You know, all that woke rubbish that's stopping everyone from doing everything.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 14:15, Reply)
I'm looking forward to the new PM getting rid of all that sex and race equality woke rubbish.
Incidentally, here's an opinion from someone who went to Liz Truss's school.
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/jul/18/liz-truss-roundhay-school-foreign-secretary-education
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 22:47, Reply)
She wasn’t unhinged when she was a Lib Dem. But now she has power. Yay.
(, Fri 22 Jul 2022, 21:01, Reply)
There will be a cameo by Birdman and Peter Potomus?
YOU WILL LIKE THIS!... probably not.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 13:55, Reply)
I have tried watching that...it has its own direction.
Ha Haaaa
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 22:04, Reply)
mean getting taller and thinner?
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 15:44, Reply)
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 17:14, Reply)
DC science otoh, perfectly reasonable.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 17:20, Reply)
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 17:45, Reply)
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 0:47, Reply)
Now, THAT'S something I'd watch.
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 20:07, Reply)
As for how long I think it depends on how long it takes to re-arrange all those notes.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 3:51, Reply)
What the fup is wrong with the left in Britain?
You're going to have either a female or ethnic minority prime minister next, something Labour has never achieved or indeed even attempted. The last Tory government was more ethnically diverse than anything Labour ever had, and it was the Tories that legalised same sex marriage, not Labour, eventhough they had 13 years to so do. To an outsider, it is obvious that Labour are the old fashioned/racist/conservatives and the Tories are actually much more progressive.
And yet, there they are, demonizing the evil Tories.rather than cleaning up their own party.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 19:46, Reply)
We’re still faced with a choice between an absolute moron of a woman or a filthy rich Asian guy. I don’t care about setting silly precedents, I want a competent leader.
Never mind that the NHS and minimum wage were brought in by Labour. As for gay marriage, I honestly think it would have been brought in at about the same time regardless of which party was in power. Never forget that it was a Tory government who was responsible for our version of “don’t say gay”, and a Tory government who want to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 20:31, Reply)
they represent the interests of the membership who are, in the most part, very white, very old and very rich.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 21:13, Reply)
They did get a whopping majority in the last election, that can't all have been rich old white people.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 21:24, Reply)
www.thelondoneconomic.com/politics/tory-party-demographics-revealed-ahead-of-leadership-election-and-they-make-for-pretty-grim-reading-329194/
97% white
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 21:40, Reply)
But we don't get a bar subsidised by the tax payers.
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 2:41, Reply)
They got a whopping majority because of FPTP, but it doesn't reflect their share of the vote (43.6%).
If we had a system of proportional representation with 2nd preference ballots, etc, we would have more sensible electoral outcomes.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 21:43, Reply)
I live in a country with PR. As a result, my vote never goes to an actual person, but to a party. There is no local representation in parliament, no MP holding local surgeries, no one single parliamentarian to hold acountable as they all hide behind the gray collective party responsibility. This lead to a huge chasm between voter and representative. Not only that, but no party will ever realistically have a majority and any goverment will be a coalition - meaning no party can ever be held acountable for actually delivering on their manifesto. Combine this with a system where the actual government ministers aren't members of parliament means voters can't even get rid of party leaders by voting them out. FPTP may not be an ideal situation, but you have much more influence on actual government policies than an RP voter will ever have.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 22:29, Reply)
No reason why you couldn't have a list of individuals and a Nth preference column. No reason why your constituency rules couldn't have recall/retrigger clauses that apply to individual representatives. These are choices that have been made, they're not intrinsic to the concept of proportional representation.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 22:37, Reply)
So our situation isn't all that different to yours. There's no reason why the MP for a given constituency shouldn't hold surgeries, though I suspect that you overestimate how much impact they actually have anyway.
Coalition government is a double-edged sword but I say that one of them is blunted: you do lose some accountability but voters absolutely remember what parties do while in a coalition (just look at the Lib Dems) and having a government that can only realistically pass the legislation that a real majority of the public voted for sounds like a Good Thing to me. A fringe benefit of coalition government is that there's a larger pool of MPs to choose from when it comes to government posts. Where do you live? It seems bizarre to have heads of government departments that aren't MPs (or whatever you call them).
FPTP is definitely not an ideal solution; it allows a minority to get away with things that the majority oppose, just because of the way boundaries have been drawn. The cherry on the cake is that the direction of the UK government is about to be set by a person elected by less than 1% of the populace. Fuck that.
A presidential style of government à la USA* is patently wrong, but I'm open to the idea of a hybrid system (it's worth a try) wherein we have a reformed upper house (sorry Lord Winston, you were one of the good ones) elected by PR and a lower house elected by FPTP, but without the latter having power to overrule the former. If that works then perhaps we could continue on to PR all round. Who knows, we could even add a third chamber of old-style peers to give advice to the other two, appointed entirely by dint of wisdom rather than political backhanders.
*The filibuster rule** is just so fucking stupid. I'm all for consensus in government but expecting a supermajority in a two-party system basically means that nothing will ever get done.
**Which isn't actually a real rule. I mean come on, having people stand up and talk and talk until the clock runs out is a popular Radio 4 programme***, not a system of government.
***Insofar as any Radio 4 programme could be considered popular.
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 3:41, Reply)
Ministers are usually (but not exclusivly) selected from elected parliamentarians, but when they become ministers, they are no longer part of the parliament and their seat goes to whatever candidate was on their party's election list but didn't get in. On the plus side, it means the government itself can't vote on their own legislation - although their parliamentary parties obviously can.
As for getting 'legislation that a real majority of the public voted for' yeah, no, that doesn't happen as all legislation will be a compromise between the ruling parties and therefore exactly what nobody voted for. Perhaps I am overestimating the importance of having a single person responisble for representation, but I do like the idea of having just the one target to pelt with various rotten fruits rather than a mass of politicians who don't have to care about losing a few hundred votes as their seat will be safe either way. The good thing is that we have litterally dozens of parties, to cater to your specific flavour, rather than just a few. I suppose the grass is always greener on the other side.
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 15:06, Reply)
Especially when the 44% are a coalition of gullible fearful idiots and nasty cunts.
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 15:46, Reply)
See how many diverse faces you see there
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 20:43, Reply)
It’s only the Tory Party who would gift the opportunity to a third-rate Thatcher tribute act and a barely competent multi-millionaire to lead them.
Labour are stuck in the past with their insistence on being capable of actually governing.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 21:17, Reply)
That would have brought down the government in any normal country
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 21:24, Reply)
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 21:54, Reply)
...and not by the colour of their skin you'll find that they're all awful cunts.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 23:08, Reply)
having a vagina ≠ progressive
Idi Amin and Thatcher
having progressive policies and doing progressive thing = progressive
is there anything else you'd like cleaned up, apart from coloured vaginas?
as to the same sex marriage act 2013, this was drafted and introduced by the liberal democrat Lynne Featherstone, and all parties gave their MPs a free vote on it. 126 conservatives voted for the bill, while 134 voted against it. It passed with labour and the other parties voting majority for it. I'm not sure how you think this paints the Conservatives as progressive, though I guess Cameron allowing a free vote wins some minor points.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 23:55, Reply)
but selecting someone with a vulva as party leader sadly still is, and Idi Amin wasn't an ethnic minority in Uganda. You could have used John Vorster as an example.
I do take your point, though, even if I still feel Labour is not managing to portray itself as a progressive, inclusive party.
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 0:15, Reply)
there, generally black voters lean democrat, and blacks tend to lower socio-economic status, so that having more representation in your party is seen as progressive, aligning with things like affirmative action
In the UK the largest minority are indian and pakistani, and they're not generally of lower socio-economic status, and if anything their traditional views on cultural issues are more conservative than the median.
I guess the other thing is that there's no bible belt in the UK that the conservatives need to pander to. Guys like Cameron and Johnson are intertwined with The City, the financial hub, and the big media conglomerates (and were both ex-journos). Their policies have widened the gap, with the rich getting richer and the middle class and poor getting poorer. The opposite to this is progressive taxation that spreads the wealth more fairly, and less privatisation of public assets. They're not fighting the culture wars and personally I think don't give a fuck about it one way or the other, apart from some half-hearted bleating about wokeness to test if there's any votes in that
But, yes, labour have their own issues, but I think it's not getting more brown faces but finding someone with a fucking spine that's not so terrified of putting some 'boro brexit voting blockhead offside that they can't call out it's obvious shitness and offer a solution.
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 0:39, Reply)
The fact that I tend to agree with the rest of what you wrote is incidental.
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 4:02, Reply)
in the early days I followed a blogger calling himself the Teesmouth, and a big boro supporter. had a regular gig writing for bbc sport before he got the axe
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 13:44, Reply)
Gay marriage was simply a way to shed the nasty party image whilst holding on to 99% of the nasty policies
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 7:08, Reply)
why didn't Labour introduce this when they were in power? I know Tony Blair was to busy with the wholesale slaughter of Iraqis, but surely Gordon Brown could have found the time?
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 15:18, Reply)
Do you know anything about this? Have you heard of Section 28? Civil partnerships? That's what they were doing. Dismantling all the openly homophobic shite the tories had brought in over the previous 20 years
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 15:36, Reply)
and see (at least the current) Tory party as a group of individual and collective failures. On a personal level they are venal corrupt liars, and on a professional level they are inept to a degree previously unseen.
The choice given is between this lot and the current alternative. Regardless of the mess that the opposition present. they still have more appeal
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 6:49, Reply)
They are not
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/gender/parliament
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 7:19, Reply)
Chatty little beast too, this might be a game.
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 23:16, Reply)
Patrolled and defended, you should have seen the scat politics when my two big male cats died.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 21:14, Reply)
Wait for the replay.
Edit: Might not be for everyone due to person getting injured. He's moving at the end, though. So assuming he didn't die.
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 22:21, Reply)
Not going to click like as its a little bit snuff tbh
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 23:03, Reply)
i know it's a spoiler, but quite a few people avoid watching videos like that, Swagatha.
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 23:06, Reply)
I'll not be clicking on another Streamable Video.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 0:50, Reply)
Female Prussian carps use sperm of other species to stimulate their eggs to divide. The genetic material of the male is then broken down in the egg cell without being used (sperm-dependent parthenogenesis)
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 19:22, Reply)
But I really enjoyed the fabulousnessing of Ken
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 17:09, Reply)
Drag does nothing for me, and I find "fabulousness" repellant.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 22:30, Reply)
I kinda agree. However, the first few seasons of Ru Paul's Drage Race (before they started allowing female contestants to compete) are fucking amazing.
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 22:58, Reply)
Me, I used to glam up and dress a bit camp or kinky in my youth, and everyone just assumed I was a gay lad - but I've never been interested in anyone's knob but my own.
(, Thu 21 Jul 2022, 13:32, Reply)
My club hosted the first show of their UK tour in April. My favourite gig this year .
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 15:02, Reply)
Was worried they might be one hit wonders, but far from it - fantastic musicians, really good fun, and great tunes. Would see again.
Oh, and happy candles!
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 16:01, Reply)
It was weird how well he knew all the Beatles songs. Here's a more realistic version.
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 13:18, Reply)
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 10:47, Reply)
Another amazing cover (not saying there are socks being knocked off tho!)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr8agWD3lmY
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 11:57, Reply)
Was watching to see how much hate he put out.
There was some in the subtext, but nothing worse than Priti Patel.
There's only on way to find out.
(, Mon 18 Jul 2022, 22:30, Reply)
I don't get the appeal of the 'old man incoherently rambling about wokeness' scene. It's obviously a money earner as there are so many bitter old has-beens doing it.
(, Mon 18 Jul 2022, 22:55, Reply)
The more deterioration I see in Jim Davidson, the less sad I am.
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 17:41, Reply)
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 18:06, Reply)
you don't want your enemies to live long enough to get old?
I can believe that.
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 23:57, Reply)
Davidson’s just a shadow of him, which coincidentally was what manning called black people
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 7:26, Reply)
as a backdrop? Is there some subtext about getting the hump or something?
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 9:03, Reply)
and it was the only thing that worked
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 17:40, Reply)
Did they get a request 'make me as white as possible'?
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 15:01, Reply)
With the last episodes of Neighbours right around the corner, a friend of mine thought it was about time to honour one of his heroes.
(, Mon 18 Jul 2022, 15:07, Reply)
Great tune for a very hot day - hope you're all dodging what you can of the heat.
(, Mon 18 Jul 2022, 15:05, Reply)
Just put it on repeat in the car and drive round town. Whole album is a belter
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 12:01, Reply)
I found it on Andy Smith's Trojan Document compilation - every tune on that is a good 'un.
(, Tue 19 Jul 2022, 12:19, Reply)
(, Mon 18 Jul 2022, 13:25, Reply)
I was at peak Doctor Who age with Pertwee, and I don't remember it. I remember a bright yellow "vintage" car
(, Wed 20 Jul 2022, 14:47, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »

