Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8480161.stm
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 17:55, 93 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
full of Jamacians, and I never knew it was a quarter of your land mass.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 2:21, Reply)
How I feel about the bhurka to be honest.
I believe people should be allowed to do what they want. As long as it doesn't affect others. But then again, if I started bowling around in a motorbike helmet would it be accepted? At the end of the day, I suppose, there are actually security risks (however minor) with people having their whole faces hidden. Not sure I'd be comfortable with them being banned though as where would it end.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 18:12, Reply)
I'm saving up for Heidi-esque surgey
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 18:54, Reply)
Go on, tell the Amish they are banned from driving buggies. It's, like, repressive, innit.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 23:08, Reply)
If they choose no, they do not lose their heads.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 1:09, Reply)
given that some shops ban wearing hoodies now, and some places won't serve people with low-pulled hats etc that burkas are still acceptable.
I personally find it very discriminatory against women. To the extent that I know that almost anyone wearing a burka is someone I am unlikely to want to talk to
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 18:22, Reply)
2. I think it's grotesque control of women as possessions, up there with the Hassidic practice of shaving their women's heads. Primitive and repulsive.
So it's a dangerous and uncivilised practice, to my mind.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 18:34, Reply)
deserves a bit more than two points*?
*both beginning with "I think"
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 19:04, Reply)
with a short bout of knee jerk reactionary vitriol then I say so much the better. Now, what about having the gays in schools?
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:06, Reply)
the kids need to learn and the sooner they do the better
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:20, Reply)
If a minority of people feel just that little tiny bit better about their lives because of a personal choice I say take it away. I also think smoking, drinking, all highs legal or other wise, dancing, film and music should be banned. Oh and the Internet.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 18:37, Reply)
nor in many cases is it a 'personal choice.'
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 18:48, Reply)
I have never read the Koran but I'm pretty sure it doesn't tell women to cover up so radically. I have no problem with women dressing modestly if that's what they wish but I abhor the fact that some Muslim women have been brainwashed into wearing the burka. It's one of the few things that really makes me very angry. They do it as not to incite men's passion ffs. Why do women have to be the ones who suffer because of mens inability to control their urges and don't get me started on the rape laws in Afganistan etc. There has to be a witness of the rape or else the women is charged with unlawful sex.
I saw a programme the other day about a 14 year old Muslim female boxer in Leeds and it gave me a good feeling inside that there are some Muslim families that fight against the tide of female oppression.
I could go on but I won't bore you with my feelings on the matter.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 19:06, Reply)
(Not because you won't go on but because I agree with you). There was a woman in Florida who sued to be allowed to wer her burka while driving.
She didn't win.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:31, Reply)
but you feel entitled to make judgements on what it does and doesn't contain?
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:47, Reply)
I feel perfectly entitled to make judgements on what it contains. And BGB is right
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 21:04, Reply)
they'd sort it out, like a modern day, English, useless A-Team
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:21, Reply)
Whatever the causes and effects of the hijab, banning it is telling people what to wear. That's not cool in my book. There's a principle, and violating it sets a precedent.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:28, Reply)
more than most here I reckon. However the problem is primarily in the religious culture - that's what should be tackled. No one is actually forcing those French women to wear burkas, unless they are using illegal coercion.
I do accept that the situation is fucked and wince whenever I see that headgear.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:35, Reply)
family and everything they know that is also a type of coercion.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:39, Reply)
who willingly wear the veil as they believe it is right and proper for them to do so. I disagree entirely with them and think they are fucking retards, but if they want to do that then they should be allowed.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:46, Reply)
I'll say it a third time.
You have the right to wear what you want. There are many muslim women who simply will not appear in public without a full veil, so by banning the veil you are effectively putting them under house arrest. Your views and my views about the stupidity of this has no relevance to their right to wear whatever they want to.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:53, Reply)
then they are not able to make a free choice. The "honor" killings conducted by some fanatical family members are just a sympton of the situation.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 1:14, Reply)
The wearing of the burka is not a religious indoctrination but a cultural one, the same as infibulation and shaving heads for the Hassidic women.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:39, Reply)
The world is fucked, always has been.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 21:04, Reply)
lots of people do lots of things I find fucking disgusting, such as buying the Daily Mail, or voting for Boris Johnson, but the whole point of a free society is that these people can do that if they so choose.
Banning people from wearing a veil has fuck all to do with protection of women, it's an outright attack on freedom of expression. If they wanted to protect women from oppression there are lots of other things they could do. This is not one of them and will almost certainly lead to women, who previously could go out and interact with people whilst wearing their veils, being effectively locked up at home.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:40, Reply)
you are a gigantic arsebandit and an argumentative bastard, but you do speak sense when it counts
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:41, Reply)
you hob-breaking-cheese-eating-child-abuser
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:44, Reply)
Poor Blousie, she no politician but she drunk and hate wimmins opreshun, quite rightly. faredeplay.
*am I turning into gonz while he's ill?*
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 21:44, Reply)
You have no idea what you are talking about
I am no idealist, theologian or intellectual but one thing I do know about is women's rights and the history of female repression so shut up right now or I will get very angry.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:47, Reply)
you're wrong.
I just said, the ban has nothing to do with womens rights and oppression and will only have a negative effect in this regard. The right to wear a full burkha, or whatever the fuck you want to wear is essential to any society that calls itself free.
The fact that the burkha is usually a symbol of what I would consider stupid misguided individuals makes no difference what so ever. This ban is not a good idea.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:51, Reply)
"Any act that represses women should be banned.
I have never read the Koran but I'm pretty sure it doesn't tell women to cover up so radically."
So to follow your logic, you think that because they cover up it's oppression of women and therefore should be banned.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 20:54, Reply)
I stand by my first statement but I also realise that you can't change things overnight by a blanket ban on everyone's religious indoctrination.
Just agreeing that things are wrong but you accept their right to be indoctrinated is a cop out.
Edit - You can never have the same feeling of anger to this as you will never have to worry about this being an issue for you.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 21:00, Reply)
is that most of those women will need to leave the house anyway (since their husbands sure as fuck aren't going to be doing the shopping, picking up the kids and tidying the garden) so in fact they will still get out and about. And maybe now they'll have the option of face-to-face contact, and possibly the glimmering of a realisation that heaven hasn't struck them dead, and that maybe, just maybe all those pretty French woman with their uncovered hair and faces and lives and jobs and careers might have something right
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 21:08, Reply)
yes this is exactly what will happen. Absolutely. The fact that they've been walking around up until now seeing exactly the same things and yet they still choose to follow their religion in the way they do will magically change just because of the ban.
I really am trying to make this point as clearly as I can, this ban is not going to have any effect on women who choose or are coerced into wearing a burkha, they will still be in that situation. If you strongly believe this is wrong then you should look into how you can prevent this form happening, but I strongly believe that anyone should have the right to wear whatever they want to wear out in public if they so choose.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 21:40, Reply)
I'm saying that when they realised they're not being smited by God, sexually assaulted by men for showing a face or anything of the sort, that it might have some positive impact.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 22:06, Reply)
I was on an exchange trip to Paris when I was 14 and they were all wearing shellsuits.
Où sont les gendarmes de la mode?
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 21:15, Reply)
I beg to differ
Edit: I thought you were doing a riff on "ou sont les neiges d'antan" but on reflection this seems unlikely and I'm making no sense. But 50 gazillion points to anyone who knows what I'm on about.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 21:45, Reply)
Nobody can go as the Imperial Guard now
nirahlee.com/iswwr/evidence/Imperial_Royal_Guard_by_TheAphex.jpg
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 21:24, Reply)
Hang the bounders.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 22:43, Reply)
I may live in a northern backwater but the 21st century hasn't totally passed me by, old chap.
I've also heard that you can elect your chosen political party of choice these days. Who'd have thought it? Next thing you know, women will be working!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 0:12, Reply)
*lights cigar*
It's the Pakistanis, you know. Ghastly fellows. Can't understand a bloody word they're saying, what?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 0:17, Reply)
Especially if the kitten is wearing a burka so I can't see them. Do burkas cover breasts? Surely it's bras that cover breasts, and bras are a bit phwooaar, eh? Eh?
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 23:42, Reply)
Mind you, I'm as cissed as a punt and no mistake.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 23:55, Reply)
before you added your own phwooar. Thus I assumed synchronicity. Yes old boy, I am fucking hammered.
(, Tue 26 Jan 2010, 23:57, Reply)
the police may be raiding the brothel at the end of my street. It's frightfully noisy out there.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 0:02, Reply)
You have a brothel at the end of your street? What a frightfully delightful neighbourhood you must live in. All exotic, like.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 0:07, Reply)
Was when my next door neighbour use to remember that all her bras were hanging on the washing line and would dash out into the garden, tits on display, to grab one.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 0:10, Reply)
I have a local pal Ray who is the absolute spit of Huggy Bear who was recently regaling me with a tale of one of his chums who refused to pay the requisite £35 BUT INSTEAD PAID £25!!!!
How we laughed.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 0:11, Reply)
INTERNET CONTROVERSY!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 2:25, Reply)
As I hate the French and that religion in equal measure.
Yrs,
N Griffin.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 8:28, Reply)
sexy to see a woman's hand or ear or anything other than a shapless pile of cloth.
It would be strange to live in a society where if you see a woman’s hand or face it is considered porn and excites you. Maybe by forcing the women to take off their burkas or chadors, all of the men will be so horny they won't have time to think about jihad or bombing anyone because they will be so busy wanking 24 hours a day.
(I know, politically incorrect, not really funny, poorly written, etc) Shoot me.
I do know I would rather not see someone in a burka in an airport as in Iraq there were a number of bombings conducted by men dressed as women in burka type clothing. Also, I am not sure what banks think about someone coming into a bank with their identity completely disguised. Isn’t that what bank robbers do?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 12:46, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »