Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15373071
So the earth is actually warming or is it? Lets see how many of you people are climate change deniers now?
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:31, 127 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:34, Reply)
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:34, Reply)
So much for this "global warming"!
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:34, Reply)
Fucked if I know what it is though.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:35, Reply)
and one is more to do with regional variation from established norms. I think.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:37, Reply)
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:38, Reply)
of the El Nino/La Nina ten year cyclical period of warming and cooling. It's helping to offset the worst of the temperature increases caused by pollution. Also, where we are, the Gulf Stream is slowly being pushed away from Europe by meltwater from the Arctic, causing a general lowering of temperatures.
After about 2020 we'll be back in El Nino and temperatures will start spiking again.
I'm assuming you were being serious.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:44, Reply)
he was talking about the fact that it's winter.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:46, Reply)
And "Lord" Lawson will still be a cunt. Even if his daughter makes my willy do that funny thing.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:34, Reply)
What dribble a bit more piss once you've put it away? That's not Nigella Al, that's age.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:36, Reply)
"It is acknowledged by almost all relevant scientific bodies that the earth is getting warmer but that comes under the heading of Climate Change. I seriously doubt that man is having any really significant effect on climate. Until there is universal acceptance that mankind contributes to global warming I will continue to believe that this view is derived from biased analysis or misinterpreted data."
So unless every single other person in the entire world believes it's true, they won't.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:36, Reply)
Ah, here we go, an "independant" study by those who are in on the global warming con.
They wouldn't need this study if other scientists hadn't been dishonest about their findings, and now it's been verified by some other scientists, how very convinient.
I hoped with the death of new labour this lie would be exposed, sadly the loony liberals got their concessions on this then!
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:41, Reply)
Stop depressing me by repeatedly pointing out cunts like that exist.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:13, Reply)
He is a massive, massive cunt who wore a velvet Chinese-style 'Tang' jacket, which did not help his case.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:41, Reply)
I really can't see any point in that entire family.
All Nigel Lawson did was fuck the economy up the arse in the late 80s and then appear in interviews bemoaning the Euro.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:44, Reply)
In fact, didn't he write a book on it?
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:51, Reply)
when I get into power.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:59, Reply)
merely about how much of that is down to human activity and how much is cyclic change that we as a species have little or no influence on?
Or are really people who are actually denying our climate is changing?
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:39, Reply)
but as that's become more and more accepted and accurate they move on to how much is human activity.
After that becomes more reasearched and understood they'll move on to something else.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:42, Reply)
Genuinely? admittedly I try not to converse with retards, but I wasn't aware of anyone who thought that thermometers had somehow become inaccurate over the last 200 years.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:55, Reply)
And people jumped on the UEA scandle. Not serious scientists but not just nutjobs on youtube. Politicians, pundits, that sort of thing.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:59, Reply)
Not the conclusions the pundits drew, I mean, but people who behave like the UEA lot don't really help science's cause.
In any case, I struggle to regard a fair few climate change "scientists" as really scientists at all
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:07, Reply)
"While accepting that global warming exists I question the actual data. For instance how accurate was the equipment 200 years ago compared with today ? Have the same global 4000-odd sites been monitored continuously or have new sites been included possibly skewing trends?"
You may belm at this correspondent now.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:59, Reply)
It's actually quite sad that even at my age I still stand open-mouthed in wonder at the fucking stupidity of the human race.
Then again, Big Brother. So maybe when we hit the bottom of the barrel we were still accelerating?
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:05, Reply)
I distinctly remember one chap replying to a post on a forum to say "if there is a problem with the earth's climate our scientists will sort it out".
The bulk of his post was used to defend the Bush Presidency, so he was obviously an idiot; unfortunately there are millions of idiots like him across the pond. They call themselves Republicans.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:44, Reply)
Chaos theory innit.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:44, Reply)
and your norks causing the al-anese pants quake.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:45, Reply)
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:47, Reply)
I think it may be my brain size that is the issue.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:55, Reply)
I'm not playing any more.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:02, Reply)
I still wouldn't watch ITV though.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:55, Reply)
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:55, Reply)
i missed Dr. Jim on BBC 4 last night annoyingly
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:58, Reply)
their weather station is at an airport
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:48, Reply)
/not letting the fact that you may have a valid point get in the way of my joke.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:51, Reply)
I hate cold weather, and everyone looks better with a bit of colour
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:52, Reply)
there are, however, millions who are man-made climate change deniers. This article won't address a single issue of theirs.
All this vastly funded study did was prove that the thermometers that everyone else used really were probably right. In fact, it will actually add to the sceptics case because it links global temperature to North Atlantic temp fluctuations - i.e. warm/cold currents - which has been the mainstay of the scientific sceptic argument for years.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:53, Reply)
All the proposed actions to mitigate it are good things in their own right, so we should do them anyway. Anyone who disagrees should be turned into biofuel.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:56, Reply)
rather than using the evidence to come to a sensible conclusion.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 10:57, Reply)
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:01, Reply)
Frankly it's the most fucked up branch of science available to humanity. Certainly, it's the only one where those that question it are treated as pariahs regardless of what evidence they offer. It's not really science at all any more.
For the record, the best stance is TLiC's one. And anyone, scientist or otherwise, who claims to have "proved" climate change is man-made or isn't man-made is a lying charlatan cunt. Proof is for courts. Evidence is for scientists. And the global climate is far too complex for anyone to extrapolate meaningful conclusions from any amount of evidence.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:03, Reply)
Wait, do you mean "do those things" or "mulch the idiots“ ?
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:19, Reply)
I'm always putting my penis in her for some reason, can't help myself
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:02, Reply)
I knew you'd admit it eventually. Or something.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:05, Reply)
It's perfectly natural. Isn't it?
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:07, Reply)
/previous thread homage
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:21, Reply)
is getting to wear nice tights. i like those ones they have at m&s which look as if you are wearing sexy slutty stockings, but secretly are comfortable fat-ass granny warmers without the hassle of hold-ups that fall-down or suspender belts.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:06, Reply)
we nearly got thrown out of the cinema, he reacted so well to them.
he was probably picturing himself in them.
i can slag him off now it's over!
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:10, Reply)
and bulging out at the seams?
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:16, Reply)
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:20, Reply)
suspenders are for the bedroom only, otherwise they're a complete pain
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:08, Reply)
why can't men have a fetish for dishcloth grey marks and spencers 5 for a tenner pants instead?
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:10, Reply)
Over the right body, of course.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:12, Reply)
i agree with this, as they are comfortable, but i always think it is edging a bit near a schoolgirl fetish.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:13, Reply)
See also the 'fully shaved' thing and the 'school uniform' thing.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:16, Reply)
it doesn't make them a paedo. That's a tremendously simplistic interpretation of it.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:50, Reply)
unless the person is really quite dark skinned, tbh. I don't think it's really a schoolgirl fetish, though, even if people are into plain white. Boys don't really get to see girls in their smalls at school, so schoolgirl fetishes tend to revovle around uniform etc, surely?
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:17, Reply)
If you get those 6-strap deep suspender belts, you know the old fashioned ones, you feel like Sophia Loren, or Marilyn.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:46, Reply)
The best bit about autumn/winter is cardigans. I'm not even sure you can get a slutty cardigan, so it's just the comfortable fat-ass granny warmness for me.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:08, Reply)
Is the seasonal food. Eat properly and you are less likely to get cold (within reason).
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:10, Reply)
I love being in the mountains so so much, the fresh crisp air, beautiful fresh snow and bright sunshine is the cure to all ills
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:12, Reply)
Can't now due to the metal in my lower back from the impact of falling - same reason I can't play rugby anymore.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:15, Reply)
Tel Aviv for obvious security reasons & Frankfurt as that was where the Lockerbie bomb was planted.
When I used to travel a lot for work I used to carry an x-ray copy with me. All other airports have been fine.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:24, Reply)
I was lucky enough to spend an entire season in Val d'Isere once, 26 weeks of back to back snowboarding, bliss.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:20, Reply)
so imagine I made some hilarious joke about standing back to back with someone while snowboarding, and how that would be very difficult.
kthnxbai
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:22, Reply)
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Is that ok?
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:22, Reply)
I'm going to do that as a sabbatical once I've got enough books and papers that I really need to write..
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:23, Reply)
lots of interesting soups and stews and crumbles. And sloe gin. Mmm.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:29, Reply)
I always read it as the tights thing, instead of people who deny stuff. Then I feel silly.
I know we're on the brink of another ice age, but we're also affecting our ecosystem by causing global warming. I think I get that the net effect of this will be lots of weather upheavals, tsunamis, cyclones, earthquakes and shit, but I really haven't read enough about it to have a proper grasp of the situation.
I should really start watching Newsround again - they always knew how to break the complicated shit down for morons like me.
(, Fri 21 Oct 2011, 11:13, Reply)
...but there's no harm in NOT polluting the air around you.
However, people have been banging on about being 'green' since at least the early 90's. That graph shows that despite all the 'green' cars, and 'green' taxes, that the steep curve continues to be steep, so in all, being 'green' hasn't made a blind bit of difference.
If anything, it could be argued that the graph shows that it's NOT a man made occurrence.
I also think the term 'deniers' and it's obvious connotations lends credence to the 'denier's' theory.
(, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 21:05, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »
