Bonus smut: twitter.com/michaelkrivicka/status/1418360968938246147
Thanks to machinepix for the rabbit hole, so to speak.
(, Fri 23 Jul 2021, 11:51, Reply)
More NFT stupidity. Wonder when folk will get bored with this nonsense.
(, Fri 23 Jul 2021, 13:14, Reply)
More news-inspired cryptic craftiness for anyone that likes that sort of thing. Deadline for entries is 1 Aug. Enjoy.
Download links...
Printable PDF: drive.google.com/file/d/18qCyKBNgQv0Z7DGThIop6G3WFP9_KY8O/view?usp=sharing
Interactive (AcrossLite) PUZ format: drive.google.com/file/d/17rKecNYx7nPb8N00B31HX1SxSVQcFXDW/view?usp=sharing
Solution to last month's puzzle (with explanations):
drive.google.com/file/d/1VpIYaQubgSDo5-_gJOx1Km9wy0I9PrrD/view?usp=sharing
(, Fri 23 Jul 2021, 9:20, Reply)
With a lot of Beck as well I feel. Pretty good. The oldsters are having a bit of a renaissance, what with decent material from Tom Jones and The Hoff as well.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 21:30, Reply)
does beck still believe in aliens to avoid tax! or has he changed his tune to gain a bigger audience.
Liking the song either way
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 22:22, Reply)
I thought he said he wasn’t any more.
Not sure it would affect his market anyway.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 22:40, Reply)
I do not like Paul McCartney but I *do* like this. So I clicked like.
(, Fri 23 Jul 2021, 7:51, Reply)
I'm not American, so none of this applies to me anyway.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 16:48, Reply)
DOB, Nationality, shoe size, etc.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 19:57, Reply)
Are DOB and Nationality. The rest just change the colours of the rows.
Which seems a bit over simplistic as a way of guesstimating life expectancy.
(, Fri 23 Jul 2021, 9:48, Reply)
But it does assume that each year is exactly 52 weeks long.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 18:44, Reply)
Mostly at home though, I often log on to B3ta to find out what I posted the previous night...
(, Fri 23 Jul 2021, 17:16, Reply)
it is depressing seeing the age of death of so many famous talented people and then comparing what they did to what I've done :(
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 20:38, Reply)
Football team's secret of success
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 14:31, Reply)
He was really friendly, but his horns were right where I wanted to put F3 and F4!
Thats all.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 7:22, Reply)
But I just know it would interfere with everything, from medical stuff to playing VR.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 10:40, Reply)
If I had time I would learn and create some sort of ML algorithm and train it on all the comments from the daily mail and daily express and just keep commenting on all their stories
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 8:33, Reply)
Nostrils are there for a reason, he’s in for a lifetime of infections.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 21:33, Reply)
- caused by bad uploading artefacts.
Appo-polly-loggies for the FailBook link and 12 minutes of chill out.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 16:40, Reply)
it is quite similar to the shit I've been making/posting since 1996
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 18:43, Reply)
So there
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 21:15, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 16:54, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 19:33, Reply)
thinks about the Holocaust.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 9:16, Reply)
Thank you for calling the Nuclear Emergency hotline, if you're currently experiencing vomiting and hair loss please dial 1...
