
Another page from a year long project. Click around, make me happy.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 5:15, Reply)

Your blog post combined with my bacardi/coke provoked my gag reflex, or maybe my drink-exits-from-nose reflex. This stuff is great (your blog, not my nose liquor); favourited and clicked. Keep it up.
( , Sun 10 Jul 2011, 2:40, Reply)

This makes me happier than any penis picture ever sent to me.
( , Sun 10 Jul 2011, 3:28, Reply)

I've only just discovered these guys! Fucking excellent, have some "Becoming Insane"
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 4:26, Reply)

it's Infected Mushroom. their recent music is considered more of a mainstream. the early music was quite psychedelic. originally it was one guy writing music in impulse tracker(iirc). then he won some radio show competition and as 1st prize they sponsored release of an album. after that he got 'world wide' attention.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 6:15, Reply)

Most of what I have heard so far seems OK, the track that I posted is the best of that bunch.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 6:22, Reply)

Here's my current album\ep list, and I'm sure I'm missing a lot of the recent stuff
1999 - Intelligate
1999 - The Gathering
2000 - Classical Mushroom
2000 - Infected Mushroom Vs Liranran - Double Click Ep
2001 - B.P Empire
2001 - B.P.Empire
2001 - Children of the Doc Vinyl
2001 - Infected Mushroom Vs Cosma - Unknown
2001 - My Mummy Said
2001 - Never Neverland Vinyl
2001 - One Absolute Promo
2001 - Outdoor Party vol.III
2002 - Birthday
2002 - Merlin
2002 - Power of Celtics
2002 - The Beauty and the Beat-Promo
2002 - Wider (Astrix_Rmx)_Promo
2003 - Ballerium - Promo
2003 - Chmimo
2003 - Converting Vegetarians (2CD)
2003 - Cream-Promo
2003 - Deeply Disturbed
2003 - Infected Mushroom Vs. Psysex - Dirty_80s
2003 - Semi Nice - Unreleased
2003 - Songs From The Other Side
2004 - Artificial Visualization
2004 - Cities Of The Future
2004 - Elation Station (Beat Hackers Remix)
2004 - I Wish (Skazi Remix)-Unreleased
2004 - Im The Supervisor
2004 - Infected Mushroom Vs. Violent Vision - Citys of the Future-Promo-Vinyl
2004 - Unreleased Tracks
For epic tracks, my favs are Zahadum and Twisted
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 8:25, Reply)

I'll need ti listen to Zahadum a few more times. I also like Muse Breaks a lot.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 9:02, Reply)

Classic mushroom is an incredible album, Erez Eisen was considered the next Simon Posford. Then they turned into Linkin Park. Still, they've got amazing production skills.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 22:51, Reply)

www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5FV8ic833s
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 3:29, Reply)

But I wouldn't even consider this as something to pass the hours away!
Edit: I thought it was a game, turns out its 3D animation. Nevertheless this post is way out of my comfort zone, but, other stuff on the web site is actually pretty well done!.
vizivius.com/animation.html
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 4:26, Reply)

You've probably seen this video, but what has astounded me is how the Daily Mail reported this meeting as told by Mullan to them.
So read this first, then watch the video and you'll see what I mean;
www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1373106/Hugh-Grant-racks-bar-tab-worth-5-45-local-pub-Dover--leaves-paying.html
Also, McMullan was nearly glassed recently, lol
www.thisiskent.co.uk/Castle-landlord-hits-council/story-12788285-detail/story.html
He also likes seeing tits in his dingy pub, what a guy!
www.thisiskent.co.uk/Concerns-bar-s-topless-dance-plan/story-11987724-detail/story.html
The Castle Inn
Russell Street, Dover, Kent, CT16 1PY
0871 951 1000
www.dover-kent.com/Castle.html
"The girls want to make a bit of extra cash by taking off their pants for a tenner and who can blame them? But this is a real sticky point for the council, so we are looking at semi see-through netting."
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 2:46, Reply)

I'd advise very much at least watching the video. The closing line is beautiful.
These past months I've developed a bit of a liking for Hugh Grant.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 8:45, Reply)

'I'll get you one day, bleeding newspapers, you see if it dont' kind thing :)
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 8:55, Reply)

"Barman Matt Sheppherd, 23, said: 'I asked him to sign an autograph for my niece and he wrote her a lovely little message. He is a really nice guy, he still didn’t pay for his pint though.'"
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 9:29, Reply)

Anyhow... I'm putting it out later this month :-) I predict you boys will verbally rip it to shred :-p
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 1:51, Reply)

But if you made it, click the 'I made this' button.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 2:14, Reply)

But found the vocals very hard to hear.
And, as Sundae said, you should click 'I made this'!
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 2:23, Reply)

Back in the day. I'd have lapped this up. But older and wiser as I am, I'm going to have to say that this will appeal to the euro/happy house crowd. I'm not going to say that I won't find a way, but be that as it may, I'm always gonna stay and I was sitting on the dock of the bay watching the ships going out and then coming back in again.
Nice tune. Well put together and as I said before it would be well appreciated by those that like this kind of music. You said it yourself that it may be ripped to shreds. B3ta doesn't tend to like this. I stress tend as well. If you'd decided to go the fundementalist end of hard style or dubstep or SPEEEEEEEDCOOOOOOOOOORE, you'd have probably got a few rave reviews, unfortunately I just think you may get "meh". I'm still going to click it as you made it and thus deserve some credit.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 3:01, Reply)

I used to like this type of music but now I have my bath-chair and ear-trumpet I can't understand the beepy-beepyness.
I am old
( , Sun 10 Jul 2011, 13:36, Reply)

not stoned, just very well dubbed.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 1:33, Reply)

/rehabilitated GC Nazi blog
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 1:50, Reply)

but i have a huge man crush on Count Buckulees so click ;)
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 2:09, Reply)

I didn't have the balls to shout out 'Steaphen!'.... I suck :(...;)
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 2:25, Reply)

No idea what it's called, but it's a very imaginative cartoon I remember seeing years ago.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 0:57, Reply)

(OK, so Google Translate isn't perfect)
Original title: How the Cossacks at the wedding walked
Released: 1984
Genre: Animation
Director: Vladimir Dakhno
About the film: He rode as a stalwart on the road, but met a woman of unearthly beauty, just bare. In love with stalwart without memory, and said that will produce beautiful red boots. As the Cossacks at the wedding of walking (1984) tells of how all three Cossacks brides themselves have found and the path of all evil in the district won. And so went the bride burly red boots to buy, but lost. Bride rasperezhivalas, found his two friends and said that stalwart lost. Friends are sent on the road. At night they're watching a strange mill. It turns into a tavern for evil. In the tavern, the music plays, the devil has fun. The Cossacks were seen as a stalwart and Kabachnik pulls something tells scum. The lanky kid and come up with a plan to release stalwart. Cartoon gay marriage ends loud all three main characters.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 3:13, Reply)

They need to bring Zimmer back for the next one, this is some of his best work.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 0:26, Reply)

The censored version of this was posted over 3 years ago, so here it is in it's "un-bleeped" glory :-D
NSFW for swearing.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 0:07, Reply)

I think Maccy's chips are too salty. If it was a chicken select going in that dip though, id be all over it.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 0:07, Reply)

...rips into NOTW reporter Paul McMullen.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 0:00, Reply)

punch that unctuous fucktard into next week.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 0:49, Reply)

is exactly why the NOTW and gutter press "journalists" deserve everything they are just about to get. Out of arguments, out of work, out of morals. Say what you want about out politicians, the real cancer in our society is chaps like Paul McMullen. CUNT.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 1:20, Reply)

I think you are being too optimistic. We have to remember people bought the NOTW. People buy Hello and OK and all the other vacuous crap. People watched Big Brother and made the people in it famous. People spend hard earned dole money phone-voting into 'I was a celeb, now my career is flagging'. The Red Top journos are maggots, but maggots wouldn't exist without decay. Chicken or egg?
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 1:36, Reply)

readership was at about 2 million before this story broke. so out of a population of almost 70 million is it surprising that you've got 2 million or so fuck-wits
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 1:42, Reply)

Then again, I'm not sure they can televise torture, can they?
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 1:42, Reply)

I gues to make him look less bond villain like. All that cunt needed to be told was "are you listening to your self?" desperate and pathetic. He doesn't believe for one second what he's saying, he's watching his arse and eyeing the position above him on the pay roll.
As for press freedom, before I studied it I had a bee in my bonnet about Murdoch and press plurality and politics ( I still have a big issue with press plurality dont get me wrong). The Sun didn't win it, when Murdoch took over the sun, he shifted a left wing paper to suport Thatcher against the vast majority of its readership, his readerships voting pattern did not alter (this doesnt negate any long term drip effect), in short there is no hyperdermic needle effect when it comes to peoples opinions etc and the media (proved by the recent election, vastly Tory press could not elect an outright Tory government). When it comes to the general working ethos of the redtops, Murdoch inparticular there is a real issue however, this has been long standing, (say what you like about mickymouse Media students but this is the kind of thing we look at, turns out its a bit important than just smoking dope and watching films eh!,though we do mainly do that!) The IPCC has been known to be toothless and essentially working as a officially recognised kartell in gossip and lies for as long as its been set up. One good thing thats come out of this debacle is that things have to change, this has put to the fore of public knowledge the real problems we have in our democracy in that, it doesnt matter who the papers say who you should vote for, theyre too clever for that, they shift the debate to the right, the area which suits them the most, they distract from the real issues by telling you how fucked up Amy Winehouse is, or who George Clooney may or may not be fucking.
Things are looking up though, the internet is changing things (it aint just a cliche, it is, 'new media' is as powerful as the leaflets around the time of the first printing presses were). To be honest I'd say the work of Manic on here is a quality example of that, blogs arse allready "old news" to some, but I think they will continue to provide the indepth detail and free expression thats needed to sort this shit out. And yup I'de say Manic up there as one (Ive even mentioned him to one of my lecturers.....*gushes* ;) )
PS. Drunk again on b3ta ;)
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 1:45, Reply)

I like to think not. You mention the early leaflets; they were usually totally inacurate and often influenced public opinion, including juries. The New Media is the same. People post allsorts on blogs, and some 'play' with Wikki for fun. I don't see it as a new age of truth.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 2:02, Reply)

i'm the public. you're the public. are we so easily swayed? *sigh*
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 2:33, Reply)

But still a revolutiuonary move from peoples opinions being presented from the Pulpit or the town crier.
I agree, its a new age as in a new opportunity. As a Labour guy, I see my party aknowledging that fact but not quite grasping it.
The free movement of information is critical (filtered by how arsed a person can be to click on a link from a site like this or a friend on FB), at the moment we're on the wane of it I think, like all thing commercial interest will bring it back down to earth. The point is that news organisations and political parties really need to understand and engage with it in a much more sophisticated manner than they are.
Lets take the last election as an example. The press were 100% behind the Tories, it dint work out as planned, why?. The Labour party went to the brink of bankruptcy putting out political pamphlets door knocking, phone pooling, putting the message out there (with less than half the funds of the tories), it worked, not well enough but it worked.
For all the talk of 'the age of spin' they really didn't use FB etc as much as they could. They still don't, take a recent Ed Milliband FB message for instance "I am disgusted by the latest allegations about the hacking of the families of fallen soldiers."... No shit Sherlock. There is an opportunity to really engage with the public through such services without churning out crappy soundbites.
Ofcourse theres the main issue of the direction of the party, as a Socialist I could wax lyrical about the problems with the party (as I have on here)
basicly theres a world of opportunity out there, we dont (and never did) need to cosy up to tin-pot media barrens. Theres a good story about an old school press baron who used to have a tank of fish with a board in the middle, he's release a pike by lifting the board to watch the other fish die. He'd then request "Get me a murder a day!". Murdoch has being doing the same on a larger scale with our country for the last 30 odd years, because know one thought that his tank and board were fake. As soon as our politicians begin to work for us rather than the press the better. THe internet gives them the perfect "out" for that...but only for a limited time
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 2:40, Reply)

Sorry, and as for truth. Well truth is transient. Ive learnt that much. Truth depends on who you talk to, accuracy in that version of truth is what matters though. One thing I'd like to see out of this is the press publish retractions on the same page and within the same page space as the initial 'mistruth'. People can say what they want on blogs, true enough. But people like Ben Goldacre allready support a process of linking and referencing. Learn to trust ethical press, broadcasters, and indeed bloggers :)
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 2:44, Reply)

could you please explain to me, an 'individual', exactly what it is that the labour party stand for? and then the conservatives. and then the lib dems, etc...
in simplistic terms using words of as few syllables as possible. short sentences preferred. an idiots guide to politics, if you will. ta muchly.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 2:51, Reply)

Well. As a 'Labour Guy' I can only talk for my self. So I have certain political beliefs, Social Democrat in nature mostly, I joined because I was looking for a party that broadly conforms to that, Under Blair Labour didnt work for me though I should have joined for the reasons I will state shortly. 97-07 fullfilled alot of Neil Kinnock's, and mostly John Smith's Social Democratic ideals, minimum wage etc. Unfortunatly under Blair Labour became enthrawled with Free Marketism, cosied up to the city, fleet street etc. All very distastful. I joined the seconed (the very seconed I timed it right) that Blair resigned to the Queen. I joined Labour because they are the only party which has fulfilled the aims of socialism (whilst never being exclusevly socialist, which I agree with, Im not an ideological socialist), NHS, etc. So thats that
Lib Dems, well yes they encompas the SDP whicjh split, so the Dem part of the Lib Dems are Labour people throwing a strop. Unfortunately they tend to only make a noise when it suits. Generally the Lib Dems are (spineless has always been our assesment of them in Council seats) Economic Tories, but moral liberals. I believe strongly that if the election had given the Lib Dems more of a choice, Clegg being more 'Liberal' than 'SDP' would have still gone into bed with the Tories.
Conservatives. Ok well they are a strange beast. Things may change with the next generation of them, god knows Ive had enough arguments (and heard enough borderline bigtoed racist shit from them). They may move away from Thatcherism (Cameron is Thatcher writ large, basicly people think the bogey man is in a wheelchair so theres nothing to worry about. The Condems are skillfuly doing what Maggie never could). So in 10 years expect the Conservatives to return to their moral conservatism, rather concentrating so much on Laissez-faire economices.
Or in short. Labour = Spiv with a heart of gold who you need to keep an eye on and guide in the right direction
Lib Dems = Two faced cunt that will screw you if it saves his arse while your back is turned
Conservatives= the cunt who looks down his nose at you and wants to keep it that way.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 3:08, Reply)

not much in the grand scheme of things. i was looking for something a little deeper, on the birth, life, death, relationships, nature of existence, being a human, being, within a vaguely stable and sustainable society and not destroying ourselves in the process kind of things. ho hum.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 3:17, Reply)

difficult he's self-employed...
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 22:06, Reply)

would highlight those posts that others have enjoyed.
Here, I must reply also.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 3:09, Reply)

i never knew steve c had this in him. my level of respect for him has gone through the roof.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 6:30, Reply)

( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 9:09, Reply)

......this hasnt changed anything. NOTW is dead in the water, reprehensible behaviour etc, I dont want to get into that.
He (Paul McMullen) make some valid points about Coogan in that he was found to be a cocaine snorting, philanderer,a 'Sex junkie' (what ever that was) and an out and out cunt to his wife ,to whom he is now divorced. He has starred in, and taken money for Murdock movies ,claims to be a socialist, but drives Ferraris as I said an utter dichotomy and a complete cunt.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 9:17, Reply)

But what business is that of ours? Even if he is a "cocaine snorting, philanderer, sex junkie" then it doesn't change anything about what he does, which is write, and perform comedy. Surely that fits squarely under being "of interest to the public", not "in the public interest". He never set out to sell his work on the basis of being a saint, or being decent in the slightest for that matter. And trying to paint him as a hypocrite for taking money from a Murdoch company for some of his work is a pretty shaky criticism. You'd be hard pressed to find support for the kind of stuff done by the NOTW, but that doesn't mean everything that Rupert Murdoch's many subsidiary companies do is evil. It's like calling someone who doesn't like the ethics of battery chicken eggs a hypocrite for shopping at Asda, even though they always buy the free range ones. As for his Champagne socialism; it doesn't make the tiniest bit of difference to me or you or anybody else what his views are. As soon as he becomes a politician then let me know and I'll give a monkey's, but until then it 's just totally inconsequential.
( , Sat 9 Jul 2011, 23:40, Reply)

thats a massively obtuse over-simplification. You categorically cannot take cash off the organization your espousing to slate on the one hand, just in exchange for 'a TV appearance' on the other. Im sorry for your lack of perception in this matter, not mention ,lack of experience in lifes wider margins.
( , Sun 10 Jul 2011, 9:51, Reply)

The point is that he's critisising the tabloid press, and their practices. At no point in that interview does he actually lay into the Murdoch media as a whole. You can get grubby tabloid "news" from The Sun, The Mirror, The Star, The Daily mail... It doesn't have to be owned by Rupert Murdoch to be a tabloid, or to employ the underhand tactics exposed over the last few years. To work in TV and Film and rule out dealings with the rest of Rupert Murdoch's media empire based on your distaste for a tiny, tabloid-shaped corner of it would be foolish and over-idealistic. You accuse me of an obtuse over-simplification, and then feel compelled to tar the entire holdings of News Corporation with the same brush because of the NOTW?!
Also, I think the personal attack ("Im sorry for your lack of perception in this matter, not mention ,lack of experience in lifes wider margins.") was entirely unjustified. You know absolutely nothing about me other than half-a-dozen lines written on the messageboard of a site that has an obsession for purple cocks. It's pretty judgmental to infer my experience of "lifes wider margins" from that.
( , Sun 10 Jul 2011, 10:37, Reply)

shaved and suited and booted, bit of a makeover.
Still the same BS tho, he honestly seems to personally believe that someone making better of themselves or getting into the spotlight more than him qualifies him to treat them like shit and intrude upon every aspect of their personal lives without reproach and sell anything he finds, or makes up.
You're better than me therefore I can hurt you any which way i like, maybe destroy you, it's my job.
Ok...
( , Mon 11 Jul 2011, 11:24, Reply)

these are amazing!
www.scarysextoyfriday.com/2010/12/scary-sextoy-friday-tentacle-haute.html
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:30, Reply)

If so, I declare the entire species doomed.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:32, Reply)

we should have made today dildo friday!
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:37, Reply)

Maybe "bizarre sex toys" could be a compo idea? If it hasn't already been done?
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:42, Reply)

I was beginning to worry that nothing really shocked me any more. You've restored my faith in my sense of revulsion. Now, if you'll excuse me, I must go do a vom. toodle pip!
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:31, Reply)

( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:41, Reply)

Ive gone through so many of the older pages, that barely any posts have any image that are still hosted! Its fucking brilliant! (in a wrong way)
Chekk dis
www.scarysextoyfriday.com/2009/08/scary-sextoy-friday-quit-pussyfootin.html
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:40, Reply)

now with 50% more pyro! :D xx
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 22:51, Reply)

...had better be better than 'Kevin and Perry Go Large'. Mind youm a kick in the sack would be better than that.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:02, Reply)

alternative words to fanny as possible. best characters are Neils dad (im not gay!) and the head teacher, both im sure will have a minutes air time.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:58, Reply)

Buy this. It's cheaper than a hooker. Basically.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 22:38, Reply)

Nice illusion.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 22:52, Reply)

It's the outside bit. I tried recording the intro bit, but it all flies past so sudden. But you see it shatter and fall out. I ffigure you're trying to "rebuild it" as you play through. Cool though.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:01, Reply)

which is great in my book.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:11, Reply)

in it's stylings and playing. Braid, not so much, aside from the jigsaw thing. It's more like a better thought out version of one of those hunt-n-seek games you find for a quid each in PC World (that my GF is ADDICTED to)
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:46, Reply)

Samorost/2's bigger brother. Tiny Bang Story took me all of about two hours and a half to finish (although steam says 2 hours played) but it was a great couple of hours and definitely it had the stylings of Samorost/Machinarium. To be honest though, it was a bit of a downer when, after spending ages finding all of the jigsaw bits in all but two levels, it turns out you didn't need them to finish the game.
Love the reviews Dogbomb. Keep 'em coming.
( , Sun 10 Jul 2011, 3:11, Reply)

You remember that link from yesterday, right?
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 22:18, Reply)

( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 22:39, Reply)

Don't you know about the galleries made from when people click 'I like this!'
If a cam is available a snap ends up here http://www.b3ta.com/features/ilikethisgallery.html
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 22:41, Reply)

the one that became a meme.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:38, Reply)

Not too long before I think.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:47, Reply)

A family argument gone really wrong.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 22:16, Reply)

I mean, life is tough enough as it is without asking for trouble.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 22:34, Reply)

until I got to the first picture and saw it was real.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 22:37, Reply)

that just really fucking annoyed me... I hate people with such a deluded sense of entitlement... "Oh yeah, not only have I just wasted $100... I'm going to make you feel bad about it by pretending that it's my anniversary present to you."
I know I've probably and drunkenly skipped over a paragraph or a reply in the comments which shifts the context, but meh... I hope she gets hit by an AIDS soaked asteroid.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:34, Reply)

And then she has the nerve to blog about how her husband *gasp* reacted normally to her spoiled psychosis. I feel sorry for the guy, but I'm betting all his friends warned him about her 15 years ago.
( , Fri 8 Jul 2011, 23:40, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »