All the cool kids will start making their pics 500px
as a pictorial 2 fingers to The System, and The Man.
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:13,
archived)
nobody tell happytoast or tga
speak for yourself the fp won't fit on my monitor now *sulks and feels inadequate
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:23,
archived)
splendid
are will still aiming to come in under 250k for anim's, 50k for still images?
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:16,
archived)
in that case
we'll stay as we were, just because of you.
edit/ i'll probably stick to 280 ish, optimisation seems to work nicely
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:18,
archived)
edit/ i'll probably stick to 280 ish, optimisation seems to work nicely
Too right.
I'm on 30gb a month, and I think I've done most of that in the last few days, but fuck it.
I don't actually care about image size, it will be alright and I'll try not to cry.
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:20,
archived)
I don't actually care about image size, it will be alright and I'll try not to cry.
Shitting christ
My 500px wide images are going to have to get bigger then.
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:16,
archived)
You'll want to keep your fp/pineapple image ratios correct
so I reckon you should be aiming for around 760px wide from now on.
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:28,
archived)
Ta for the math, I'll have that as an average from now on :)
I'll try and work to a 600px minimum from now on, none of my stuff would ever get on the front page so it's better not to live in hope and just do something big and weird :D
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:30,
archived)
I'm going to make everything 280px wide from now on
because I'm hardkore oldskool like that.
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:31,
archived)
really?
*looks at my old posts to see which one prompted Rob to demand policy change*
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:18,
archived)
Cool rob
thanks.
EDIT: also please consider fp'ing the Thom Yorke dolphin-hump picture.
www.b3ta.com/board/8734729
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:25,
archived)
EDIT: also please consider fp'ing the Thom Yorke dolphin-hump picture.
www.b3ta.com/board/8734729
wooooaaaaaooooaaaaaaaaoooooooo
this is the sound of my brain breaking :D
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:28,
archived)
this changes everything
who knew that such technology would exist to allow for more pixels.
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:46,
archived)
Still no word on where these extra pixels are supposed to come from though.
Fucking typical.
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:51,
archived)
yeah that was my initial thought
but I'd quite fancy a flutter on the alsorans.
:D
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 18:38,
archived)
:D
Oh no!
*fears change*
:O(
Also, I think the front page is going to look a bit shite from differently sized images in the Best Of column. Forcing everything into 280 gave a nice uniformity.
Has OCD.
And readily available source images are often less then 400px wide, so it's not as if everyone will just start producing bigger images.
We're all DOOOOOOOOMED!
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 17:55,
archived)
:O(
Also, I think the front page is going to look a bit shite from differently sized images in the Best Of column. Forcing everything into 280 gave a nice uniformity.
Has OCD.
And readily available source images are often less then 400px wide, so it's not as if everyone will just start producing bigger images.
We're all DOOOOOOOOMED!
Eh? Where do you get your source images from?
Most of my posts are made with high-res pics and have to be shrunk to post them here.
Tbh, I've no problem with the 280px limit, it's always the filesize that hurts image quality.
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 18:05,
archived)
Tbh, I've no problem with the 280px limit, it's always the filesize that hurts image quality.
Getty or straight Google.
Where do you find yours?
Do tell...!!!
( ,
Sat 13 Sep 2008, 18:14,
archived)
Do tell...!!!