i'm not sure the of the hummus factor of this one. maybe it's too cerebral. it doesn't say the three frames need to come from the film you're depicting though
(reali'm not happy 'til you're not happy,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 3:54,
archived)
(PedroHinCome along & ride on a Flantastic Voyage,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:38,
archived)
Never mind.
I've already won this week's compo, it's just going to take everyone a couple of days research to work out why. edit: anyone familiar with Vertical Features Remake (see below) will realise how the self-mythologising therein lends itself so appositely to this week's compo and, in the face of my meisterwerk, will close potatoshop for the week.
(Lord KronosGo Team Pachyderm,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:19,
archived)
Sorry,
so do you think this is a suitable riposte to the IRR ? I'm still not sure it's what Tulse Luper had in mind, but I did my best with the available material and the constraints we are all forced to work under. edit: btw, the 92kb next to click for Tulse Luper? Not true. also: vfr, if that helps
And the IRR is The Institute of Reclamation and Restoration, I knew that.
(Thank you Wikipedia)
(Lord KronosGo Team Pachyderm,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:42,
archived)
Okay.
So now you need to work on the meaning of the 3 frames (why did I choose these - do they represent what TL had in mind) and what exactly is the significance of 92?
(reali'm not happy 'til you're not happy,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:03,
archived)
Lovely choice of frames
(mediocreha ha ha, you're reading this,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 5:56,
archived)
As an ordained minister of the Church of the Latter Day Dude...
I find this horribly offensive. The Big Lebowski is about more than rug-pissing and treating objects like women. There are also, in the parlance of our times, trophy wives and nihilists.
This aggression will not stand, my friend; you are entering a world of pain.
The VHS of a horse vomiting on a pile of sand whilst a German man with a bowlcut, polar neck and glasses looks on and weeps, is in the post.
(Bourbon FoxBourbon is a moron,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:00,
archived)
The 1969 original or the 1994 remake?
(Lord KronosGo Team Pachyderm,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:04,
archived)
The original, of course.
They bastardized it in the remake, in which the German man's hair should be dark brown, it is but a walnut tone. An absolute travesty. Yes. *adjusts spectacles*
(Bourbon FoxBourbon is a moron,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:11,
archived)
Excellent *strokes chin*
(Lord KronosGo Team Pachyderm,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:15,
archived)
*quits gayshift*
(reali'm not happy 'til you're not happy,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:04,
archived)
death from 'pretentious aids'
(Rattleheadall time with the gay, forever touching,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:00,
archived)
Isn't Death From Pretentious Aids the band that formed from the ashes of Her Cock Disturbs Me?
(Lord KronosGo Team Pachyderm,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:07,
archived)
No, you're thinking of Skinny Jeans Poetic Travesty
(thwartis just not feeling it with you,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:10,
archived)
Surely that was Lulu Peniswart's old band?
(Lord KronosGo Team Pachyderm,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:18,
archived)
yes
it's a 4 disc album, each one an hour long of just silence apart from an orgasm on the last disc from 59:00 to 60:00
(Rattleheadall time with the gay, forever touching,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:11,
archived)
Genius!
(Lord KronosGo Team Pachyderm,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:17,
archived)
I paint to this album. It really makes me think.
(Bourbon FoxBourbon is a moron,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:23,
archived)
Do you use emo-lsion paint?
(Lord KronosGo Team Pachyderm,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:36,
archived)
Yeah, and I only use shades of grey.
*flicks fringe to side*
(Bourbon FoxBourbon is a moron,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 2:40,
archived)
I'm trying to avoid cliches by not using a brush... I'm using my penis - do you want to see?
See, they put more production value into it, making it seem more like a movie rather than "found footage", a trend I hope dies quietly and soon.
(Bourbon FoxBourbon is a moron,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 1:24,
archived)
There are probably some film-makers who could still make that format work -
it's just that most films, of any genre, are a bit rubbish. By the time the producers, test audiences and product placement directors have had their input there's slim chance of anything of any merit making it to a cinema.
I can honestly say I didn't mind Cloverfield; it was different, to say the least.
You are so right about that, though. Movies are an art form, so to have them tainted, fucked about a bit before they're pushed out into the box office, is a damn shame.
(Bourbon FoxBourbon is a moron,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 1:50,
archived)
*tuts*
loudly!
(@><|= w0nu!)or cunt to my friends,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 12:17,
archived)
(Bentley T. Coonmiles and miles of piles,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 0:00,
archived)
i was just thinking of this movie a few days ago
EDIT: *realizes what the compo is* ungghh
(Rattleheadall time with the gay, forever touching,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 0:01,
archived)
shit, isn't it
The compo, not the film. The film's ace.
(Bentley T. Coonmiles and miles of piles,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 0:03,
archived)
yes, i liked it.
i think they made two more which i haven't seen, they looked pants though.
(Rattleheadall time with the gay, forever touching,
Thu 22 Sep 2011, 0:09,
archived)
yeah cube was great
hypercube was the second and it was a big pile of shit. Didn't make any sense at all and was basically just random shit. Best bit was the totally bolloxed Maxwell's equations scrawled everywhere at one point for no reason other than they looked a bit sciencey.
The third one I think was a prequel and it was ok. I found it entertaining but I can see why people might not like it, and it kinda fucked up the first one a little bit.