b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1883816 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | Popular

Politicalololololz
You ever been on a protest? Or even thought that you'd like to go on a protest? I've thought about going on a few, the trouble is that a lot of people who protest all the time / career-protestors, really get on my nerves, even if I agree with their cause. Like when they exersize their rights to pathetic levels at inappropriate times ("Officer ! I would like to make a complaint ! That man assault me by touching my arm !").

Lunch Alt: french bread pizza

Second Alt: That Aids cure is a bit mental, whatcha reckon?
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:00, 190 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
Protesters are nobs
lunch, i have already covered.

altalt: I'd rather they cured the common cold, more people get that than AIDS
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:05, Reply)
What if they're protesting something that would effect you. Like stopping the oak flooring tax or whatever.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:06, Reply)
meh, you had your shot at democracy when you voted, now piss off out of my way

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:07, Reply)
Hey can you gaz me your new postcode so i know where to go tonight?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:07, Reply)
MK1 1AA

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:07, Reply)
It must be convenient living on an industrial estate

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:09, Reply)
Actually that's a lie, it's MK14 6HW
Which is a joke no one will get without googling. But that's the community care office for Scope.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:09, Reply)
Lol, I'm sure you'll agree.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:19, Reply)
Has protests ever changed anything in recent history?
I know that's not the only point of one, but I'm just wondering.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:13, Reply)
The Arab spring?
But in the UK, I'm not sure to be honest, there'll never be a direct change in response to a protest because politicians don't want to seem like they're backing down, but I assume that they do shit themselves a little when they see large protests outside their windows.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:15, Reply)
But having a look at this.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_protests_in_the_United_Kingdom
I'd say probably the UK uncut caused Starbucks et al to be pulled in front of the select committee, and the Gurker justice thing basically got all of it's demands met.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:18, Reply)
Isn't it illegal to hold a large protest outside their windows now?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:18, Reply)
Stay about from their windows

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:19, Reply)
you can do it if you get their permission,
which ruins the point
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:21, Reply)
I think they can't unreasonably refuse it though.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:22, Reply)
that would kind of be the same as it not existing,
if it were anything more than just words
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:27, Reply)
It's sort of practical things like you can't protest on this street while we're replacing the mains water
and you'll have to let us know a time so we can get cops in to do crowd control.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:30, Reply)
yeh

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:45, Reply)
Oh yeah', I meant UK.
That makes sense, if they give in, then they'll be protests all the time, and that simply won't do.... we can protest in the form of a queue every 4 years outside the village church.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:22, Reply)
go eat a bag of dicks

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:48, Reply)
Go shove a bag of dicks up your arse and then puke them out your mouth while rimming your granny so the dicks fly out your mouth like a TLDR

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:23, Reply)
Nope, never
Full of well meaning people but almost always overtaken by crusty cunts with fake dreadlocks and "fuck da police" mentality. I'd rather shit my own spine than be associated with them

Alt:
Pizza

SecondAlt:
Very much so
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:11, Reply)
How do you know that if you have never been on one?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:12, Reply)
I have eyes and a sense of smell

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:12, Reply)
That's what I reckon.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:16, Reply)
I went on the big anti war one whenever that was.
But normally I can't be bothered to deal with the screaming hippies that are sometimes so ill informed and biased to undermine the rest of the people who seem to really care.
A few of my friends went to London for the student loans thing, and got arrested for being on the balcony at that posh shop.

In all honesty gonz I'm just a bit too selfish, I have little free time as it is, and my lifestyle is pretty good, none of the stuff their protesting directly effects me enough to motivate me to go. I went and protested the university buildings that ruined the view of the meadow where I walk my dogs, but couldn't muster the desire to go and protest for the nhs, or any of the other myriad causes that I should be concerned about.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:11, Reply)
I think I'm the same as you mate, except I'm lazy rather than selfish.
Plus I'm disenfrachnised, I never believe it'll actaully make a difference in the end, and that it doesn't matter who's in power, it's always ending up the same.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:18, Reply)
apathy is killing democracy.
Or some other bollocks.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:20, Reply)
meh

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:23, Reply)
democracy killed democracy because it is fundamentally flawed

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:27, Reply)
your mum is fundamentally flawed.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:37, Reply)

aw oor
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:05, Reply)
What do we want !?!??! STUFF !
When do we want it ?!?!?! At your convinance !
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:23, Reply)
I went on this (inaccurately reported) demonstration in 1993:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=c91z_gh0fRQ
It was a good day, apart from the whole getting attacked by the police thing.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:11, Reply)
No youtube at work
What was it?
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:14, Reply)
An anti-BNP demonstration that ended when the police attacked the crowd.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:15, Reply)
Ahh OK

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:16, Reply)
^ This description is as balanced and unbiased as the ITN report in the link.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:16, Reply)
The crowd were banned from walking apst the BNP HQ and started attacking the police
then they went rioting through innocent peoples gardens BECAUSE THEY HATE RACISM
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:17, Reply)
looks like a minority of violence dick heads on both sides ruined it for the rest of you calm weak malnourished vegetarians.
Protestor are often as bad as the police.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:17, Reply)
This wasn't how it looked from where I was standing.
Yes there were around twenty or so dickheads on the demonstrator side.
As I mentioned below, they were only armed with balsa wood sticks.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:24, Reply)
if you go protesting and it gets viloent you should expect a police beating
they are hardly going to say, "no truncheons today lads thee veggies have only got thin sticks"
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:26, Reply)
Just like arming the Taliban with drones to "equal" it up

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:27, Reply)
aerial remote control drone battles
Top Gun 2: High End Gaming
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:30, Reply)
I wasn't there, and I'm not going to call you a liar,
But I'm fairly sure police don't charge in to people with 0 provocation.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:35, Reply)
This is also what I believed before that day.
To make matters worse for me* I was coming down off the strongest acid I have ever taken.



*And perhaps make me a less reliable witness
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:37, Reply)
typical crusty protester, out of his mind of "goof balls"

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:39, Reply)
damn right they did
that's precisely how I want my tax money spent, beating the shit out of lefties and communists
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:27, Reply)
Looks like they fucking deserved it

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:15, Reply)
The police were armed with batons and shields.
The twenty or so "rioters" were armed with balsa wood sticks.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:17, Reply)
and bricks.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:18, Reply)
The bricks came from a wall that collapsed when the mounted police charged at a crowd largely consisting of families.
There is no footage in that clip of anyone throwing a brick.
In fact the only person holding a brick in that clip is a police officer.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:20, Reply)
you can see them throwing stuff that isn't sticks.
You can clearly see protectors punching kicking and attacking police, regardless of how it started, attacking police officers is a dick move.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:22, Reply)
At the risk of posting a "But he started it!"
Yes you are right, it is stupid to attack a police officer.
However, some dicks will fight back if they are attacked.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:30, Reply)
if a police officer beats you up then you deserve to be beaten up, that's my view

