i was so touched by muffrat's proposal proposal
that i made this:
this technique will definatley work
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:38,
archived)
this technique will definatley work
aah
i don't usually like this cutesy shit, but this is really nice :)
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:42,
archived)
quick!
send me your phone number cos i've lost it and i'm leaving work in 5 mins!
and yes, i am being stalked by a rather large gay heron.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:45,
archived)
and yes, i am being stalked by a rather large gay heron.
in case you didn't know
NTL have just offered me broadband internet installation for free and only £14.99 a month rent.
Apparently they have had this offer since Monday. Sic 'em B3tans!
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:36,
archived)
Apparently they have had this offer since Monday. Sic 'em B3tans!
ah!
Now I am not experienced enough to know the difference... oops.
/edit anyway night y'all!
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:52,
archived)
/edit anyway night y'all!
it's be 128k
but it's 26 squid for 512,
and 128 is over twice dialup.. it's sooo much better.
go for it.. get 512 if you think u can afford it
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:57,
archived)
and 128 is over twice dialup.. it's sooo much better.
go for it.. get 512 if you think u can afford it
Yeah,
but is that 128K with contention between 20 or 50 people? Or is it all to yourself?
If there's contention it's not worth having!
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 17:04,
archived)
If there's contention it's not worth having!
won't be able to find out the contention
but it is on each node..
I have 512ntl cable and even with contention it rocks..
(btw to all those lucky ADSL users, you may find that some companies will put you on a 70:1 contention.. nasty)
Unless you are business user, e.g. expensive, you will be on a contetion of about 50:1
oh and all modem access is contended at about 40:1 anyway.. so it's not a new thing and it doesn't really matter that much.
itwon'tbeeasy - show me a service where you get 128kb uncontended with a facillity to upgrade to 512 or 1mb with no installation fee that costs less than £30 a month. Don't exist.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 17:10,
archived)
I have 512ntl cable and even with contention it rocks..
(btw to all those lucky ADSL users, you may find that some companies will put you on a 70:1 contention.. nasty)
Unless you are business user, e.g. expensive, you will be on a contetion of about 50:1
oh and all modem access is contended at about 40:1 anyway.. so it's not a new thing and it doesn't really matter that much.
itwon'tbeeasy - show me a service where you get 128kb uncontended with a facillity to upgrade to 512 or 1mb with no installation fee that costs less than £30 a month. Don't exist.
Modems
Yes but the 56K limit is not contended with other people - it's the pipe after that.
With ADSL you are either on 50:1 or 20:1 contention. There is no 70:1. The contentions are provided by BT wholesale, not by the ISPs so the ISPS don't dictate what they are.
If every one of the 50 users were active on a standard 50:1 contended ADSL package, then you would get WORSE speeds than a 56K modem. ADSL contention is unscalable. Enjoy it while you can is my advice :)
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 17:15,
archived)
With ADSL you are either on 50:1 or 20:1 contention. There is no 70:1. The contentions are provided by BT wholesale, not by the ISPs so the ISPS don't dictate what they are.
If every one of the 50 users were active on a standard 50:1 contended ADSL package, then you would get WORSE speeds than a 56K modem. ADSL contention is unscalable. Enjoy it while you can is my advice :)
there is 70:1
and the ISP do decide.
Btw Memo to ISP's from bt when they started adsl suggested they use a 65:1 contention. (trust me it's true)
Even so - every one of the 50 users would have to be using 512k (or whatever the max they have) CONSTANTLY. as in every second, all the time.
Don't happen so everybody gets a rather good connection.
I work very closely with an ISP every day. And as a reseller of bandwidth i also run a contended service (20:1) contention. which strangely everybody is happy with.
Ntl contends by node on its cable network - and nodes tend to be alot smaller than 50 users + rare that everybody will use cable modems.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 17:24,
archived)
Btw Memo to ISP's from bt when they started adsl suggested they use a 65:1 contention. (trust me it's true)
Even so - every one of the 50 users would have to be using 512k (or whatever the max they have) CONSTANTLY. as in every second, all the time.
Don't happen so everybody gets a rather good connection.
I work very closely with an ISP every day. And as a reseller of bandwidth i also run a contended service (20:1) contention. which strangely everybody is happy with.
Ntl contends by node on its cable network - and nodes tend to be alot smaller than 50 users + rare that everybody will use cable modems.
apologies for the crapness
of my mspaint skills!
first ever picture, though, so be nice ;-)
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:35,
archived)
first ever picture, though, so be nice ;-)
aw, thanks
*huge sigh of relief that I didn't totally embarass myself*
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:48,
archived)
Some people have such interesting lives......
Spending your life researching this.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:34,
archived)
interesting creature
that ostracod he's talking about (clicky)
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:54,
archived)
see you lovely people next week
i'm off to get lagered up and oggle at nice ladies.
my lurk a bit at the weekend as i'll be at my mates house.
play nicely
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:33,
archived)
my lurk a bit at the weekend as i'll be at my mates house.
play nicely
ta ra chuck....
see you next week...i'm off t'pub as well (not the same one) see y'al next week
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:37,
archived)
remind me
to add '.co.uk' to my username for that 'cold-hearted exploiter' look
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:32,
archived)
excellent piece of random
spam, well done that man.
now, please, back in your box.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:31,
archived)
now, please, back in your box.
Haa haa
My bad. Just wanted to give it a try.
This site (b3ta) is funny!
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:32,
archived)
This site (b3ta) is funny!
at least it wasn't a drive by posting
please stay a while and look around.
remembering all breakages must be paid for.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:34,
archived)
remembering all breakages must be paid for.
Furtive immortalised in stone ....
Non-potato-shopped
Taken at a rather posh art museum in Paris called Musée d'Orsay - oppostite the Louvre. (Not so interesting website in new window HERE)
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:18,
archived)
Non-potato-shopped
Taken at a rather posh art museum in Paris called Musée d'Orsay - oppostite the Louvre. (Not so interesting website in new window HERE)
I've seen that.
It's in the San Francisco MOMA innit? Top building.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:36,
archived)
aye. i think
it was. fucking ace, apart from the yoko ono exhibition. i hate yoko ono.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:39,
archived)
ewww Yoko Ono.
There was an Ansel Adams exhibition on when I was there which was very pleasant. I think I preffered the LAMOMA though, saying that it was all great.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:43,
archived)
give it a couple more years
he will achieve ultimate whiteness
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 17:32,
archived)
Assignment:
Could someone please photoshop a field guide to distinguishing between gurning and belming? I'd appreciate it in the form of a wallet-sized card. I think it would look best as red line drawings on a white background, like one of those CPR cards with the stupid smiling people.
Thank you. That is all
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:18,
archived)
Thank you. That is all
Oh. Ah.
No, no x for me. I just feel it's my duty as a patriotic American to be able to properly distinguish between gurning and belming. Those who oppose our way of life think they can keep us from doing it, but they're wrong. In truth, they've only strengthened our resolve to do so.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:33,
archived)
If more of our
septic cousins popped pills at the weekend the world would be a MUCH better place.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:45,
archived)
i 'panda' to your needs
el panda flamethrower wallpaper
was a really low-res image though - so it's not great... sorry
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:18,
archived)
was a really low-res image though - so it's not great... sorry
cheers
you even flipped it so my massive cluster of icons onthe left doesn't obscure the panda :)
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 17:12,
archived)
i'm sorry
edit: ooh bugger, it's too fast, and a bit wide, but i'm not in a mood for fixing it
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:17,
archived)
edit: ooh bugger, it's too fast, and a bit wide, but i'm not in a mood for fixing it
that's
ladle
write 'ladle' 10 times in the margin and don't do it again
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:27,
archived)
write 'ladle' 10 times in the margin and don't do it again
Absolutely massive!
A giant water beauty yet it drifts so elegantly in the sunset
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:16,
archived)
the thing that worries me about this
is that it is intended as a joke that will unravel - that is going to be absolutly dire
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:20,
archived)
your surrealism
is to be applauded, but you're stealing other people's bandwidth, which is naughty even if they are american... get yourself some webspace and make some nice pictures :)
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:21,
archived)
this suspense
reminds me of the original 'thank crunchie it's friday' ad campaign.
oooh, that was a nail biter
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:31,
archived)
oooh, that was a nail biter
have you thought
of letting pshycics have a bash at predicting names, features, things about the people that you can then check when they are found.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:17,
archived)
my mommy
is a physics teacher. it would be more fun if she was a psychic tho...or maybe not. i woulda gotten smacked around a lot more when i was a youngin'.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:28,
archived)
yeah both
there must be a spychic physicist out there somewhere.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:37,
archived)
Ginger? Yes. Stoltz? No. (miserably)
edit: could be his ugly brother. theres always one. see the Swayzes.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:24,
archived)
edit: could be his ugly brother. theres always one. see the Swayzes.
He
is hiding something. His smile is of the "just smelt shit" variety. One of the twins off neighbours had it too.
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:25,
archived)
There's no substitute...
...for the original.
Just like what when I was a kid
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:13,
archived)
...for the original.
Just like what when I was a kid
There's a strange
3D effect to that.
He just wants a cuddle, dunnee!
( ,
Fri 13 Sep 2002, 16:34,
archived)
He just wants a cuddle, dunnee!
« Older messages | Newer messages »