

Bindun?

62. Possession of prohibited images of children
(1)It is an offence for a person to be in possession of a prohibited image of a child.
(2)A prohibited image is an image which—
(a)is pornographic,
(b)falls within subsection (6), and
(c)is grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character.
(3)An image is “pornographic” if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal.
(6)An image falls within this subsection if it—
(a)is an image which focuses solely or principally on a child's genitals or anal region, or
(b)portrays any of the acts mentioned in subsection (7).
65. Meaning of “image” and “child”
(1)The following apply for the purposes of sections 62 to 64.
(2)“Image” includes—
(a)a moving or still image (produced by any means), or
(b)data (stored by any means) which is capable of conversion into an image within paragraph (a).
(6)Where an image shows a person the image is to be treated as an image of a child if—
(a)the impression conveyed by the image is that the person shown is a child, or
(b)the predominant impression conveyed is that the person shown is a child despite the fact that some of the physical characteristics shown are not those of a child.
(7)References to an image of a person include references to an image of an imaginary person.
(8)References to an image of a child include references to an image of an imaginary child.
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:35,
archived)
(1)It is an offence for a person to be in possession of a prohibited image of a child.
(2)A prohibited image is an image which—
(a)is pornographic,
(b)falls within subsection (6), and
(c)is grossly offensive, disgusting or otherwise of an obscene character.
(3)An image is “pornographic” if it is of such a nature that it must reasonably be assumed to have been produced solely or principally for the purpose of sexual arousal.
(6)An image falls within this subsection if it—
(a)is an image which focuses solely or principally on a child's genitals or anal region, or
(b)portrays any of the acts mentioned in subsection (7).
65. Meaning of “image” and “child”
(1)The following apply for the purposes of sections 62 to 64.
(2)“Image” includes—
(a)a moving or still image (produced by any means), or
(b)data (stored by any means) which is capable of conversion into an image within paragraph (a).
(6)Where an image shows a person the image is to be treated as an image of a child if—
(a)the impression conveyed by the image is that the person shown is a child, or
(b)the predominant impression conveyed is that the person shown is a child despite the fact that some of the physical characteristics shown are not those of a child.
(7)References to an image of a person include references to an image of an imaginary person.
(8)References to an image of a child include references to an image of an imaginary child.

How am I meant to wank to this?
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:39,
archived)

(7)Those acts are—
(a)the performance by a person of an act of intercourse or oral sex with or in the presence of a child;
(b)an act of masturbation by, of, involving or in the presence of a child;
(c)an act which involves penetration of the vagina or anus of a child with a part of a person's body or with anything else;
(d)an act of penetration, in the presence of a child, of the vagina or anus of a person with a part of a person's body or with anything else;
(e)the performance by a child of an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive or imaginary);
(f)the performance by a person of an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive or imaginary) in the presence of a child.
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:40,
archived)
(a)the performance by a person of an act of intercourse or oral sex with or in the presence of a child;
(b)an act of masturbation by, of, involving or in the presence of a child;
(c)an act which involves penetration of the vagina or anus of a child with a part of a person's body or with anything else;
(d)an act of penetration, in the presence of a child, of the vagina or anus of a person with a part of a person's body or with anything else;
(e)the performance by a child of an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive or imaginary);
(f)the performance by a person of an act of intercourse or oral sex with an animal (whether dead or alive or imaginary) in the presence of a child.

fictional child porn is OK, I think. is in fact not ok
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:44,
archived)

Yep, that's all fine and dandy. Each case will be examined on its merits but it is extremely unlikely that any textual publication would be prosecuted (based on precedent).
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:47,
archived)

is not ok on the basis that it's fictional, I think XD
ok, I've not quite woken up yet, but having re read the sections, I think dave's work is covered by all of these.
except perhaps 65/8
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 23:09,
archived)
ok, I've not quite woken up yet, but having re read the sections, I think dave's work is covered by all of these.
except perhaps 65/8

Specifically if an image of an imaginary child is found to be "child porn" then it will be treated in exactly the same way as an image of a real child.
So some of Dave's work (which thankfully I haven't seen, but have heard mentioned) probably is covered under this act.
So everyone who browsed this site and has one of his images in there cache should be mildly concerned.
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 23:20,
archived)
So some of Dave's work (which thankfully I haven't seen, but have heard mentioned) probably is covered under this act.
So everyone who browsed this site and has one of his images in there cache should be mildly concerned.

So every shitty TV crime drama with a paedo scene is in fact illegal? That should clear the schedules.
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:57,
archived)

I just knew it.
It seems to me that if we rounded up all the people the queen bothers with, we'll have all the nonces locked up.
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:46,
archived)
It seems to me that if we rounded up all the people the queen bothers with, we'll have all the nonces locked up.

Iggy Pop's stomach
( ,
Fri 30 Aug 2013, 1:25,
archived)

Which I have saved in my special area. Hang on a knock at the door.
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 23:07,
archived)

I've written a fucking book on birdwatching and I can tell you, that is a bad-ass badger.
Fo sho.
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 22:11,
archived)
Fo sho.


needs whirring clockwork sound
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 18:42,
archived)

My neighbor had one of those. Didn't it also make a laugh noise?
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 19:05,
archived)
![Challenge Entry: Creepy Stuff [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
these are from my very early days on b3ta and I'm quite fond of them. Time to repost for compo.



( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 19:32,
archived)




while rummaging through my old cat stuff, I found this. It's yeeeaaars old. Knew the source looked familiar...

( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 19:35,
archived)



:D

( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 21:14,
archived)


Oh! Cameron was using *that* Mickey Mouse towel ...

( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 17:14,
archived)

![Challenge Entry: Creepy Stuff [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)

Now it just seems lazy :)

NOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.........
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 17:41,
archived)

That's just overkill.
*overkills with pointy implements*
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 16:44,
archived)
*overkills with pointy implements*

IT CAN SIIIIIIIIIING!
Compo it.
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 16:19,
archived)
Compo it.

should turn it on her side, give it eyes and have her sing some
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 16:22,
archived)

Thanks now I have that song in my head.
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 16:28,
archived)

but this reminds me of Statler from the Muppets...

( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 16:27,
archived)



it's only 2 according to the news
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 15:57,
archived)

![Challenge Entry: Creepy Stuff [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)
I once wrote a program to display random images from the internet. Absolutely captivating, since you never knew what was going to pop up next. Surprisingly little porn, by the way.
Eventually I stopped using it, though, because of some of the fucked-up shit that popped up. Medical images, crime scenes, blood, gore and all manner of human depravity.
This one I've re-created, from a memory which is unfortunately burned into my brain. It was a photo, judging from the clothes and hairstyles probably taken in the late 1920s or early 1930s, showing what appears to be a suicide. The guy had hanged himself, with the added twist that he'd used a bound-up woman (presumably his wife or partner) as the counterweight. So that she had to watch him die, knowing that it was her weight that killed him...

I'd love someone to tell me that this was a scene from a film, rather than a real crime-scene photo.
Anyone?
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 15:44,
archived)
Eventually I stopped using it, though, because of some of the fucked-up shit that popped up. Medical images, crime scenes, blood, gore and all manner of human depravity.
This one I've re-created, from a memory which is unfortunately burned into my brain. It was a photo, judging from the clothes and hairstyles probably taken in the late 1920s or early 1930s, showing what appears to be a suicide. The guy had hanged himself, with the added twist that he'd used a bound-up woman (presumably his wife or partner) as the counterweight. So that she had to watch him die, knowing that it was her weight that killed him...

I'd love someone to tell me that this was a scene from a film, rather than a real crime-scene photo.
Anyone?



I'd be more pissed off about being tied up rather than any counterweight/guilt issue.
Very inventive though.
On the subject of "burned into my brain", I found an Imagine episode on the war photographer Don McCullin on my PVR the other day. There's some images in that I wish I'd never seen.
( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 15:57,
archived)
Very inventive though.
On the subject of "burned into my brain", I found an Imagine episode on the war photographer Don McCullin on my PVR the other day. There's some images in that I wish I'd never seen.

( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 19:07,
archived)

( ,
Thu 29 Aug 2013, 15:57,
archived)
« Older messages | Newer messages »
