apathetic- a reggae-ish hip hop tune...
I made this!
sorry about this shameful and spammy repost of this rap that i've done. hope folk who didn't see it last time see it this time. if you're wondering why i'm reposting let me say that i've written daily for ten years and have recorded a grand total of 11 songs in that whole time, the lyrics for this one took 3 or 4 months and i'm going to wring every bit of ear use i can out of it. throw your hands in the air if you're just apathetic! :D x
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 14:06, Reply)
sorry about this shameful and spammy repost of this rap that i've done. hope folk who didn't see it last time see it this time. if you're wondering why i'm reposting let me say that i've written daily for ten years and have recorded a grand total of 11 songs in that whole time, the lyrics for this one took 3 or 4 months and i'm going to wring every bit of ear use i can out of it. throw your hands in the air if you're just apathetic! :D x
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 14:06, Reply)
i shall tell anders, who wrote it, that you sid that. cheers! :D
edit: sid. said.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 15:41, Reply)
edit: sid. said.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 15:41, Reply)
did you get lessons from that phorcyte geezer?
hahaha just kidding with ya mate. This is great. There was another one you posted a while back which i loved (wish i could remember its name... poss about no one doing anything - i thought it was this one but its not reggae-ish)
nice rapping for a white british kid too. Do you write the music or just the lyrics, or how is all this done?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 18:09, Reply)
hahaha just kidding with ya mate. This is great. There was another one you posted a while back which i loved (wish i could remember its name... poss about no one doing anything - i thought it was this one but its not reggae-ish)
nice rapping for a white british kid too. Do you write the music or just the lyrics, or how is all this done?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 18:09, Reply)
i think it was this one.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2mGOiNOH7M i just write and perform the rapping and different people produce. i do stuff with a dude called anders and we're called burning bright. we have an ep that's coming out tomorrow. i'm pretty happy with it. apathetic is from that.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 18:53, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2mGOiNOH7M i just write and perform the rapping and different people produce. i do stuff with a dude called anders and we're called burning bright. we have an ep that's coming out tomorrow. i'm pretty happy with it. apathetic is from that.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 18:53, Reply)
あんた誰 ? (Who are you?)
Not weird or cruel in the slightest.
From this unsettling blog - cachorrodeperuca.tumblr.com/
A cat would look far sexier, etc, etc,
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:57, Reply)
Not weird or cruel in the slightest.
From this unsettling blog - cachorrodeperuca.tumblr.com/
A cat would look far sexier, etc, etc,
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:57, Reply)
Dishing the dirt on Colonel Sanders...
The FBI vault has hundreds of declassified documents full of facinating information, so why did I titter like a schoolgirl at the name of Colonel Sanders secretary on page 5? Answer: Because I'm a purile b3tan.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:34, Reply)
The FBI vault has hundreds of declassified documents full of facinating information, so why did I titter like a schoolgirl at the name of Colonel Sanders secretary on page 5? Answer: Because I'm a purile b3tan.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:34, Reply)
Who'd have thought hiding from the Nazis would be such a non-stop giggle-fest
A dramatisation of The Diary of Anne Frank on stage. The pictures make it look like Anne Frank had more fun with the Nazis than Max Mosley
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:42, Reply)
A dramatisation of The Diary of Anne Frank on stage. The pictures make it look like Anne Frank had more fun with the Nazis than Max Mosley
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:42, Reply)
Is this the same play
which, during one production was deemed so awful and cringe-inducing by the audience that when the Nazis appeared on stage to find Anne Frank several of them shouted out 'She's in the attic!'?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 13:25, Reply)
which, during one production was deemed so awful and cringe-inducing by the audience that when the Nazis appeared on stage to find Anne Frank several of them shouted out 'She's in the attic!'?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 13:25, Reply)
We all know this is how it should be:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXWrgnavIkY
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 15:57, Reply)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXWrgnavIkY
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 15:57, Reply)
Impressive!
but embarrassing if you're that bloke's son (though apparently that was the idea - mission accomplished!)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:25, Reply)
but embarrassing if you're that bloke's son (though apparently that was the idea - mission accomplished!)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:25, Reply)
CEO of a costume shop?
Unless he is the above, how much would that have cost him?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 13:04, Reply)
Unless he is the above, how much would that have cost him?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 13:04, Reply)
that's ace
(and don't they have an awesome view out of their house?)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 19:39, Reply)
(and don't they have an awesome view out of their house?)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 19:39, Reply)
10 + 10 X 0 = 10?
I am completely confused by this, I was taught Maths reads from left to right same as writing, the way I see it, you have 10 objects, you then add 10 objects, so you got 20, the multiplication tagged into the end makes no difference to anything because nothing is nothing so does nothing, you still have 20 objects*, it would only be 10 if it was done right to left (nothing times 10 equals nothing, plus 10) which almost everyone in the comments agrees is the correct way to do it.
WTF!?
Is this some major difference in math Merkin style or something, like the way they do dates, or is this some way of doing math where you perceive it as a formulae with entirely different rules rather than anything applicable to physical objects, read in the order written?
Discuss...
*edit* oopsie I forgot multiplication by zero is always zero regardless, confused by trying to think of it as physical objects, ignore that bit ;)
*edit edit* as my argument is invalid here's an appropriate picture:
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 10:51, Reply)
I am completely confused by this, I was taught Maths reads from left to right same as writing, the way I see it, you have 10 objects, you then add 10 objects, so you got 20, the multiplication tagged into the end makes no difference to anything because nothing is nothing so does nothing, you still have 20 objects*, it would only be 10 if it was done right to left (nothing times 10 equals nothing, plus 10) which almost everyone in the comments agrees is the correct way to do it.
WTF!?
Is this some major difference in math Merkin style or something, like the way they do dates, or is this some way of doing math where you perceive it as a formulae with entirely different rules rather than anything applicable to physical objects, read in the order written?
Discuss...
*edit* oopsie I forgot multiplication by zero is always zero regardless, confused by trying to think of it as physical objects, ignore that bit ;)
*edit edit* as my argument is invalid here's an appropriate picture:
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 10:51, Reply)
it's to do with order of operations
BIDMAS (Brackets, indices, division, multiplication, addition, subtraction).
If you calculate it following that order you get 10.
10 x 0 = 0
0 + 10 = 10
www.bbc.co.uk/schools/ks3bitesize/maths/number/order_operation/revise2.shtml
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 10:55, Reply)
BIDMAS (Brackets, indices, division, multiplication, addition, subtraction).
If you calculate it following that order you get 10.
10 x 0 = 0
0 + 10 = 10
www.bbc.co.uk/schools/ks3bitesize/maths/number/order_operation/revise2.shtml
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 10:55, Reply)
I was...
...absolutely amazed that WiL wasn't taught this in school.
And then I saw the replies about BIDMAS and realized I was taught something different in school... MDAS (My Dear Aunt Sally) for the order * / + -
Wheird.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:11, Reply)
...absolutely amazed that WiL wasn't taught this in school.
And then I saw the replies about BIDMAS and realized I was taught something different in school... MDAS (My Dear Aunt Sally) for the order * / + -
Wheird.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:11, Reply)
must be different all over the place
and depending on when you learnt it, I guess.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:29, Reply)
and depending on when you learnt it, I guess.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:29, Reply)
BIDMAS for me, too.
MDAS is fine, but it doesn't tell you about brackets or indeces.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:16, Reply)
MDAS is fine, but it doesn't tell you about brackets or indeces.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:16, Reply)
I was taught at school
the BODMAS rule, which is the order in which you would do the maths. BODMAS is brackets, or division, multipication, addition and subtraction, so in this case it would be 10 x 0 = 0; 0 + 10 = 10. Its been a fair few years since I've done this so I'm probably wrong...
EDIT: Turns out I was right!
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 10:57, Reply)
the BODMAS rule, which is the order in which you would do the maths. BODMAS is brackets, or division, multipication, addition and subtraction, so in this case it would be 10 x 0 = 0; 0 + 10 = 10. Its been a fair few years since I've done this so I'm probably wrong...
EDIT: Turns out I was right!
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 10:57, Reply)
I was taught the "O" in BODMAS was "order"
By which they meant exponentiation.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:39, Reply)
By which they meant exponentiation.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:39, Reply)
BIDMAS:
Brackets, indeces, division, multiplication, addition, subtraction. (A bit like PoM in the previous reply.)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:17, Reply)
Brackets, indeces, division, multiplication, addition, subtraction. (A bit like PoM in the previous reply.)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:17, Reply)
Priority of operatons
This isn't a left-right thing, it's priority of operations. Multiplies are higher priority so you do them first. This lets you write equations like a = 10b + 5c without tons of brackets (brackets say that a part of a formula has to be done first). With brackets the above is 10 + (10 * 0) = 10.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:00, Reply)
This isn't a left-right thing, it's priority of operations. Multiplies are higher priority so you do them first. This lets you write equations like a = 10b + 5c without tons of brackets (brackets say that a part of a formula has to be done first). With brackets the above is 10 + (10 * 0) = 10.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:00, Reply)
I have NEVER been taught this and I've programmed computers too, and it all worked fine and as expected,
as has it in the physical world, I understand that when brackets are used that means that that part of the equation must be done first, BUT I was never taught that when maths is written in a sentence like that that it is not to be read as a series of instructions, but as a 'math language' which has rules of order of execution regardless of lack of brackets.
This is weird, how can I not have known this till forty fucking three!?
My school teachers must have been shite!
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:11, Reply)
as has it in the physical world, I understand that when brackets are used that means that that part of the equation must be done first, BUT I was never taught that when maths is written in a sentence like that that it is not to be read as a series of instructions, but as a 'math language' which has rules of order of execution regardless of lack of brackets.
This is weird, how can I not have known this till forty fucking three!?
My school teachers must have been shite!
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:11, Reply)
chances are the compiler for your programming language will have taken care of precedence for you?
It's odd for a maths teacher to forgot to teach this...
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:19, Reply)
It's odd for a maths teacher to forgot to teach this...
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:19, Reply)
It was 1k basic
and you should know better, there was that or a 16k expansion pack! ;)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:21, Reply)
and you should know better, there was that or a 16k expansion pack! ;)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:21, Reply)
I can't believe you just tried to correct me on a retro issue.
I'm still right. The Sinclair BASIC language / OS was on an 8K ROM in the ZX81 (4K in the ZX80). Only the RAM size was 1K.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:28, Reply)
I'm still right. The Sinclair BASIC language / OS was on an 8K ROM in the ZX81 (4K in the ZX80). Only the RAM size was 1K.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:28, Reply)
Oh stop it!
I'm still reeling from the sudden knowledge there's a language to math I never knew about till now!
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:29, Reply)
I'm still reeling from the sudden knowledge there's a language to math I never knew about till now!
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:29, Reply)
oh dear oh dear
you weren't very good a programming then I gather?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 14:22, Reply)
you weren't very good a programming then I gather?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 14:22, Reply)
No discussion needed
Discuss? No need. Multiplying has a higher priority than adding.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:10, Reply)
Discuss? No need. Multiplying has a higher priority than adding.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:10, Reply)
Yeh I figured by asking the question I was gonna get a load of 'DHURR! YOU STUPEEED!' answers
but if you look at the comments above you can see a lot of people are equally confused and I wondered if there was a disparity of rules taught in different areas, as it's not something I recall ever having been taught and is entirely new to me, which cracks my head a little!
I can't help but wonder tho, as I'm now seeing it with fresh eyes, if the order it's written in is not the order in which it should be performed, then why not write it in the order it will?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:18, Reply)
but if you look at the comments above you can see a lot of people are equally confused and I wondered if there was a disparity of rules taught in different areas, as it's not something I recall ever having been taught and is entirely new to me, which cracks my head a little!
I can't help but wonder tho, as I'm now seeing it with fresh eyes, if the order it's written in is not the order in which it should be performed, then why not write it in the order it will?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:18, Reply)
It shouldn't matter which order it's written in...
...because it's always worked out in the correct order (usually).
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:34, Reply)
...because it's always worked out in the correct order (usually).
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:34, Reply)
I learned that if you need certian parts worked out first they should be in brackets
so I would have come up with 20. but if I put 10 + 10 x 0 in to a scientific calculator I get 10 but if I put it in to a normal calculator I get 0. Odd.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:13, Reply)
so I would have come up with 20. but if I put 10 + 10 x 0 in to a scientific calculator I get 10 but if I put it in to a normal calculator I get 0. Odd.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:13, Reply)
Yeh...
...pocket calculators don't evaluate the entire expression when you press 'equals,' it performs that operation to the result of the previous operations, so 1 + 2 * 3 will be evaluated as (1 + 2) * 3, when you should think of it as 1 + (2 * 3).
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:20, Reply)
...pocket calculators don't evaluate the entire expression when you press 'equals,' it performs that operation to the result of the previous operations, so 1 + 2 * 3 will be evaluated as (1 + 2) * 3, when you should think of it as 1 + (2 * 3).
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:20, Reply)
Yeh if I ask Google as a whole maths problem it says 10
but if I type it into a simple handheld calculator it says 20, presumably tho 'cos I'm not changing the order.
Confusing!
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:20, Reply)
but if I type it into a simple handheld calculator it says 20, presumably tho 'cos I'm not changing the order.
Confusing!
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:20, Reply)
It should say 0...
...because the final operation is multiply by 0, which is always, you guessed, 0.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:30, Reply)
...because the final operation is multiply by 0, which is always, you guessed, 0.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:30, Reply)
Oh yeh correct,
sorry I got that wrong!
Jeez it's a LONG time since i had to do math in my head, curse of the modern world I guess!
*edit* Which means I wrote my OP wrong too, DUH! I think I regressed to my 8 yo self when we were taught to do basic maths problems with pennies, I forgot a multiplication by zero is zero rather than thinking of it as unchanged physical objects, same as a division by zero is INFINITY AND BEYOND!!
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:35, Reply)
sorry I got that wrong!
Jeez it's a LONG time since i had to do math in my head, curse of the modern world I guess!
*edit* Which means I wrote my OP wrong too, DUH! I think I regressed to my 8 yo self when we were taught to do basic maths problems with pennies, I forgot a multiplication by zero is zero rather than thinking of it as unchanged physical objects, same as a division by zero is INFINITY AND BEYOND!!
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:35, Reply)
I tend to say a math problem, or doing math,
and maths as the subject.
I think there's a difference in American English and English English to that end and as ever when that happens the two end up being sort of mashed together.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:06, Reply)
and maths as the subject.
I think there's a difference in American English and English English to that end and as ever when that happens the two end up being sort of mashed together.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:06, Reply)
Strange
I was only taught that brackets came first, I thought the answer was 0 too.
I did higher level Maths in secondary school, but this is the first I heard of any BIDMAS/PODMAS rule.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:29, Reply)
I was only taught that brackets came first, I thought the answer was 0 too.
I did higher level Maths in secondary school, but this is the first I heard of any BIDMAS/PODMAS rule.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:29, Reply)
Well I'm glad I'm not the only one with the balls to admit they never knew about it
out of curiousity what age are you as I'm wondering if this was simply accidentally missed off of the teachers text books back in the day (I'm 43).
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:32, Reply)
out of curiousity what age are you as I'm wondering if this was simply accidentally missed off of the teachers text books back in the day (I'm 43).
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:32, Reply)
I'm glad you mentioned it...
...we've got a fairly lively discussion going and a whole lot of knowledgable people all saying they've been taught different things at school...
(edit)
I started doing Maths at 'A'-level and I remember being taught Multiplication came before Division (as has also been mentioned here).
I guess, within a given group of people (say, a regional area) if everyone uses the same notation, it doesn't matter as everyone will get the same answer. It's when you go wider that you get problems...
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:39, Reply)
...we've got a fairly lively discussion going and a whole lot of knowledgable people all saying they've been taught different things at school...
(edit)
I started doing Maths at 'A'-level and I remember being taught Multiplication came before Division (as has also been mentioned here).
I guess, within a given group of people (say, a regional area) if everyone uses the same notation, it doesn't matter as everyone will get the same answer. It's when you go wider that you get problems...
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:39, Reply)
What freeks me about this tho is my concept of the application of math is apparently entirely wrong and has been all my life
yet my application of it day to day has always produced the answers *I* perceive as correct and it's always done what I expected it to.
That's really rather odd, you would have thought at some point I'd have had something throw up an anomaly that made me think 'WTF!?' and question what I was doing wrong, esp when using ye olde computers that had to be programmed...
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:46, Reply)
yet my application of it day to day has always produced the answers *I* perceive as correct and it's always done what I expected it to.
That's really rather odd, you would have thought at some point I'd have had something throw up an anomaly that made me think 'WTF!?' and question what I was doing wrong, esp when using ye olde computers that had to be programmed...
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:46, Reply)
Hahaha!
Yeh ya just used the Dragon 32's preloaded games engine that emulated 3 dimensional physics for you, eh?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 20:58, Reply)
Yeh ya just used the Dragon 32's preloaded games engine that emulated 3 dimensional physics for you, eh?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 20:58, Reply)
Dragon 32!? Ha ha ha!
I had a proper computer - 64 all the way. :-).
( , Mon 6 Jun 2011, 21:53, Reply)
I had a proper computer - 64 all the way. :-).
( , Mon 6 Jun 2011, 21:53, Reply)
I'm 24, so I don't think it has to do with when we were in school.
I'm also Irish so maybe our curriculum hasn't caught up yet?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 13:10, Reply)
It's the BODMAS thing.
Seems silly, but try solving more complex equations without using it. You can't.
I can't remember being taught it at school either. I came across it in 'Advanced Homework for Adults' last year.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:45, Reply)
Seems silly, but try solving more complex equations without using it. You can't.
I can't remember being taught it at school either. I came across it in 'Advanced Homework for Adults' last year.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:45, Reply)
I've been looking up that BODMAS acronym since I started this discussion
and altho some folks seem confused as to what the O is I know and knew ALL parts the acronym stands for, I simply was never told there was a set order of execution if no brackets or exponents were present.
God my mind is literally blown that I've got THIS far in life without knowing that, weird!
*goes to lie down*
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:03, Reply)
and altho some folks seem confused as to what the O is I know and knew ALL parts the acronym stands for, I simply was never told there was a set order of execution if no brackets or exponents were present.
God my mind is literally blown that I've got THIS far in life without knowing that, weird!
*goes to lie down*
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:03, Reply)
I was taught it when I was 11.
I'd met brackets by that point, but the notion of powers was utterly alien at that stage.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:19, Reply)
I'd met brackets by that point, but the notion of powers was utterly alien at that stage.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:19, Reply)
Try going to a welsh school mate.
now that will mess your maths up.
:(
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:19, Reply)
now that will mess your maths up.
:(
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:19, Reply)
I never got my head around 'a minus x a minus = a possitive'
If I don't have 3 oranges and multiply that by not having 2 oranges I now somehow have 5 oranges!!! Think I got caned at school for "arguing" with the teacher about that one. Load of old bollocks maths
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 15:28, Reply)
If I don't have 3 oranges and multiply that by not having 2 oranges I now somehow have 5 oranges!!! Think I got caned at school for "arguing" with the teacher about that one. Load of old bollocks maths
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 15:28, Reply)
I think I was taught this at pretty much every level of my education..
So I've known this since the first time multiplication and division came up in first or second grade. And it was STILL mentioned when we took our first courses in programming, because things like this exist: www.cs.uwf.edu/~eelsheik/cop2253/resources/op_precedence.html
I remember being shown some ridiculous, long strings of +, -, = signs and bracets with two or three variables within, each appearing a few times; and then being assigned the task of puzzling out the end values of all those variables. Mostly it was to give us an example of how NOT to program and encourage us to strive towards producing readable code, of course. It certainly is possible to handle precedence correctly with just a generous use of brackets, even if you ignore all the other rules, and often that can be the easiest to read also.
Anyway, my mind is blown that not all people know about this.. Either teaching has gone up a long way in ~20 years, or I have just been lucky with my maths education :)
( , Mon 6 Jun 2011, 21:37, Reply)
So I've known this since the first time multiplication and division came up in first or second grade. And it was STILL mentioned when we took our first courses in programming, because things like this exist: www.cs.uwf.edu/~eelsheik/cop2253/resources/op_precedence.html
I remember being shown some ridiculous, long strings of +, -, = signs and bracets with two or three variables within, each appearing a few times; and then being assigned the task of puzzling out the end values of all those variables. Mostly it was to give us an example of how NOT to program and encourage us to strive towards producing readable code, of course. It certainly is possible to handle precedence correctly with just a generous use of brackets, even if you ignore all the other rules, and often that can be the easiest to read also.
Anyway, my mind is blown that not all people know about this.. Either teaching has gone up a long way in ~20 years, or I have just been lucky with my maths education :)
( , Mon 6 Jun 2011, 21:37, Reply)
Great find......
Absolutely captures the true spirit of football.
Everyone there playing with a smile on their faces, I'd love to see a European pro side do this at least once a season.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:00, Reply)
Absolutely captures the true spirit of football.
Everyone there playing with a smile on their faces, I'd love to see a European pro side do this at least once a season.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:00, Reply)
I'd like to learn to spin wool and knit my own socks. Clickyvondicky.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 9:03, Reply)
Surprisingly, this is ace!
Baton twirling for the office, hypnotic&-)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 10:37, Reply)
Baton twirling for the office, hypnotic&-)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 10:37, Reply)
That would look simply amazing
with a small glow stick in the dark.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 15:35, Reply)
with a small glow stick in the dark.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 15:35, Reply)
I didn't know there were such things as star volcanologists
And er, do people die in the video then?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 4:14, Reply)
And er, do people die in the video then?
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 4:14, Reply)
It is an unfortunate side effect
Of running up to exploding volcanoes and looking into them as hot magma and toxic gases spew out. To be fair though, the actual volcanic effect that did for them would've killed them if they'd been a couple of miles down the mountain anyway, so, so much for caution.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 10:21, Reply)
Of running up to exploding volcanoes and looking into them as hot magma and toxic gases spew out. To be fair though, the actual volcanic effect that did for them would've killed them if they'd been a couple of miles down the mountain anyway, so, so much for caution.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 10:21, Reply)
I remember watching this at school
It made me laugh at the time. That seems a bit strange now.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 15:55, Reply)
It made me laugh at the time. That seems a bit strange now.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 15:55, Reply)
Random bit of culture,
I stumbled upon this. Estonia has a fucking massive choir recital every year. It has about a thousand singers and about 10 million people at the event (that's what it looks like).
It doesnt sound exciting, but about a minute in, some of you will be a bit impressed. I was. Loads of people singing. Loads of people watching. Big thing.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 2:17, Reply)
I stumbled upon this. Estonia has a fucking massive choir recital every year. It has about a thousand singers and about 10 million people at the event (that's what it looks like).
It doesnt sound exciting, but about a minute in, some of you will be a bit impressed. I was. Loads of people singing. Loads of people watching. Big thing.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 2:17, Reply)
pretty impessive
love to of heard them blast out this...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDFFHaz9GsY
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 2:29, Reply)
love to of heard them blast out this...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDFFHaz9GsY
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 2:29, Reply)
Ah, Laulupidu! An amazing event; happens every 5 years (next one is 2014).
There's an amazing documentary all about the Soviet occupation of Estonia called 'The Singing Revolution'; they literally regained their independence through the power of song. Almost like a perfect sequel to the Sound of Music!
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 3:19, Reply)
There's an amazing documentary all about the Soviet occupation of Estonia called 'The Singing Revolution'; they literally regained their independence through the power of song. Almost like a perfect sequel to the Sound of Music!
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 3:19, Reply)
Not quite "literally".
I think the political instability in the Soviet Union might have had something to do with it ;-).
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:02, Reply)
I think the political instability in the Soviet Union might have had something to do with it ;-).
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 11:02, Reply)
True, but I'm looking at it through my Julie Andrews tinted eyes. *runs down a hill tralalala-ing*
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 14:44, Reply)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 14:44, Reply)
Lifeforce - Altitude. Nice mellow old school piano house tune.
I just banged my head on the edge of the telly really hard. It hurts. There's a lump. So here's a tune.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 1:51, Reply)
I just banged my head on the edge of the telly really hard. It hurts. There's a lump. So here's a tune.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 1:51, Reply)
This had been a public service announcement on behalf of the Cataract Sufferers Society.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 1:42, Reply)
beaut.i.ful
One of the albums of the year (doesn't beat Nicolas Jaar, but it's an honerable contender regardless).
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:12, Reply)
One of the albums of the year (doesn't beat Nicolas Jaar, but it's an honerable contender regardless).
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 12:12, Reply)
Shampoo prank.
A simple yet effective prank, though he does start to have a bit of a mental breakdown after a while.
( , Sat 4 Jun 2011, 23:55, Reply)
A simple yet effective prank, though he does start to have a bit of a mental breakdown after a while.
( , Sat 4 Jun 2011, 23:55, Reply)
ha ha
poor bugger, I bet his eyes were closed so there's double teh fear.....oh lord....teh fear!!: D
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 0:06, Reply)
poor bugger, I bet his eyes were closed so there's double teh fear.....oh lord....teh fear!!: D
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 0:06, Reply)
yeah, but it isn't really used here anymore
as it has slightly racist overtones. ("Hey, here comes that negro...") And although it means black in French, the rest of the words are in English, which is strange.
( , Sat 4 Jun 2011, 23:47, Reply)
as it has slightly racist overtones. ("Hey, here comes that negro...") And although it means black in French, the rest of the words are in English, which is strange.
( , Sat 4 Jun 2011, 23:47, Reply)
Well, it looks like ones in English, one's in French and one's in Spanish.
( , Sat 4 Jun 2011, 23:51, Reply)
( , Sat 4 Jun 2011, 23:51, Reply)
Yeah I picked it up pretty easily.
At 3 years old I could get by, hold a conversation by about 6 years old and fully mastered English by about 13.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 0:13, Reply)
At 3 years old I could get by, hold a conversation by about 6 years old and fully mastered English by about 13.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 0:13, Reply)
it's more of a spanish thing I think. Not English.
either way, nothing racist of course. I think Stevie Wonder has his own company El Toro Negro. Black Bull. So as far as racist overtones go I think Negro may be a safe bet in some places. Just saying like.
: )
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 0:02, Reply)
either way, nothing racist of course. I think Stevie Wonder has his own company El Toro Negro. Black Bull. So as far as racist overtones go I think Negro may be a safe bet in some places. Just saying like.
: )
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 0:02, Reply)
Yes i realise that
It's the humourous juxtaposition of the english-looking words on the third line with the word negro.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 9:44, Reply)
It's the humourous juxtaposition of the english-looking words on the third line with the word negro.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 9:44, Reply)
"War School" - ( NSFW)
NSFW
Just a reminder to us how civilised an environment we live in compared to
some other parts of the world. Video ends at 6:16, the rest is credits.
Very reluctant NSFW for one "F" bomb.
( , Sat 4 Jun 2011, 22:06, Reply)
Just a reminder to us how civilised an environment we live in compared to
some other parts of the world. Video ends at 6:16, the rest is credits.
Very reluctant NSFW for one "F" bomb.
( , Sat 4 Jun 2011, 22:06, Reply)
Up to the "making an example" bit
It seemed familiar. A good friend grew up in East Germany, her PE lessons included being taught how to throw grenades and she reckons she can still strip and reassemble a rifle should the need arise.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 1:59, Reply)
It seemed familiar. A good friend grew up in East Germany, her PE lessons included being taught how to throw grenades and she reckons she can still strip and reassemble a rifle should the need arise.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 1:59, Reply)
Tempest 2000 for DOS!
Following yesterday's post about Jaggi T2k, and having dug out my Jaggi and T2K cart and played it lots, I remembered I use to have the DOS version on CD-ROM.
You'll need to sign up for the site, and grab a copy of DOSbox but it's totally worth it.
( , Sat 4 Jun 2011, 21:52, Reply)
Following yesterday's post about Jaggi T2k, and having dug out my Jaggi and T2K cart and played it lots, I remembered I use to have the DOS version on CD-ROM.
You'll need to sign up for the site, and grab a copy of DOSbox but it's totally worth it.
( , Sat 4 Jun 2011, 21:52, Reply)
IT Engineer
he's a senior IT engineer. He forgot to switch to English.
"You may need to apply percussive maintenance or enact power cycling to rectify the technical aberration."
"What!?"
"Hit it or turn it off and on again until it works."
"Oh, right..."
Translation of the OP: You can play a version of the old Jaguar's Tempest 2000 game (Tempest updated in a Rave stylee) on your PC by going to the above linked site, but you gotta sign up first to get to the downloadable freebies.
K!? ;)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 8:02, Reply)
he's a senior IT engineer. He forgot to switch to English.
"You may need to apply percussive maintenance or enact power cycling to rectify the technical aberration."
"What!?"
"Hit it or turn it off and on again until it works."
"Oh, right..."
Translation of the OP: You can play a version of the old Jaguar's Tempest 2000 game (Tempest updated in a Rave stylee) on your PC by going to the above linked site, but you gotta sign up first to get to the downloadable freebies.
K!? ;)
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 8:02, Reply)
Feels a bit laggy on the keys
Not fast enough I reckon. But I did find Another World on that site, that's a splendid game
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 3:15, Reply)
Not fast enough I reckon. But I did find Another World on that site, that's a splendid game
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 3:15, Reply)
I was impressed by the Midi interpretation of the T2K ravey soundtrack
it manages pretty well considering!
Yeh there's lots of other stuff on there, Shalroth was going thru it for about 2 hours last night, got addicted to some Duke Nukem/Doom looking thing for a bit, sorry dint catch the name, but it looked pretty cool.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 9:29, Reply)
it manages pretty well considering!
Yeh there's lots of other stuff on there, Shalroth was going thru it for about 2 hours last night, got addicted to some Duke Nukem/Doom looking thing for a bit, sorry dint catch the name, but it looked pretty cool.
( , Sun 5 Jun 2011, 9:29, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »