Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
uk.news.yahoo.com/nandos-feature-colonel-gaddafi-and-saddam-hussein-in-controversial-advert.html
For those who don't wanna go to the article, it's a new Nandos advert featuring Gaddafi at a dinner table alone. He's thinking about prominant dictators (Gadaffi, Husain, Mogabi and a whole bunch I didn't recongise) frollicking around, such as making 'Snow Angels' in the sand, having a water-fight with with a golden AK47, and driving around standing on top of a tank.
Although I can see this has the potential to really hurt someone who's suffered under the verious regiems, is it people getting offended on behalf of others? Or is this just a modern take on Charlie Chaplin's "The Great Dictator" ?
What's your two-cents?
ALT: Friday today, got the weekend coming up, handed in my notice in my current flat, gonna go order my furniture and carpets and paint and cupboards tomorow. OH BOY.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:18, 174 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:22, Reply)
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:26, Reply)
My friend claimed to take offence to 'Ahmed The Dead Terrorist', I told her to piss off.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:30, Reply)
because it's fucking shit and not remotely amusing.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:32, Reply)
But none of the funny bits are quotable, so a not-too-terrible sketch has been ruined by retards quoting every unfunny line in it.
See also: Little Britain, Peter Kay, etc.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:40, Reply)
They took a handful of ideas which, on their own, might be reasonably funny, and repeated them over and over until they just looked pathetic.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:42, Reply)
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:43, Reply)
and I think if I was oppressed by any of them, I'd actually like them being mocked.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:26, Reply)
and by directly comparing him with Gadaffi and Hussein it makes him look like a fool.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:29, Reply)
Although, as a counter-point/devil's advocate, if someone has done something horrific to you and yours, something quite significant, terrorised you. I think maybe if that was turned into an insignificant event, it might irk me. The jewish culture is well known for mocking those who oppress them, the jokes in the ghettos can be really funny* in a morrose way. But I could imagine something that has effected me all my life in an horrific way, mocking that thing in relation to belittling it into nothing, might see that the rest of the world don't realise what a big deal it is.
* Hitler hears of a fortune teller in the ghetto. So he asigns his best SS officers to guard him and he goes into the encampment. He sees this women and demans "Yid ! You shall tell me the future, and for that, I shall spare a trip on the trains. Tell me, when will I die?". So the old women takes Hitler's hand and traces a line on it. She then looks him straight in the eye and says "Mine furrah, it is fortold that you shall die on a Jewish Holiday". Hitler's face turns gray, and asks her how she knows. The old lady looks him right in the eye, and she says "Hitler, any day you die, will be a Jewish Holiday".
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:39, Reply)
I think we should worry that it's a stupendously fucking awful advert and the people who commisioned it should be burn on spikes.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:32, Reply)
shock factor will compensate for.
If people are going to get offended by adverts, those ones with the cartoon rappers banging on about fancy cars with bluetooth or whatever the fuck it is are a good place to start.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:37, Reply)
surely you couldn't give fewer of a fuck?
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:37, Reply)
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:51, Reply)
This is becuase I am LESS stupid than you.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:59, Reply)
since even Quentin would have spotted the pisstake.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:03, Reply)
it was a midly humerous diversion to the thread.
not everything on the internet has to be about being a cunt, you know.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:10, Reply)
and 'less' is used to describe singular things,
and a fuck is a singular thing, I'm not really sure what your point is.
I'm not quite sure what a 'discrete quantity' is either but I'm willing to bet your pubes to my wristwatch that it doesn't shed any light on whatever they fuck you were talking about.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:58, Reply)
It would shed light on it were it not for the fact I'm quite obviously deliberately talking shite. However I've no need for your pubes, and they aren't really a fair stake against my U-Boat. Soz.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:02, Reply)
I need to know, I wouldn't want to look stupid on the internet.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:04, Reply)
whatever. you know, it is possible to run with a joke without being a tit about it, you know. Even Al managed, if you noticed.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:07, Reply)
then you would think an unemployed barrister would be able to do it too.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:11, Reply)
Americans who say "I could care less", when they mean they couldn't care less. How fucking idiot is that?
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:41, Reply)
because
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:36, Reply)
too much kebab in my belly.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:37, Reply)
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:40, Reply)
I was thinking I may go by Sunday to pick up my post and be all like OH HAI! Was I interupting your packing? Sorry I'll help! And by help I mean shout encouragement. Maybe I'll buy some pom poms
Give me a G! Give me an O! Give me an N! Give me a Z! iiiiiittttt'sssss goooooonz
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:44, Reply)
"Give me a G! Give me an N! Give me an Eplison! Give me a Q! What do you have? Fuck knows"
SOrry Gonz mate. I had to go there.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:53, Reply)
Shock ad's are nothing new (think back to the Benetton ad's of the past).
Creative agencies come up with them for 3 reasons; 1] they can't think of a better idea 2]the client wants PR as part of campaign and 3] they want people to talk about it.
None of it is original thinking.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:40, Reply)
...and now it appears I'm a Panda
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:04, Reply)
although i DO like their peri-peri mayonnaise.
so i have a third date tonight with this guy that i really don't like but i'm too wet to tell him i don't want to go, esp as i have cancelled twice already. any suggestions for putting him off?
for the benefit of al: the idea is to stimulate an amusing discussion about dreadful things to do on a date rather than to say "swipe, your repellent face and personality should have put him off already". for the avoidance of doubt.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:59, Reply)
In australia they are more like a takeaway.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:01, Reply)
(scroll down a tiny bit to see the pictures)
custardpringle.livejournal.com/511446.html#cutid1
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:02, Reply)
this is sheer genius.
some of it is still true. the drinking one? very very true.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:10, Reply)
except doing my makeup in public, which i never do.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:23, Reply)
the 'not caress other men on your date'
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:25, Reply)
presumably because men do not object to that.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:28, Reply)
when women were a necessarily, albeit silly, evil you needed to endure in order to get your washing done.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:28, Reply)
Oh, you didn't.
Er, yeah, anyway. Carry on.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:33, Reply)
when i re-read it, i thought someone would make that joke.
i just never thought it would be you, b3th. for shame.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:07, Reply)
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:14, Reply)
to realise she isn't the only pervert on the planet.
also... yeah, as DF said, nobody is surprised to hear that. not. at. all.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:12, Reply)
you've been spreading the manly seeds of your adoration all over your screen for years.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:15, Reply)
I've got a screen protector for that kind of thing.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:17, Reply)
somehow makes this whole disgusting image so much better
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:25, Reply)
I have people to do that kind of thing for me these days.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:32, Reply)
Basically TMB, you're more in denial than I am.
YEAH I WENT THERE
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:18, Reply)
a) no it isn't
b) where's eygpt?
c) Who the hell are you and what have you done with Badger?
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:21, Reply)
my apologies. that rather bollocks that one up.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:23, Reply)
I might cryogenically freeze myself now so as to forever preserve a feeling that will doubtless be fleeting and never return.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:25, Reply)
welcome to my world. you've got 5 minutes. don't waste it.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:26, Reply)
*examines label*
...and now I know everything about you that interests me
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:26, Reply)
Hint: Pepperberry is your friend
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:29, Reply)
coming onto DF
you're not a real gay.
you're a BI. a big, swinging, pink sock wearing, BI!
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:24, Reply)
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:26, Reply)
i don't think it would benefit anyone on here if i were to answer that!
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:27, Reply)
Is that totally bald, or the one with a line which might as well have "Heaven this way" tattooed above it?
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:27, Reply)
Fairly confident Swipey won't be mistaken for a child any time soon though
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:32, Reply)
he goes for: views on appearance (based purely on facebook), shallowness (based purely on b3ta posts), dead mother.
nothing new. not for months and months and months.
he needs to change the record or change the target. i'm pretty easy as to which.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:45, Reply)
I pretty much just go for "show us yer tits"
Is that somehow better?
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:50, Reply)
in a minute she'll say "I'm not angry, I'm just disappointed"
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 13:07, Reply)
Nobody makes the same assumptions over shaved armpits, or legs. Yet logically the same argument applies.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:34, Reply)
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:36, Reply)
because some people find hair unsightly and smooth skin feels nicer.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:37, Reply)
Whilst on the face of it the same principle should apply, the shaving of armpits and legs is commonplace, especially if these areas are to be displayed. There is a much wider range of options in play for the bikini line.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:39, Reply)
because the thing about paedos, the defining, indisputable feature of them, is that they fuck children. Not adults with shaved mittens.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:42, Reply)
as referenced by my pointing out that Swipey is not going to be mistaken for a child, unless she's a child smuggling two other children in her blouse. I was just illustrating the difference in attitudes towards the shaving of the respective areas
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:44, Reply)
when really it'll be waiting tables for the next 15 years before ending up in porn.
I probably needed to think that analogy though a bit, but, fuck it, let's throw it out there.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:29, Reply)
I thought it probably wasn't very good. Apart from the porn bit.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:33, Reply)
that your analogy was not very well thought out, i mean.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:36, Reply)
If so, we have something in common. Apart from the forthcoming spitroast of a London-based solicitor.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:36, Reply)
but, if me being BI works for you, let's run with it.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:28, Reply)
How on earth would anyone ever work it out?!
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:08, Reply)
Let us bask in our internet anonymity, 'Darth Foxtrot', 32, telecomms analyst from Norwich.
; )
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:11, Reply)
"Oh I'm sorry, I'd like to go out with you, but I have a history of managing to pull homosexuals. They, at least, had the decency to pretend to be straight, ducky. Kiss, kiss"
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:10, Reply)
get pissed, go back to his place, be a crap shag.
He'll never phone you again.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:18, Reply)
i don't think i could. it'd be like trying to hide a warhead in the sahara.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:26, Reply)
not that he has a small cock.
Happy to help.
Edit: There's a lot of talk about your chuff on here today.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:30, Reply)
the advert itself barely makes sense, I was watching thinking the reason he was alone was that they'd all fucked off to Nandos without him.
Alt: I'm off to Ireland tonight. A ridiculous amount of time aboard a coach beckons and possible freezing to death
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 11:59, Reply)
They pass a gay bar and one turns to the other and says,
"let's pop in here and get shit faced"
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:02, Reply)
he's actually just building a straw man argument against H&S and PC.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:18, Reply)
I think it's terrible. Those lookalikes are shit.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:11, Reply)
I have to volunteer this information; ParcelForce are worse. Much worse.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:28, Reply)
On wednesday they claim the consignee had resheduled.
He had not they were lying
On thursday they claim it's a non arrival at the depot and that we hadn't sent it.
We had they were lying.
Today they admit they have lost it and we will have to fill out a mazillion forms to claim the money back. They apologise for losing it.
My customer calls to say he's just received it.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:33, Reply)
only, he'll probably be conkers deep in it by now if so.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:35, Reply)
I hope he's not fucking my bathrom furniture
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:37, Reply)
That is fairly breathtaking actually.
*gasps for air*
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:35, Reply)
Whilst I would enjoy the endless paperwork involved in attempting to reclaim any money from you in regards to the lost item, I have just had an email from my customer saying that he has received the item.
I am slightly concerned that whenever our “regular” driver (Mike – who is an absolute credit to your company and one of your few redeeming features) if off, we appear to get people turn up in plain vans, with their girlfriend sat in the passenger seat looking incredibly bored as they load up the van and then everything goes missing. Do you not trust these people with scanners which is why nothing ever seems to get checked in? Does your depot not wonder what these strange large parcels are that suddenly appear that aren’t in the system? Are there no checks anywhere along the line to see if the thing they are throwing around is actually logged in and being tracked? Now that my customer has signed for an item that according to you doesn’t exist will it flag up anywhere on the system?
I do commend the fact that people now actually answer the phone when I call the depot, I am, however, not impressed that I have to keep calling to rectify “non arrivals” that have arrived, “incorrect/non existent addresses” that are taken from YOUR online booking system and “lost items” that have been delivered.
I am also dreading the Christmas period as last year you managed to excel yourselves in the number of missing and delayed deliveries which is why I was eventually forced to use TNT and then was actually shocked that as a delivery company they managed to actually deliver everything on time.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:36, Reply)
Dear R. Evans,
Thanks you for finally getting back to me regarding this PCN after I responded to you promptly on the 4th of April and again on the 16th after receiving no reply. I can only assume you send out so many dubious fines that you have an enormous backlog to get through.
I don’t know when you put up the no u-turn signs, I’ve been turning around there for years and no it’s not dangerous and no it didn’t cause a delay as your photos clearly show a complete lack of any other traffic on the road, I can only assume then that this is a another revenue gathering mechanism as it obviously has nothing to do with road safety whatsoever.
I am well aware that you will read this and have a laugh with your colleagues that you’ve caught out another driver, well let me congratulate you on adding to your revenue for the year, you should be very proud.
It’s always enjoyable to be considered guilty until proven innocent in a legal matter, something that you take to your full advantage by threatening increased fines and court appearances.
Your department is a joke, taking 2 months to reply to me when I am given only two weeks to reply to you or my fine is increased. In fact why don’t we reverse that lovely piece of legislation and I say to you that by not responding within two weeks I get a £60 discount and we’ll call it evens and the debt cleared
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 12:44, Reply)
"It was safe when I did it"
And if you didn't notice the signs, that surely points to you being an unobservant driver and a danger on the roads.
WAH WAH WAH! I'M A GOOD DRIVER YOU SHOULDN'T WASTE YOUR TIME ON ME!
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 13:05, Reply)
Nando's have got a ton of free advertising from the people that were offended by this, it may well have been their intention, in which case well done nandos.
Edit: having watched it: I think this is my favourite advert of all time. Love it.
(, Fri 25 Nov 2011, 13:00, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »
