b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 10542387

# I have drawn a man shitting in my head...
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:35, archived)
# Nice...
But not enough neck!
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:35, archived)
# That's what I told my missus.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:45, archived)
# ^ This
Needs more bulbosity
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:45, archived)
# Tastes great though
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:04, archived)
# The bulbous neck was there...
I toned it down a tad. Maybe I softened it too much. I shall have a rethink.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:28, archived)
#
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:42, archived)
# sounds great!
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 17:46, archived)
# The more I think about it the more I think he's trolling
and laughing far harder than you can possibly imagine

Or maybe he's just proving his point :D
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:38, archived)
# Your RoboWars FP is amazing!
:D

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:44, archived)
# ooh FP :)
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:46, archived)
# One way to see if the mods are present
post a new happytoast or monkeon pic and see how long it takes :-)
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:49, archived)
# if it were that simple I'd have about 5,000 fps
*edit - more than that in fact according to contents of my B3ta folder
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:53, archived)
# blimey
thats a lot of b3ating
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:57, archived)
# Those are only the pictures I've kept
I would guess I've done twice as much
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:59, archived)
# *and the b3ta glass cock award for lifetime achievment goes to...*
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:00, archived)
# thanks to the academy
but that cheap statuette is hardly going to pay the bills or get back the wasted time :D
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:07, archived)
# Not wasted.
You can save money on a portfolio by just having a link to the front page.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:18, archived)
# some of the stuff they've picked is truly awful
embarrassed to look back at it

They never pick the ones I'm proud of :D
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:24, archived)
# YOU'VE wasted time!?
Huh!


(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:18, archived)
# :D
you slowed down way too much, you could have been on 100k by now
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:24, archived)
# All that low poly work keeping you on 32k huh?
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:25, archived)
# hahaha
I get paid less than an actual tea boy at the moment :(
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:28, archived)
# tea boys at the Ritz are on £35k/annum
plus a company trolley
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:42, archived)
# *applies*
fuck it, my cucumber sandwiches are all 2005 standard and my tea pouring showreel is even older.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:47, archived)
# I ran out of hummus . . .


(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:27, archived)
# Lies
and
Filth
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:42, archived)
# I'm so glad I don't give a fuck about star wars
it sounds too stressful
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:40, archived)
# I don't get why people get upset
and I class myself as a star wars fan

"He's spoiling it for future generations" not if they've not seen the other version he's not
"He's spoiling it for me" but you saw the original and liked it right, just don't bother with the new ones, then he hasn't changed anything!
"He's just doing it to make more money" so?

The only people that should give a shit are Lucasfilm in case it doesn't sell
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:45, archived)
# ^ This
With more Ewok blink
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:47, archived)
# I think that's a lovely touch
not making me rush out and buy them though :D
I'd rather have the unedited DVDs from a couple of years back that everyone seemed to forget about
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:48, archived)
# i've got them
i watched a couple of scenes from the remasters and the originals and he's cleaned up a hell of a lot in the process. the originals on the dvds are the laserdisc transfer which was pretty rubbish. the remasters have much crisper colours, a hell of a lot less blur and generally look better -- until the shitty mid-90s cgi comes on when it just looks poor.

i prefer the original versions myself but then i did watch them when i was about 7, something people always seem to forget when they get all hot under the colour about it.

also, i agree, i think he's just trolling people and seeing how far he can push it before people *actually* stop buying the new release instead of just saying that they will
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:51, archived)
#
The Ewoks were the only thing I liked about that movie. That and Luke Skywalker. I wanted one (an Ewok, I mean).
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 16:12, archived)
# ^this
With more Anakin 'Yippeeee!' dubbed in
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:47, archived)
# and ewok snuggling
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:49, archived)
# and human wampa arm
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:52, archived)
# My problem is...
mess with YOUR movie as much as you like. Just give me the option of watching the movie I grew up with on the same format.

Thanks

Love

Tokyo x
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:50, archived)
# you want a copy in 4:3 at 576 with fuzzy VHS lines all over it?
or you could have it in DVD version like these ones were
www.amazon.co.uk/Star-Wars-Episode-IV-Theatrical/dp/B000FMH8UI/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&qid=1316440602&sr=8-10

Original Version:2.0 Dolby Surround sound and is 2.35:1 letterbox within a 4x3 picture Disc 2 is THX, ensuring the highest possible quality picture and sound
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:56, archived)
# You know very well what I mean young man.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:59, archived)
# I've just read that the blu rays have luke missing with his grappling hook!
For years people have said I was imagining it, but the scene exists!
Now to work out how the hell I saw it.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:08, archived)
# That's another issue..
you can't get ALL the missing scenes and extra's without buying the 3 piles of poo to.

Lucas's marketing dept. is excellent.....for him!

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:16, archived)
# bonus features in "used as motivation to purchase" Shocker!
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:19, archived)
# Motivation to purchase the movies no one really likes...yes.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:21, archived)
# All guns have been replaced by walkie talkies...
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:28, archived)
# He's changing that back...
releasing a blu with none of the changes.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:35, archived)
# i don't understand why he doesn't release the originals on blu-ray
then those that have them on VHS and DVD will buy them all over again.

they could even do an ultimate mega bastard collection, the original theatrial release, the re-release with updated effects and the new 'Nooooooooooooooooooo' version along with 3 weeks worth of extras.

it would sell.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 17:51, archived)
# seconded
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:45, archived)
# I bought the originals on VHS in like 1995
that was the last time I found myself giving a fuck
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:50, archived)
# I find that I am increasingly being made to feel that I should have opinion about this.



But I'm just not really that interested in early 80s Science fiction films.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:40, archived)
# not even flash gordon?
:-(
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:48, archived)
# "You've never seen a Valkyrie go down".
:-)
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:53, archived)
# HAHAHA
THATS WERE YOUR WRONG THEY WERE LATE 70S AND EARLY 80S LOL ASH CALLED THERE FIRST ALBUM 1977 COS THAT WAS WHEN THE FIRST ONE CAME OUT HAVE A CLUE BEFORE YOU COMMENT

*ahem* sorry, been reading daily mail comments and i think it's whacked 60 points off my iq
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:54, archived)
# Exactly, and now having pointed out one small flaw in his statement
He is now legally compelled to abandon his former belief systems and shout from the rooftops about how he is now a converted fan of all things Star Wars.
That's how internet debating works, isn't it? That's what we all signed up to, right?
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:59, archived)
# Absolutely!
I think Chutters will admit he's come to his senses because I picked him up on a small, unimportant slip, and the world will be set to rights until the NEXT time someone says something a pedant can poke a very small hole in.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:04, archived)
# *pokes*
*splurt*
*wipes*
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:30, archived)
# Oh well, may as well add my tuppence worth to this subject
Erm...
*thinks*
What is Star Wars?
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:12, archived)
# It's where three womens go shopping for shoes . . .
. . . IN SPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACE!


(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:19, archived)
# *Rushes to Amazon to order a copy*
They'd better be sparkly shoes.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:23, archived)
# you're confusing it with Sex and in the City
with that woman with the face
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:40, archived)
# Sarah Unexpected Jessica Horse Parker?


(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:54, archived)
# It's not science fiction!
It's a fucking fairy tale in space!

Dark Lord kidnaps Princess
Wizard enlists hero to rescue Princess
Dark Lord uses dragon to destroy Princess's home
Hero rescues princess (but wizard gets killed)
Stuff happens
Good guys kill dragon and defeat Dark Lord
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 16:00, archived)
# Sounds like a mash-up of the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 16:03, archived)
# Proper term from the golden age of sci-fi: Space Opera
As in: Star Trek is science fiction, Star Wars is space opera.

They both have their place, but which space operas you like sort of depends on how stinky you like your cheese.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 18:34, archived)
# Lovely.
:D

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:43, archived)
# I'm glad I gave up on Star Wars when Episode 1 was released.
The whole series has become a parody of itself, to the point where I can't even watch the original cuts anymore. Lucas is biting the hand that feeds him, and has done for years and years.

Hypocritical fat necked fuck.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:43, archived)
# I remember seeing it at the cinema when it first came out
My mate nagged me to go, I was apprehensive.

I tolerated about half an hour's worth then walked out of the cinema.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:44, archived)
# I think it's a case of rose-tinted specs with most people.
I tried watching 4, 5 and 6 for the first time in years over the Summer, and I got so bored I had to give up... just near the end of ep. 4.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 16:34, archived)
# Like Messrs. Savalas and Chutney, I'm not a Star Wars fan
but I agree wholeheartedly with the point being made here
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:43, archived)
# Needs more World War 10

:D
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:44, archived)
# Expendables 2. *fingers crossed*
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:45, archived)
# i thought the first one was wank, so no ta from me
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:49, archived)
# Mm, it didn't do much for me either. Could have been a lot better.
But daring? Definitely.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:53, archived)
# The airline friendly version was fucking hilarious
"Run you custard!"
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:58, archived)
# hahaha!
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:08, archived)
# This film must be made!
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:47, archived)
#
must be has been
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:49, archived)
# *Heads off to dvd shop*
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:53, archived)
# It's called "Sense and Sensibility"
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:56, archived)
# *Puts disc in dvd player*
You fibber!!
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 17:33, archived)
# Blimey!
That's a whole lotta awesome!
:D

(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:50, archived)
# I bet you stole this from Steven Seagal's downstairs loo
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:23, archived)
# Hahaha...
:D
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:32, archived)
# I only ever saw the first one.
Which is now the fourth one, or something.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 14:55, archived)
# It was amazing forethought.
He made one of the best films ever but left himself plenty of room to comprehensively trash it over the next few decades.
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 15:31, archived)
# Is that a cover for "Songs to take a Dump to"?
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 16:32, archived)
# if so, it's better than mine
*flounce*
(, Mon 19 Sep 2011, 16:50, archived)