www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEtWGBVdszk
(, Sun 12 May 2019, 18:48, Reply)
That's the first Boards track that i heard. ( seems like so long ago ).
I went on a stint of collecting their albums afterwards.
(, Mon 13 May 2019, 3:39, Reply)
In case they accidentally pull over the wrong one?
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 15:56, Reply)
This week I visit Lichfield, which has good tat all round! I chose a haunted painting.
Went for a horror film this week!
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 10:32, Reply)
This https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-_QHgLo-0Y
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 12:22, Reply)
Bjork just put out this new video. Whatever you think of her music (I love it, can appreciate lots of people really don't) this is a simply jaw-dropping bit of animation.
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 0:53, Reply)
But her earlier stuff is dope. Missed the opportunity to see her a few years ago as tickets were nearly a hundred quid each which I thought was a rip off. I then saw a documentary afterwards about the gig and it had these crazy giant one of a kind sculpted instruments imported from Iceland, a hundred quid would've been a bargain!
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 7:24, Reply)
It sounded like somebody throttling a weasel.
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 7:58, Reply)
Test subject #1: Dormouse.
Result: No.
Test subject #2: Kingfisher.
Result: No.
Test subject #3: Stoat.
Result: Close, but not quite.
Test subject #4: Bobcat.
Result: OWFUCKOWGETITOFFME!
Test subject #5: Weasel.
Result: I think we've got it.
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 9:06, Reply)
The recent IPBES Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services has identified simile research for online comments as the main global threat to wildlife.
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 9:55, Reply)
It's got more and more sterile and forgettable. No doubt my ageing ears/opinions
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 8:29, Reply)
But it's a pretty good trick.
Preferred the Sugarcubes just for the wider variety of songs.
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 18:27, Reply)
The name escapes me, but it involved some chanting about "Bad Kangaroo".
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 19:21, Reply)
A game which won't be out until the back end of the year, which I've been lucky enough to play early. I'm available for voice acting if anyone is keen...
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 22:15, Reply)
with a funky flutey vibes soundtrack
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 20:16, Reply)
Relaxing as fuck video on silk making
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 16:47, Reply)
'Extracting raw silk starts by cultivating the silkworms on mulberry leaves. Once the worms start pupating in their cocoons, these are dissolved in boiling water in order for individual long fibres to be extracted and fed into the spinning reel.
To produce 1 kg of silk, 104 kg of mulberry leaves must be eaten by 3000 silkworms. It takes about 5000 silkworms to make a pure silk kimono.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 18:15, Reply)
I hope a massive primark doesnt open nearby selling cheap bastard disney pyjamas or theyre all fucked
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 20:30, Reply)
I've never seen the silk from the cocoons just stretched out to a massive sheet - it's got incredible properties. I thought it was always pulled off the cocoon in a single thread, which in itself seems quite implausible - it's bad enough trying to undo a small ball of tangled string. Now I'm wondering how the hell they find the start of the thread - time for a bit of research!
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 20:50, Reply)
I think the larva extrudes a mess back and forth on twigs before making the cocoon to hold it in place on the bush. I think that's where they start.
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 1:15, Reply)
Cheers for that - I read that they use a brush on the wet cocoon to find the end, but on its own that doesn't give much detail. If there's going to be a thicker bit where it was joined to the twig I can see how it would work. I still find it incredible that you can pull the single thread off without it snagging or getting tangled.
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 9:14, Reply)
I know some of you have decent taste in music, so I thought I'd bring your attention to The Wildhearts having released a new album last week. It's fantabulous!
NSFW: video contains rudies, bewbies and horror movies.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 11:34, Reply)
There's a decent psychobilly type track on it though.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 11:50, Reply)
Well the Wildhearts one is winging it's way to me from Amazon now.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 13:58, Reply)
I'm waiting for the 12 inches I ordered to come through my slot, so I've got it on loop on the old splottify.
Saw them last year on the Britpop Must Be Destroyed tour, they were soup herb.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 14:07, Reply)
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 11:44, Reply)
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 11:57, Reply)
It did for the Chili Peppers.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 12:00, Reply)
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 8:33, Reply)
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 11:58, Reply)
Where's my time machine?
Come on - WHERE IS IT?
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 13:22, Reply)
Close your eyes.
Wait a while.
Open them.
Now you're in the future.
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 4:14, Reply)
The past and future don't exist, therefore nobody can be there.
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 17:05, Reply)
But I'm sure the astronauts in orbit experience time dilation effects and therefore are ever so slightly in the future. Time is not a straight, flat line.
(, Sun 12 May 2019, 7:19, Reply)
Having only seen snippets and not being interested in the twitters. but this video does a very good job of highlighting the fact that he is a wrong thinking racist cunt. The fist part about alexa nearly lost me because it was a pretty weak argument. The the rest of it however, was very strong and proved the point very well.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 14:10, Reply)
but I wonder what he's done to merit a 36 minute meta-analysis inevident in his opinions?
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 14:15, Reply)
it's only satire! see also 'it's only a prank, bro'
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 17:25, Reply)
I get a chance to not vote for the tit in a few days time which adds a bit of interest
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 15:57, Reply)
Be sure to savour that frisson of power and influence that not voting for someone gives you. Oh man, that's the good stuff.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 19:12, Reply)
With the exception of the "Vincent" tape-gone-wrong thing, even as an easy to please kid nothing he did even raised a smile out of me. 4 Eva in R harts, the bestest ever comedian to gag the media from reporting that he fondled a kid, good riddance to the unfunny cunt.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 1:39, Reply)
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 12:00, Reply)
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 12:46, Reply)
(, Sun 12 May 2019, 16:53, Reply)
But then again nothing from that period does because the world has changed too and the simple, music hall slapstick seems tired and dated. Even classic comedy like Monty Python leaves me cold now when I know I found it hilarious when I watched it live. I doubt most of the the things we laugh at today will age well either, the Little Britain team already cringe over what they did not so long ago.
Having said all that, I think it misses the point to judge old TV by the standards of today, tastes change and humour gets more sophisticated. So I'm telling myself I'm wrong to be so harsh on it as well, you have to remember what it was like when you saw it for the first time as a kid. And thinking about it that way, I enjoyed Starr's unpredictability in live performance, but the filmed stuff never really worked. It doesn't capture the manic behaviour. It seems old hat now but you really didn't know what he would do next and that was truly exciting back then.
As for his personal life, I am sure he could be a dick, but judging behaviour (and I mean non-criminal behaviour) by today's standards won't give you any insight into how someone compared to those around them, although it may make you feel morally superior if that's what you are looking for.
(, Sun 12 May 2019, 21:42, Reply)

A mix of music from 1913, this is the year of Hot Dance Ragtime which you've never heard of but which is a weird and brilliant thing, so come listen.
Since last time I posted something here I've made a new version of my earliest mix, because I found a load of other recordings and wasn't happy with the blog post. So, the new one is here - centuriesofsound.com/2019/04/17/1853-1860/ - and our new start date is 1853.
Also I've been nominated for this thing, which is next week - www.britishpodcastawards.com/noms19 - so wish me luck or misfortune or something.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:42, Reply)
And it's all quality, I really enjoy them. Cheers.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 22:07, Reply)
My 11yo niece is having her head shaved so that it can be made into a wig for someone with cancer. It's a pretty brave thing for a young girl to do and she's struggling to make her target. Even if you can spare a pound, it'd be greatly appreciated.
Thanks and goodnight z z z
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:39, Reply)
bit skint right now but have lots of hair - let me know if you need any extra hair
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:44, Reply)
My sister in law has passed on thanks to you ask too, she's right chuffed.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 21:54, Reply)
I'm having trouble understanding how this exists...
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 20:46, Reply)
I found it particularly amusing.
(Note, I'm not in favour of Brexit, but I'm fully in favour of anyone telling a room full of tabloid journalists where they should shove themselves.)
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 19:46, Reply)
in charge of assessing which women their brown trousers should rape?
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 20:05, Reply)
Though I understand he's in charge of assessing which women that they won't rape.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 21:36, Reply)
“I suppose with enough pressure I might cave.”
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:03, Reply)
But I will say that's clearly intended as a throwaway joke, whether anyone finds it funny or not.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:38, Reply)
But I'd say that given the context, you'd have to either be pretty thick or willfully obtuse not to also see that.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:57, Reply)
as though its weighty and thoughtful. Is it a placeholder, or the end of the discussion?
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 23:10, Reply)
that Jess Philips was talking about receiving threats on Twitter, and he @d her to say he'd not rape her, then encouraged a pile-on.
"Banter"
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 0:15, Reply)
or he intended it to be seen by his followers, and he must know that his fans will pile on because they always do. I mean, why else would he put "Please do not contact the subjects of any of my videos, ever" on his YouTube channel if he wasn't looking to shirk responsibility for something he knows will happen anyway - it's a shitty disclaimer. And if he didn't expect his fans to see the message, what response do you think he wanted to his 'joke' in the first place?
Besides, he @ed in someone with something he knew would upset her, which I'd say *contextually* makes it not "clearly intended as a throwaway joke".
He's a bully. Most bullying behaviour is technically 'jokes' - bullies laugh when they bogwash someone. I'm not sure when something being a joke became an excuse for anything. I wouldn't read it as a *literal* rape threat, but I would read it as malicious communications.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 13:18, Reply)
The test is, if you 'joke' back they get very upset.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 14:56, Reply)
Also he didn't bogwash anyone (which would of course actually be assault), which is an entirely different thing.
And also, the answer is no, he did literally the opposite of inciting a pile on.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 15:08, Reply)
The context was @ing someone in with abuse, which clearly falls under the malicious communications act.
You haven't said why it is clearly a joke given that context.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 16:54, Reply)
There's no threat there. There's no profanity. According to case law it would not be considered grossly offensive. The only thing it actually contains is an implication that she's ugly. I think you'd need some pretty interesting chicanery to actually classify this as abuse from a legal standpoint.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 17:05, Reply)
your neighbours' letterbox with his joke on them. See how you get on.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 19:18, Reply)
doesn't mean it isn't a joke. Your face for example.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 19:28, Reply)
Something that disproportionately effects one side of the population - many on a day to day level because of trauma - is funny to the other side!
Da boom tish. /s
As a side note; I think it's probably funny to some ill informed, lucky or naive people because they don't understand that yes; at various parties, functions, "comings of age" men have pressured other men into raping women.
[EDIT: You're a man, because you hurt someone who isn't. Is probably the most essential motto of this ethos/thinking.]
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 3:38, Reply)
this fucking thread. fuck off edgelord
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 16:27, Reply)
Also, a bit rich coming from you Coulter, don't you think?
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 17:07, Reply)
I'm the fluffiest bunnie in the whole warren. And I've never found 'I'd smash the back doors off that' or 'wouldn't even rape her' remotely amusing. The guy is a fucking cock and deserves ever milkshake he gets.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 17:23, Reply)
She really does deserve worse.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 18:10, Reply)
Does this you mean you're actually concerned what people around think of you? That would be tragic for many reasons.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 19:29, Reply)
Does Jess Philips deserve 'worse' than rape threats for the crime of not agreeing with vile-edgelord?
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 19:27, Reply)
1. It was never a threat.
2. That isn't the reason.
Why you so bummed dude? I thought being an edgelord was kinda your thing? Anyway just click ignore and it's over, instead of replying with something you know doesn't make any sense.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 19:33, Reply)
1. By saying you *wouldn't * rape someone, you're saying you would rape someone else
2. Then saying you would rape them if you were drunk enough is a rape threat
3. It's vile,stupid and unfunny whether you accept the above or not
4. saying she deserves worse is bone-heaed , tone-deaf vile, stupid etc
5. Why is the onus on me to leave the room rather than making you stop saying shit - after all if this was a pub car park at closing time, you would not be saying this.
6. Stop talking shit.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 20:42, Reply)
1. Not actually correct.
2. Arguable, though I disagree in this case.
3. Subjective.
4. Subjective.
5. You don't have to read it or reply. This is not even slightly like a room, nor a pub car park. You're dangerously close to being a hard man on the internet.
6. You too.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 21:18, Reply)
Against the most dreary fuckers on the board. I think he can handle it.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 19:04, Reply)
Too many things to reply to, its easy to miss a few or not give them all due consideration.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 19:38, Reply)
Almost as if the far right tits here are copying his tactics entirely
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 21:50, Reply)
But as an example of the problem the media has in the UK, take a look at the coverage of this Danny Baker tweet. Pretty much every story directly calls him racist, with the reader's interpretation of the message being confused with the sender's intent. Essentially the media as a whole has constructed a strawman with his name on it. He's guilty of crimes that he's committed in other people's imaginations, and that's all that matters.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:49, Reply)
'Professional gobshite says something without thinking, gets sack' is a story as old as time.
The problem is insidious cunts like this one making people think that everything they've been told their whole lives is a sham in order to get elected. You'll notice he doesnt mention the trustpilot reviews of the actual tabloids. Why? Because they're mostly on his side
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 10:49, Reply)
Any entertainment organisation can fire anyone at any time, on the basis of public opinion... from a commercial point of view an entertainer's entire purpose is to be popular, and if they're not popular it is not tenable to keep them (though they should have just said that, rather than pretending the tweet was racist).
The problem is intentionally selecting the worst possible interpretation of some facts specifically to paint someone in a bad light, and shouting down any attempt by a person to clarify what they mean because that would require the media to admit that they'd jumped to conclusions and got it wrong.
He mentioned the trustpilot scores of the top 3 television news organisations and none of the papers, but they're not on his side in the slightest. The daily mail has wasted no time; they've already smeared him as a pedo... as has the sun and the mirror. He was referring to all of them, and they know that and they've brought out the biggest gun they can.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 11:14, Reply)
I'm telling you why you're wrong, and how you're thick.
And which cunt in particular?
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 12:55, Reply)
The fact that I'm being as civil to you as I am is already rather generous.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 15:10, Reply)
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 21:05, Reply)
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 21:03, Reply)
hanging around with unsuccessful clones of yourself.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 21:11, Reply)
debating society tory pricks at sixth form, my uni housemate's cunt friend from school who is apparently "a fucking ledge", the loudest one from an obnoxious group of posh backpackers at a hostel in Budapest, there are many of them around, think it just takes that mixture of arrogance, selfishness, cruelty and pig-headedness public schools seem to nurture in some people.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 21:53, Reply)
But then that goes with the territory when you're rinsing people constantly and without apology.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 21:35, Reply)
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 21:39, Reply)
I don't moderate your feed. I think that might be a Ben Shapiro thing.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 21:41, Reply)
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 21:41, Reply)
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 21:15, Reply)
which pretend like they're not biased, are considerably more of a problem than someone who is open about the fact they're biased. He's not in any way pretending to be non partisan
Also, what false information has he disseminated?
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 21:48, Reply)
I'm enjoying him telling a room full of journalists to eat a dick.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:29, Reply)
Not sure precisely what cultural marxism means? Is that referring to no-platforming of dissenting opinions or what?
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:41, Reply)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0_HgiiukIME
Here he is making an absolute dogs dinner of loads of unrelated concepts.
You can tell he's on the conspiracy version of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frankfurt_School#Cultural_Marxism_conspiracy_theory because he's talking about the critique of the enlightenment, and attacks on rationalism itself.
Frighteningly similar to the core aspect in the Nazi's anti Jewish rhetoric that led them into a war aimed at wiping out the 'threat to western civilization'.
The guy thinking reading something in a sarcastic voice, and then scoffing makes him an intellectual. Best case he doesn't know shit, worst case he know's what he's doing and is muddying the waters for actual Neo Nazi cunts.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 0:37, Reply)
I don't agree with them. Though a guy sarcastically scoffing without any input is kinda par for the course round here though, so I can't really knock it too much.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 18:35, Reply)
He's entertaining perhaps, but he's also a gatekeeper into a downward spiral of scum, it all starts with his main lesson which is teaching people to skim read and then dismiss opponents out of hand. As if mindless scorn were a meaningful response.
It's the antithesis of critical thought.
It's your life and all, but the more you watch him, the angrier and stupider you'll get.
Why not learn, or create something new instead?
Life's short man, let the hateful wallow in their own shit.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 21:54, Reply)
Incidentally I've not watched him much. Just this and maybe half of two other videos, which were considerably less interesting.
I don't think there's any particular risk to my critical faculties, since I don't really agree with much of what I heard. But I'm not prepared to dismiss everything someone says out of hand just because of other things they've said or who they associate with, and that goes equally for this guy as it does for people at the other end like John McDonnell.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 23:21, Reply)
Just keep an eye on it. This lot are an extremely effective, well oiled machine when it comes to pushing the harder stuff, and they'll sneak it up on you very gradually.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 23:42, Reply)
His "I'm not pretending to be non-partisan" thing is the same thing Trump peddles, "they're all crooks, so vote for the one who puts it all out in the open" - but the thing is they aren't all crooks, some are better and some are worse, why on earth would you choosing to go for the worst one of all instead of doing your duty as a human and using your judgement?
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:11, Reply)
unrelated but: kottke.org/19/05/the-beginning-of-recorded-sound
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:24, Reply)
He didn't link to my site at all, which is a bit weird, the track on mixcloud has 3400 plays now though.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:30, Reply)
how hard would it have been to make the first three words a link?
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:42, Reply)
Dunno if it's worth emailing him, maybe he didn't like the rest of the site, just that bit.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:44, Reply)
I don't agree with much of what he says to be honest I just like the fact he is unafraid to tell journalists what he thinks of them, instead of that sickeningly faux contriteness they always demand and receive from politicians.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:53, Reply)
don't be a sucker: www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwGLSuP4t7U
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 22:57, Reply)
I look forward to seeing more of it in the near future.
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 23:11, Reply)
journalists do their job. you post edgelord videos from loser racists who love doxxing women.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 17:49, Reply)
They can still be cunts.
I posted a video that contained no racism or doxxing.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 18:12, Reply)
and that makes you a cunt.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 20:56, Reply)
I'm enjoying a video that has nothing to do with doxxing anyone. You're winding yourself up because of your own hypothesis about what I think about the guy. Kinda makes you the cunt.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 21:20, Reply)
All he knows is the internet. He thinks that tabloid journalists are thick and can be played. But they're more intelligent than their broadsheet counterparts, with added ruthlessness and they (unlike a YouTuber) genuinely shape opinion. For anyone in public life, they are to be feared above all else.
There's no equivalent in America, so Trump sailed through. But in the UK, no-one insults the tabloids with impunity (except Coogan and Hugh Grant, whose careers are set and who both know the worst is out there). UKIP are fucked now. And Farage - who's wise to the game, and who is a very great deal more sinister than Akkad/Dankula - slips effortlessly into the voice of Brexit reason and, soon perhaps - blessed be the day - into power...
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 6:05, Reply)
But let's say the King of YouTube, Pewdiepie, stood for election. He'd get nowhere. Voters are conservative. They don't like rape jokes, they don't know who Pewdiepie is, they fear change that they don't understand. That Black Mirror episode seems prescient after Trump, but it's bollocks.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 19:47, Reply)
I reckon your judgement might be a bit off
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 10:34, Reply)
And lets be honest neither do you.
(, Fri 10 May 2019, 11:16, Reply)
and how it is now failed if that guy is to be believed
(, Sat 11 May 2019, 6:30, Reply)
Autonomous boat sails between UK and Belgium
Puns are welcomed
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 18:01, Reply)
I'm a dogger with rhotacism in my forties, I go forth and fornicate, all wight?
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 19:54, Reply)
(, Thu 9 May 2019, 20:18, Reply)
« Older links | Newer links »
