Lately, I've worked my arse off trying to create a new search app.

I had the idea "what if you could find out what the internet thinks of a certain person/thing/whatever?" The technical concept was thought up in a minute, so the next day, I built it. Took a good 2 days of programming (and learning search API's and JSON queries).
This thing searches using 3 major searchengines (google, yahoo and microsoft's new baby, Bing). On top of it, it also uses Twitter for a random - but related - tweet.
If you enter a search, it will try to produce 3 set of results from each search-engine:
- positive associations with the searchterm (e.g. "I like", etc.)
- negative associations with the searchterm (e.g. "I hate", etc.)
- ambivalent associations with the searchterm (e.g. "I don't care about", etc.)
It will then count - and here's the trick - the total number of returned results and add them (per type) together. Then it will display the results in a graph.
This way, you can see what the internet thinks!
Examples:
Jeremy Clarkson: 85,9% negative, 14% positive, 0,1% ambivalent :)
b3ta: 96,5% positive, 3,5% negative and 0% ambivalent
Note that the results vary greatly per hour and - this is an even bigger difference - per search-engine used.
I hope you all have some good fun with this, as I did :) I am still working on it (tuning the algorythm), so expect it to improve!
PS: Note how Bing seems to produce enormous amounts of results (at least 100x more than google on some searches).. what is microsoft up to?
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:31, Reply)
and "Warning: Division by zero in /home/shilka/WWW7/index.php on line 112"
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:38, Reply)
Never expected it to turn out this good.. it was a lot crappier in my head
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:48, Reply)
do I need to submit this for the newsletter seperately? (I was going to, but seeing as you replied..)
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:42, Reply)
then consider it submitted
(we consider anything posted that gets a few 'i like this' clicks)
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:45, Reply)
(and Twitter says: Warning: Missing argument 2 for TweetSearch()!)
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:35, Reply)
More importantly the Internets is 100% positive about HappyToast!
(wonder if its just because "Happy" is in the title :D)
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:37, Reply)
www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/index.php?s=Tits&st=google
Sounds excellent but is this result correct???
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:41, Reply)
www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/index.php?s=Squirrels+with+tits&st=all
Edit: "anal prolapse" is quite in at the moment too
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:44, Reply)
and, more strangely, when I tried 'the financial crisis' on google yesterday, people where mostly ambivalent (45% versus 25/30 pos/negative), but today, all that has magically changed.
WHAT ARE YOU UP TO GOOGLE!! *shakes fist*
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:52, Reply)
finger on the pulse of the internets. Shockingly "gang rape" is also very popular.
It does make you realise just how dodgy the internet really is.
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:55, Reply)
but compare that to:
www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/index.php?s=boobs&st=google
(, Thu 18 Jun 2009, 19:09, Reply)
Is more positive about Rotterdam than Utrecht. The internet is a stupid hole!
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:43, Reply)
though the internet is not quite sure about me.
On the other hand it loves the movie Lifeforce, so all is well
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 10:48, Reply)
I have discovered the internet is 66% positive about rape. Bring on the trial by internet jury!
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 11:03, Reply)
Negative: 0% Postive: 0% Don't Care: 0%
Conclusion: Even the internet is not quite sure about Leighton S********, according to all search-engines.
... and, accordingly, Twitter says: ......
Sounds about right!
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 11:04, Reply)
The ultimate test- how do you rate yourself?
http://www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/index.php?s=your+new+app&st=google
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 11:08, Reply)
Although teh interwebs seem more disapproving of "the BNP" than just "BNP"
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 11:08, Reply)
"Conclusion: The internet is mainly positive on the subject of osama bin laden, according to Google."
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 11:10, Reply)
www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/index.php?s=muslims&st=allhttp://www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/index.php?s=muslims&st=all
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 11:09, Reply)
I knew the internet was ambivalent about gay lampposts
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 11:11, Reply)
I love how b3ta has taken your master work and used it to search for tits...
Here's one that validates a commonly held belief...
www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/index.php?s=kids+today&st=google
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 11:15, Reply)
Conclusion: The internet is mainly negative on the subject of Microsoft, according to Yahoogle.
Conclusion: The internet is mainly positive on the subject of Microsoft, according to Bing.
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 12:06, Reply)
Gordon Brown: www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/index.php?s=Gordon+Brown&st=all
Adolf Hitler: www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/index.php?s=Adolf+Hitler&st=all
Crikey.
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 13:18, Reply)
Click for bigger (15 kb)
That's right! 100% positive!
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 12:49, Reply)
www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/index.php?s=wanking&st=google
this is normal right? One side a little bigger?
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 21:33, Reply)
www.whatdoestheinternetthink.net/index.php?s=romanians&st=all
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 12:54, Reply)
8.5% of the internet feels negative about me (using my real name) but NONE of the internet feels negative about Chickenlady.
*considers changing name by deed poll*
**EDIT** Now the internet says that 11.9% feel negative about Chickenlady...you fickle internet you!
Excellent bit of stuff/app/thing
(, Wed 17 Jun 2009, 12:54, Reply)
or at least - there was a link to their website in the paper, which I suspected led to this site...
(, Thu 18 Jun 2009, 8:54, Reply)
