b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Archive 37791 (Older | Newer)

[challenge entry] iFoundthis
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:51, archived)
# Argh, recursion!
*mind crumbles*
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:51, archived)
# iVe just noticed the middle smoke looks like a happy elephant
I should have won that compo
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:51, archived)
# noice :D
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:52, archived)
# Hahahaha
I found this "I found this". I think it should win the "I think it should win" compo.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:53, archived)
# Recurs
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:55, archived)
# !
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:04, archived)
# Stuck in an infinite loop! Send help!
(, Thu 28 Jan 2010, 0:32, archived)
[challenge entry]
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:57, archived)
# :D
Hmm..

#:D
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:00, archived)
# You get a click too.
Frankly, everyone click these and flood the popular with them.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:55, archived)
[challenge entry]
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:56, archived)
#
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:57, archived)
# !
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:01, archived)
# ihave found the winning entry everyone....

Simply take any one of these images, make it 200% larger and post it in this comp.

* Wins

_/ \_
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:59, archived)
# ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:15, archived)
# I found this too


Sorry.
(, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 22:06, archived)
[challenge entry] well, it's bigger and heavier than the ipone
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:48, archived)
# Sod Saber Book
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:49, archived)
# Vast Jack
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:49, archived)
# minor threadjack
this was keeping me awake last night.
Are there any electronics boffins here who can tell me what this would do?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:50, archived)
# FOR THE LOVE OF GOD DO NOT SWITCH THIS ON
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:51, archived)
# yeah but what would it do?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:56, archived)
# Almost nothing
is my opinion. But I am sure somebody else will be able to improve on that
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:58, archived)
# well sometimes you'd be surprised what stuff does.
I made a physical analogue of this ages ago when I was trying to invent a constant engagement continuously variable transmission. Which is supposed to be impossible, but I'm telling you it's not.

(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:16, archived)
# Instant singularity
Which would end badly for us fleshy types.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:58, archived)
# are those supposed to be coils?
because I don't know either way.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:52, archived)
# It would
disguise itself as a robot.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:54, archived)
# It creates a shortcut through a particularly thick hedge
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:56, archived)
# Can I have biscuits?
Sorry, actually meant to write Can I haz bizkitz plz? but then I remembered where I was posting.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:57, archived)
# not a lot
err, looks like a complicated way of doing a 1:1 transformer, But need to know the turns ratios the be precise.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:57, archived)
# assume # of turns is proportional to # of squiggles.
my thinking is that, through one circuit, it's step down, but through the other, it's step up, so it could be 1:1. Or it might not be. Depending on which way the current wants to go.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:00, archived)
# Putting AC thru it would be odd.
Phase would change on output.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:03, archived)
# it would have to be AC, or it wouldn't do very much at all.
you could also introduce LC filters in the middle, for lols, to get a transformer whose ratio depends on the frequency.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:05, archived)
# non issue
it's balanced just switch over the connections
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:06, archived)
# yep
on the LHS the upper half of the centre section looks like a 3:1 step down, in phase with the lower half which looks like a 3:2 step down. And on the RHS vice versa, overall giving you in=out
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:04, archived)
# but that's assuming equal current distribution between the two paths,
which isn't necessarily the case for all types of output load. I've a feeling the overall ratio could be quite unpredictable.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:06, archived)
# possibly but not necessarily.
If we're getting into that level of detail we need detailed specs of the two transformers.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:10, archived)
# I'm going to have to make one, I think.
It's not going to blow my house up, despite the concern expressed above. At least, not if I only use low voltage.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:13, archived)
# I'm intrigued now
What do you expect?

it's going to give you in=out unless you go to too high or too low freqs or too high or too low power loads, and then, unless there's some odd unbalance in the transformers or wiring it'll be nothing unusual
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:22, archived)
# Would it have some capacitance?
(Reading between the lines {;-) )
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:06, archived)
# everything has some capacitance.
which raises an interesting point about the gate charge of MOSFETs in switching power supplies.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:08, archived)
# and PAL and NTSC
NTSC (Never The Same Color) bolloxed the colour on US TVs due the base emittter capacitance variation of transistors changing with DC offset, PAL (Pricey And Late) overcame this with an expensive modification
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:16, archived)
# ?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:02, archived)
# I actually tried to work that out before I went onto the next panel
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:03, archived)
# I know nothing about electronics.
I don't even know about stuff like the differences between voltage and current.

Now, if you were to express a circuit as a weighted graph, on the other hand....

(actually come to think of it, I only really know about unweighted graphs, so never mind)
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:06, archived)
# that's an interesting question
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:25, archived)
# Wait what?
Don't make her forget her lust for women, silly man!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:52, archived)
# iWas wondering about that myself
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:53, archived)
# heheh
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:53, archived)
[challenge entry] All the good rhymes were taken
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:45, archived)
# heh, nice rhyming
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:51, archived)
# Dammit
I could have had 'mackerel scad'! Too late now
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 23:12, archived)
[challenge entry] I found this, I think it should win the compo.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:43, archived)
# iLikethis!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:44, archived)
# yeah!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:46, archived)
# Clicked, damn it.
[/;-D
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:53, archived)
# This is by far the most amazing thing I have EVER seen.
100% fact
(, Thu 28 Jan 2010, 13:22, archived)
# It's drawing Tiem with Lord Aerixis!
Still a WIP, please tell me you can tell who it is?



Click for bigger (392 kb)

(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:38, archived)
# iBoris?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:39, archived)
# Thank
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:41, archived)
# Why, 'tis easy!
'tis easy!Lord Boris of Johnston!
And a very good likeness too I might say.
I may have spelled his surname wrong
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:39, archived)
# For that
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:41, archived)
# It's an iPad.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:39, archived)
# Winnar!
lolnotreallyjustkidding
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:41, archived)
# BoJo!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:41, archived)
# Woo!
Thanks god for that, I'm always worried my portraits'd look like someone totally fucked up
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:42, archived)
# iThought iT was Boris Becker
but iThink iGot mixed up
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:43, archived)
# Odo?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:41, archived)
# hahahahaha
*breathes*


hahahahaha
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:42, archived)
# Nah, it's real good like.
iLike drawing too, got two I'm about to scan in now.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:49, archived)
# Nah
He was never able to morph that good into human
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:43, archived)
# But he looks better with a fringe
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:44, archived)
# That's true.
That's very true.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:47, archived)
# Lilly Allen
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:44, archived)
# *spits doritos everywhere*
close enough
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:47, archived)
# WIP?
Wanker in progress?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:47, archived)
# wow,
now I know who that person is so I can tell it's a good likeness this time.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:49, archived)
#
i pratt?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:50, archived)
[challenge entry]
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:38, archived)
# Hahaha
*clicks*
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:39, archived)
# Waste of good beer that is
iThink it's an outrage!
(, Thu 28 Jan 2010, 13:09, archived)
[challenge entry]
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:37, archived)
# yay!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:37, archived)
# Hahahaha! *clicketyclick*
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:38, archived)
# yes
it's got knobs
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:40, archived)
# Oddly
that's who'll buy it too.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:41, archived)
# ^This
And woo.
(, Thu 28 Jan 2010, 2:20, archived)
# hahaha
this to win the compo :D
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:42, archived)
# Pffft....
*click*
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:45, archived)
# hhahahha
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:50, archived)
[challenge entry]
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:36, archived)
# I've just been watching
I Robot then I turned off the TV to see what this week's compo was. Spookeh!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:40, archived)
[challenge entry] Wow, this has changed our lives...
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:32, archived)
# nsfw!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:34, archived)
# How about....
iLovehorses and then we quit this?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:36, archived)
[challenge entry] ...
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:29, archived)
# This deserves more Woo!
Give some woo people, please
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:51, archived)
# woo!!!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:55, archived)
# This helps
oh, it's you
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:56, archived)
# ...
i hear that a lot...
:(
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:59, archived)
[challenge entry] Minor deviation from the thoughtless repetition ;)
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:27, archived)
# no red ink?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:28, archived)
# :((
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:34, archived)
# I know, I was sad too
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:36, archived)
[challenge entry] Revolutionising tablet ennis?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:24, archived)
# Hahaha!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:25, archived)
# Think of the advertising opportunities!
Also www.tabletennisdb.com/dictionary/pad

But it's INCORRECT, So don't go getting any ideas.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:37, archived)
[challenge entry] Bindun, but added some flair ;o)
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:22, archived)
# well I never
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:27, archived)
[challenge entry] for smug gits everywhere...
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:18, archived)
# Cor!
E's got a biggun
what he is compensating for is another matter entirely
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:20, archived)
[challenge entry] not only smug gits
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:35, archived)
# haaha XD
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:52, archived)
[challenge entry]
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:18, archived)
# Is it under your right bollock?
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:19, archived)
# Ewwwww.
I thought that was his leg :(
please tell me that's his leg
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:22, archived)
# Its not his leg!
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:30, archived)
# Oh, Wobbly :(
Wobbly :(You has made it impossibles for me to speep tonight nows :(
but your happy doggy makes it all better
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:34, archived)
[challenge entry] mouse pad? there's an app for that...
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:17, archived)
# Nice.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:26, archived)
[challenge entry] he proceeded to kill everyone
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:17, archived)
# whos with me
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:17, archived)
[challenge entry] Token lazy effort


(shamelessly ripped off from The Wall Street Journal's original quote)
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:20, archived)
# Yeah, it is.
Might be wise to start thinking of an altcompo
idea just to keep ourselves amused.
(, Wed 27 Jan 2010, 22:21, archived)

« Older messages | Newer messages »

XML feeds