
Haven't people got legs and public transport any more?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:00,
archived)
and would have to give up my job, due to not being able to afford to get there. Public Transport does not facilitate my getting to work
I could do it, but it would take 2 1/2 hours a day, and cost more than my monthly fuel bill
:(
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:03,
archived)
I could do it, but it would take 2 1/2 hours a day, and cost more than my monthly fuel bill
:(
and rosy cheeked buxom lassies carry me to work on a throne while they take it in turns to vigorously fellate me. It normally takes between 20 and 25 minutes.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:20,
archived)
... aside from the underclass of rosy cheeked buxom lassies
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:25,
archived)
It wouldn't affect me *that* badly, but there are plenty of people it would. It's nowhere near as clear cut as a lot of people think it is.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:12,
archived)
I bloody hate it but it's the cheapest way to get in.
:(
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:17,
archived)
:(
I'm a busdriver - you'd think we were the most evil people in the world anybody think we had a right to drive down a "Bus Lane" and park safely at a... wait for it... "Bus Stop" or even dread of dread actually go through a (what scientists like to call) "Bus Gate" without having to avoid hitting some idiot short cutting in the opposite direction...
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:05,
archived)
I use them very often. Lovely, it is.
Well done to you for being a bus driver, I've seen some of your lot deal with some right pricks.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:07,
archived)
Well done to you for being a bus driver, I've seen some of your lot deal with some right pricks.
I was assaulted twice in 2 weeks by these pricks simply because I refused to turn the other cheek and let them ride for free and because I dared to challenge them I get them throwing punches at me. The first threw an out of date daysaver at me then ran upstairs then 2 weeks later a man who made a big deal about where he was getting off - decided to over ride - I simply informed him that to go further will cost him more money he punched me with a tin of beans in his hand. After all this what did my company (First) say to me - "Don't challenge passengers!" well excuse me that is my job or do you expect people to ride free because that is fine by me.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:12,
archived)
Sure, some of them are cunts, but you get that in all walks of life.
I have no problem with using public transport, it's just the methods that Greater Manchester Future Transport have used to promote this.
Impartial? My fucking arse.
If they listened to all the other ideas that people had put across for improving public transport, then perhaps we'd have had a yes vote today.
Anyway, I've blabbered on about this enough in the past few months. Just going to enjoy the result now.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:11,
archived)
I have no problem with using public transport, it's just the methods that Greater Manchester Future Transport have used to promote this.
Impartial? My fucking arse.
If they listened to all the other ideas that people had put across for improving public transport, then perhaps we'd have had a yes vote today.
Anyway, I've blabbered on about this enough in the past few months. Just going to enjoy the result now.
nonsence clearly the buss lane is for people who eat crunchy nut
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:15,
archived)
people saying get'im while pointing at a screen.
however there are no bus lanes near me as I am a rural type. but if there was one, I would not park in it.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:22,
archived)
however there are no bus lanes near me as I am a rural type. but if there was one, I would not park in it.
yeah time goes three times as slow of me cause i am from jupitur. so i get fthree cakes
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:23,
archived)
And the conjestion charge is a great concept. Unfortunately environmental issues are not what it's ther for. It's ther to generate profit. I'm slap bang in the middle of the London CC.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:17,
archived)
Since the congestion charge I refuse to drive into London because of the congestion charge.
So it hasn't really affected me. Really.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:22,
archived)
So it hasn't really affected me. Really.
The idea is great, the people profiting from it isn't.
Unfortunately I'm slapbang in the middle of the extention, except the extention ingludes the entire area except my street. The traffic and the accidents have quadrupled since it's advent.
The secret if you're approaching from the west of London is to drive into Acton with is relatively safe for parking and free to park and just get the tube in the little way from there.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:26,
archived)
Unfortunately I'm slapbang in the middle of the extention, except the extention ingludes the entire area except my street. The traffic and the accidents have quadrupled since it's advent.
The secret if you're approaching from the west of London is to drive into Acton with is relatively safe for parking and free to park and just get the tube in the little way from there.
more accidents per mile than any other road user and responsible for a whopping 74% of motor vehicle related bicycle accidents might not mean that YOU are a bad driver, but does kind of point at bus drivers generally being cunts.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 17:36,
archived)
But it was obviously going to have nothing with the voters and everything to do wit the corporations what would benefit from it.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:00,
archived)
Who in their right mind would pay every time they got a blocked nose?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:00,
archived)
in order to persuade me to be more careful not to catch colds, since I don't know what's best for me.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:04,
archived)
your really don't want a cold, you should be aspiring to 'flu at least.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:09,
archived)
I'm my own worst enemy, that's why I must be thwarted and slain.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:25,
archived)
and I don't want to appear ignorant, so I'm going to say that I think it's appalling. Either that or it's long overdue. Or perhaps, let's wait and see how it turns out before we judge it.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:04,
archived)
although i've not quite made up my mind.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:08,
archived)
Co-ordination problems and all that economic speak, innit? Although, I do hear tales that Manchester doesn't have a congestion problem. I would've voted 'Yes' given the choice.
EDIT: Woo to picture!
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:05,
archived)
EDIT: Woo to picture!
I am fed up and exhausted from pointing out the positives to all the nobs that voted no.
Urgh. I'm going to bed.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:20,
archived)
Urgh. I'm going to bed.
The thing is, the "No" voters:
- Don't think the plans were justified
- Don't think it's fair that drivers should have to pay a third driving-related tax to subsidise a service that they won't use
- Don't trust GMPTE not to almightily fuck up as they usually do
- Don't trust the fact that it was a proposal and therefore open to change
- Don't like the fact that they're pushing more money into the knickers of Stagecoach when they're rolling in money as it is
- Hate those fucking awful adverts with the tenuous "MY BABY WILL DIE OF AIDS IF YOU VOTE NO" statements on them.
I am fed up and exhausted from pointing out those points to all the nobs that voted yes.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 17:18,
archived)
- Don't think the plans were justified
- Don't think it's fair that drivers should have to pay a third driving-related tax to subsidise a service that they won't use
- Don't trust GMPTE not to almightily fuck up as they usually do
- Don't trust the fact that it was a proposal and therefore open to change
- Don't like the fact that they're pushing more money into the knickers of Stagecoach when they're rolling in money as it is
- Hate those fucking awful adverts with the tenuous "MY BABY WILL DIE OF AIDS IF YOU VOTE NO" statements on them.
I am fed up and exhausted from pointing out those points to all the nobs that voted yes.
to drive 6 miles into Manchester city centre at 8.30am, why should i pay £1200 a year so that the chavs can have more buses to piss in?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:35,
archived)
that has really, really annoyed me is the Arrogance of Lucy Powell. ( Labour, Withington ) Who has decided that the reason the public have voted no on this issue is simply because it was too complicated for us to understand why getting out of our cars and onto council run public transport schemes was for the greater good.
Well forgive me for being too damn stupid to understand why forcing me to pay more to use my car so that I may subsidise a continually failing ( and in the main, privately operated ) public transport system ( failing despite having more and more public money thrown at it despite yearly worsening performance ) is in the greater good.
Here's why the public said no. We'd rather sit on the A57 or the M62 for an extra 10 minutes and pay no more stealth taxes than sit on the roads with no notable change except that we are paying so some chav can drag her brood to the precinct on a bus.
We can only learn from London. Yes it worked to an extent for the city but the reasons were mainly that it became financially impossible for private motorists to continue to drive in congestion charge areas. That of course did have a positive effect on the vehicles on the road. So what did they do? Rest on their laurels at a job well done? No, they made the congestion charge area even greater ( practically outside my front door in my London address ) and stretched it out to the suburbs. Why?
Finance. There has only ever been one reason for congestion charges and that is because it is an unavoidable tax and props up local governments who have been unable to balance books due to them being unable to collect council tax.
I'll tell you who should feel stupid. Whoever thought having a referendum would work in the favour of stealth taxes.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:21,
archived)
Well forgive me for being too damn stupid to understand why forcing me to pay more to use my car so that I may subsidise a continually failing ( and in the main, privately operated ) public transport system ( failing despite having more and more public money thrown at it despite yearly worsening performance ) is in the greater good.
Here's why the public said no. We'd rather sit on the A57 or the M62 for an extra 10 minutes and pay no more stealth taxes than sit on the roads with no notable change except that we are paying so some chav can drag her brood to the precinct on a bus.
We can only learn from London. Yes it worked to an extent for the city but the reasons were mainly that it became financially impossible for private motorists to continue to drive in congestion charge areas. That of course did have a positive effect on the vehicles on the road. So what did they do? Rest on their laurels at a job well done? No, they made the congestion charge area even greater ( practically outside my front door in my London address ) and stretched it out to the suburbs. Why?
Finance. There has only ever been one reason for congestion charges and that is because it is an unavoidable tax and props up local governments who have been unable to balance books due to them being unable to collect council tax.
I'll tell you who should feel stupid. Whoever thought having a referendum would work in the favour of stealth taxes.
West Ken and Shepherd's Bush road. Not any future plans they might have to see if they can stretch it from Paris to Glasgow without anyone noticing.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:29,
archived)
No VAT on them and instead of scanning cars ,scan bikes and give a bonus per bike, per household for those cycling.
That was not only do you solve, partially, the problem with those on low income but those on low income that suffer from obesity, or the ones with a poor diet not the lazy bastards.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:30,
archived)
That was not only do you solve, partially, the problem with those on low income but those on low income that suffer from obesity, or the ones with a poor diet not the lazy bastards.
We don't need a congestion charge. We need a baby charge so that people stop churning out sprogs that grow up unable to afford a car and only see the inside of the one they nicked or the one they get transported to jail in.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:35,
archived)
Had a few technical issues though. Do you mean "unable to afford a Range Rover"?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:40,
archived)
I said make it cheaper for people to cycle!
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 17:00,
archived)
Private roads are what we need, if we're ever going to have perspex tubes in the sky and other pleasing ideas.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:31,
archived)
We have a flat in Hammersmith because she still works down there during the week.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:33,
archived)
I hope that £8 to drive a distance it'd be quicker and cheaper to cycle, or to cover by tube, doesn't wipe you out completely.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:39,
archived)
When I was last there I had to be in Mayfair every morning for 8am. I could drive it in 15 minutes or take the lottery of the tube and get from Hammersmith to Green Park in a random 45 minutes to an hour and a half.
Cycling in London is dangerous at the best of times but when you have heavy baggage it is not viable.
Don't talk to my like you know my traffic habits and can assume that all London car journeys are easier by cycle or tube because that's simply not so.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:45,
archived)
Cycling in London is dangerous at the best of times but when you have heavy baggage it is not viable.
Don't talk to my like you know my traffic habits and can assume that all London car journeys are easier by cycle or tube because that's simply not so.
Or I would if they extended the congestion charge zone and built a few more bus lanes. Otherwise it'd take ages.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:54,
archived)
They're almost public transport, and don't seem to charge you for the C-Charge anyway.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 17:01,
archived)
so he's got somewhere to park his ship.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:34,
archived)
Complaining about a 'stealth tax' that's about as stealthy as an elephant, painfully snobby ranting about 'chavs', saying the congestion charge worked and still whining about it..
...do you work for the Mail?
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:37,
archived)
...do you work for the Mail?
I said that the congestion charge in London had the effect of reducing traffic in certain areas and I qualified that with further statements.
Stealth taxes don't have to be 'hidden' They are designed to be a way of income generation without being a state ratified national taxation.
The term stealth tax refers to a levy that you pay that is a tax in all but name. Not your definition of a payment that is obvious.
fuck you and the Daily Mail.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:41,
archived)
Stealth taxes don't have to be 'hidden' They are designed to be a way of income generation without being a state ratified national taxation.
The term stealth tax refers to a levy that you pay that is a tax in all but name. Not your definition of a payment that is obvious.
fuck you and the Daily Mail.
you should do less of that, chavs are people too, I'm almost sure of it.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:44,
archived)
meant to subsidise their being? I'm happy for all people to do their own thing. Just to have them pay for it themselves.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:47,
archived)
If it were a tax ratified in parliament then all well and good, but it's not. It is a revenue gaining scheme aimed at the wealthy or business that has done nothing in London for the public transport system ( which I believe was meant to be the big carrot )
If local councils want more money for public transport then ask the government for it as they are supposed to. If the government need more money for it then ask the country as they are supposed to.
I'm not adverse to paying taxes. I'm adverse to being forced to give money to local councils that don't manage things any better with or without the funding.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 16:53,
archived)
If local councils want more money for public transport then ask the government for it as they are supposed to. If the government need more money for it then ask the country as they are supposed to.
I'm not adverse to paying taxes. I'm adverse to being forced to give money to local councils that don't manage things any better with or without the funding.
10% off bus fares came in very handy.
As did the reduced prices on the Oyster system.
New buses on my route this month too.
You're talking from a standpoint of ignorance I'm afraid.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 17:27,
archived)
As did the reduced prices on the Oyster system.
New buses on my route this month too.
You're talking from a standpoint of ignorance I'm afraid.
for those that use it by charging those that don't is not my idea of useful. It has not made it any easier or quicker to travel around london by public transport. We were promised quicker travel. In my experience of London, for the most part travel by bus has grown longer in time on the same routes and I have no idea what the figures for tube travel are but it's clearly now operating way beyond capacity.
The fact is that if I finish work at 6pm in Central London I can leave for home on public transport or I can go to the pub for an hour and a half and still get home at the same time.
I'm not ignorant of public transport. It's simply not an option for me due to the amount of time it takes to get anywhere. Because it is cheaper for you does not in any way mean that the infrastructure has benefited from the congestion charge.
The idea was to free up roads and make journeys quicker. making it cheaper to sit on a bus longer is just taking the piss. Especially for those that don't sit on the bus.
(,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 17:39,
archived)
The fact is that if I finish work at 6pm in Central London I can leave for home on public transport or I can go to the pub for an hour and a half and still get home at the same time.
I'm not ignorant of public transport. It's simply not an option for me due to the amount of time it takes to get anywhere. Because it is cheaper for you does not in any way mean that the infrastructure has benefited from the congestion charge.
The idea was to free up roads and make journeys quicker. making it cheaper to sit on a bus longer is just taking the piss. Especially for those that don't sit on the bus.

