b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 1368080 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | Popular

FFS
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/sep/26/dale-farm-residents-win-reprieve

This is getting a bit silly now isn't it. How much clearer do they need to be? Listen up you fuckwits, half the development is illegal, if you don't know which half after 10 years of legal battles, then you don't deserve to live there.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:01, 258 replies, latest was 14 years ago)
Napalm
It's the only answer
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:04, Reply)
The Daily Mash was funny on this

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:04, Reply)

www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/society/irish-travellers-'have-ancient-right-to-ignore-planning-laws'-201109194317/
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:07, Reply)
was that the "they really aren't very good at travelling, are they?" article?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:10, Reply)
"The situation at Dale Farm needs a sensible and common sense approach and we urge all parties to use this pause to find an amicable solution."
No it fucking doesn't. It needs clearing out, like it should have been done.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:05, Reply)
Agent Orange
You down wit DDT, yeah you know me
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:06, Reply)
Agent Orange?
Are you suggesting that by removing all of the leaves from their 'tree' they will leave? Or are you hoping for long term health problems and birth defects?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:08, Reply)
They already have the latter from generations of inbreeding.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:09, Reply)
And potato

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:10, Reply)
A more long term approach
De-caravanisation
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:09, Reply)
it is a bit silly, but I suppose it's good on ballance, that the council is being made to abide by the letter of the law
even if, in this case, the case seems pretty clear.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:08, Reply)
Fuck off with your reasoned responses.
BURN THEM!!
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:09, Reply)
Yes Monty.
I'd have thought you'd feel more fellow feeling for these long-haired shiftless drug-takers.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:10, Reply)
They have taken over his "lucky heather/peg" patch in Basildon

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:11, Reply)
Ahh, Pikey Wars, excellent.
I'm now seeing Monty as that Brad Pitt Character in Snatch.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:13, Reply)
What does he need a fucking caravan with no fucking wheels for?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:14, Reply)
I have a superb namedropping classic to do with that.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:14, Reply)
G'wan den.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:15, Reply)
Tell the group....

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:15, Reply)
My pal Steven was in that (also Band of Brothers and is playing Capone in a big budget film coming out soon)
As a result I sold Brad Pitt 2oz of weed.

Really, really shit weed that no-one else wanted - nicknamed 'Subbuteo' as it was bright green. He thought it was 'really good'.

THE END.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:18, Reply)
I'm surprised you had the energy to do so.
Why were you not at home resting your old bones?

In case you're wondering, I'm mocking you for pulling out of Wednesdays super happy fun time.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:20, Reply)
Lusty has the potential to get a new job and I am broke as a mutha.
I am sorry to miss it though.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:21, Reply)
WAH! WAH! WAH! MY NAME IS MONTY AND IM A 97 YEAR OLD CLAGNUT COLLECTOR FROM PONTEFRACT! WAH! WAH! WAH!

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:24, Reply)
That's my name too!
How weird is that!!!!!!
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:29, Reply)
If they were 'proper' travellers
ie 'New Age Travellers' (c) the 1980s, then I'd be right behind them, scoring some drugs. As it is they are gyppos and under Hitler rules must therefore be exterminated.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:13, Reply)
Ah, they did better travelers back in the old days, didn't they Uncle Monty...

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:18, Reply)
They sure did.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:18, Reply)
If they were New Age Travellers circa 1980s
they'd have just arranged for daddy to "have a word" at the golf club and all the planning stuff would have been brushed under the carpet.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:18, Reply)
One of the chaps I used to knock about with back then was a classic one of those.
He was a semi-vagrant and his dad owns half the Isle of Man (or something).
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:23, Reply)
Professional tramps

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:25, Reply)
If you put the same level of bullshit into this as the Brad Pitt story
It would be half of America.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:30, Reply)
If they were time travellers then we'd all be OK with them.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:29, Reply)
I know where you're coming from
but it's not really about obeying the letter of the law, is it? it's about a series of more and more highly-paid lawyers finding tiny loopholes, costing shitloads of taxpayers money. Because the council have to pay for their lawyers, whereas the travellers aren't. And won't be able to when they inevitabley get costs awarded against them, so the council/taxpayer will never get to recoup the hundreds of thousands being wasted on stupid appeals.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:15, Reply)
I think the thing is that I don't really care that much.
But I generally think it's a good thing when the government/council forced to go through the same level of rigmarole that the rest of us usually are when we have to resort to the law.

I think people are also biased because they dislike the 'travellers' in this. I'm fairly neutral, I'm not predisposed to like shitty fake hippies or people enforcing planning regulations.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:22, Reply)
I'm predisposed to hate everyone equally also.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:23, Reply)
These aren't shitty fake hippies, they're Irish gyppoes, though, aren't they?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:26, Reply)
Are you asking
to be sure?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:28, Reply)
I neither know, nor care.
It makes little difference to my point.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:28, Reply)
One lot need a bath.
The other lot need gassing.

A very important difference.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:32, Reply)
The argument I see against the site seems to be THEY SHOULD FOLLOW THE LAW LIKE EVERYONE ELSE
well they are, and they're winning legal battles so surely that argument isn't valid.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:14, Reply)
It seems to be delaying legal battles, rather than winning

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:16, Reply)
Often the same thing
just usually exploited by people with money, or Swipe.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:24, Reply)
see above.
They aren't "winning legal battles" .. they are using expensive lawyers to stall, and costing the council a fucking fortune. It isn't the same thing.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:16, Reply)
Exactly.
They should have just carpet-bombed these cunts and have done with it. Would have saved a fortune as they wouldn't be able to move down the road, set up camp and repeat the whole sorry mess ad nauseum.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:21, Reply)
It's true, not even the judge is saying it's actually about overturning the decision
it's just a delay.

Though I have to say I find ocntinued use of the term "stay of execution" very distasteful in light of the decision of Texas state to execute a number of prisoners recently after somewhat murky trials.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:22, Reply)
I think using every available legal course to protect your home is not only justified
it's morally correct.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:23, Reply)
Generally, your home should be a legal one though

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:23, Reply)
But by using that argument
should the onus not have been on them to go through every single possible legal attempt to get permission before building on it?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:25, Reply)
I've heard that they had temporary planning permission that was revoked.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:27, Reply)
you heard totally wrong then.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:27, Reply)
Retrospective permission was partially granted and then revoked.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:31, Reply)
Yes.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:27, Reply)
So you don't think that building it illegally
claiming ignorance of the law and then trying to resort to shady legal loopholes to protect yourself later might be, oh, what's the phrase, massively fucking hypocritical, leaving you with not a single tiny moral leg to stand on? just out of interest?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:26, Reply)
You haven't even mentioned horse theft.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:31, Reply)
I really don't see the case for destroying an established community
based on planning regulations.
If the council were doing their job properly they should have stopped the buildings when the first thing got put up there. Now they're settled and occupied it seems to me more important to protect the people living there that had nothing to do with building the stuff. The children and extended family members. Rather than take a stand for the sacred green belt.
It's the facts on the ground, they took a leaf out of the Jewish settlers book.

I don't see the big importance of planning permission anyway, the council would probably love a caravan park with nice middle class white people in the same place. That's not what it's about it's about gypsies living there.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:45, Reply)
So you're happy to have one rule for people who are willing to just ignore all rules and regulations for years
and another for those who want to do things by the book.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:49, Reply)
Well that's an oversimplification isn't it.
I'd rather a government (even local) even with the consent of the majority can't just get rid of people it doesn't like.
I'd rather a justice system that is flexible and independant rather than just sticking to the letter of the law.
And I'd rather people didn't get didn't get evicted from their homes pretty much ever.

I'd also like local councils to be able to actually do something competently without taking years and it costing millions, but I'm a dreamer.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:55, Reply)
Again, you're blaming the council for the fact that the irish people are using solicitors, paid for by you and me
to find loophole after loophole, every single one of which to date has been ruled to be incorrect by judges.

Why are you not blaming these people for not actually using solicitors paid for out of their own pocket to ensure they were legally allowed to build on their land?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:00, Reply)
Because I believe that everyone should get legal representation, innocent or guilty.
From that article though; the problem the judge had with the notices was that they were too vague. The fact they didn't classify the "chalet type structures" and didn't specify fences gates and other built structures seems like the notices were badly drafted.
I also agree that claiming you can do "anything that is reasonably necessary" is far too wide for a legal document.

If you're doing something this high profile you have to be accurate and specific. Otherwise it gets picked apart in court. That's not a loophole. The fact it wasn't caused this delay, and the people at fault for that are the council and their legal team. Otherwise the judge would have dismissed it all.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:11, Reply)
It's always easy to criticise anything that's written down after the fact.
These are tiny points which are not going to change the fact that these people are still most likely to be evicted.

If they were still protesting the original question of whether or not their applications were wrongly rejected I would be more on your side, but they aren't they are delaying the inevitable.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:32, Reply)
omg how woolly can you get
community my arse, they knew it was wrong when they built it. they should be glad they've eked it out for 10 years, not crying because they couldn't be arsed to follow the law and now the law is following them.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:47, Reply)
I think one thing this highlights greatly is the fact that the council need to act on things in a timely manor, that if they didn't twiddle their thumbs for 10 years, this problem wouldn't have been nearly as bad as it is.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:21, Reply)
I think (rather than know)
that they have been pursuing this for the last 10 years, not twiddling their thumbs.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:25, Reply)
I'm not sure myself, but I very much doubt they've spent the whole time persuing action in a speedy manor,
I've just come up with a fucking wicked idea, that might/might not work in this case, but would still help.... if a contracter is contracted to do building works without planning permission (and checking to make sure it's legit), then they should be forced to cover any deconstruction costs.... or something like that.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:31, Reply)
This situation is only going to get worse until the government agree to dress up as bears and chase them off the land.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:22, Reply)
Once again UToL finds the solution that we're all grasping for.
UToL - voice of reason. And bears.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:22, Reply)
This is the best response I've ever heard.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:23, Reply)
My company actually deal with Basildon Council
I'd love to see their IT department take this up
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:24, Reply)
Apart from Monty, who bases his opinions on these types as laid down in Mein Kampf
Why do any of you care what happens to to these people? I think I've seen one person previously mention that they might live near to this or a similar site, but everyone else seems to be foaming at the mouth about something that does not directly affect them in any way.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:24, Reply)
It does actually set a dangerous precedant on planning law
and whether or not it can be enforced. In the UK our law is based on cases, so if a judge says someone is legally allowed to something, anyone else can cite this as a precedent and be allowed to do it too.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:26, Reply)
They are in the process of changing planning law anyway.
But that seems a reasonable response.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:28, Reply)
The changes to planning law
are a massive pile of shit waiting to hit an enormous fan, but any changes would take around 3 years to implement and I doubt they would be retrospective and therefore that has nothing to do with this case.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:32, Reply)
Ahh, the voice of reasoned indifference
For this I shall buy you a pint on Saturday if you are coming.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:26, Reply)
Sadly no
I was hoping to show my face, but my wife seems to think that I should do things with my family rather than with strangers off the internet.
Weird eh?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:29, Reply)
How odd.
We're not strangers once we've met.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:31, Reply)
Very weird
and showing a lack of backbone on your part. I rescheduled my son this weekend, in order to attend.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:31, Reply)
That's PROPER that is.
I take back all I said about New Cross Gate.

*crosses fingers*

How are you getting over there?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:33, Reply)
On the train I guess, I have checked my passport in preparation.
Actually I haven't looked at the location yet, just figured "it's london I'll manage"
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:37, Reply)
To Montys Bar, Overground from your stop to Shoreditch High St. 5 min walk.
Take 35 mins I reckon.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:39, Reply)
*feels stalked*
OK then I guess that's how I'm going.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:40, Reply)
*don't*
I merely know you live near an Overground station and that there's one a 5min walk from the Bar.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:42, Reply)
*draws curtains*
OK then. anyway, if it's there then all is good. Well except having to go to shoreditch.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:47, Reply)
Oh, I always thought you were a girl. Donno why.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:33, Reply)
This is the internet.
We're all slightly rabid.

but also, what al said.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:27, Reply)
That's good enough for me.
And with that, I'm off home..
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:31, Reply)
the casual racism directed at the gypsies bothers me much more than the illegal building does

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:31, Reply)
They are not a race

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:33, Reply)
This^
There is a reason why the Irish Government won't recognise them as a new racial group.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:34, Reply)
If they were, they'd come last in it.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:34, Reply)
well, whatever prejudice it is then

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:34, Reply)
I might entitle my autobiography
'Pride in Prejudice'
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:45, Reply)
It's very formal racism on my part.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:33, Reply)
I have put my back into this racism.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:34, Reply)
do you wear your best Hugo Boss suit for it?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:38, Reply)
Damn right I do.
I don't get many opportunities to dust it off these days, since political correctness went mad. I don't know. What's the world coming to?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:39, Reply)
A gyppo caravan site?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:41, Reply)
*sighs*
It certainly seems that way.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:41, Reply)
Actual quotes from an email conversation I had with a friend about this.
"I think the point is more they are non-contributing members of society who arguably cause various hassle to contributing members of society and all we seem to do is make their life easier, for free. "

"They are an extremely selfish people who have no regard for anyone outside their shut off backwards community. "


She's... slightly right wing.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:34, Reply)
She might well be slightly right wing
but in this particular instance, she isn't far off the money. There are some people who live in caravans and happily move from site to site, leaving them in a tidy fashion and not causing any bother to anyone.

They are these people: www.caravanclub.co.uk/
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:40, Reply)
This^
/pandering
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:34, Reply)
She's either engaged or married, not worth it.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:38, Reply)
*shrugs*
Not actually trying to get in her knickers you understand, looks rather too young anyways, but I do tend to agree on this point.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:39, Reply)
Haha
This is why it pisses me off!
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:40, Reply)
She doesn't even have a facebook.
I'm going to presume she looks like eaither Nancy From Hollyoaks as a default.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:41, Reply)
More like a young Davina Macall.
if memory serves.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:45, Reply)
ha, that's a new one.
I'm usually told its either Avril Lavigne, or Zoe Slater from Eastenders, which I think is just from having long brown hair really
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:47, Reply)
YOU AIN'T MY MUVVA!

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:50, Reply)
Well, obviously.
She's alive for a start.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:50, Reply)
Haha, oof.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:54, Reply)
I did wonder briefly if that was going too far

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:55, Reply)
Not to worry, I believe Al still has the monopoly on that.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:56, Reply)
Well, yes, this seems fair.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:57, Reply)
It was a truly magnificent post that won him the crown.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:59, Reply)
I think I vaguely remember.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:00, Reply)

No harm in posting it again
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:03, Reply)
I'm open to further pictures, to give a more balanced opinion, you understand

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:50, Reply)
I'll bear that in mind

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:53, Reply)
*insert standard pervy comment*
I must be getting old, I can't be bothered any more.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:56, Reply)
What, what? You look like Avril Lavigne or Zoe Slater?
I don't get it, that's a bit like saying that I look a bit like Will Smith and Will Young.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:54, Reply)
well, I don't think I actually look like either of them,
I just have long brown hair
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:58, Reply)
Ohh, ok.
I think you should post a photo of yourself sitting on top of the washingmachine with the spincycle set to 40 degrees on eco wash with a load weighing in no more than 25kg.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:01, Reply)
Thanks guys (!)

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:41, Reply)
Don't worry. I'll protect you.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:43, Reply)
By sheilding their face with your cock.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:43, Reply)
Does she have a particularly small face?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:51, Reply)
it's about 1cm wide and 5cm long.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:56, Reply)
That big? Wow!
I can only dream of such girth.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:58, Reply)
Think nothing of it.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:45, Reply)
Despite the fact that you're all hooked up, I completely agree with you.
www.jewify.org/
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:39, Reply)
Gonz, you've posted that before
but it's not even remotely comparable to say that the news stories about this group of "Irish Travellers" are the same as anti-sematism.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:42, Reply)
Also, can you knock one of those up that changes the words" causes cancer" into "turns you black"
because that would be very relevant to the argument I'm having with people about the negative view of cancer in the press.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:45, Reply)
Yeah', but I have no idea the point of it.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:50, Reply)
The thing is though, not all travelers and gypsies are tax avoiding and law breaking scum.
And saying "I'm not saying _all_ of them are like that, but the ones who I've delt with all are" seems to me like an attempt at a get-out clause.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:48, Reply)
Only if it's not true.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:50, Reply)
Have you meet a fair representation then?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:51, Reply)
I used to live next to a farm load in Fawkham Green in Kent.
Unpleasant they are too.

Some are OK but the rest (and there are more than enough bad apples) are anti-social, thieving buggers.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:58, Reply)
Oh, I guess it's like how I think all black people are hooligons because I live near Wood Green.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:02, Reply)
In this particular instance Gonz
the council built a school for all these kids. It has almost the worst attendance record out of all the schools in the country.

Do you not think that if this particular group of irish people (they are not gypsys) were really keen to appreciate all the things the council is willing to do for them, they would not be making sure their kids always went to school?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:56, Reply)
But that's the thing, this group of people, they maybe scum, they maybe thick, they maybe horrible examples of humanity.
But what they're not, is _every_ traveler there is.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:07, Reply)
And I never said they were.
But of the stories on that page you linked to, two are about the Dale Farm camp so you have to refer to them as travellers, two are about plans in other countries which are actually condemning the actions taken against travellers, one is about a criminal gang of travellers who took driving tests for other travellers, how else are you going to report that story without referring to travellers? The one about Tessa Jowell is a story about how a group of travellers moved onto a site without planning permission.

So i'm questioning the relevance of the argument about comparing use of the word traveller to the word jew?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:21, Reply)
<3 u

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:31, Reply)
ive removed 'friends' from my fb for this
my entire family on my dads side are travellers, but apparently its just me who's ok. err, fuck off
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:30, Reply)
Oh is that why you deleted me and then called me creepy?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:33, Reply)
srsly, get over it

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:34, Reply)
this is the only other reference I have ever made to that event. The first being an obvious joke.
I think I'm over it love.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:37, Reply)
nice one

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:54, Reply)
No wuzzers

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:55, Reply)
Are you joking?
Do you really take no interest in anything outside your personal world?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:34, Reply)
If I may speak for my beardy colleague in indifference
It's not just that it's that I don'y like either side, so happy to see them fight it out.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:42, Reply)
Bit of a late response...
It is not that I am indifferent to this, or any other news story. It's just this story tends to bring out strong opinions in people you might not expect to hear them from.
It's like immigration - the majority of those who live in fear of it generally have little or no experience of it.
Oh, and I'm not a girl, although I think you have already worked that out...
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:55, Reply)
I'm fairly sure that the people at the site will not be paying rent or tax
As I am paying both, I'm pissed off that they've found a way to get away with it, and I haven't!
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:37, Reply)
But I likely pay more tax than you.
Does that mean you are my bitch?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:40, Reply)
No.
And it's likely that everyone on here who earns pays more tax than I do, but it's still a pain in the arse that I have to, and they aren't.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:41, Reply)
Well it's a pain to me you don'pay as much as I do.
To me, you fall in the same category as a non-paying gyppo.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:43, Reply)
My monthly tax deductions make me cry a little bit

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:47, Reply)
Mine make me vomit.
Nearly 2 grand last month.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:49, Reply)
Ouch...although if you pay that every month then you can't be too hard off
So why do you live in lewisham?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:52, Reply)
The question I avoided asking.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:54, Reply)
It's not cheap where I live.
Two bed house is 300 grand.

I am recently divorced.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:56, Reply)
Sorry to hear that/pleased you escaped
delete and appropriate.

It seems know is cheap anymore, unless you brave the cultural desert of the North
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:00, Reply)
I could move out of town and buy somewhere nice. I might yet.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:01, Reply)
We are looking Hants, Berks, Sussex
which are not cheap counties, but i could still get a little cottage with a garden for the price of my flat...but then where do i work? Commuting costs a fortune and I'd have to kill myself if I worked in 'Reading' or 'basingstoke' etc
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:04, Reply)
It's likely I don't pay as much because I don't earn as much.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:49, Reply)
That's the North for you, or you are just a bit shit

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:50, Reply)
Stuck in a shit industry
But it's shown itself to be utterly recession proof, so whilst I'm not exactly earning a great wage, I can be certain that I'm not going to lose my job anytime soon.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:55, Reply)
True.
I was just highlighting the irrational link between paying rent/tax and disliking/feeling hard done by them.

Much better to hate them because they smell and talk funny.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:55, Reply)
I dislike people on very high salaries
who pay a smaller percentage of their income in tax than I do.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:57, Reply)
Me too. It's fucking criminal.
And companies like Vodafone that pile all their money offshore. See Barclays, Tesco etc etc.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:00, Reply)
No, if you pay tax at all, you're all equal, doesn't matter how much you earn in ratio to what you pay because the system is whatever the system is.
It's those who aren't paying anything that you can look down on, however, if you want to have degrees of rightous indignation, the more you pay into the system (in ratio to work done), the more you can look down on them.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:44, Reply)
Rubbish.
The system is not equitable.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:45, Reply)
I tell you what's really annoying me about the whole situation.
My mate is dating a Pikey, so there could have been endless scope for japes about this, but the selfish bitch has gone to Peru for 3 weeks.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:34, Reply)
Well it's the Peruvian heather harvest about now.
Can't blame her.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:36, Reply)
I shall remember this for her return.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:43, Reply)
Will she be staying in a yurt while she is there?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:44, Reply)
A hotel, I think
I do not know all the details.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:53, Reply)
i don't know and don't really care
but I like things that are silly.

how's everyone today, then?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 16:59, Reply)
I should be in a good mood
It's payday, I'm seeing a girl tonight, my friend has got himself a job, my sister has had her 20 week scan (all is well), and I'm having a chippy tea.

But, I'm just a bit pissed off, frankly.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:00, Reply)
Just can't shake the depression of living in the North?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:02, Reply)
I'd far rather live in the North than the South.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:04, Reply)
We'd rather you lived in the North than the South

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:07, Reply)
Works well for everyone then!

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:07, Reply)
YEAH, it does, doesn't it?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:10, Reply)
here here

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:14, Reply)
why are you pissed off, it all sounds nice
what you need is a cup of tea
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:02, Reply)
Not sure, just one of those days really.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:04, Reply)
Only four more days untl everyone wakes you up?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:08, Reply)
Nah, that was last year
Been too busy to sleep this year!
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:11, Reply)

cup of tea rough arse fucking by a Victorian style muscle man
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:05, Reply)
Bully!

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:07, Reply)
I have a hankering for fajitas tonight

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:10, Reply)
Sounds like a good idea

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:11, Reply)
I wasn't really sure where i was going with that post...

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:13, Reply)
Me neither
I had torn chicken last night, that was quite tasty. We had a sort of Northern fajita, it was torn chicken with bacon and BBQ sauce. Pretty tasty, bloody filling though.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:14, Reply)
*offers string*

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:01, Reply)
woohooo! this stuff is kerazy!

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:03, Reply)
Welcome to the League of Indifference.
I'm OK
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:03, Reply)
so are you some kind of Nazi, now, then?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:03, Reply)
no, that would be Monty, why do you ask?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:06, Reply)
now that you aren't a communist
I thought maybe you'd decided to go over to the Right
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:08, Reply)
There are more than those 2 options.
I didn't particularly want to spend the rest of my life on b3ta being a lolcommie in the way Monty is a lolnazi.


I'm open to suggestions as to what my new gimmick should be.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:10, Reply)
Colonel Sanders son

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:11, Reply)
dull, maybe I shall be just Q.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:12, Reply)
and set us all
mind-fuck challenges in holographic worlds
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:13, Reply)
Or Be a Winged Serpent.
Or better than M. these jokes have all been done earlier.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:15, Reply)
oh, sorry, I was doing stuff

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:16, Reply)
You and your proper job...
Maybe I should just stick to what I'm good at.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:18, Reply)
being creepy?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:21, Reply)
I leave that to the professionals.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:23, Reply)
I thought we only did extremes here
anyway...you don't get to pick your meme, your meme picks you
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:12, Reply)
I have no meme...aside from being a spelling spakker

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:13, Reply)
I picked the communist thing.
And it's not even that widely adopted, it'll go away if I want it to.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:14, Reply)
When you were naiai69 you were really rather left leaning

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:15, Reply)
You remembered, how sweet.
I was and still am, but not a communist, being as I'm not actually retarded.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:16, Reply)
I seem to remember we had an argument, as you were quite argumentative
you are much better now, well done.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:18, Reply)
I'm not sure this is a good thing.
I suspect I was not only argumentative, but also clinically depressed back then. Apologies, on the very slim chance that you deserve them.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:19, Reply)
Very unlikely!
I'm pretty sure it was nonsense anyway!
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:20, Reply)
Most likely.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:21, Reply)
I've already taken the lolbertarian niche.
Christian Fundie?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:20, Reply)
You've taken the Tory Nonce niche

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:21, Reply)
Well i wasn't going to take the easy route.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:22, Reply)
You, my boy, are a disgrace to libertarians.
I can get on with a decent Libertarian, you, on the other hand.....

Why am I bothering? and why did you come back?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:22, Reply)
couldnt resist the banter.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:26, Reply)
So you came back for the abuse?
A Tory peer in the making, clearly.

tell ya what, pay my train fair and give me a fiver for my trouble and I'll come round and piss on you.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:29, Reply)
you know you just offered to pee on a 16 year old, right?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:30, Reply)
For money, no less.
I believe this to be legal. Fuck it, I'll piss on a Tory for free.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:31, Reply)
you've gone back to communist!
...anyway, this seems like a good pastime
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:33, Reply)
I thought I'd keep the username for now at least, just Quixote didn't look right.
It'll probably change in time, most things do, I'm quite Bowie-like in that respect,
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:38, Reply)
You're a massive cunt?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:50, Reply)
No, I just change the way I dress periodically.
Hence the "in that respect"
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:59, Reply)
Just checking.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 18:03, Reply)
1st day of lectures done. Woohoo!

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:20, Reply)
What were you being lectured in?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:21, Reply)
Welsh and psdwbc or something

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:46, Reply)
hsleW
is the word you are looking for.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:48, Reply)
really welsh?
are you planning to teach kids in welsh?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:51, Reply)
this is cool
www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-15060310

also the last line

"After a month the monkeys had produced five pages of the letter "S" and had broken the keyboard."

sounds like a class I had once
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:23, Reply)
That's quite amusing

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:34, Reply)
alright bumnuggets?
What's my meme?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:26, Reply)
Man who is not as great as he thinks he is?
Otherwise I dunno.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:27, Reply)
I love you so much.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:30, Reply)
I know you do plummy, I know you do.
and how could you resist, what with me being so cool and stylish.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:32, Reply)
I know bbz.
You're so GQ, Bateman.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:35, Reply)
Hmmm... Bateman, now there's a meme I could get behind.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:37, Reply)
I've already got that meme covered.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:38, Reply)
Psychopathy?
OK dude, all yours.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:40, Reply)
suaveness and violence.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:48, Reply)
You are Violent?
*fears*

*remember's Dozer isn't coming to the bash*

*relaxes*
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:49, Reply)
Oh baby, the things I could do to you with a coathanger.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:51, Reply)
If ever you can afford to visit out nation's capital....

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:53, Reply)
I visit England's capital a couple of times a year.
Mainly for rave purposes. I was at fabric in June.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:55, Reply)
Tsk tsk, your capital too old boy, since the conquest.
Maybe I'll see you there.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:59, Reply)
does King James VI mean anything to you?
Unless the conquest you mean is the Norman one.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 18:02, Reply)
'Masturbateman' might stick.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:39, Reply)
stickiest of all the super heroes.

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:41, Reply)
You make people DJ for 5 hours on their own birthdays?

(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:31, Reply)
dude, if I had the cash for the train fare I would do it like a shot.
But mortgage comes first.

Did you listen to that mo wax thing?
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:34, Reply)
I am only teasing.
No I haven't - I have next week off so I'll be looking at that sort of thing then.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:35, Reply)
it's only half an hour or so.
But the EM is two hours.
(, Mon 26 Sep 2011, 17:37, Reply)

« Go Back | Reply To This »

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1