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:39, Reply)
yeah but they could have picked up bricks at any moment
I have no problems with pre-emptive strikes against smelly people
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:35, Reply)
Why did they need sticks in the first place?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:18, Reply)
They had banners attached to them.
I'm surprised there weren't more paper-cut injuries sustained by those poor mounted police with helmets, shields and batons.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:22, Reply)
I was there too...
In my right on lefty way. unfortunately there were some dicks there that did want to start it... Admittedly the old bill overreacted and thats when it kicked off,
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:28, Reply)
yeah you go
protesters = pricks
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:29, Reply)
Not all protestors are pricks
the vast majority are well meaning people wanting to make a point. however you will always have some dicks,
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:42, Reply)
Not all police are pricks
the vast majority are well meaning people wanting to make a point. however you will always have some dicks,
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:43, Reply)
I think this is the truth.
I can believe the police over reacting to protectors pushing their luck getting at an area the police have been trying to keep them out of, as well as I can believe that 2 or 3 idiot protestors with the wrong attitude can turn the mood of an entire crowd.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:50, Reply)
Did you not get the sense that the police were spoiling for a fight from the outset?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:31, Reply)
Not in the slightest. What it looks like is protestors attempted to force the police line
and the police forced them right back again. Violence then ensued. The reporter says, right at the beginning of the report, that "six petrol bombs were recovered". Petrol bombs are not something you improvise in the middle of a fight. You prepare them beforehand. The people spoiling for a fight here were the protestors.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:35, Reply)
The report was inaccurate.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:44, Reply)
Now come on, you dont have to believe everything you hear.
The report does give a very one sided point of view, you will always have some elements that spoil for a fight in which ever crowd situation you are in. The problem was their were innocent protesters including kids etc. who were jammed up against a violent response from the old bill. As I said it was fine until the march bottle necked at the blockade and then it went properly scarey
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:45, Reply)
I made my judgement from how it looked.
The protestors rushed the line.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:46, Reply)
I completely understand
And of course the news outlets get the most "accurate offcial" reports from the old bill and can adapt it accordingly.
It is a bit like saying... I made my judgement on giving birth from a book I read called here comes the stork
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:48, Reply)
That is how it was reported.
That is not what I saw.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:02, Reply)
To be honest at first I had a chat with a few plod and they were sound.
It wasnt until we got near the blockade that it all got tense. There are always certain tensions on these things and lets be honest at that age you are in a situation when the old bill are something to fight against so there is always a bit of an atmosphere. Admittedly the report isnt very balanced.
Police horses are fucking big when they charge though,
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:36, Reply)
I found it all rather terrifying.
I wasn't there to fight with the police and I didn't expect to be charged by them either.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:39, Reply)
I agree,
And this is the point, once the police start to react in the way they did they become indiscriminant and people were getting badly hurt who did nothing against the law.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:46, Reply)
Yes, they do. They are trained to break up the crowd.
Sometimes people get caught out and sometimes innocent people get hurt. It is regrettable. What I take issue with is the statement from Tangles that the police were there to start a fight. They weren't. They got rushed, they reacted. That's all.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:49, Reply)
Which I have to a certain extent agreed with,
However at no point are the police allowed to create collateral damage. You cannot make a statement to the effect that if you are on a demo you are fair game to a copper.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:51, Reply)
yeah you are
you know how a demo can turn out, therefore you should be prepared to be shoved in the back as you walk away triggering a devestating heart attack
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:57, Reply)
I phrased that badly
I don't mean that the police were there to start a fight, but at several points before that they gave the impression of a rather aggressive form of defence.
From where I was standing (which was quite near to where the orange smoke bomb was set off) the police attacked first.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:02, Reply)
had the protestors been trying to push them back though?
You don't have to be punching and kicking to cause aggro.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:06, Reply)
As I understand it the police forced a change to the planned route on the morning of the demonstration.
In order to facilitate this they lined the route with mounted officers.
The official line of the demonstration organisers was to stick to the revised route, however unhappy they were.
I'm not for one moment suggesting that there wasn't an element who intended to try to take the original route, but as I have repeatedly stated, the police were the ones doing the charging not the demonstrators.
We reached the fork in the route and, after all the argy-bargy, that is where the march ended.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:11, Reply)
fair enough.
the charging through people's front garden thing is pretty inexcusable mind.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:16, Reply)
Watch the footage.
You see how the riot police came in from behind the uniforms? That is because they were being held back in reserve. There was a line of normal policemen cordoning off a road. The riot police moved in because the crowd tried to force their way through the cordon. That is what happened. The police made no aggressive moves until your lot tried to force their way through. They were forced right back again and the mounted units moved into to disperse. That is standard riot control. It is still used today.

I'm getting sick of this conversation, now. I get that you didn't like it as you were caught in the middle and feel you didn't deserve it. The police were not there to start a fight. Your lot were. They got a kicking as a result and then bitched about it afterwards.

The end.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:16, Reply)
Alright I've just watched again and I think you are referring to the bit around 40 seconds in.
You are correct that the riot police come from behind the normal officers.
I can't see any agression from the demonstrators before the push from the riot squad.
I'm not saying that people weren't trying to breach the cordon and take the planned route - I am saying that the police approach was disproportionate and overly aggressive.
The riot police were in evidence throughout the march, presumably as some kind of deterrent.
"My lot" were mainly families and college students and had no plans to breach any police lines.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:27, Reply)
This

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:52, Reply)
bricks that hurt a lot, even when wearing a helmet.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:18, Reply)
are you suggesting then police shouldn't be protected in their place of work?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:20, Reply)
Clearly the riot police aren't in fact there to put down rioters as quickly as possible in order to defend the surrounding innocent citizens
and are actually there to provide a series of set-piece battles featuring the exact equipment the rioters have. They should probably set up jousting lists.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:29, Reply)
balsa woods sticks at dawn!

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:30, Reply)
*slaps with glove*

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:31, Reply)
*cries*

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:31, Reply)
It did rather seem as though they were there to do battle rather than, y'know, maintain the peace.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:35, Reply)
Sorry Tangles, you're wrong.
www.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post1883925

The protestors instigated the whole thing. I know it's en vogue for hippies to hate the police and think of them as brutal commissars whose purpose is to destroy individual freedoms or some shit like that, but you are being daft.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:37, Reply)
I don't hate the police.
There were no petrol bombs thrown.
There were many people who sustained baton injuries on the backs of their heads.

The story, as reported by ITN, does not reflect my eyewitness account.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:42, Reply)
Which is the view of one person, from one small area of the protest
and doesn't reflect the whole. No petrol bombs were thrown. Six were recovered. Why would you make petrol bombs if you weren't intending to throw them? Some of the protestors went there with the intent of starting a riot. The police reacted and you were caught in the middle. The police were not there "looking for a fight".
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:45, Reply)
Actually I think the police probably did like a rumble in those days
having cut there teeth in the 80's, but still the rioters didn't have to be there the police did
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:48, Reply)
My dad was a copper in the Eighties and was present for the Brixton riots.
They operated a zero tolerance policy. I'm not saying it's right, but I am saying they didn't turn up to these thigns looking for an excuse to break heads.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:52, Reply)
Again, it wouldnt be beyond the old bill to grab any old bottle and claim it was a petrol bomb.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:53, Reply)
None of the people I saw were armed.
All of the police were.
Which ones came ready for a fight?
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:12, Reply)
You're being ridiculous.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:13, Reply)
Kind of.
But only in response to your slightly ridiculous statements.
The difference is that you are basing most of your opinions on this particular case on that news clip.
I am basing mine on my personal experience of the case, which differs from how it was reported.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:15, Reply)
Your personal experience is every bit as biased as that new report.
I am basing my opinion on what I saw from the video footage, not what comes out of the reporter's mouth, I am also taking into account my own knowledge of police procedure that I got from my father. No doubt also biased. The police were expecting a riot. They came equipped for dealilng with a riot. The protestors lived down to expectations and got dispersed.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:19, Reply)
I said that right at the start of this:
www.b3ta.com/questions/offtopic/post1883850

I also was trying to avoid a "He started it, Miss!" line of argument, as it doesn't really matter when people are getting hurt.
However, my assertion is that it was the police who created the situation, not the demonstrators.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:30, Reply)
Which is fine. But you're wrong.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:57, Reply)
Quite possibly.
I was only seventeen at the time and that is how it seemed to me.

I have tried not to deal in black and white here - deliberately using words/phrases like 'seem' or 'from where I was standing'

I still have a healthy respect for a police force, but I saw a different side on that day.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 15:03, Reply)
I like how you used quote marks to suggest they weren't really rioting

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:31, Reply)
just a bit of rough and tumble innit
that's how the old couple cowering in their bathroom and as a thousand stinking lefties piled through their pagonias saw it.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:32, Reply)
Wow, that's mental.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:19, Reply)
I know, protesters are always dicks

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:21, Reply)
Lol even non human girls are bitchy
www.bbc.co.uk/nature/21621643
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:13, Reply)
Chimpy

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:16, Reply)

bitchy sexy
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:48, Reply)
Here Gonz, you're a loner with a fetish for health professionals.
Have you ever used www.uniformdating.com?
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:15, Reply)
That keeps being advertised to me on Facebook.
The "models" they use are all fucking minging.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:16, Reply)
I have an alert set up for Traffic Wardens on that site.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:20, Reply)
i had a chat with the occupy protesters they were mostly dicks tho

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:20, Reply)
pity they can't cure yidprick

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:21, Reply)
they don't make enough of a difference
partly because there are too many of them. if we only had one a year, people would notice it. but of course you can't draw that distinction. no tamil tigers, it's the stop the war coalition this year.

see also the tube strikes. people were fairly sympathetic the first time round. now everyone just sees a load of greedy incompetent cunts. i even saw an indian comedian do a routine about how asian parents no longer push their children into the cliches of law/medicine; these days they are all desperate for their kids to get into london underground...
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:23, Reply)
tl;dr

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:31, Reply)
Maybe they should just fit the Underground with the same system as the DLR?
Hey presto no drivers needed.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:41, Reply)
this is exactly what they should do
that and put bob crow's head on a pike outside the tower of london
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:54, Reply)
Saw some protestors on the way home from town on Saturday
They were protesting against new powers brought in to shift squatters, with the enthusiasm only students from white, middle class homes can muster. They ought to shift the squatters into their (parents') houses. Bet they won't want to protest then. I figure, don't protest against something you'd want to be in force if you were the victim. The victim being the property owner, in this case.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:25, Reply)
are you dead yet?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:26, Reply)
How many ice cube trays have you filled?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:27, Reply)
with?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:27, Reply)
anal juices

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:28, Reply)
why would I...this is...i'm confused

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:29, Reply)
roflfreezingshitcopters

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:30, Reply)
Nah, I'm on the lam.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:30, Reply)
Not Eukanuba?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:31, Reply)
I can't nuba, no

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:32, Reply)
I saw something about the changes to squatter laws that meant they were all now using business premises instead of houses now

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:26, Reply)
that's fine though, cos small businesses can easily afford to get rid of them
i mean it's not like they provide jobs and growth* to the economy that help prevent people from being homeless.

*generally rather than right now
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:28, Reply)
it's now a criminal offence to squat in a resi dwelling
so they are targeting commercial instead. empty pubs are a prime target as they usually have facilities like kitchens, bathrooms etc.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:30, Reply)
it should be a criminal offence to be a smelly communist fucking hippy

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:33, Reply)
poor tangles

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:38, Reply)
He's probably already beating off a police squadron
who were wandering around Coventry looking for innocent, peaceful, petrol bomb carrying protestors to kick the shit out of.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:39, Reply)
Happy finish

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:41, Reply)
i think it is in some countries
i'm eating freekah for lunch, does that make me one?

i bet momo would rip my fingers off for it, it's fucking tast-eh.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:53, Reply)
someone told me that in Singapore if you're a bloke with long hair then they make you stand at the back of the queue in the post office
I see no reason why that law shouldn't be enacted here
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:37, Reply)
No, doesn't tempt me in the slightest.
Lunch: Poached salmon salad box, a bit good.

AltAlt: Is it actually 'cured' though, or is this only a short term thing? The way it sounded this morning is that they 'think' things are going well, but every newspaper is leading with 'HIV CURED!'.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:32, Reply)
Newspapers are retarded
See Hilary mantel on Kate Middleton as an example
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:34, Reply)
wha?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:35, Reply)
That's some seriously specialist slashfic he's talking about there.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:38, Reply)

www.kineticnorth.com/TheGutter/SlashFictionGenerator/Default.aspx?s=21&p0=16&p1=63&ff=0&mf=0&mm=1
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:06, Reply)
poss nsfw

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:07, Reply)
On my third click I got Billy Piper and Britney Spears
Which caused my genitalia to return from where it had retreated on the previous click's Noel Edmonds and Tracy Emin.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:25, Reply)
wait til you get Robert Mugabe and Stephen Hawking

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:27, Reply)
i think you need an ample brush
to clean your mind out
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:29, Reply)
don't you start
I'm warning you
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:36, Reply)
Yeah, it's effectivley cured.
Which means they can still find traces of the virus, but it's in such low levels that it shouldn't be able to replicate and the chance of passing on the infection is absolutly tiny.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:34, Reply)
so it's safe to rape the baby?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:37, Reply)
that's the easiest way to cure AIDS
they've been doing it in Africa for years
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:37, Reply)
Its working very well I see

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:46, Reply)
Fairly

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:38, Reply)
meh, it was probably a poor and therefore ugly one

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:38, Reply)
This shit cray
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rat_king_(folklore)
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:39, Reply)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Thomas_Hogg
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:41, Reply)
I've dropped into another dimension

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:44, Reply)
Pay close attention

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:12, Reply)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Mordrake
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:15, Reply)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pasqual_Pinon
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:18, Reply)
So to avoid the death penalty all he had to do was deny it
and yet other blokes admitted it and were hanged...
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:47, Reply)
Sexy pigs

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:47, Reply)
It's the multitude of large distended nipples that do it for me

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:49, Reply)
*spaffs*

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:49, Reply)
*oinks*

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:50, Reply)
*penetrates*
*tickles ear*
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:54, Reply)
"A cow fucking a pig, well now I've seen EVERYTHING"
racist crow lols
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:56, Reply)
me and sporty get a little fresh sometimes.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:19, Reply)
WT actual F?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 13:42, Reply)
nature is fucking bad ass sometimes.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:04, Reply)
I've been on lots of protests over the years.
I'm going to one this evening. I quite enjoy them.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:16, Reply)
I wish to protest against this.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:17, Reply)
what you protesting against tonight doc p?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:18, Reply)
It's a pro choice rally.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:22, Reply)
so you're against the slaughter of children? GOD'S CHILDREN!
Nah, I'm joking, I'm with you.
The whole abortion question is a big deal in Ireland I understand. My mother was sort of cut off for marrying my father (he's an English protestsnt) and never told her mother or sisters that she had had an abortion early in their relationship.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:32, Reply)
I protest against the amount of wine left in the bottle on a regular basis
and I like to think I've made a real difference.
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:19, Reply)
This is the kind of protest I can get behind.
VIN LA REVOLUTION!
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:25, Reply)
... and achieved nothing

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:19, Reply)
Bollocks. I protested against a war once and then the war ended.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:23, Reply)
I don't see why anyone would protest against a war

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:27, Reply)
18th June 1984

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:27, Reply)
that was a Monday.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:33, Reply)
I was 16 and probably drunk

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:35, Reply)

84th US Golf Open: Fuzzy Zoeller shoots a 276 at Winged Foot GC NY
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:37, Reply)
I was seven and probably sober.

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:37, Reply)
I was 24 and very angry

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 14:46, Reply)
I went through an animal rights phase when I was about 9
Used to sit with a bunch of unwashed hippies at Greys Monument in Newcastle and started eating beanfeast shit.
Soon saw the error of my ways when they tried to stop me eating sweets because they had gelatin in.

And meat just tastes better really.

Alt.Alt. I reckon diseases like AIDS and Cancer are natures way of keeping the population down.
Also, where did AIDS come from? Theories are a bit vague *cough* man made *cough*

Imagine though!

*wears tin foil hat*
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 15:05, Reply)
I thought it was God's way of punishing the gays?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 15:14, Reply)

God is gay
(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 15:21, Reply)
A bit like Cardinal Keith O'Brien?

(, Mon 4 Mar 2013, 15:23, Reply)

« Go Back | Reply To This »

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1