors, or guards. Then I'd maraud.
it's vs. its
your error disturbs me strangely. i'm becoming more obsessively pedantic every day :-\
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:28,
archived)
my error disturbed me also..
the apostrophe of doom... placed there by unseen, meddling hands..!
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:30,
archived)
it is
starting to do my head in, can some one show me how to ignore my own posts please
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:43,
archived)
hmmm
interesting.
this might do it:
www.b3ta.com/board/ignore.php?start=21087
I suppose you could then un-ignore yourself...
which would be:
www.b3ta.com/board/ignore.php?stop=21087
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:53,
archived)
this might do it:
www.b3ta.com/board/ignore.php?start=21087
I suppose you could then un-ignore yourself...
which would be:
www.b3ta.com/board/ignore.php?stop=21087
you could have come up with a terrible yolk for the caption
I'm truly sorry for that
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:09,
archived)
tammy would think twice about
drinking 10 litres of tango before going in the giant's tiny jacuzzi.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:10,
archived)
the catch is easy to fix
but it'd probably be best to get a new one
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:06,
archived)
aww
keep it, you could use it as a firing mechanism for...stuff
woo too
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:06,
archived)
woo too
Cock it.. 'click'
Are male Geese also called cocks? (I bet they get so much shit in the pub)
EDIT: Oops..WOO!!
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:09,
archived)
EDIT: Oops..WOO!!
and then he sank just that little bit deeper
last bus to hull leaves when?
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:01,
archived)
last bus to hull leaves when?
You need to grow your own moobs
so you'll always have breasts to play with.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:59,
archived)
You sir am too good at teh 'shopping
BTW who is the lady that you always seem to include in your work? I mean here and on your own site.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:28,
archived)
Ich verstehe sie nicht.
abandons self taught snippets of German
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:54,
archived)
mir
is the dative personal pronoun. You should have used the nominative, 'ich'.
*my goodness it is time for my bed*
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:11,
archived)
*my goodness it is time for my bed*
it's been 17 years since I stopped learning german
I'm rather out of practice
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:13,
archived)
I taught myself for 6 months
I think maybe i'll go back to classes
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:19,
archived)
do not panic
i live there and even the locals can't get it right.
Just point, shout in english and when that fails say you know Jamie Oliver. For some very odd reason they all love him.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:21,
archived)
Just point, shout in english and when that fails say you know Jamie Oliver. For some very odd reason they all love him.
I worry about my grammar in English...
I worry about about spelling.... maybe that's why my imagination levels are currently at zero..! hahahaha
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:27,
archived)
waaahhhh... that's the trouble....
I couldn't tell you the difference between the dative and nominative in english..! it just comes naturally..!
But when you have to think about stuff like that in German.........
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:22,
archived)
But when you have to think about stuff like that in German.........
that is why
the world should all speak english as well is we is
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:37,
archived)
if that were my cat
you'd probably just find the little yellow tail lying sadly on the mat.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:33,
archived)
mine would leave entrails from the catflap to the front room
like he did with a pigeon a few months back
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:34,
archived)
nothing quite like getting out of bed
and stepping barefoot in dead things.
or bits of dead things.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:54,
archived)
or bits of dead things.
Yeew!
I know that one!... our moggy keeps bringing chicken carcasses back from god-knows-where.
Woo to the pic :)
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:34,
archived)
Woo to the pic :)
Oh..good times..
such good times.
(bring back Pirate day. Every day)
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:53,
archived)
(bring back Pirate day. Every day)
aww
I'm not criticising.
why, just the other week I bought a toy fluffy rabbit just because it had such a cute face I couldn't leave the shop without it.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:46,
archived)
why, just the other week I bought a toy fluffy rabbit just because it had such a cute face I couldn't leave the shop without it.
I plan on taking him
to someone's house who has a digital camera, so I can make a woo-yay pic involving this rabbit.
o yes.
and hah! that killer rabbit is priceless.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:51,
archived)
o yes.
and hah! that killer rabbit is priceless.
there's a better one that's all bloody, too lazy to google for it though.
edit
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:54,
archived)
edit
i wouldn't want to google for "bloody"
regardless of how motivated i may be.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:01,
archived)
I'd search for
monty python toys, there's a great site somewhere.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:04,
archived)
I had a talking one, but i'm not sure where i put him
he was better than my interactive Yoda - all they skin cracks if you leave him in sunlight.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:49,
archived)
also
I wish this picture had been photoshopped.
but, it's not.
*shudders*
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:44,
archived)
I wish this picture had been photoshopped.
but, it's not.
*shudders*
my thoughts exactly
if I had a list of 'people I'm glad I'm a long way away from', he'd be on it.
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:46,
archived)
I'm sure he'd be fine
...strapped to a gurney, with a mask, Lecter-style.
:)
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 1:20,
archived)
:)
Noel Coward
and I've finally updated my sites with all the newer pictures:
The Wesley Snipes celebrity pun archive
Mort's Picture Archive
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:29,
archived)
and I've finally updated my sites with all the newer pictures:
The Wesley Snipes celebrity pun archive
Mort's Picture Archive
There's a book on board called Noel Coward and friends
It looks awesome, and I may have to pur-chase a copy when back in the ussr Uk
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:30,
archived)
That's unfortunate timing
:@ )
i shall enjoy a peruse, nonetheless.
EDIT: Splendid!
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:32,
archived)
i shall enjoy a peruse, nonetheless.
EDIT: Splendid!
hahahah
woo!
say, did you see this thread?
free to a good home...
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:34,
archived)
say, did you see this thread?
free to a good home...
also good!
I did actually try and find a suitable source pic for Walken's body but didn't manage it. Well done :D
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:44,
archived)
ah
well, that one is rather on the fat side.
which must be why he's exercising.
:D
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:47,
archived)
which must be why he's exercising.
:D
YAY!
elija wood still makes me piss myself - i mean that sincerely
i'm off to bed - just saw that film the grudge and feel a bit fragile... NIGHTYNIGHT!
( ,
Thu 27 Jan 2005, 0:47,
archived)
i'm off to bed - just saw that film the grudge and feel a bit fragile... NIGHTYNIGHT!
« Older messages | Newer messages »