
from the people who keep an eye on "loose cannons"
*edit - you may want to resize that ;)
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:10,
archived)
*edit - you may want to resize that ;)

some of us are struggling to get jobs as it is, without this cunt jumping in.. ;)

or are you just "helping them with their enquiries"?
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:36,
archived)

it will involve me selling here and moving, mind.
but it's all good.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 16:07,
archived)
but it's all good.

*starts campaign for more bell towers in sink estates*

saville row is where all the touriss go for suits.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:16,
archived)

Excellent work, as always. I am so intimidated by your greatness I can barely trype.
In other news: did you get my pic for zombification?
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:17,
archived)
In other news: did you get my pic for zombification?

I currently have about 30 requests too many
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:22,
archived)

I'm not a big enough b3tan for people to recognise, so I never really expected to get 'done'. As they say in the 'hood', "it's all good". Or something.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:23,
archived)

and, unless I stop eating really soon, getting bigger by the day.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:26,
archived)

chip butties, bacon and egg on toast, even sodding croutons. it's just not worth the pain.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:17,
archived)

felt like shit after six hot dog buns.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:19,
archived)

that's just eating too many hot dog buns. :)
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:21,
archived)

because of crispy duck and pancakes! it didn't even cross my mind that pancakes contain wheat.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:24,
archived)

I didn't know wheat allergies could be that dangerous.
*eyes pancakes suspiciously*
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:26,
archived)
*eyes pancakes suspiciously*

my date just panicked and drove me straight to A&E. they thought it was my appendix and decided to keep me in overnight.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:29,
archived)

But I spent 2 nights in hospital with appendicitis when I was a lil' un.
*edit* That should have been "SUSPECTED appendicitis".
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:33,
archived)
*edit* That should have been "SUSPECTED appendicitis".

the pain is often in the same place as it would be with appendicitis and they don't want to take the chance. appendicitis can kill you.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:34,
archived)

i've been pulled in 6 times so far with "suspected" appendicitis. i keep telling them it's not, but they insist on checking anyway. they still haven't taken my sodding appendix out, though!
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:44,
archived)

with wheat (gluten) in OAT cereal! Luckily I know what is and isn't safe to eat, because my Dad's a coeliac, and I've watched him doubling over in agony at so many foods.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:28,
archived)

it's nasty! bloody expensive, too. £2 for a small loaf. it's bad enough having to put up with soya milk without eating that cack as well.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:31,
archived)

home made gluten free bread (done in a bread maker) tastes just like the real thing. I can't bring myself to eat the pre-packaged stuff. Aside from the fact it crumbles everywhere, it tastes like cardboard - and not in a good way.
However, Morrisons do a really nice range of biscuits - coconut flavour are excellent.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:35,
archived)
However, Morrisons do a really nice range of biscuits - coconut flavour are excellent.

and i've lost a lot of weight since i cut out the bread, so i suppose it's a good thing, really.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:37,
archived)

I seem to be over compensting with crisps, rice pizazz and ryvita.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:39,
archived)

that way, i've always got healthy stuff when i've got the munchies.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:42,
archived)

but it turned out just to be a lie.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:33,
archived)

then i had a major allergic reaction to antibiotics. since then, i've been developing allergies to all kinds of stuff.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:35,
archived)

it's coming to something when your body parts gang up on you!
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:47,
archived)

what are you viewing with, what can't read them?
JPG version here for you: www2.b3ta.com/host/creative/46786/1190038494/WheatChaffJPG.jpg
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:15,
archived)
JPG version here for you: www2.b3ta.com/host/creative/46786/1190038494/WheatChaffJPG.jpg

Because JPEGs are more heavily compressed than other image formats, their information is more volatile and likely to expand at high speed through an unchecked buffer, poorly allocated resource or any other available system space. I'd guess you're probably losing image data through one of these means.
You see, when you load a JPEG into memory, the EXtra colour Information Format (EXIF) header is loaded into RAM in order to prepare the video prebuffer for the incoming high-speed flow of colour information from the uncorked JPEG. If your bus isn't ready for this information, the rapidly decompressing file information can flow through other parts of your system.
Ordinarily this isn't a problem: as a matter of fact, JPEG was designed for this sort of thing. Older computers couldn't handle the explosive power behind the fledgeling image decompression algorithm, so rather than fight it, image experts invented the Jampacked Picture Extraction and Gathering (JPEG) protocol. They cleverly decided to allow the image data to spray wherever it would, knowing that after the extraction phase would send raw data all over the inside of the computer, the gathering phase would locate it all and reassemble it into an image. With the advent of faster computers the delay between spray and collection is so small as to be unnoticeable, while newer and bigger video cards are more capable of withstanding the onslaught of colours.
Still, the primary weakness of this algorithm is the haphazard placement of decompressed data. There's just too much of it to channel through normal means, so any loss of data containment results in corrupted images. In your case, it would appear that you're losing image data through the empty hole where your goddamned shift key should be.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:17,
archived)
You see, when you load a JPEG into memory, the EXtra colour Information Format (EXIF) header is loaded into RAM in order to prepare the video prebuffer for the incoming high-speed flow of colour information from the uncorked JPEG. If your bus isn't ready for this information, the rapidly decompressing file information can flow through other parts of your system.
Ordinarily this isn't a problem: as a matter of fact, JPEG was designed for this sort of thing. Older computers couldn't handle the explosive power behind the fledgeling image decompression algorithm, so rather than fight it, image experts invented the Jampacked Picture Extraction and Gathering (JPEG) protocol. They cleverly decided to allow the image data to spray wherever it would, knowing that after the extraction phase would send raw data all over the inside of the computer, the gathering phase would locate it all and reassemble it into an image. With the advent of faster computers the delay between spray and collection is so small as to be unnoticeable, while newer and bigger video cards are more capable of withstanding the onslaught of colours.
Still, the primary weakness of this algorithm is the haphazard placement of decompressed data. There's just too much of it to channel through normal means, so any loss of data containment results in corrupted images. In your case, it would appear that you're losing image data through the empty hole where your goddamned shift key should be.

Words!!! One eleventy!
*eyes glaze over*
*goes to sleep*
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:18,
archived)
*eyes glaze over*
*goes to sleep*

JPEG Joint Photographic Experts Group. The international consortium of hardware, software, and publishing interests that, under the auspices of the ISO, has defined a universal standard for digital compression and decompression of still images for use in computer systems. JPEG compresses at about a 20:1 ratio before visible image degradation occurs. It is lossy data compression standard that was originally designed for still images but can also compress real-time video (30 frames per second) and animation. Lossy compression permanently discards unnecessary data, resulting in some loss of precision.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 16:24,
archived)

and most online image editors don't seem to be able to handle png files.
I can see them if the host isn't blocked. But the b3ta hosting is blocked.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:24,
archived)
I can see them if the host isn't blocked. But the b3ta hosting is blocked.



besides, the ne'er-do-wells will surely stab her and rape her poodle to steal her coffee.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 15:41,
archived)