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 16:57, Reply)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PragerU
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 11:53, Reply)
www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/wikipedia-founder-larry-sanger-democrats-b1885138.html
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 12:59, Reply)
he seems to bummed that wikipedia imposes editorial standards which it didn't when it started.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 14:48, Reply)
The organization depends on donations to produce its content. Much of PragerU's early funding came from hydraulic fracturing (fracking) billionaires Dan and Farris Wilks. Two members of the Wilks family sit on PragerU's board. The next-largest donor is the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation. Other donors include the Morgan Family Foundation, Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund, Donors Trust, the late Republican megadonor Sheldon Adelson, Lee Roy Mitchell, and the Minnesota-based Sid and Carol Verdoorn Foundation, led by former C.H. Robinson CEO Sid Verdoorn
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 13:13, Reply)
arstechnica.com/science/2021/03/is-there-a-shift-from-disbelieving-climate-change-to-attacking-renewables/
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 14:02, Reply)
the argument has never been "we need enough batteries to capture all of the electricity currently being generated". It's a moronic assumption. countries that increased renewables have had reliable power generation because they only needed enough capacit to cover the shortfall in fluctuation, less so when you have a mix of renewables. And they've also found the power plants don't need to do as much because households are now getting their own roof and battery supplies to supplement the grid, as prices keep falling. There are now 5 countries on 100% renewable, with a bunch more over 50%. so what is the point of saying it would take some tesla factory, which is dedicated to making car batteries, 500 years to produce enough batteries for some thing that will never be needed? It's already fucking happening. you can run a whole country on renewables
The argument about efficiency is also irrelevant. Only the cost per MW is what matters commercially, though the obvious point is that nobody cares about the 70% of sunlight and wind that you waste, while the 50% or so wastage of coal plants lost in heat come in the shape of burning coal that you've dug up and turned into CO2 and other pollutants, as well as fucking the local water table aquifers and leaving a great hole in the ground and big ass plant that needs decommissioning when the seams runs out that nobody factored into their costing. Ah, fuck. I ended up deconstructing it after all.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 15:56, Reply)
to the point of total insignificance in any discussion about global energy demand.
And almost all their energy comes from hydroelectric or geothermal sources, which simply are not practical alternatives in the vast majority of places, and they also come with their own environmental issues.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 17:08, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 22:12, Reply)
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 0:21, Reply)
but I take your point, the point I was making was about batteries and the claim made in the vid, and there's plenty of examples of countries that have shifted to wind and solar have found they've been able to scale battery capacity to manage these fluctuations. Spain now gets 50% more from wind than coal. In Australia, an example I'm quite familiar with was south australia, which now gets 60% from wind and solar. There was identical fear mongering along the lines of this video when SA proposed at the time was the worlds biggest battery farm, "it's not going to be reliable when there's no wind etc.". But the warnings turned out to be hot air. The battery farm has been doing what it's supposed to do and has been making a good profit as they've sold their excess peak power from windy days to other states when they've had issues with their coal-based grids at times. The idea that battery capacity is holding it back is false, those that have shifted have been able to scale battery storage with increased generation capacity. SA saved millions by eliminating the need for a fuel-powered ancillary service with their battery farm. Other places are following suit, with larger battery farms built or in development around the world.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 23:24, Reply)
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 11:43, Reply)
it's almost as if we're comparing electricity production, not population. Norway ranks 28th in the world for electricity production, out of 209.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 15:01, Reply)
you can find out more here: 25 fascinating facts about Norway
(, Fri 23 Jul 2021, 0:15, Reply)
Brazil's renewables are mostly hydroelectric. So many thousands of km^2 of rainforest is now underwater, and tens of thousands of people have been displaced from their homes.
Building their Itaipu dam actually involved destroying some lovely natural waterfalls which were a popular tourist attraction, but much worse than that those falls acted as a natural barrier separating species before and afterwards... now invasive species from below the falls are threatening those from above.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 13:12, Reply)
But the video made some specific claims that a car battery factory in the US would not be able to supply capacity for the entire US's electricity production, therefore wind and solar could no be substituted for fossil fuels. I countered that this was an irrelevancy as this much battery capacity would never be needed, and that countries had been able to scale renewables to meet their needs such that battery capacity had not been a limiting factor. If you have anything to say about this, go ahead.
If you'd prefer to discuss the migratory pathways of capybaras and perhaps compare the relative harm of this hydro to that of a study published this month that because of the great drying out of the amazon and fires, the entire basin has depressingly gone from a net carbon sink to a net carbon emitter of 1 billion tonnes of CO2 per year, which will consequentially contribute to it drying out even faster as large parts of the southern and eastern forest the size of fucking france have already significantly changed their vegetation profile away from that of a rainforest, I'm happy to have this comparative discussion too
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 15:22, Reply)
that you and others are making them out to be, and that the specific countries that have high levels of renewables also have pretty specific situations that are not generally applicable to other countries. Most countries don't have anywhere to build the 200GW dams required.
But you appear to have taken it pretty personally for some reason.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 16:40, Reply)
However, and this is a side point, I do think the relative harms of the Itapui dam are dwarfed by the increasing apparent consequences of global warming caused by greenhouse gas emissions. Massive sections of amazonas transitioning to a dry sclerophyll forest or no forest at all is killing a lot more critters than the dam ever did, and is already affecting rainfall patterns and water reliability in adjoining rich agricultural areas. So renewable have that big advantage over fossil fuel generated power.
I don't take it personally, I like to argue, and B3ta is a good place to do it, as it's not as if the place matters. And the OP is quite possibly a Poe anyway. Though perhaps my general disgust levels are a little raised when during once in a thousand year heatwaves and fires in western north america, massive floods in europe and china, billionaires thought it a great idea to start space tourism, yet another source of emissions, just so ultra rich people can get a 10 minute astronaut scout badge.
(, Fri 23 Jul 2021, 1:00, Reply)
I personally sit on the middle in this.
I think you're right that the greenhouse gas emissions issue is the greater problem right now. But I do also get irked by the way that alternative options are often presented as an easy fix (except for fission which everyone hates even though it's clearly the best one).
I'm not gonna get fully drawn into the whole Bezos thing again, except to say that I believe his ultimate goal for pushing this space program is to get humans living in space so that we stop fucking up the planet. I read a interesting interview a number of years ago where he explained this, but I cannot for the life of me now find it (I think it was in some Airline's onboard magazine). So, no doubt he is bit of a ruthless cunt, same as Musk, but if their space programs can be made viable long term then I think that's a good thing.
(, Fri 23 Jul 2021, 11:20, Reply)
Interdasting.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 14:14, Reply)
you're buying into some serious corporate right-wing propaganda
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 14:41, Reply)
there's a certain predictability to people who share these kinds of videos
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 1:11, Reply)
I could deconstruct it but I reckon I'd be a wasted effort if you're the kind of person who would sit and watch something this bad and think "hey, this guy's makes a lot of sense. I'm going to post this so other people can learn"
I learnt about global warming in the 80s. I thought at the time that greed being what it is, we'd probably have to wait until the shitty things, like regular once in a thousand year floods, fires, heatwaves and the like actually started happening before the world all moved as one to do something about it. Now that's it's happening, I guess I underestimated just how fucking stupid and easily manipulated many people are.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 15:12, Reply)
it's like if the tobacco industry persuaded millions of people to share videos about how smoking causes cancer is a hoax
I could do one using the irrelevant fact logic of the above video
"did you know cigarettes are up to 75 efficient at not causing lung cancer? did you know that more smoke is produced by cars every day than all the cigarettes smoked in a year. that's because people want you to think smoking is dangerous"
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 15:34, Reply)
vintagenewsdaily.com/30-outrageous-vintage-cigarette-ads-claimed-that-more-doctors-smoke-camels-than-any-other-cigarette/
Plus all the films from the 40s onward that made smoking look sexy.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 15:57, Reply)
accurately documented the glamour, sophistication and sexiness of smoking.
Seriously, bring back smoking on TV and films. All the villains have toothpicks these days. Toothpicks! It's ridiculous.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 16:48, Reply)
these days you'd depict people standing near the skips outside shopping centres trying to suck down a marlboro in their 5 minute break. it'd only be 3rd world countries you could go all bogart and not make it fantasy
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 2:34, Reply)
I did Environmental Science GCSE, late 80s, global warming was not part of the syllabus. In fact the syllabus mainly used the example of the coming ice age theory, backed by Greenpeace and other international govts, as a how not to lesson.
A Leonard Nemoy presented film about it is on YouTube if anyone wants a real hoot. All the same people backed and funded that film as back global warming now, except isnt it a ‘climate holocaust’ in the new jargon? These are the same buy now pressure techniques a life insurance salesman might use. With the previous ice-age scare they used Mr Spock cos he is a clever tv character and that’ll convince ‘em, he had no formal training on the subject. More convincing than the teenage school drop-out by comparison, true. So the stupid is spread all over the greeny fictions as well.
In 80s Environmetal Science GCSE, I’d say the overriding common exam question was about “peak oil” and that too fell by the wayside in the intervening years. Lastly a note for an equivalence being made elsewhere here: Greenpeace is richer than many oil companies at this point, mainly due to the way they keep refreshing their product lines. Though yes, follow the money always.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 21:16, Reply)
Point was made above about “learning about global warming in the 80s” taking an exam in the subject in that period in which it was not even prominent in the syllabus is entirely cogent. Obviously one A level counter bid trumps me, or 97% of scientists maybe.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 21:35, Reply)
Here is greenpeace international's financial report: www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-international-stateless/2021/06/0639667b-greenpeace-international-combined-financial-statement-2020.pdf. Their worldwide turnover was 90 million euro, with 52 million euro in assets, which puts them as about a medium sized charity.
Now if I take Santos, which is a medium sized oil producer in Australia, a very small player by world standards. their profit was 1.8 billion.
So you're not only wrong when you say "Greenpeace is richer than many oil companies at this point", you're wrong by a factor of 100s, which takes a special kind of ignorance. So when I say "how fucking stupid people are", here's a good example. and along with many stupid people, you won't let this change your mind. you'll keep repeating this absurd claim as if you have access to some inside information. you don't.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 0:05, Reply)
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 14:41, Reply)
how does the RSPB have any money, since birds don't even have wallets? WAKE UP, SHEEPLE!!!1!
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 15:03, Reply)
(, Fri 23 Jul 2021, 2:15, Reply)
Projection seems to be endemic in far right wing circles, they are most annoyed by their own behaviour; Which they seem to have little insight into.
Ooh look, another one has had their arse kicked
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-57930901
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 15:30, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 22:35, Reply)
I took my GCSE Geography in the mid 90s, all our textbooks were from the 80s, and nothing at all was taught to us about a coming ice age, so you'll understand me assuming you're a fucking liar, or some sort of b0t regurgitating facebook nonsense.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 20:09, Reply)
Or was it just the existence of Bezos?
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 10:08, Reply)
whatever your feelings about pubeless space voyaging.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 10:34, Reply)
But this looks a bit like a case of "bitch eating crackers".
Like... look at that fucking guy. Holding a press conference about a milestone in human development. Celebrating the triumph, and happily thanking everyone who had any involvement... what a cunt!
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 10:35, Reply)
is hardly a milestone in human development.
Also, I'd be interested to hear from an Amazon warehouse hand about their intimate involvement and personal investment in turning some guy into spacespunk.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 10:58, Reply)
(worker*) That tin can he was in never did anything afterwards.
This is a private company, taking civilians into space, in a reusable rocket vehicle, as a potentially viable long-term commercial endeavour. It's a completely different milestone.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 11:16, Reply)
When you have to disparage the previous milestones to prove this milestone is actually a milestone then you might be struggling a bit
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 11:33, Reply)
It's a descriptive term... it was a disposable metal container. It is in no way disparaging of the milestone, but is comparing the primitiveness of the early vehicle with the sophistication of a modern one.
Have you ever actually engaged in a discussion in good faith? Yet again you've picked on a totally irrelevant aspect of your oppositions argument, instead of actually addressing the content therein.
Stop with the straw man and learn to steel man.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 11:36, Reply)
Also, though by now probably far less likely, some may not have survived attempts
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 11:30, Reply)
space technology to the point where space tourism by a private company is now an actual thing is a milestone?
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 11:11, Reply)
Reusable rockets? SpaceX got there years ago with Falcon 9. An orbital class launcher.
Reusable capsules? SpaceX got there last year with Crew Dragon. An orbital class capsule.
Space tourism for the super rich? Dennis Tito would like a word.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 12:28, Reply)
might be technically space tourism, but it isn't exactly a budding space tourism industry.
Falcon 9 is not completely reusable.
Everything we make is human development, you do realise? Your house... the leisure centre down the road. How is this ever not human development?
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 12:41, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 13:07, Reply)
is not an unreasonable milestone.
I mean, it definitely took much more effort to do that, than paving 1 mile of road.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 16:31, Reply)
that other one is not entirely reusable. Some parts of it need to be rebuilt between flights.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 16:48, Reply)
Not sure which bit of that system needs rebuilding between flights, but I doubt that Blue Origin would just restack and refuel without performing extensive maintenance checks.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 16:55, Reply)
uses sub orbital space planes, with rocket engines, but they're not rockets, and it's debatable if they actually even go into space.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 16:56, Reply)
I don't understand why you're so wedded to the need to describe this pointless irrelevance as a milestone, while simultaneously so determined to ignore the other pointless irrelevance that successfully beat it to an arbitrary definition of space. It's like trying to argue that Charlton Athletic are the best football club in London because Leyton Orient only play in the second division.
Have you got tickets or something?
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 19:24, Reply)
It was also a space plane, which used a pair of independent rocket boosters to get it close enough to space for it to fly independently.
I didn't say the other things weren't milestones or even suggest that. I pointed out how they were different, and so were not THIS milestone.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 20:03, Reply)
You don't usually surrender with this few moves. Even benny lasted longer than you.
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 16:46, Reply)
so I guess they'd have to have some kind of replacement cartridge at the very least. As stated above though, I'd expect them to have to go through an exhaustive series of maintenance checks between each flight anyway, so I don't see that as much of a handicap.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 19:39, Reply)
and land to make first contact with him tomorrow.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 12:29, Reply)
It's basically an amusement ride for rich folk. I know you can argue it's a stepping stone to bigger things, but that's stretching it. They went straight up and then came back down in ten minutes. This was already done 70 years ago.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 11:03, Reply)
it's hardly a solid argument
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 12:03, Reply)
You seem to be suggesting that because an company has the resources to achieve something previous beyond all companies, it's suddenly not an achievement?
The simple fact that some companies are as powerful as some governments is itself a milestone in human development, regardless of whether anyone thinks it's a good thing or not. Such milestones don't have to be things that are good, or right, or just.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 12:44, Reply)
Then the room laughs at the little people. The fact that you can't see anything wrong with that really says more about you than anything else.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 10:54, Reply)
So at least there's one grown-up in the room
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 10:58, Reply)
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 11:22, Reply)
I reckon she hates him more than I do at this point
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 11:37, Reply)
And then the room laughs.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 11:23, Reply)
Blue Origin is not Amazon. Blue Origin is funded from Bezos' own wealth, created by Amazon employees working their arses off in sweatshop conditions.
It would be like Mike Ashley thanking all his Sports Direct employees for buying him a new boat.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 12:39, Reply)
If he didn't thank people you'd call him a cunt for not being grateful.
So your opinion about him thanking people isn't exactly valuable, as you're starting from a position of "how can I interpret this guy's actions so that he's a cunt?"
Like I said, this is all just bitch eating crackers.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 12:51, Reply)
I've never heard him talk before this, so I've got nothing else to go on. However this interview makes him look like a tone-deaf cunt.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 14:17, Reply)
Whereas I see this as yet another opportunity to highlight the pair of giant sequoia trunks you meticulously balance on each shoulder.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 16:27, Reply)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chip_on_shoulder
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 16:49, Reply)
and b3ta being what it is these days, it's not like we're distracting from something better
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 5:26, Reply)
so what of it?
Is your contribution supposed to interest people?
(, Thu 22 Jul 2021, 16:49, Reply)
You spent $20bn over 17 years building the world's tallest fairground ride so you could have 11 minutes of "fun". Knobhead.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 11:15, Reply)
Fuck you Simple Minds haters. You better explain
(, Tue 20 Jul 2021, 23:02, Reply)
I'd forgotten how good they were back before they turned glam.
(, Wed 21 Jul 2021, 19:00, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »



