
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular

Why don't you fucking grow up and just fucking stop it? Eh?
Ta in advance.
Not really, Chompy.
Will 'e-books' eventually do for print (outside the 'antiques' market)? I would say they probably will, and really for throwaway fiction etc why not? I don't have one but I've no strong feelings on the matter.
Alt: Good weekend? Plans for this week?
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 8:38, 153 replies, latest was 13 years ago)

See below re curry - also had a splendid time with Jr and went to a surprise party for Lusty's cousin, arranged by her blatantly gay fiancee.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 8:47, Reply)

It is evident to all bar his fiancee and possibly himself.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:04, Reply)

It was a Hairy Bikers recipe - I cannot endorse it more firmly.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 8:44, Reply)

I roasted a duck yesterday and made a gravy with sloe gin & the giblets. I was rather pleased with it.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 8:46, Reply)

This one was pitched absolutely perfectly.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 8:48, Reply)

I'm working till 6 on Saturday, and trying to figure out if it is worth heading to London after work. Also, why East London? The wrong side of London from the side I arrive on?
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 8:53, Reply)

West London sucks cock, is one reason. The Sebright is about ten feet from my flat, is another.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 8:55, Reply)

Actually, looking at it, I could get the bus, jump on the tube at Marble arch, and take central all the way across to Bethnel green, and then walk up from there.
I'll have a look at somewhere to stay, price it up, and then not tell you if i'm coming or not so that is is a wonderous surprise.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 8:59, Reply)

Piece of piss: circle line to Liverpool St, then a 26 or 48 to the pub.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:00, Reply)

but the bus goes from outside the pub and is about a third of the pric at that time of day.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:14, Reply)

It's one of the faster lines, too.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:19, Reply)

Even as a teenager I atruggled to fully understand the point of 'gaming'.
I don't believe that print will die, as there is more to books than simply reading. An author I know, whose books are published by Bloomsbury, always has notes in his book on the choice of typeface. Aesthetics will not die.
It is the same with music formats - the CD was supposed to 'do for' vinyl, but since the advent of downloading music, vinyl has enjoyed a massive resurgence and now it is the CD which is slowly dying out.
Alt: Yes, excellent thanks - loldrinks with friends, swimming with the littl'un and baking cakes for my unworthy colleagues.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 8:50, Reply)

that was never going to translate to CD's as they are soul less. Vinyl looked good, you had to treat it right, same with books. I get angry ifsomeone puts a finger on my vinyl, or bends the spine on one of my books, i could give a shit if someone threw one of my CD's across the room in to a fire.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 8:52, Reply)

Often given unnecessarily lavish packages in order to justify the extra expense, when it would sometimes be better just to issue a simple affordable LP.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:00, Reply)

will either download or buy it on CD. Only pretentious people who mistakenly think that vinyl is somehow "warmer" actually buy LPs, as evidence I present you and MOnty.
The defence rests.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:48, Reply)

My vinyl only policy acts as one of the few restrictions on my, frankly out of control, need to buy more and more music.
If it doesn't have a vinyl release, I don't buy it. (Unless I really, really need it.)
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:58, Reply)

Plus I like the sleeve art, and the pops and crackles add a charm for me too. Also in the case of really old records, I like having a genuine artifact from that time.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:28, Reply)

Monts, the curry was all well and good. What about the 7 bottles of wine?
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 8:53, Reply)

I've never even fucking seen a NZ Pinot Gris in a supermarket, let alone one for less than £15. This is £6.
However, it could be piss for all I know, I was on the gin last night so didn't open one.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:43, Reply)

I stood on the train platform and downed a litre of pineapple juice in one, and had a series of naps throughout the day.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 8:57, Reply)

e-books won't kill print. I don't yet have a kindle but I will get one in the near future. However, I expect I will still buy books, even when I have it.
The weekend was excellent, thanks for asking. Friday night was spectacular - went to se the 'Acoustic masters' tour in Gloucester. Three of the best acoustic guitarists ever* under one roof in a fantastically intimate venue. Made my whole year.
This week I are mostly dealing with tax people and lawyers.
*Jon Gomm, Preston Reed and Andy McKee.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:05, Reply)

I left the gig smiling 'cos I'd actually met and spoken to all three of them, then drove home reciting the mantra 'I ain't never gonne be that good' over and over again.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:11, Reply)

What a hypocrite.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:50, Reply)

They give up far too easily.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:01, Reply)

( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:12, Reply)

It's tomorrow and I am keeping the rest of the week free. Don't want to be jaded for Saturday, although one can never tell what might happen.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:08, Reply)

Although one can indeed never tell what might happen.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:10, Reply)

My step-daughter has one and they seem to be really slow to react when "turning" the pages. I find that I'm using the library more these days
Alt:
A mixed weekend. Party for No.1 son on Saturday which was great, but narky kids all day Sunday, which wasn't so good. Excellent Indian takeaway on Friday and house viewings on Sunday. You get a lot of garden but not enough bedroom size near the coast.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:13, Reply)

( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:14, Reply)

I'm gobsmacked that a 22 year old can be such a fucking Luddite
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:15, Reply)

( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:16, Reply)

there is no Santa. Tell the kids this, and make them cry.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:33, Reply)

Yeah, not a bad one. I went to watch some "experimental" theatre, which was so bad, it was excellent. Think League of Gentlemen characters, "Legs Akimbo". And multiply it by a lot. I checked out the Student Union Bar later, and, as you kindly suggested, it was cuntish.
No mega-plans this week, college, and a visit to the dog track. It's good to pretend to be a member of the proletariat sometimes. Oh, and I might turn up to your bash, and complain/applaud the music choice.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:32, Reply)

It's just 'down the pub' unless I decide to hold an after party (this is quite likely).
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:38, Reply)

I don't think the Kindle will kill books - if anything it'll do what mp3s do for music, get people buying more.
That Viking programme last night was well interesting Monty.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:34, Reply)

so imagine it was gloriously witty, eh?
General gist was no, too many disadvantages with eBooks, but I'll probably end up getting one for travelling,
And I was horribly depressed to see that more than 50% of the paperback bestseller list in Tesco was sub-lit mummy porn. Humanity, gt a fucking grip, for christ's sake.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:38, Reply)

I attempted Karl Pilkington's thing, but found it far too irritating.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:46, Reply)

I was talking about in an actual shop. In the outside and everything.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:56, Reply)

You should take the only honourable course of action.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:50, Reply)

or DYAAKY?
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:54, Reply)

And one that more people should consider.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:59, Reply)

and how you can use them. Also, the pricing model is fucking ridiculous. You cannot charge more for an ebook than a paperback and not expect a lot of your target market to go "actually, fuck this I'm going to pirate it for nothing".
It's the failings of the music industry all over again.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:52, Reply)

my lady works in Academic publishing, and the online journals market is ripe for it. In the next couple of years i would not be surprised to see some sort of e-reader in the hands of all serious academics and researchers.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:55, Reply)

As part of my job I sometimes need to read published articles, and can have to pay in excess of £40 just for one article, not even a whole issue of the journal.
Which I think it pretty ridiculous given that it's supposed to be a way of opening up your discovery's to people.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:57, Reply)

But it's a fuck-up, because most totally open access journals are, well, shit.
There's a compromise whereby you can pay to have your papers free-access in a non-free journal, but then the academic group is paying about £3K so others can read the work for free, so understandably most groups don't do that.
The problem is, well, the journal has to make money somehow.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:01, Reply)

We do get sent iPads now for some grant reviewing jobs, though, because otherwise they'd have to ship over a thousand printed pages to every reviewer.
You do have to send them back afterwards, though. Bah.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:59, Reply)

Can they not just upload a pdf to dropbox or whatever?
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:20, Reply)

( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:23, Reply)

and you need to have them to hand when you go down to London to sit on the judging panel.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:24, Reply)

If not a PDF, then a DOC, or whatever. There absolutely is a better way of doing it then sending 400 pounds worth of tablet through the post.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:33, Reply)

nobody would have to send anything or cart anything around at all.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:38, Reply)

If they could do that, they would be making money in proper jobs.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:38, Reply)

But then I have worked in academic IT before and to call it "amateur" would be highly offensive to almost anybody that can operate a mouse.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:43, Reply)

It's their interpersonal skills that are usally the issue.
Actually, much like most IT staff.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:53, Reply)

Academic staff want all the flashy gear to show the board, but aren't willing to pay for the supporting infrastructure. As such, all the professional IT types get frustrated and leave for commercial enterprise, leaving you lot with Colin the school leaver.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:58, Reply)

most academics I know wouldn't even know how to turn on a smartboard, let alone care about using one.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:03, Reply)

A combination of a gadget enthusiast, IT ignorant Head, no infrastructure, 1930s power solutions and the comms room in a disused boiler room. Fucking nightmare.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:09, Reply)

However, here, you're the one being daft, because you're not in possession of all the information.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:51, Reply)

( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:51, Reply)

You can't expect people to put it on their own kit. You'd need consistent format and kit across all reviewers, who would have to supply it themselves. We don't get paid for this (reveiwing grants), why would we do it if we have to shell out for stuff?
Confidentiallity issues prevent a website from being used for some of these things. All the reviews I do for RCUK are done through an online system called JeS which does exactly as you describe. However, things like Wellcome Trust funding is done differently. You need to be able to sit at panel, talking to other reviewers and applicants at interview, with all the documents and all your private notes (which you do not share with others) to hand. I fail to see how the cost of posting an iPad twice is somehow an inefficient way of doing this?
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:50, Reply)

You've got the copy online as your master. Consistent format is easy enough, Word 2003 .doc format. Every piece of kit going can open it and save to it. I fail to see why you all need identical gear if the format is identical. Presumably there's a reason?
If you're going to a bloody review board, to sit in front of them and talk to them, please explain to me why an online original and a downloaded, amended, private copy of the document is a worse solution than the current? Because I'm baffled. Quite apart from the cost of having one of these things get lost in the post, if it does get lost, all that confidential data is in the public domain.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:56, Reply)

the second you let anyone download it. Which your scheme requires.
I reckon there's a fuck sight fewer iPods lost by couriers in this scheme then you would have documents left on trains if you let people handle it themselves.
and you want a format you can make notes on, not edit. So word is useless. Plus, figures and pictures will move and re-format, all that shit.
And that doesn't change the fact that reveiwers would still need to provide some piece of kit to bring to panel.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:01, Reply)

you don't need identical kit, meaning people can bring it in on laptops or USB sticks if there's a PC available on site.
I suspect half of all this is "this is the way it's done, therefore it's the only way to do it". You can make comments/notes on pdf documents without editing the original text.
OK, you have a point with the security, but you all seem happy to throw iPads through the post, so it doesn't seem as though that's exactly a high priority.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:04, Reply)

if they are not being paid to do a job. So, let's say you provide PCs at the panel - fair enough. 15 PCs still cost as much as 15 iPads. There's no saving there. You have a much higher risk of loss of confidentiallity though, because you'd be giving people access to files in a format they can print, so they might do that. And then leave them on trains, in hotels, etc. Or else drop their memory stick. You're a lot less likely to lose an iPad than that.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:09, Reply)

That is a complete non argument.
If the data is on the ipad it can be taken off the ipad. so the confidentiality argument is bullshit too.
If confidentiality is that important are you all forced to sign non disclosure agreements, or similar? If not then that's just further evidence that it's a bullshit argument, if you are, then it makes no difference how you are sent the information. You can be issued with individual version of an encrypted pdf so if it got leaked it would have your name on it.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:12, Reply)

You lose a Citrix keyfob in the post and you've lost nothing as they're assigned to passworded user accounts and even then you've got no idea which site it belongs to. Plus they cost pennies in comparison to iPads.
People log in. Access document from intranet. Make notes via pdf comments. Save to file. Journey to review panel, access via PC or laptop or even these iPads which you no longer need to post. User specific drives to save on, meaning confidentiality between reviewers.
Job done.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:13, Reply)

( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:14, Reply)

People just don't like change, even if it's demonstrably better and cheaper.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:17, Reply)

And I've seen nothing in Kroney's argument that is cheaper. You could instigate a system like he suggested which would be more secure, but it's certainly not cheaper. And as I said most academics would refuse to use it.
I think I'm spot on that you're bored and trying to provoke a meaningless arguement for the fun of it.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:21, Reply)

it's pointing out that couriering ipods back and forth is a stupidly inefficent system given the technology we have available at the moment. You keep defending it as the only way it could work given your criteria, but Kroney has already come up with a better solution that doesn't involve driving computers back and forth across the country.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:23, Reply)

I said it was the best for the scenario. Kroney's system is technically fine (except I still fail to see how two computers, one at each end, plus addional software, is in any way cheaper than one iPad or tablet), but fucking useless becuase a fair proportion of academics would refuse to use it. And no, that's not a problem with the academics. You need a system that works for all the aspects of the problem. Simply ignoring one aspect on the grounds you think that it's stupid is failing to provide a proper solution.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:30, Reply)

than couriering 15 iPads once a year?
Also, people then can't work while they are travelling to and from the panel with your model.
And, you're dealing with academics here. Tell them you're sending them a Citrix fob through the post that'll generate a random code enabling them to log onto a secure site etc etc etc and they'll tell you to fuck off, they aren't doing it unless you send paper versions. Tell them you're sending them a magic screen they can touch to make notes on and they'll probably grumble but agree.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:18, Reply)

For the cost of one iPad you can buy 30 Citrix tokens at a support cost of a few grand for the initial install and ongoing support. Plus you can send them first class in envelopes.
As for academics yes, they're change fearing morons. My point is that couriering iPads is a stupid solution, not that academics won't resist a different one.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:20, Reply)

Plus a fuck sight more technical support than you need to use an iPad
It's not a stupid solution. It's a perfectly sensible solution for the overall situation. You've just identified that certain parts of the situation are stupid and should be changed, but failing to see that the solution has to handle all aspects of the situation, rather than the parts that suit you.
You've identified a problem with some academics (change-fearing - morons it a bit fucking harsh, coming from a IT jockey, no?) and my point above is exactly the problem with IT. Refusal to accept that a good solution has to work for the all users and that you don't get to bend users to do what you want.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:26, Reply)

( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:31, Reply)

"OK, you're right in that it's technically better, but academics will refuse to use it because they're too change-resistant."
Which means that it's the users that are stupid, forcing you to use a stupid system. Which is fine, but that doesn't mean my solution is not better.
Simply saying that the users will refuse to use a better solution doesn't mean that your solution isn't less stupid or more sensible. It's fully retarded and you'll know that if you've got any sense at all.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:35, Reply)

it's as cheap as your solution, simpler, and for the users concerned, higher security. For people more IT literate, your solution is great. But it's not about change-resistance. Why should they change to use something they will never use again for a job they are doing as volunteers? It's like making it a condition of volunteering for the Samaritans that you have to be a fully trained psychotherapist.
"stupid" is not the same as "not interested in something not relevant" unless you want me to call you stupid because you can't design a process to scale up the manufacture of a therapuetic drug?
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:44, Reply)

You don't need to be any more IT literate than you need to be to use HSBC's online banking system. It uses precisely the same basic technology. They can access it from their own home computers, so no cost for the volunteers. My solution may have a higher initial cost, but when you balance that up over years against courier fees and the inevitable lost iPads, I'd be willing to place my own money on it working out even at the very least.
And "stupid" is exactly the same as "not interested and not relevant" if they're shooting themselves in the foot by taking that attitude.
I am not calling the people stupid, I am calling the solution stupid. I am calling the people ignorant. If you wish to call me ignorant for not understanding the process to scale up the manufacture of a therapeutic drug, then you'd be exactly right to do so.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:54, Reply)

being shipped once every 18 months - 2 years. By the time your setup cost has been outweighed by courier costs I suspect both solutions will be obselete.
And your solution still offers no way of working on the documents while travelling, which is when we tend to do this stuff. What with us being volunteers, and having more than full time jobs already.
No-one is being shot in the foot by anything, since the only people I've come across that have a problem with this are you and Al.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 12:07, Reply)

I'll look forward to reading about the loss of confidential data in the newspapers.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 12:09, Reply)

And I agree yours is more secure, but that's only one aspect of the situation.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 12:14, Reply)

You have just as much chance to disseminate that info as you do if you were to download it.
And you are just as likely to leave an ipod on the train as a document, honestly badger, you're really clutching at straws here.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:06, Reply)

And it's more secure becuase you'd have to download the pdf from the iPad, through choice, onto another device, and then disseminate it. You're not going to do it by accident. And the sender sets the security parameters, not the reciever. idiot-proofing.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:12, Reply)

If I had a document in it, then I would have lost it. If it had contained an ipad I would have lost that too.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:14, Reply)

is he more likely to walk off with a thick wedge of paper covered in SCIENCE, or an iPad?
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:18, Reply)

And having access to Microsoft office is hardly an unreasonable expectation.
And with current technology using a website to share data can't possibly cause confidentiality issues, certainly no more than physically sending you a paper document or a file rather than sending a whole ipad.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:56, Reply)

but on your last point, how do you access the website when you're sat at panel?
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:02, Reply)

www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/aug/06/amazon-kindle-ebook-sales-overtake-print
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:57, Reply)

Hope you die.
Fuck off.
Alt: Not great, arguments, football, boredom.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 9:59, Reply)

This may make my performance on Saturday, never stellar, positively mediocre. I'll be in dire need of that curry though, that's for sure.
Also, how do I get to this pub without going on any povvo carriages? I hate busses.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:06, Reply)

try Viagra.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:09, Reply)

( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:21, Reply)

because he's constantly flapping his arms they just assume (correctly) that he's a mental spaz.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:22, Reply)

( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:25, Reply)

( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:27, Reply)

Don't see the point of carting a Kindle around. It's a bit more conspicuous than staring thoughtfully at my phone when I'm sitting at my desk and having a stealth-read.
Quiet weekend, consumed a bit too much wine but had a very nice Sunday Lunch at the Whitechapel Gallery with the added benefit of spotting the stereotypical artfags.
This weekend I figure maybe a curry and a few drinks? If only I knew a bunch of people who also wished to do this.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:25, Reply)

( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 10:57, Reply)

no, never for me. I love the feel of books.
Weekend was alright. I"m home visiting my parents for a couple of days, then back to uni.
( , Mon 24 Sep 2012, 11:04, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »