
I can't help thinking that Conan Doyle must have been, at heart, thick as absolute fuck
but a rich tapestry of highly viscous m&s premiere fuck
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:24,
archived)
Totally agree with you on Doyle. Late 19th/early 20th century was the age of otherwise seemingly intelligent people believing in the patently cobblers.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:37,
archived)
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:43,
archived)
FROM A LIZARD!!!!!!!!!!
/donstinfoilhatblog
and they asked "have you ever been to Dallas, Texas?"
I was so close to saying "Yes, I was the second gunman on the grassy knoll", but that sort of thing would've seen me refused entry.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:51,
archived)
I was so close to saying "Yes, I was the second gunman on the grassy knoll", but that sort of thing would've seen me refused entry.
*awaits proj's cheery greeting*
is it top shoppage or have you just done the aminashon?
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:39,
archived)
is it top shoppage or have you just done the aminashon?
(, Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:44, archived)
Not as awesome as the old ones but still a Beetle.
I saw one painted up as Herbie the other day, in the middle of suburbia. Made me chuckle.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 16:32,
archived)
I saw one painted up as Herbie the other day, in the middle of suburbia. Made me chuckle.
and surprising how many babies they have, no wonder VW are loaded
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:24,
archived)
seemed a shame to let it go to waste and not post it

(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:22,
archived)

apologies if I got a bit shirty with a few posters.
and no this was not about "the pixel width of my images and I took offence and flounced off"
I think it's clear what my opinion about that was
www.b3ta.com/board/10737745
404 pixels wide images fits just dandy on the fp without adjustment
I know because my nick clegg post was 404
www.b3ta.com/board/10735440 and fitted fine without resizing (but this was taken off the fp when it was pointed out, probably the same mystery mod that edited my posts - making me look like a paranoid dick and being fine with it)
and for the record I didn't 'flounce because of resizing images'
www.b3ta.com/board/10739125
believe it or not posters can leave this site out of choice rather than in a huff
but never let the truth get in the way of a good story
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:29,
archived)
and no this was not about "the pixel width of my images and I took offence and flounced off"
I think it's clear what my opinion about that was
www.b3ta.com/board/10737745
404 pixels wide images fits just dandy on the fp without adjustment
I know because my nick clegg post was 404
www.b3ta.com/board/10735440 and fitted fine without resizing (but this was taken off the fp when it was pointed out, probably the same mystery mod that edited my posts - making me look like a paranoid dick and being fine with it)
and for the record I didn't 'flounce because of resizing images'
www.b3ta.com/board/10739125
believe it or not posters can leave this site out of choice rather than in a huff
but never let the truth get in the way of a good story
you think you will, but you never will, you'll end up mugging old ladies for their broadband connection and using the 2 hours free computer access at the local library.
:D
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:35,
archived)
:D
Flouncing is the ancient art of leaving a board, community, blog or Internet forum in the most dramatic way possible.
Whereas normal people who are fed up with a discussion or debate simply leave, flouncers need eternal validation. Instead of simply logging off, they must announce that they are leaving. Flouncing usually occurs when a wanker realizes that other people on the planet hold differing views.
History
In childhood, flouncing is called "tantrums."
Types
* A Convoluted Flounce is a wordy diatribe in which the wanker must make it clear how everyone else is forcing them to leave, and that the wanker simply has no other choice.
* The Double Flounce is when a flouncer vows never to post again and never to return. They then return to announce again that they will never again return.
* The Triple (or more) Flounce is exceedingly rare, but definitely the most amusing.
Effects
The goal of a flounce is always to elicit an outpouring of handwringing and sympathy from other fans ("Please don't go, we love you, you're brilliant!") If there's a corresponding threat of deletion, they will expect an added outcry for the sake of their fic ("It would be like Michelangelo erasing the Sistine Chapel if we live without chapter 217 of your Harmonian opus!"). The wanker must know that they are so vitally important mass suicide will result if they leave the fandom. If there is an insufficient outcry the first time, the wanker will institute the double flounce.
98.7% of flouncers return within a week, usually in the form of a sockpuppet. A percentage of these flouncers will actually return as themselves or not leave at all, most with the explantion that the sympathy garnered has changed their minds.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:46,
archived)
Whereas normal people who are fed up with a discussion or debate simply leave, flouncers need eternal validation. Instead of simply logging off, they must announce that they are leaving. Flouncing usually occurs when a wanker realizes that other people on the planet hold differing views.
History
In childhood, flouncing is called "tantrums."
Types
* A Convoluted Flounce is a wordy diatribe in which the wanker must make it clear how everyone else is forcing them to leave, and that the wanker simply has no other choice.
* The Double Flounce is when a flouncer vows never to post again and never to return. They then return to announce again that they will never again return.
* The Triple (or more) Flounce is exceedingly rare, but definitely the most amusing.
Effects
The goal of a flounce is always to elicit an outpouring of handwringing and sympathy from other fans ("Please don't go, we love you, you're brilliant!") If there's a corresponding threat of deletion, they will expect an added outcry for the sake of their fic ("It would be like Michelangelo erasing the Sistine Chapel if we live without chapter 217 of your Harmonian opus!"). The wanker must know that they are so vitally important mass suicide will result if they leave the fandom. If there is an insufficient outcry the first time, the wanker will institute the double flounce.
98.7% of flouncers return within a week, usually in the form of a sockpuppet. A percentage of these flouncers will actually return as themselves or not leave at all, most with the explantion that the sympathy garnered has changed their minds.
the post up there was genuine, the fallout and abuse I knew would come from posting it is part of the course, it was aimed at the posters I came here for and enjoyed seeing their stuff
we're all probably grown ups in real life , we sit here probably in an office or working from home and typing about this stuff on a comedy forum we logged onto, probably in between doing a design for a client or making some toast
I think that's probably the size of things and the reality of it, to be honest
EDIT: sorry if I didn't address any points you may have made, I admit I never read your reply past the first 2 lines (I 'm guessing the gist) but I'm not being obtuse when I say that, but I did reply given you spent the time to type out that huge chunk of text
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:58,
archived)
we're all probably grown ups in real life , we sit here probably in an office or working from home and typing about this stuff on a comedy forum we logged onto, probably in between doing a design for a client or making some toast
I think that's probably the size of things and the reality of it, to be honest
EDIT: sorry if I didn't address any points you may have made, I admit I never read your reply past the first 2 lines (I 'm guessing the gist) but I'm not being obtuse when I say that, but I did reply given you spent the time to type out that huge chunk of text
you just missed out the bit about unhealthy masturbation.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:07,
archived)
it's hard to take you seriously or personally though when trolling just seemed to be your sole function on this forum
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:36,
archived)
edit: I love the fact you are debating at all whether to take my comment "Flouncy McFlounce" seriously.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:37,
archived)
and it's still a tshirt worthy slogan
"MICHEAL ELLIS: I CANNOT FORGIVE"
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:11,
archived)
"MICHEAL ELLIS: I CANNOT FORGIVE"
to remind us you've gone. Just in case we missed the last time you came back to tell us you'd gone.
It'd be more convincing if you'd just go.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:43,
archived)
It'd be more convincing if you'd just go.

Which I feel explains everything, from the depths of my soul.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:54,
archived)
It's just funnier if it was, and this isn't the place to let facts get in the way of a joke.
Now stay.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:57,
archived)
Now stay.
...you initially got wound up about something pretty minor, accused the mods of being out to get you, dismissed everyone who dared suggest you might be overreacting as trolls, went around trying to have the last word in every resultant subthread, then had your account deleted. Having done that, you were clearly still watching the drama you'd caused unfold -- otherwise, why come stir things up again with another account, and go around trying to get the last word over everyone again?
... and now you're back once again. So you weren't actually leaving, you were just causing a shitstorm of drama with you as the center of attention.
I'm sorry, but that's a massive flounce. And a huff. (Incidentally, no-one other than you suggested that either of those suggest a lack of "choice" on your part.) Your recent antics are, in fact, precisely those of an attention-seeking drama queen.
How tedious.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:30,
archived)
... and now you're back once again. So you weren't actually leaving, you were just causing a shitstorm of drama with you as the center of attention.
I'm sorry, but that's a massive flounce. And a huff. (Incidentally, no-one other than you suggested that either of those suggest a lack of "choice" on your part.) Your recent antics are, in fact, precisely those of an attention-seeking drama queen.
How tedious.
Actually, I'm channeling the moderation on the User Friendly comments section, (a surprisingly thriving community) where I was a regular for a few years. They've got a "no drama queens" rule that I really like, viz:
if you post a big production goodbye that says basically you're leaving because the board sucks/you people are idiots/etc your account will be permanently disabled. In other words, we will enforce your goodbye so be sure you really want to go before posting something like that.
Personally, I think that rule would be good for pretty much any internet community.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:48,
archived)
if you post a big production goodbye that says basically you're leaving because the board sucks/you people are idiots/etc your account will be permanently disabled. In other words, we will enforce your goodbye so be sure you really want to go before posting something like that.
Personally, I think that rule would be good for pretty much any internet community.
and it had such potential to be a benchmark flounce but it's just become a long drawn out affair
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:06,
archived)
You can argue with people, say you are leaving forever and ask for your account to be deleted without it being a flounce you know.
Apparently.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:09,
archived)
Apparently.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:28,
archived)
It'd have to be of such biblical proportions that it's discussed on Newsnight for the aftermath of it to beat him.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:09,
archived)
the "is this small enough" flounce was an amazing read
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:13,
archived)
I was just trying to go for the drama of it all so I don't feel left out
*feels left out*
bastadrs! I'm leaving! you bastadrs!
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:14,
archived)
*feels left out*
bastadrs! I'm leaving! you bastadrs!
No after this post, I've had it!
It's always been SOMETHING.
"Oh you used a font I don't like!"
"It's too brown!"
"It's too this!"
"It's too that!"
Almost never a comment that has to actually do with the image.
Eat more fucksocks, I'm out of here!
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:20,
archived)
It's always been SOMETHING.
"Oh you used a font I don't like!"
"It's too brown!"
"It's too this!"
"It's too that!"
Almost never a comment that has to actually do with the image.
Eat more fucksocks, I'm out of here!
edit: funny, because it's someone who isn't me having a mental breakdown
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:20,
archived)
I'm too unawake to even think of something smart to say. And since lurking is evil, I thought it better to type this stuff.
Everything feels right, now.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 15:43,
archived)
Everything feels right, now.
I shall take him home and feed him Greggs sausage rolls.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:33,
archived)
I'm currently working with a Romanian steel company in putting together enough iron to create the gigantic frying pan I will be using to spang your face off
PS: I'm not really going to hit your face off with a giant frying pan, just in case you think I'm being serious.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:53,
archived)
PS: I'm not really going to hit your face off with a giant frying pan, just in case you think I'm being serious.
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 11:56,
archived)
this compo should not be won on likes, it should be won on who can find and convince a messageboard full of people the hoax is real. I reckon you're in with a chance
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:46,
archived)

*Runs away giggling*
Also a nice photoshopping detail to let the colours from the explosion reflect in the spaceship. It's a detail that a lot of people would have overlooked
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 19:19,
archived)
but noooooooooooooooo
you wouldn't listen, would you
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 12:28,
archived)
you wouldn't listen, would you
He must have been giving that some serious tugging!
Ning Toasty!
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 8:15,
archived)
Ning Toasty!
*swings arm round and round*
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 8:26,
archived)
Today, we find Jeremy Beadle and David Letterman talking about David Cassidy cocks.



(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 7:52,
archived)



It looks like Brooklyn Deckers and Pandora Peaks stripes have effected Shannen Doherty eye a little more that usual?


NSFW Shannen
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 7:52,
archived)


NSFW Shannen* Don't say that!!!
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 8:54,
archived)

I was going to say quick and dirty - but after hours of turd polishing it still looks just dirty.

Click for bigger (171 kb)
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 6:22,
archived)
Click for bigger (171 kb)
I've not posted on here in years..
(Psst!.. Can you find Rob and ask him for the key to these chains please!?)
(,
Wed 18 Apr 2012, 22:36,
archived)
(Psst!.. Can you find Rob and ask him for the key to these chains please!?)
stay long enough (a week or two) and it'll all make sense
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 9:24,
archived)
it's not very good though really ;)
(,
Thu 12 Apr 2012, 9:25,
archived)
(, Thu 12 Apr 2012, 4:26, archived)
« Older messages | Newer messages »



























