I've not been on B3ta much recently, and this game is the reason why. It's utterly, utterly addictive, and you can complete the same levels over and over again in classier ways once you get good.
It starts off so simple, but you end up making machines like this: FantasticContraption.com/?designId=6120243
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:57, Reply)
Made the newsletter, in fact, it was that good ;)
Good opportunity to have anoter crack at it, though.
Edit and that's a belting machine for that level. I think my solution just relied on pivoting the thing and was a bit hit and miss.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:59, Reply)
Well thanks for breaking it nicely. To those that haven't seen it, take this post to be a roaring recommendation to give it a try.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:06, Reply)
www.incredibots.com
It's smack in internet game form.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:22, Reply)
I can't find the original developer of this one, but It's also quite a neat one.
FantasticContraption.com/?designId=2231244
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:44, Reply)
:) so very satisfying.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 15:01, Reply)
i hope she/he dies, there are kids and troops in Afghanistan whose lives are completely wrecked by loosing limbs.
what a fucking selfish douche
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:00, Reply)
so it could be fake.
Tho it is very disgusting :{
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:07, Reply)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apotemnophilia
Hard to understand, but it is an actual disorder. There are other varieties where people are repulsed by the limb, can't control them or ignore them completely.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 15:53, Reply)
Presumably soldiers don't want to lose their legs. This person did.
How is that selfish?
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 16:26, Reply)
but a bit of a waste don't you think?
or maybe not, i don't really know how to word it, but it just doesn't seem fair.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 16:42, Reply)
Because she's mental? You think mental people should die? A bit unfair, don't you think?
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 21:50, Reply)
i would never really want someone to die, just something bad to happen to them
(, Wed 18 Feb 2009, 1:08, Reply)
news.bmezine.com/wp-content/uploads/200709261007-pix1.jpg
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:18, Reply)
did I really just hear "Injected my knee with my own faeces"?
Yes. Yes I did.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:31, Reply)
the American administration have been so slow in reforming thir welfare system ;)
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 20:21, Reply)
Yeah yeah yeah so it's the Torygraph so sue me.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:43, Reply)
Solid gold.
I will be very interested to see what, if anything, comes from that.
Think there's scope for an impromptu bash - take the piss out of the Westboro lot and then go for a beer :)
EDIT - UNREPINENTANT - pfffft.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:46, Reply)
like it was written by an angry 14 year old.
CAPS and everything... Great find
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:54, Reply)
"YOUR SONS ARE IN HELL"
So Christian.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:56, Reply)
"Holly, wipe the rabid foam from your chin and start again."
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:54, Reply)
I mean - they use CAPS too!
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:52, Reply)
"...The Beast Obama, That Son of Perdition, that Man of Sin.."
What a bunch of fuckwits
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:52, Reply)
this is the first time I've ever said: "I really want to be in Basingstoke"
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:27, Reply)
We really need to picket them, and generally embarrass them
The rest of America, even right wing christians, hate them so this would get great coverage in the states :)
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:38, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=-STpW7jarrs
I wonder if Jacqui Smith will have the guts to ban them from entering the UK, like she did with Geert Wilders
edit: www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ciee1qdWE3M
"Look at that Virginia Tech massacre: it's awesome!"
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:21, Reply)
Jacqui Smith is a useless cunt
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:34, Reply)
They might get a bigger audience than the play. This could be like the David Blaine egging but so very much better.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:26, Reply)
And strangely, students at BCoT used to call Q.M.C. (the venue in question) Queer Men's Club!!
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 15:33, Reply)
I have this downloaded, but not on my mp3 player yet. I think I will do it now.
this is my next one!
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:57, Reply)
awaiting a drunken watch
"Dolemite is my name, and fuckin' up motha fuckas is my game!"
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:45, Reply)
NSFW for some sweary bits.
Bit of blaxploitation love for you.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:25, Reply)
Or shut up ewes.
Lamb head-butts Golden Eagle. Ronseal.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:14, Reply)
in which someone or other rejoiced somewhat at her impending death from cancer, and a bunch of other b3tans pointed out a number of reasons why dying of cancer and making orphans of your children is a really bad thing even if people think you are an annoying gobby chav slapper.
The link is not funny or silly or quirky or otherwise b3tarded, just an opinion piece from Michele Hanson in The Grauniad, that happens to be a bloody good explanation of why there are times to stand up and support even the most painful of individuals, even when they employ a cynical moneygrubber like Max Clifford as a publicist.
Apologies for such a dose of seriousness, but I know a few of you responded sympathetically last time this was aired and I thought you might find this interesting.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:12, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftMZpQYbgWU&feature=channel
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:26, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_Pq86rHp1E
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:32, Reply)
I toured with them, and Daeth Shall Rise was the first death metal song I learned to drum.
You're still ignored though.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 16:52, Reply)
I lost my mother and ex husband to cancer, and nearly my dad too. I've actually found a lot of the stuff on here about Jade Goody extremely offensive- and not in a good, b3ta-ish kind of way. I hope the people who think its so amusing never have to go through it themselves.
I know this sounds self- righteous but I don't care.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:29, Reply)
I may not like Jade Goody, or what she represents, but two young boys are about to lose their mother to a horrible disease.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:45, Reply)
Cancer isnt remotely funny or a punishment for annoying people. It is a horrendous state of affairs for the sufferer, those who have to support the sufferer and those all to often left behind.
As much as Jade has annoyed me in the past the way she seems to be tackling this illness shows courage well beyond what I think I would be capable of in her position.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 15:10, Reply)
but I do give a shit about having her terminal disease shoved in my face - having someone close to you dying of cancer, you don't really want to be reminded of it every day.
and thats about all she is contributing to the world now, serving as a constant reminder of the horrible death of loved ones. Someone tell me when its all over, meanwhile I have no interest in attending her 3 month long media funeral
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:43, Reply)
Good luck to her but I dont want to be reminded every day in the papers and news that she is ill.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:50, Reply)
I mean, what is so special about jade goody's cervical cancer that makes it front page news... what about my nan, what about all the other thousands of women who have ever suffered from it (in relative silence).
It's then that the two words "Max" and "Clifford" loom large (her publicist btw).
For that reason it wouldn't surprise me to hear that she makes a "miraculous recovery" in the not too distant future.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:46, Reply)
for her to make this documentary, then why the hell shouldn't she make it?
That's not to say I'm going to watch it - the same way that I wouldn't watch any of the fly-on-the-wall documentaries about her life pre-cancer, or a Jordan and Peter wedding special...
The fact is that a lot of people will watch this. Whether they be the Heat/Hello readers after something to gossip about after Corrie has finished, or people who've taken a genuine interest in how terminal illness affects a family, huge numbers are going to tune in to watch her final moments.
As the article rightly points out, whether we like her or not, she is bringing to the attention of the media and public at large, the necessity for screening etc and that in itself has to be commended.
I'm of the opinion that Jade Goody is a fucking spack simply because she has caused so much public offence on several occasions and doesn't seem to learn from her mistakes. The making of the film in no way redeems her for events past, but we can at least say she has (or will have) had at least one positive impact from being a public figure.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:53, Reply)
and no one should ever go like this, one thing still plays on my mind. Dying of cancer does not make you a good person. And yes, I was mocking her poor attempt at racism, her lack of any general knowledge and general annoyance. And at that time, she had no cancer. Just because she is now playing the heart strings of the public by saying what any body dying would say -miss her boys laugh etc- does not mean she has changed. Deep down, she is still the same person I detested since 2002. And why should we feel guilty about the things we have said about her, when she should be carrying the weight of her own ways in the past. I am not willing to share her burden.
Any way, I blame the media.
Quote of the day
What's incredibly sad is that neither C4, nor the tabloid press, nor a brand of scent, nor a Christmas cookbook, nor even a premature and impending death can manage to make Jade Goody at all interesting.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:56, Reply)
you have to be of a certain age...
Click the HQ button for better pixellation resolution...if you know what I mean.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:35, Reply)
... and I hate to sound as though I'm defending one more installment in a stream of odious and stupid policy decisions - but it's not illegal.
Taking photos of policemen that may be useful to terrorists, with the intention that they be useful to terrorists, is.
There's a big difference.
There's been a lot of very bad law passed in the last few years in the name of security. But if one's going to oppose it, one should at least get the right targets.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:45, Reply)
just leads to profiling?
Coppers making judgements based on someone's appearance to decide whether the person is acting like a terrorist.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:48, Reply)
^
If you take a photo of a copper beating the crap out of someone and posting it on the Net, that isn't illegal.
If you take a picture of where he lives, that is.
Cheers
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:56, Reply)
Whereas in the past the police have not had the power to prevent photographs being taken of them, from today they have. Under the new Counter-Terrorism Act it is an offence to take pictures of officers "likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism". This is such a catch-all measure that it can be used – and, in view of recent trends, will be used – to prevent photographs to which the police object merely by invoking counter-terrorist requirements. While it is important for officers involved in such operations to maintain anonymity, many photographers fear these powers will be abused.
www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/philipjohnston/4632459/Why-cant-we-take-pictures-of-policemen.html
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:05, Reply)
and study.. it more often the case that the letter of the law is enforced, yet the spirit is not.. while there is, by way of implied limitation, exceptions to being able to photograph officers, in practice the actual law will be enforced wherever and whenever anyone wants to use it. All it requires is for an officer to justify it anyway s/he likes.
examples of this are with the anti-terrorism laws being used to punish litter louts by local councils
your country is becoming more and more a police state
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:29, Reply)
Therefore, when a police officer tells someone to do something or makes demands for which compliance is voluntary, they tend to do as bidden, even though they don't need to. This is even more likely when done in what could be perceived as a threatening manner as experienced by many photographers in the last few months (see links throughout this thread).
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:42, Reply)
taking some pictures in a park local to here, i was verbally abused by a woman that wanted me to delete all the images from my camera because i was "taking pictures of kids".. i was taking pictures of plants, flowers and a squirrel i saw (for a project)..
she stopped short of calling me a perv, though did threaten to call the police..
she didn't believe me when i told her it's a film camera..
the odd thing that struck me, was that she had crossed halfway across the park to shout at me, leaving her two kids and a pushchair alone over 100yards away
a lecturer here told me a should wear a dayglo jacket to look official..
i can only imagine this kind of misguided and misinformed nonsense will be on the increase.. police are just as human as the public
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 15:49, Reply)
this police state you are getting is being implemented under the guise of anti-terror and public safety.. when it's nothing of the sort
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 15:52, Reply)
the violent copper from deciding that you could be a terrorist who just happens to be taking photos of him while he's beating the shit out of someone?
There's a piece on this issue on theregister.co.uk which points out that
"In line with the model used in related laws, the offence itself is "strict liability": it is the gathering of information that will be deemed to be the offence, and a defence that the person had a "reasonable excuse for their action" is only allowed after the offence has been charged."
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 14:59, Reply)
until proven innocent, in direct contravention to human rights and public law (unless someone better informed can put me aright)?
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 15:54, Reply)
I thought that might be plain from the text at the start and end of the video.
Putting such vague laws in place which are so open to interpretation (and without any guidance to or restrictions on implementation) is definitely worth noting. And it is surely worth mentioning those who proposed and put the law into effect.
Furthermore, past behaviour by some members of the constabulary shows that this law is open to abuse.
So, please tell me who you consider to be the correct target as you imply I have so clearly got it wrong.
As for your qualification/clarification/put-down - Of course you are correct. I was obviously not intending to deceive but lmited by space and by my own laziness to type an explanatory extract of the act into the headline field when I posted.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:01, Reply)
www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/feb/12/photographers-anti-terror-laws
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:13, Reply)
The most likely use is to prosecute anyone taking photos of police carrying out crowd control at a demonstration.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:21, Reply)
Ok, it was Bud Ekins really but The Times sets out to see if a fairly stock, 60s Triumph 650 can complete the jump; scotching rumours that the actual bike had to be heavily modified.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:21, Reply)
that in the biography "McQueen", they mention that a ramp is used. Which would surely make the make of bike irrelevant, no?
Either way that was great!
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:59, Reply)
Sorry for posting two news links but this one is just incredible. Some people really need whats coming to them.
This bloke in China decides to hold a competition to decide which one of his 5 mistresses he is going to keep. Inevitability of such stupidity ensues.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:19, Reply)
Chimp goes ape (no pun intended) and has to be killed by the police. The reason I posted though is because about 2/3rds of the way through the story it says about another chimp going on a rampage and chewing off some blokes nose and genitals. WTF????
So a chimp has the power of up to 7 men, well Id have the power of 50 if something tried to chew my knackers off.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:04, Reply)
Most of the films of chimps being cute are because they *are* cute! They're babies - little kids. They're programmed to be submissive.
Then they get older and the hormones kick in.
Adult chimps are fucking dangerous.
Cheers
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:14, Reply)
The nose/balls man, I mean.
As I remember, he and his wife had had a baby chimp as a pet, but when it got bigger, they gave it to a zoo. They visited it every day, going in to the enclosure to give it a cuddle and say hi, but one day, one of the other chimps went mental and tried to rip him apart.
I really don't understand why the hell they were allowed into the chimp enclosure at all, when it wasn't just their "tame" one in there.
Freakin' eejits.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:50, Reply)
As an avid L4D fan I like this
edit:
Also: www.i-hacked.com/content/view/274/48/
** HACKER TIPS #1 ** Should it will ask you for a password. Try “DOTS”
** HACKER TIPS #1 ** Should the sign be padlocked, try and obtain a binary saw :)
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:05, Reply)
But funny as fuck so that's all right then.
Cheers
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:35, Reply)
the media call anyone who is intelligent enough to break into a system a hacker
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:37, Reply)
what skillz those h4ck0rs must have had. Maybe they used a Binary saw.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:49, Reply)
Quick CCTV footage from a 6.1 Quake that hit Costa Rica on February 11th. You have to wait 'till 0.34
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 10:38, Reply)
although the one time I was in a decent earthquake was when working in greece and I didnt even realise what was going on - my thought process was "oh my - those pillers shouldnt be flexing like that. Whats in this beer"
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 10:53, Reply)
That shelf on the right has a shit load of IBCs on it - It's very likely that they were filled with a very nasty mix of chemicals too!
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:13, Reply)
I had a summer job putting up pallet racking once. It always seemed far too flimsy to hold all that weight.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:15, Reply)
The shocking truth about b3ta's favorite "colour"
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 10:37, Reply)
Cool!
And proof that colour blind people are actually 'correct'. The rest of us just make stuff up.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:55, Reply)
as far as I know. It's not specific to pink.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:16, Reply)
its protanopia, deuteranopia or tritanopia. Depends on the cones.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:43, Reply)
see! there we go.
I think this is quite similar to harmonics in a way, if you play 2 different frequencies, one in each ear, the brain produces an entirely new frequency that can be beyond the frequency range of the human ear.
Clever stuff really!
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:04, Reply)
Nothing looks right to me.
(, Wed 18 Feb 2009, 1:22, Reply)
ONE colour? Funny, I don't see brown there either. Or beige. People never pay enough attention to biege.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:41, Reply)
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:53, Reply)
Don't get me started on whether my magenta is the same colour as your magenta.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 12:47, Reply)
If the eye receives light of more than one wavelength, the colour generated in the brain is formed from the sum of the input responses on the retina. For example, if red light and green light enter the eye at the same time, the resulting colour produced in the brain is yellow, the colour halfway between red and green in the spectrum.
Surely that's the mean; wouldn't the sum be somewhere closer to the violet end of the spectrum (somewhere around blue)?
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 13:12, Reply)
you merge two frequencies you don't end up with the sum of those frequencies, you end up with a modulated wave.
(, Wed 18 Feb 2009, 2:05, Reply)
Magenta most certainly is a colour. It may not have a specific wavelength but the brain interprets the two signals as a colour without any problem whatsoever.
Interesting read though, if flawed.
(, Wed 18 Feb 2009, 2:03, Reply)
This video isn't done by me, but by my friend. He is graded on how many views his video recieves, and i thought you guys might like this kind of stuff and give him a view :)
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 10:08, Reply)
but Kudos to him - I could never have the patience to spend the time learnign to do that
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 10:11, Reply)
Sorry for 2 in a row but this is a video of the Japanese Finance Minister feeling a little tired and emotional at a press conference.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 9:46, Reply)
Well you have to look and I apologise in advance. :)
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 9:31, Reply)
One of the stories at the top is entertaining.
"sex with my son sets me on fire"
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 10:10, Reply)
Silly kitty - you is an cats, not dogs
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 9:21, Reply)
... But the thing that made me smile about that was the fact that you can just about hear "Let's Go All the Way" by Sly Fox in the background.
I've not heard that since about 1985, and was beginning to wonder whether it'd ever really been released.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 9:31, Reply)
soundtrack though I might be wrong
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 9:33, Reply)
WMG have had it taken down. Shame. I'd've liked to have posted it for all the b3tans whose parents hadn't even met yet then.
God, I feel old.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 9:35, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EyVzLVGd6Q
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 9:41, Reply)
The video's a bit naff, but the song stands up surprisingly well...
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 9:47, Reply)
Did you remember it was Sly Fox or did you have to Google it?
Takes me right back to horrible school discoes of the mid-80s.
/shivers
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:24, Reply)
Comedy/News by Disabled People, Produced by South Park's Matt + Trey.
...exploitive?
...or progressive?
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 5:49, Reply)
his interview style is just brilliant!
and
"that bulls full of piss n vinegar!"
fantastic
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 8:44, Reply)
..haha I feel bad for laughing at work.
(, Tue 17 Feb 2009, 11:16, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »
