
( , Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:10, archived)

a Bond site I frequent doesn't allow posters on it's forum to use ANY copyrighted images from Bond films.
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:21,
archived)

and what's your source?
If it's not www.mi6.co.uk don't belive a word of it
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:29,
archived)
If it's not www.mi6.co.uk don't belive a word of it

/the bit about picking up 2 mins. after CR finished. I do like that idea a lot :)
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:32,
archived)

as long as you have his greatest hits album you're sound as a pound.
To be honest I have heard his good songs so many times I never need to hear them again.
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:13,
archived)
To be honest I have heard his good songs so many times I never need to hear them again.

you wouldn't get it out again
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:18,
archived)

I donated on behalf of someone else but it's not turned up yet :/
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:20,
archived)

and mark it messageboard stuff
they go to her
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:39,
archived)
they go to her

but have not seen anything?
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:22,
archived)

It took a little while for mine to come through too. Patience is required methinks.
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:26,
archived)

Or has been for me. But I suspect there is some delay involved in donating on behalf of someone else
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:27,
archived)

someone else bought mine..
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:30,
archived)

but it wouldn't be very pretty.
*remembers that horrific scene-that-you-don't- actually-"see" in Seven*
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:28,
archived)
*remembers that horrific scene-that-you-don't- actually-"see" in Seven*

why not?
EDIT: really -- why do you think they're a bad thing?
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:45,
archived)
EDIT: really -- why do you think they're a bad thing?

Because they fill my screen up with green links and also are only on the icons.
As such they are just reducing the link-juice to the donation page - why would you do that?
You've got no robots.txt file, so it can't be that you want it excluded, I can't see why you would, and if you do want less links to it then why not leave them in place, but include a <meta name="robots" content="noindex,follow"> tag instead?
I know I am a loud arse, but I really know a lot about this sort of thing - if you tell me what you were trying to achieve when you did it then I might be able to offer a better alternative?
[Edit: gaz]
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:57,
archived)
As such they are just reducing the link-juice to the donation page - why would you do that?
You've got no robots.txt file, so it can't be that you want it excluded, I can't see why you would, and if you do want less links to it then why not leave them in place, but include a <meta name="robots" content="noindex,follow"> tag instead?
I know I am a loud arse, but I really know a lot about this sort of thing - if you tell me what you were trying to achieve when you did it then I might be able to offer a better alternative?
[Edit: gaz]

honestly, if I added extensions that I found annoying, I'd disable the extension. But that's just me.
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 16:08,
archived)

It's not an extension, it's something I have written for FF's CSS, but I find it very useful in my job.
The green shit on my screen only served to highlight the fact that they were there, which is why I am here, it's not why I am commenting.
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 16:18,
archived)
The green shit on my screen only served to highlight the fact that they were there, which is why I am here, it's not why I am commenting.

a performer has no right to be protective over their image. If I have a photograph of an artist I am able to show it to whom I like.
Of course, if an artist has paid for artwork for an album cover or commissioned a photographer for portfolio shots then the ownership of that Intellectual Property and the copyright on that work belongs to someone and using it illegally is something which is necessary.
Not actively defending one's trademark, in some nations, can cost the rights associated with that trademark.
If the fan site has adverts then it's no different than Zoo stealing our images.
( ,
Wed 7 Nov 2007, 15:34,
archived)
Of course, if an artist has paid for artwork for an album cover or commissioned a photographer for portfolio shots then the ownership of that Intellectual Property and the copyright on that work belongs to someone and using it illegally is something which is necessary.
Not actively defending one's trademark, in some nations, can cost the rights associated with that trademark.
If the fan site has adverts then it's no different than Zoo stealing our images.