Article by the writer who coined "meritocracy"
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 23:48, Reply)
and I suppose you think poor people should get a good education
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 23:54, Reply)
Otherwise all of my wit would zoom straight over your heads.
Rather than just 90 per cent.
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 0:05, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWiIYW_fBfY
is that a CNN video?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 23:53, Reply)
He actually comes across really well.
Hunter Thompson always seemed to rather like him in a twisted way. They liked talking about football.
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 0:06, Reply)
applying to our current situation?
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 0:19, Reply)
Who can operate. He could. Why? are you picking up a vibe? That's just the chemtrails. Fnord
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 0:26, Reply)
and the Clinton cover ups. This election is epic
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 0:45, Reply)
shiny side out or in? It makes a difference.
www.theonion.com/article/study-38-percent-of-people-not-actually-entitled-t-5701
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 0:52, Reply)
my post yesterday may suggest otherwise I know, but that's another point.
I like to consider myself a realist if anything, so go on!...
I'm perfectly happy to debate or chat about it. I'd like to have the most unbiased opinion of it all as I can.
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 1:07, Reply)
but this is so tiresome I don't even do that much. Clinton is a crook, Trump is an arse. I'm not in the USA so can't vote for either. We get it.
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 2:43, Reply)
We're on the same page, but you need to tell that to the people who post the trump posts numerous times a day. Not me.
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 15:54, Reply)
Nixon reminds me of Gordon Brown here a bit. Dont know why, cant imagine Brown being as candid about his peers
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 10:51, Reply)
Thank god we have Julian Assange's Wikileaks to ensure we're all woke.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 22:39, Reply)
Trump replies to every email, even the penis enlargement ones.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 23:15, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIf3X403kH0
On the other hand, I can't tell if you're just trolling posting from a pro Hillary site or serious.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 23:15, Reply)
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 11:45, Reply)
I'm looking at this and thinking there's a case for it
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 21:53, Reply)
I would pay to see the 400m skip
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 23:13, Reply)
and it was lovely. Felt really nice and efficient, and I got a surprising amount of speed up. Didn't look good, but I recommend having a skip every now and then.
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 10:02, Reply)
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 11:37, Reply)
https://kungfury.vhx.tv/updates/hackermans-time-hacking-tutorial
(, Sun 2 Oct 2016, 19:36, Reply)
Excellent reviews including “What S...t hole" and “Wipe your feet on the way out not on the way in."
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:35, Reply)
Fortunately I have no children who will wheel me over the sticky carpet.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:50, Reply)
"Although the room was clean there was not room to swing a cat around in it. The bathroom was small and the walk in shower was a joke. It was almost impossible to move at all once you had managed to close the door, and that was only possible if you were a very tiny person" - a standard central London hotel room then costing at least 5 x as much.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 21:26, Reply)
www.eurohotelharrow.co.uk/ - what was I thinking?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 21:29, Reply)
They've made an amazing lap with preproduction car, it cannot be replicated with production one though from what I've heard.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:03, Reply)
Only a bunch of bushings and sways bars are needed to make it serious fast.
No cutting steel or geometry changes.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 21:44, Reply)
C'était un rendez-vous
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vwgwf-Pdsj8
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 9:06, Reply)
Wasn't this absolutely trounced by a Golf R in a recent test or other? Plus it looks ridiculous.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:49, Reply)
Long time lurker, second time poster.
Is this anything?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:39, Reply)
So it gets my vote, more please.
(Long time? You need candles for that;))
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:45, Reply)
starting to really come out, the big surprise dump of emails sometime next month.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:35, Reply)
Can we please stop posting US political crap here? If I wanted to see this tedious grudge match I'd turn on the news.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:45, Reply)
although it would have been nice to get the same response from the many trump postings. Esp as this is quite a serious post, no one want to talk about this though, right?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:46, Reply)
But what else are all the mouth breathers going to focus on now that 'birther' turned out to be Hillary's idea?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:07, Reply)
How is she going to tie the room together now?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:16, Reply)
he's still out dickin' bimbos! lol
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:35, Reply)
...what would you do?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:42, Reply)
EDIT: actually, it didn't stop him at all when he WAS in office hahaha
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:51, Reply)
This is what's happening right now, this was just a day or two ago.
Thee case is hung right now because of immunity being handed out to everyone, so nothing can go forward. It's literally a cover up, plain as day.
But like I say, a batch of the BIG important mails will be released next month. It's just in the process of being verified and legit atm.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:30, Reply)
Fuck Clinton.
Fuck Trump.
Fuck the pair of them, I've long passed the point of not caring and now I'm sick of hearing about the whole affair.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:28, Reply)
I'm not adverse to posting a bit of corruption though. Politics, business or stuff like that. Don't you find it interesting? better than someone who called someone something, oh noes!
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:34, Reply)
Miss Piggy aka Miss Housekeeping is pretty and fucks? A battle worth fighting! Totally justified in calling her names because....?
What a fucking arsehole. It doesn't matter a rat's gonad if this woman dines out on fried kittens every night, he talks and acts like a proper cunt. Maybe that's why he's popular.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 17:40, Reply)
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:33, Reply)
but Clinton stuff isn't? lol
And this is just preaching to the choir. Same as every other outlet. I think it's you who's missed the point here, none of these posts seem to make any difference at all. It's like Bush jr all over again, same old smears.
He won remember. Twice.
The more this stuff gets spread, the harder the reaction to it.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 18:34, Reply)
and the actual words of a presidential candidate, don't you?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 18:51, Reply)
Also corruption and lies from the current administration/candidate, cover ups and bullying are also an issue.
But, keep posting anti Trump propaganda to the converted. Let's see how that's going. She's losing.
To Trump, is she really such a winner? I think you guys are deluding yourselves.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:02, Reply)
That's not propaganda, that's my opinion. It's a mere coincidence that this view is shared by most of the world and has been for a long time.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:51, Reply)
She's fucking up her campaign the same way the remain camp did - by telling the opposition supporters they're all mental racists and failing to talk to them like actual functioning human beings.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:51, Reply)
I said fucking up.
Also be careful with polls. There weren't many that said Brexit or the last Tory general election win was on were there?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:13, Reply)
I've checked out both sides rallies. Clinton's (if she can be bothered) does one here and there with small crowds. Trump has even turned away thousands, not enough room.
She has way less twitter followers and way less on reddit and whatever, like, loads way less.
For all the hype on TV about her, she's STILL losing.
If you watch what's going on, there's a real anger about the reality of what's happening and the media version. That's exactly why facts don't make any difference at all in this election.
Most people know about the Clinton cover ups over the years, she's just been involved in too many things.
Her time was last time she ran. It's too late for her now.
And the final nail in the coffin, I think, will be what seems to be her involvement with shutting down Sanders with dirty tricks. So any Sanders voters on the fence will jump to Trump. And if these racism videos come out (which there's talk of), the black vote will go to Trump.
This is just my prediction of what's going to happen.
Like I say, I don't really care who wins.
Shirley I can't be the only one seeing this?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:50, Reply)
and the FT couldn't have been in UKIPs pocket because they are in Trump's
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 20:52, Reply)
both sides have different versions of the truth. I don't think they mean anything.
What I think does count are people who are active. I mean, show up at rallies, make posters and walk around streets. Real people, who do stuff like vote.
Right now, Trump looks to be way ahead in that department. Check for yourself, he had to turn away thousands just the other day. Thousands!
Hillary doesn't seem to have the numbers or seems to want to go out rallying, meeting people and all that. If you're a supporter, doesn't that piss you off? I mean, what is she doing?
Look at the way bands work, they tour. Get it out there, but she's not doing it and Trump is.
What it's coming down to this election is not facts, who said what or to who, it's about exactly the opposite. Clinton hasn't grasped that yet. It will be her undoing.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 21:01, Reply)
I'm not out to promote Trump. Here's a video I made if this means anything www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocm0IH2Lgto
Or to put Hillary down. Why does it bother you so much?
Surely you're not saying this should be a pro Hillary site and not allowed to suggest other sides to the story?
you can get that at /r/hillaryclinton/ or /r/politics .
If you're a trump supporter you can get that at /r/The_Donald/
I'd like to think B3Ta was above that bullshit censorship of posts. Mods or users.
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 1:49, Reply)
DT has been a cunt to his business partners, his contractors, his staff, his customers, and anyone that criticises him. I watched several seasons of his TV show and the cunt didn't once form an opinion based on anything other than a gauge of what everyone else in the room thought was popular.
The fact that others see the above and somehow perceive him as a 'winner' is just depressing.
The possibility that this guy will be heading the US's engagement with the ROTW is simply terrifying. This is why I care.
That's also why, during the debate, HC took time out from pimping herself to the electorate to address/reassure leaders in other countries. DT is promising to shake them down for cash for the US's continued military defences and at the same time promising to make their imports more expensive. He's also extremely blasé about nuclear proliferation and would doubtlessly enjoy a 'small' nuclear war somewhere unimportant. They must be shitting themselves at what crazy thing the crazy country will do next.
HC is a politician. This is the minimum job requirement. If she gets in the ROTW will just get on with the rest of its day. Who gives a fuck about emails?
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 9:16, Reply)
So what you're saying is despite being a cunt you still bought his product for several seasons? Also that he apparently listens to people around him rather than do what he wants?
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 10:59, Reply)
We're fans of the UK apprentice, so we were watching both shows at some point on the BBC
Week after week, Trump utterly failed to formulate any opinions whatsoever without some kind of 'show of hands'. He rarely if ever betrayed any thought process or values of his own. Alan Sugar is a Mensa genius by comparison.
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 11:54, Reply)
but I really don't know what politicians are supposed to do against all the post-fact shite that does so well.
If they join in, it validates it, and leads to even more dumbing down.
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 0:11, Reply)
but, my point, I think you missed (probably due to my lack of explaining well tbh) is that, like you say " I really don't know what politicians are supposed to do against all the post-fact shite that does so well.
"
please excuse me using your own words, but it illustrates my point.
If you look at the way you've worded it, it comes across instantly as the exact kind of phrasing that a Trump supporter would instantly dismiss. It's this kind of phrasing and talk that triggers that demographic. Now, look online, you'll see a huge support for Trump.
If anything, it has a negative impact for the Clinton campaign. Any support for this phrasing is preaching to the choir, and that choir is not active as far as real life goes (going to rallies, voting, making signs for their yards etc. etc.) But that kind of phrasing is actively pushing people to react, which in turn, turns into votes.
You're a long time member like me, doesn't this whole Pepe the frog being branded a hate symbol bother you?
You, like me, Rob, even down to Ben Wheatley who's doing well now.
If we go down this path, and say, something happens where this site gets classed as a hate speech site (we all know we tread a thin line here with our sense of humour). What then?
Maybe we go to a job interview, some association with a hate group. Ben makes a legit political film? instant dismissal because of an association to a 'hate speech site'.
I'm more than a little concerned about that if I'm honest and I think we as a community should address it. I don't want to be classed as a racist because I posted here over the years.
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 1:19, Reply)
votes based on emotions than right wing ones. Right wing groups can use far more tribalist sentiment and fear. It's Britain First vs Jeremy 4 PM stuff on Facebook. They both cherry pick information for the sake of emotion instead of rationality, but Britain First are going "You should be scared about this" rather than "You should think this man is great" - people are going to sit up and take notice of anything that may put them in danger or makes them angry. Neither use logic in their arguments, but what's to be done?
All the recent censorship-of-speech and public-shaming stuff is scary, but I don't really see that as a left-right issue - look how offended right wing people get about a stupid left wing idea. Christian Voice and the Jerry Springer stuff aren't really different to someone wanting to ban Germaine Greer from a university. Both should be ridiculed rather than it becomming yet another partisan thing.
I really blame social media for most of this shit - you only see one side of a conversation, it's easy to get an online mob together of people who think the same way as you, and it seems people will abuse any power they are given. Saw social media blamed for a rise in mental health issues, and it really doesn't surprise me. It can be toxic for debate.
In terms of b3ta, I suspect there is safety in obsfucation. We tend to use avatars (in your case, good look to anyone searching "tits" to try and find dirt on you), and because people have to sign up before they can call you a cunt, are less likely to form a mob around it - it's not instant pleasure for them, research would be required to trace someone (since no one ever bothers to even do a reverse image search before sharing an angry meme, that's unlikely), and its hard to do any virtue signalling on a threaded messageboard when comments are seen in context.
It's the data that's saved by the likes of Facebook that scares me far more - that's the stuff that's going to be scraped and used to profile you in future. I've seen plenty of people click 'like' on quite innocent sounding posts by far right groups - "here's a stock picture of a poppy - share if you don't hate our veterans" etc.
By cherry picking from so much data on our internet history, anyone can be made out to be anything.
(Reading a book at the moment called Future Crimes on how our internet data is stored - fucking terrifying)
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 10:59, Reply)
What a terrible thought
(, Sat 1 Oct 2016, 11:44, Reply)
or if he does he completely ignores them.
Which is slightly mental for someone running for office for the President of the United States
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:10, Reply)
the Jonathan Ross appearance again:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DOdwT3FQfQ
Marc Wootton's management taking it down in 5...4...3....
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:00, Reply)
His fans will have got the joke, and La La Land felt more extreme, so I'm not sure he was too held back by it.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:31, Reply)
it was an awful show. I think the guy from friends and Skully from xfiles.
It defo set him back though, shame.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:44, Reply)
"Probably, when I was 6 months old."
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 21:48, Reply)
finding his characters more likable than the contestants.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 21:25, Reply)
I'd just think "you're making your friends and family feel like shit for 10 grand?"
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 21:51, Reply)
You go on my first whistle etc.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 14:50, Reply)
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 14:28, Reply)
Ohh billybillybillybillybilly.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 15:27, Reply)
(, Sun 2 Oct 2016, 18:38, Reply)
And then it gets boring again
My favourite bit is when he goes "YOYOYOARGHLSHGHEHGGHGAAGAEGH"
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 12:25, Reply)
that ultimately both sides, left or right, are made mostly out of ill educated angry morons, ready to lend their unthinking support to whichever douche bag pretends to care about them.
The supporters are broadly as bad as each other, the only difference in this case being that the leader of one group is more open about how awful he is. But rest assured, that if Hilary started whipping people up into a racist frenzy, her supporters would also be willing to oblige.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 12:48, Reply)
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 13:16, Reply)
www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-will-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 14:11, Reply)
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 14:25, Reply)
I just wanted you to see that Hillary has also been endorsed by the KKK. You can ignore corruption by calling the other guy "Hitler", but you saying it does not make it so.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 14:31, Reply)
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 14:38, Reply)
People call him racist because he said we need to stop importing refugees from countries with a known terrorist problem until we can get a handle on how to determine that they're not a threat to the country. That was labelled as "racist" and "Trump's War on Religious Freedom". Two weeks later, the Obama administration announced essentially the same thing, but that was "brave". Then they overturned themselves and just allow anyone, so I presume we'll see more bombings.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 14:46, Reply)
He said you need to stop allowing people of a certain religion in.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 15:11, Reply)
He then said many of those countries would be predominantly Muslim countries. I suppose he didn't follow the rote "Islam is a religion of peace" that politicians seem programmed to say, so that must be part of the upset.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 15:38, Reply)
edition.cnn.com/2015/12/07/politics/donald-trump-muslim-ban-immigration/
My mistake.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 15:44, Reply)
"Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life."
"It does not apply to people living in the country, except we have to be vigilant."
Please, tell me what I am missing.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 15:49, Reply)
"Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on,"
That, right there, is the problem.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 16:00, Reply)
The US has had a number of mass killings due to Islamic terror. It seems reasonable to slow the influx of people from known terrorist countries, especially since ISIS has stated repeatedly that they are putting terrorists in with the flow of refugees.
Please tell me how stopping the import of people until we can assure that they will not kill the people who are offering them a respite is racist?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 16:10, Reply)
we wouldn't be having these conversations. Regardless of right or wrong on any side.
I fail to see how the situation is going to get better as it's just got worse and worse since 2009.
I'm not saying Trump is the answer, but I would say Hillary won't make it much better. She's even losing the election, against Trump.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 16:37, Reply)
it's the dictionary definition of racism.
Predominantly muslim countries is not-very-good code for 'the brown ones'.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 16:38, Reply)
And yes, to discriminate against a religion is illegal in the US (that pesky "Constitution" you guys keep railing against forbids it).
However, there is nothing that prohibits the executive from assuring that immigrants coming from any specific country are not threats to the safety and security of the country.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 17:21, Reply)
What's your heritage Coxxy? How would you describe yourself ethnically?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 17:34, Reply)
Because I've met Muslims of all shades and want to know which ones are just pretending.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 18:12, Reply)
I've met Muslims from Pakistan, Iran,Turkey and Somalia.
So I point you back to my previous post.
What colour are Muslims?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 18:52, Reply)
Truro? Penzance?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:03, Reply)
Now, enough racial profiling.
What colour are Muslims?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:11, Reply)
Turkey, Iran, Syria, half the fucking middle east, Albania.
All identify as "white"
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 19:50, Reply)
KILLARY DOES IT AGAIN!!!! SHE WAS GETTING FAR RIGHT PEOPLE BACKING HER LONG BEFORE KING TRUMP!!!
You sad fuck.
(, Mon 3 Oct 2016, 16:43, Reply)
I mean, Hilary isn't whipping people up into a racist frenzy, and there's no reason to think that she would.
Now, just for the sake of the argument, let's imagine that she did start doing that; do you have any evidence or reason to think that her supporters would be willing to oblige? Wouldn't it be reasonable to expect that there'd be something self-fulfilling about any such prediction anyway, inasmuch as that only those willing to oblige would count themselves as her supporters at that point?
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 14:05, Reply)
Imagine if Trump called Hillary supporters deplorables and some of them were subsequently attacked. I don't doubt that many in the media would have no problem painting Trump as an instigator of violence.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 14:38, Reply)
He is an instigator of violence
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 14:42, Reply)
Trump may be the nadir of political civility but the reduction to shitflinging has been going on for far longer than he's been campaigning and helped along by many people who call him the monster. The demonisation of Trump is as much a dead canary as his retarded ranting.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 14:53, Reply)
I'm not saying Clinton and Trump are equivalent at all, but that they're really the only bit of the left/right equation that AREN'T equivalent.
I definitely think Clinton is the better choice for president for obvious reasons. I just don't think her supporters are any better or worse than trumps supporters. Probably less than 1% of the people voting for either side have actually put any degree of original thought into their decision.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 15:22, Reply)
they attack people, tell them what they can say, wear and do. It's mental. They're acting like right fascists.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 16:33, Reply)
I'm not trying to defend these Clinton supporters by the way... I don't think any of these people should have a vote on their own fucking breakfast let alone the head of state of a superpower.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 16:47, Reply)
Next month should be super interesting. Shit will hit the fan come October surprise.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 17:07, Reply)
Problem arises when one side, with the media, claims to be right.
Apparently there's some racist stuff with Hillary about to be released too! Should be interesting.
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 16:58, Reply)
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 13:02, Reply)
being an antagonistic dick pays well
(, Fri 30 Sep 2016, 13:20, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »
