b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7671375 (Thread)

# Sorry.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:30, archived)
# YAY!!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:30, archived)
# I want to know what your redex is.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:35, archived)
#
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:37, archived)
# high cockalorum
mostly due to the eye blistering speed!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:38, archived)
# More fasterer!!!!!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:43, archived)
#
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:48, archived)
# I still can't figure out the more faster shit
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:51, archived)
# FASTER!!!!!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:53, archived)
# I only just recently did, in Imageready anyway.
Anything under 0.1 that isn't as low as 0.01 nor as 'high' as 0 and it'll do it. This is 0.03 for example:

It doesn't make any sense, but it does work.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:14, archived)
# 0.03 is bastard fast,
0.07 is best for movement.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:26, archived)
# Absolutely,
but I think we were talking about that super-fast vibro/spack effect folks seem to like lately.

or at least, I was...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:46, archived)
# most woosome mr ped!yakyakyakyakmoosemoosemoose
on another note...i just got one of these...
ZOO "YOU'VE GOT SPAM!"
We here at ZOO have seen your work rohyp.jpg on B3ta.com. We would like to publish it in next week's issue of the magazine, in our "YOU'VE GOT SPAM!" section.

We are sorry, but we don't pay fees for reproduction of your work in the magazine, but we will of course publish any credit you so desire.

Please confirm that you are the originator of this work and let us know by return email if this is all okay with you.

Please email [email protected] and make the subject heading SPAM. If we don't hear from you, we won't publish.

Many thanks,

WHAT IS THE USUAL B3tan thing to do...tell em to go fookoffski?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:31, archived)
# Fuckin' fucks, fuck off
Them, not you.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:32, archived)
# Hooray!
You can start your viral career. It will be a hard life, doing work for no money, but the accolade of the chavs that buy the magazines and see your work will give you all the nourishment you need.
That or you could live off the scraps from the bins of the rich Zoo and Nuts people that have grown rich on your hard work.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:33, archived)
# he he
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:35, archived)
# life eh?
bastards
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:37, archived)
# This ^
but I would say that, since I've never been approached.

Might help if I actually posted an image once in a while...
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:50, archived)
# tell them to pay up or piss off.
or just tell them to piss off.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:33, archived)
# Don't be alarmed
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:33, archived)
# the warning sounds like.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:36, archived)
# You ask them to give you the prize or you do not reply, but send them an invoice for £60 if they print it.
That si a sensible cost for a magazine image and they have already admitted that they know it is you by their attempt to contact you.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:33, archived)
# Ask them why they are willing to pay photographers and writers for their work
but not for yours
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:34, archived)
# ignore it
or politely decline

thaey can pay, they just don't, so fuck 'em
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:35, archived)
# 'lo, ever seen this film?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:37, archived)
# no
but i intend to

why?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:41, archived)
# fuck.ing.ace
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:46, archived)
# cool
i'm glad you said that
*adds to dvd rental list*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:49, archived)
# Careful, it could change your whole perspective on life.
I feel a little different today from watching it.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:52, archived)
# hmm
ok
i was a bit like that after 'children of men' but i'm ok now
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:54, archived)
# cool, I bumped that one up the queue
do you have someting like www.netflix.com/ over there?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:58, archived)
# fuck.ing.pre.ten.tious
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 18:43, archived)
# Ask them if they actually know what 'spam' is?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:35, archived)
# hahahahaha
lolz
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:36, archived)
# Tell them you're a born-again christian
...and you won't let them feature your image unless they repent and run a cover story on the glory of our lord and saviour jesus christ (...but as a concession, they can airbrush JC for the cover photo as much as they like).
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:36, archived)
# ^ this
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:38, archived)
# I'm going to use this one.
But with born again muslim "death to all infidels, Allah wants you all dead" front cover
...oh and some lasers...pew pew pew
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:41, archived)
# Kittens firing lasers in the name of Allah!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:48, archived)
# *starts writing movie script
its a winnar
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:55, archived)
# Lalalalalalalala!!
That's a song I wrote for this occasion.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:38, archived)
# *boogies on down to it*
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:39, archived)
# Tell them they can use it
but credit it to "Zoo are thieving cunts"

/goes back to bed
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:40, archived)
# Or tell them
to credit Nuts magazine.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:48, archived)
# The usual response
is a polite-ish 'no'.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:48, archived)
# tell them to fuck off! :)
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:53, archived)
# The usual thing to do is throw some sort of strop
but the general consensus is they should pay a single use fee and you retain copyright, or they should fuck off.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:59, archived)
# I think this one was the main point
they want you to give them all rights to the picture. And if you made the picture from bits of other people's pictures, you don't actually have the right to give the rights away. Right?

So say no unless you made the picture entirely from scratch and want it owned by a substandard wankmag.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:07, archived)
# Right!

(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 17:08, archived)
# Here is the gnus?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:31, archived)
# Indeedy!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:34, archived)
# Have I got Gnus for you?
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:47, archived)
# Nicely!~
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:31, archived)
# Cheers.
Of course it works much better if, like me, you pronounce gnu 'noo', whereas it seems to be in vogue to say 'gunoo', incorrectly.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:37, archived)
# hahaha
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:32, archived)
# Ooof!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:34, archived)
# that took far too long.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:36, archived)
#
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:36, archived)
# This scares me so much that a little bit of wee came out
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:39, archived)
# hahah Gnusnight
with Jeremy...er...Oxman
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:39, archived)
# Holy cow!
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:41, archived)
# I admit I had to read the file name
I was thinking "Trevor McGnunald?!?!?"
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:40, archived)
# George Mcdonald?
Gneorge?

No.
(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:42, archived)
# Woo! I'll see your pun and raise you!



(, Wed 3 Oct 2007, 16:43, archived)