Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
It says "You wouldn't behave like this on foot...", well I can assure you I fucking well would if I could get away with it. If the likely outcome wouldn't be a good telling off from a law enforcement officer or a thorough kicking from a harder man.
What false advertising has irked you lately?
Alt Q - what would you practice on a daily basis if you were confident there'd be no reprisals?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:45, 210 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
I can assure you that it was mearly tepid and certainly didn't weigh a pound.
I'd pay poor people to dance for me.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:47, Reply)
hard earned benefits? that kind of poor.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:50, Reply)
I have no use for 9 of them
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:57, Reply)
I was attempting to go with it by pretending to offer a conoisseur's opinion on the matter. It seems to have been shit.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:00, Reply)
especially with the current exchange rate.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:00, Reply)
I maintain that the first album was good, however.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:29, Reply)
I actually like the first three albums. But no-one around here thinks I'm cool, and therefore I am unencumbered my pride as regards my answers.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:38, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:52, Reply)
I don't think there's anything I'd do. I would never shoplift, the principle is abhorrent but there are so many things I want and can't afford as I don't have a job and I'm lazy. Maybe credit card fraud.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:48, Reply)
I just can't remember the ridiculous names they have in the first episode.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:51, Reply)
I was pleased with the speed of the Winchester ref if I'm honest. But my brain is more aged and decrepid than yours, and wasn't so much to write home about in the first place.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:55, Reply)
I'm tired and this computer room is a bit too hot. I might go and get a cup of tea and sit out on the terrazza in a bit.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:56, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:01, Reply)
it does have a terrace that overlooks the Thames and the Royal Festival Hall etc.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:02, Reply)
I'm being irked by the "clean hand" soap system one from Dettol at the moment. If only after you have touched the filthy soap dispenser there was some way of getting soap onto your hands, perhaps to clean them?
Alt:
Sodomy or incest
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:52, Reply)
it's your taps.
That advert for the nose spray which attacks the virus at the back of the throat. Utter bollocks.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:53, Reply)
If I actually thought about these sort of things I'd wrap myself in clingfilm and replace my blood with alcohol gel. So I don't.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:57, Reply)
you know the ones. The ones with all the fake science names that apparently mean that your hair feels like a Labrador's and yet can bench-press 40lbs. The ones that contain all those little silicate spheres that fill in the wrinkles in your skin and make you look younger. The ones that they're now trying to target at men to make us feel insecure and ugly so that we'll buy their snake oil treatments.
To the World: You are going to age, get wrinkly and die. It happens to everyone. Try not to look like a totally gullible cunt in the meantime. Occasional moisturising will make your skin feel nicer if you're a girl. If you're a man and you're using products other than those designed to make your manly side parting stay in place, you're a shirter. Products advertised by the likes of Cheerrrl Ceerl and Gerard Butler do not fucking work.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:54, Reply)
WON'T SOMEONE THINK OF THE LIPOSOMES?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:55, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:58, Reply)
And stuff is SCIENCE just because some cunt says it is, right?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:00, Reply)
is that anybody with half a brain can see that I'm right and yet the fucking stuff keeps flying off the shelves. Which means that it's the same brainless cunts that seem to exist purely for the purpose of getting in my way who're propping up the whole business.
We need a cull.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:04, Reply)
that you have repeatedly bought loads of stupid shit like Lynx and yet still failed utterly to have sex with anyone other than yourself, and this has built up into a hatred of advertising borne of this crushing disappointment.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:08, Reply)
Lynx has singularly failed to cause hordes of women with a rampaging horn to charge in my direction, apart from that time I was also waving a "FUCKING LESBIANS" sign in the middle of a feminist march.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:13, Reply)
Recently I have been delighted to notice that all the "relationship-oriented" online dating adverts seem to be making a point of featuring much less attractive actors then the "classic" ones used to. Because only an uggo wouldn't want to play the field frantically until they become a wizened, Monty-esque wreck, presumably.
In a world with no reprisals I would spend an hour a day relaxing on a perch above Oxford Street, picking off the "stop right in front of you for no fucking reason" pedestrian mongs with a sniper rifle.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:58, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:59, Reply)
I was running for the bus this morning and some mong stopped dead in front of me. Had to do a tactical swerve but I should have really kicked him in the back of the ankles.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:59, Reply)
and I DID kick him square in the ankle. Hard. Cunt.
Unfortunately it was in fact accidental on my part and naturally as an Englishman I apologised profusely.
But still, I felt the intoxicating surge of victory in my blood.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:06, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:39, Reply)
Waiting to be called to shoot my scene in a music video (two friends are shooting it for an up-and-coming rock band). There are belly dancers, fire jugglers and a couple of very hot poi dancers, but I was promised a midget. WHERE'S MY GOD DAMN LITTLE PERSON??!!
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 11:59, Reply)
I have my own scene, as a punk dressed in a suit having a relaxing cup of tea while debauchery and chaos sprawls around me.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:03, Reply)
Giz us a link when it's all done (in about 3 years I imagine.)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:04, Reply)
I'll probably be languishing on the cutting room floor.
Was great to see you Saturday.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:08, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:08, Reply)
It'd take an army of millions to wrestle it down.
Or a bucket of water.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:10, Reply)
I think it's a self defence technique I developed to save my fragile mind from thinking about such things.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:17, Reply)
Buy tickets dude, I'm definitely going now, and bring a few people too (sorry if you were hoping for a romantic night out). Will your lady be coming as well?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:04, Reply)
7/10, for the reasons already illustrated.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:07, Reply)
I'll ask around but I imagine most people will be going to see them in London as that gig's not a schoolnight.
Allow me to replay a conversation between me and Ms Foxtrot about this gig, which will hopefully answer your question about her attendance;
Me: "Fucking CombiChrist have announced gigs in Nottingham and London that weekend we're away"
MsF: "Oh never mind, they're playing InFest this year aren't they?"
Me: "Nah, that's VNV Nation"
MsF: "Well we saw them in London last year didn't we?"
Me: "No, that's VNV Nation too"
She tries really hard to like the things I do, she's fucking awesome, but CC are a bit much for her tastes.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:10, Reply)
I still haven't purged the Gino Ginelli or Shake'n'Vac adverts from my head.
However, when you watch adverts on mute you notice the over-exaggerated smiles and looks of joy the actors affect, yet their eyes remain COLD AND DEAD. Disturbing stuff, but then "The Sweeny" (or The Professionals) comes back on and I can resume my evening of shouting "SHUT IT!" at the cat.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:03, Reply)
sorry...another Reagan flashback. They're getting less frequent.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:07, Reply)
Why won't they leave my head? The horror...the horror...
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:11, Reply)
my friend Paul convinced our mate Donut that he'd bought a wicked new Gino Ginelli jumper. Lolled like mad, we did.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:13, Reply)
Jimi Hendrix was white and played onstage in a mask as he was shy
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:16, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Wu-aNr7v0U
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:13, Reply)
*shudders*
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:18, Reply)
what kind of a fictitious husband are you?
apart from fictitious
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:20, Reply)
i'm not completely weak and pathetic
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:24, Reply)
a bit of weakness and therefore the ability to be helplessly manipulated is an essential quality in a man.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:25, Reply)
lip-smackin' great-tastin' etc.
yet when my boss asked me what i had researched about easements on friday afternoon...
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:11, Reply)
or was it another trick played on you?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:14, Reply)
i won a cd. it was shit, so i took it to hmv and swopped it for something better.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:17, Reply)
given that he's the sort of man who uses products other than those intended for keeping his manly side-parting in place.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:16, Reply)
it's just that gravity is a bit of a bitch
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:17, Reply)
via a large pair of bouncing sweater puppies is entirely accidental.
Right.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:19, Reply)
edit: plus sweater puppies is the stupidest term ever. We're not American
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:20, Reply)
then we wouldn't even be able to manipulate them, intentionally or otherwise.
I have been a wicked flirt ever since I was a little girl. Most daddy's girl types usually do know how to get round men. It mostly involves wide eyes and smiling.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:23, Reply)
I've been somewhat distracted since the introduction of the phrase "bouncing sweater puppies" above
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:26, Reply)
"is in the happy visual place" but some cunt would be sure to take it as a challenge
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:36, Reply)
The rumours are rife enough already
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:44, Reply)
The last couple of threads have wound me up a bit, I think. I must be posting with some residual annoyance.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:26, Reply)
"The Professionals" has the better theme tune, but "the Sweeny" has more toerags being given a kicking down the station.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:27, Reply)
but Bodie doesn't play by the rules, he gets results
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:34, Reply)
and I know it'll have been said before, but pretty much any lynx advert especially since it just smells awful, also ads that tell me to be afraid of everything.
Alt: Culling the unworthy obviously
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:19, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIp37GVvK68&feature=relmfu
It somehow manages to be not as bad as the first fucking comment there. GAH.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:26, Reply)
Surely she should be able to find a bra that fits her in this day and age?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:28, Reply)
Good job. If you had, you may never sleep again.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:33, Reply)
Women should be encouraged to go to have their tits measured.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:34, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:44, Reply)
Although I may have to restart my B3tan bra sizes database, and all the research associated with it, it's a sacrifice I'd be willing to make.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:35, Reply)
I'd do shopping. Every fucking day. I love shopping, me.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:20, Reply)
If pensioners are finding it more difficult to cope with their meagre budget then why do they wander round Marks and Spencers every fucking lunch time buying expensive ready meals. It's like zombie central.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:25, Reply)
Maybe.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:36, Reply)
Alt: Are we talking no criminal reprisals or that you personally wouldn't feel guilty either?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:28, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:29, Reply)
I'd feel too guilty to do that even if I knew I wouldn't get caught though.
Anything I wouldn't feel guilty about I do anyway, and just hope there's no recrimations.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:31, Reply)
*attempts to look perfectly content with non-sex based answer*
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:36, Reply)
like a casino or two and a mother fucking laundromat
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:47, Reply)
"he needs bulletproof vests, not alternative voting".
Not only is it some pretty ruthless attempted emotional manipulation, it doesn't even make sense.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:31, Reply)
I find it galling that they offer it as a binary choice, like if we didn't spend money on a referendum, the money would *definitely* go to Armed Forces equipment/saving babies.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:35, Reply)
which essentially means swapping from first past the post to representational.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:44, Reply)
but the term "Alternative Vote" cracks me up. I choose to believe it means that everyone has to dress up like they're off to Bloodstock or Slimelight before their vote counts.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:46, Reply)
Giving up a system that's been in place for hundreds of years and is perfectly capable of working very well if people could actually be fucked to walk 300 yards to a polling station once every three to five years mostly based on the relentless whinging of one secondary party and a fistful of minors is daft.
The only reason it's getting any credence now is that the LDs are capable of whining slightly more loudly than normal.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:52, Reply)
Who is the PM and all that then, if that happens?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:50, Reply)
PM would be the leader of the biggest party. It'd lead to more coalitions, but other parties would feel better and that's the main thing, isn't it.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:53, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:57, Reply)
They'd gain the same percentage of seats as the percentage of votes they'd received.
Edit: Or maybe not
V
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:58, Reply)
That's not it at all.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:00, Reply)
lack of research on my part.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:02, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:04, Reply)
Although my politics are a little convuluted and I swing wildly between left and right depending on the subject matter.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:07, Reply)
... eg, say, barnet gets 30% labour and 70% conservative... conservative would get barnet's seat, or would they have to scoot down and share the seat 30% with labour. Or would it be country-wide so although Labour lost that seat, they can add up that 30% to someone elses so they win that area.
wait, I don't think that makes sense, is it....
- Is it the seats in the houses of commons is split up by the whole country's vote.
- Is the seats for each council split up by that council's votes... and if it is this, what one gets to go to parliment?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:03, Reply)
to the American system. I haven't really been taking alternative voting seriously as I doubt it'll last as an option past this Government and because I think changing the way the country votes to try to fix a symptom, rather than the cause, is a bloody silly way to behave.
BA knows a damn sight more than me on how it would be applied here. Sounds dreadful, anyway.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:05, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:10, Reply)
ARE YOU FOR AGAINST PROPORTIONAL VOTING IN A DEMOCROSIED SOCIETY?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:12, Reply)
And should people get off their backsides and start voting for minor parties, the current system is perfectly capable of delivering.
People assume that the Tories or Labour are going to win and so assume there's no point in voting for anyone else. The more seats won by minor parties means they have a larger representation. The two bigger parties then have to adjust their politics accordingly.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:13, Reply)
drumming home that a vote for anyone else is a complete waste, I don't see that ever happening. So, a change in the system.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:15, Reply)
They're still going to drum home that there's no other viable alternative. What needs to change is peoples' interest in politics, not the way we vote.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:17, Reply)
like the one in the Netherlands, then you can end up with huge turnouts because people are aware that their votes mean something.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:23, Reply)
Plus it would make referendums much quicker and cheaper to execute, meaning we could have more of them and, therefore, more direct control.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:27, Reply)
If I wanted to run the country myself I'd become a politician, I don't want to do that, I want the people I elect to run the country in accordance with the promises they set out when I voted for them.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:29, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:28, Reply)
the support for a minor party has to be hugely concentrated for them to have any chance of winning a seat.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:16, Reply)
With AV, you rank your candidates in order of preference on your ballot. They then add up all the "first" places, and see if anyone has over 50% of the vote. If not, then they add the "second" choice places and see if that gives someone over 50% of the vote, and so on. Hence why it would be difficult for the BNP etc. to gain representation.
First candidate to get to 50% in the constituency becomes the MP.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:13, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:23, Reply)
I am strongly suspicious of it and the motives behind it.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:25, Reply)
It's not the ideal voting system, but there is not one single argument in which FPTP comes out in front of AV, so from that point of view it ought to be a forgone conclusion.
The fact that the NO campaign is pedalling lies and negative ideas just goes to prove that they have nothing good to say about their choice.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:31, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:32, Reply)
Is that technically a possibility?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:26, Reply)
But thinking about it logically, I think it would be impossible.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:29, Reply)
If you have five candidates and each got 20% and nobody put a second preference for anyone, then yes I guess you could have a tie. But I think the likelihood is so low.
Plus there will almost certainly be a contingancy for one candidate not getting 50% but still having the highest percentage.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:33, Reply)
But thats not quite how it works... If no one person has acheived 50% of the vote then the person polling the lowest number of votes is eliminated and that second choice is added and so on, it is the "single transferable vote" AV is a misleading term.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 16:16, Reply)
Probably at least as extremely unlikely as it is now.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:59, Reply)
I was going to say "it's shocking", but it's not.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:43, Reply)
Given that the people with most to gain from a switch are Liberal Democrats, that doesn't surprise me either.
Totally unsurprised by any of it. That's me.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:46, Reply)
We know. We also know who's responsible for that being the only thing on the table. You cunts.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:47, Reply)
that the only way you could think of displaying it was to write it on a piece of cardboard and walk up and down a busy thoroughfare carrying it and shouting?
That'd be hilarious.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:49, Reply)
"Wait for four years for things to get worse then vote them out", please excuse me telling you to fuck off.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:53, Reply)
The democratic process really is a fucking stupid way of ensuring the viewpoint of the majority is represented. Throwing fire extinguishers at the police is much better.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:02, Reply)
you only work in an office. some people would rather DIE than do anything so mundane. the world OWES THEM A MUCH MORE EXCITING LIVING, mm-kay?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:04, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:04, Reply)
Government by 'the people'? Fuck that shit, I've seen 'the people' and they are retarded.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:06, Reply)
Certain sections of society have no business voting.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:09, Reply)
but at least you're not trying to bring the country to its knees for a day and therefore starving the economy that the cuts are meant to be helping in the first place...
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:08, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:14, Reply)
stop pedalling that retarded argument. One protest march is not going to bring the country to it's knees and starve the economy. The massive cuts that are going to cripple the economy and put thousands out of work will do that much more effectively.
I'd like to think you're smarter than this.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:18, Reply)
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:21, Reply)
There, there. Would you like some cocoa and a nice sit down in front of the telly? There's a program about that nice David Bowie on. You like him don't you.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:25, Reply)
it'd be a really interesting and worthwhile thing to do. And absolutely certain to change the government's mind
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:53, Reply)
the stupidity of these people is as criminal as the acts of violence
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:03, Reply)
and I fucking hate the self-righteousness that rolls off the cunts. They rarely come up with decent fixes or mends, they just whine about the way things are.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:07, Reply)
they are like children. big shouty smashy children.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:09, Reply)
I also don't doubt that some of them who support it are too.
There are alternatives to the current cuts.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:12, Reply)
doesn't mean they should be taken just because some people think that's the right way. The alternatives proposed aren't good enough to be honest to have to overturn their stance on certain issues in order to enable. Come up with a fantastic plan that'll fix everything, rather than a wishy-washy 'perfect world' scenario.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:15, Reply)
because having a large debt which you are quite capable of paying off over time as your economy grows is better than having a small debt and an economy which has been crippled by massive cuts and leads to higher unemployment and greater public spending on benefits which in turn ends up with a larger debt again.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:21, Reply)
God Wookiee, CAN'T YOU SEE?
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:21, Reply)
A 'Robin Hood' tax on banks could raise billions - even something as simple as stopping public schools being classed as 'charitable' foundations could gain £130 million per year.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 13:22, Reply)
I'm not sure if it's because of how dumb they are or because they're saying how they're getting amazing sex, and I'm not.
alt: your use of the word "practice" has thrown me off here, all I can think of would be dance lessons or yoga.
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:46, Reply)
Alt: welcome to my world
(, Mon 21 Mar 2011, 12:52, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »